At 6/7/08 10:46 PM, Achilles2 wrote:

At 6/7/08 10:41 PM, Epica wrote: Call a fucking ambulance then go to him and make sure he doesn't get hit by any more cars.

DUHHH

And that involves going out into the street? Someone did call an ambulance.

CNN would say that they got 4 calls wouldn't they?

An actual witness said that an ambulance arrived, but far later than it should have done because nobody rang for help straight away.

At 6/7/08 10:39 PM, PinballWizard976 wrote:

At 6/7/08 10:32 PM, Stomer wrote: The fact remains that a group of Americans watched an old man die and did nothing.

Well what were they supposed to do? Give open-heart surgery right there in the street? What would you mr. hero?

Call a fucking ambulance then go to him and make sure he doesn't get hit by any more cars.

DUHHH

At 6/7/08 10:39 PM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote: OHHHHHHHH,

Typing in caps gets your point across easier.

and makes you look cool at the same time.

At 6/7/08 10:36 PM, SardonicSamurai wrote:

At 6/7/08 10:32 PM, Stomer wrote: The fact remains that a group of Americans watched an old man die and did nothing.

This would not happen on a busy street in any other country.

Ever heard of the Bystander Effect? Probably not.

I swear to fuckin' God I'm going to find a story for every single country that makes them look bad, and make a thread saying everyone is heartless

Then make another thread with a good story about each country and say they're all very caring.

I will confuse all of newgrounds.

Yes because Wikipedia is always right, and this affects every single human in the world.

They watched an old man die. How is that not heartless?

This is tense.

I'm scared.

At 5/28/08 04:51 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 5/28/08 04:49 PM, Stomer wrote: Fine whatever fag, enjoy your pokemons.

I'll play real games not designed for 10year old japenese kids.

Stop acting your age ok? Grow up and don't be such a drama queen.

Nice reply, wait, no it wasn't.

Stop acting my age? What the fuck do you want me to do then, act your age and play childish games?

Drama queen, in what sense? Because I think pokemon is a wank game designed for children which requires you to, get this, walk around in some shitty birds eye view animation in the same recylced locations and press the same buttons constantly. ooOOo hard.

At 5/27/08 08:47 PM, Dragoonwing wrote: Yeah if you have enough time to be a loser you have plenty of time to do things like get a girlfriend or something more productive with your life.

Girlfriends are for losers who can't download porn. AMIRITE?

At 5/25/08 04:26 PM, Ledgey wrote:

At 5/25/08 04:17 PM, Epica wrote:

At 5/25/08 04:14 PM, Ledgey wrote:

Well, why not fire it from your own territory if you can launch it anywhere?

Are you actually arguing that submarines can't do this? which they can....it's a fact.

and also because it's not the only thing a submarine can do, they have many other uses as well.

Ofcourse not, I'm saying that it doesn't make it a unique weapons system with the introduction of ICBMs and you made it sound like it is.

I never once said it was unique, I was saying it wasn't a futile weapons system like that other dude said...

So fuck off.

At 5/25/08 04:24 PM, uhnoesanoob wrote:

Well, maybe if it were still the middle ages, and we only had cavalry and swords than yes China would have more experience, but modern warfare is a whole other story:D.

And how exactly do America have more experience than China with Modern warfare?

Please, tell me.

At 5/25/08 04:14 PM, Ledgey wrote:

Well, why not fire it from your own territory if you can launch it anywhere?

Are you actually arguing that submarines can't do this? which they can....it's a fact.

and also because it's not the only thing a submarine can do, they have many other uses as well.

Shit, I'm stuck!

2012 is the end of the world.

Britain attacked the Nazi's the momment they invaded Poland because they were evil and needed stopping.

America finally attacked five years later when they could make a lot of money from doing so, after most of the real fighting had been waged anyway.

At 5/24/08 10:30 PM, Asswipe3210 wrote: the U.S has some very good training facilities. Also the money to support the training.

I know first hand the type of training infantry get.

and it's nothing compared to the training the British forces get...

At 5/24/08 10:27 PM, Eskimojo wrote: *Osama

not Obama

lolz freudian slip?

I thought Obama was a pussy who's going to pull the troops asap?

At 5/24/08 10:13 PM, igott wrote: their advantages: Large armies, can make a wall of soldiers, control most production of products

Our advantages: techies, beeg bombs

You forget cool kung fu shit.

At 5/24/08 10:06 PM, Achilles2 wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:59 PM, Stomer wrote:

I'm not saying they have more than America, I'm saying they have more than they claim.

Russia has more nukes. Fact.

At 5/24/08 09:40 PM, Phobotech wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, Epica wrote:

You don't have the 'best' navy, you've got the largest.

Dude, I'm not even doing it for pride or country, we HAVE the best-trained, best-equipped (and yes, largest Navy.)

I would've even given us the best Air Force, but I'm surrendering that one to the Israeli's.

If we don't have the best Navy, than who does, and try to back it up, sir. For all you know, you could be teaching me something I didn't know.

The British do, we have the second largest navy, we are the leaders in naval warfare technology and research and development for naval warfare technology. We conquered the world using our navy, so we understand naval warfare. We have the best, most avanced type of ship there is.

At 5/24/08 09:37 PM, Why993 wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: America's army are incredibly inempt

Grammer and spelling is your friend. And you ever hear of the U.S.M.C.?

"n00b pwned, sir"

US Marines, skilled compared to the Royal Marines? HAHAHAHAHAHA

I mean....HAHAHAHAHA

AHAHAHA

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, uhnoesanoob wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, Stomer wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:29 PM, Jizzlebang wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

Wow, way to base things off of sterotypes asshole. I am sure your british troops do a great job though... oh wait a tic, the ONE AREA in Iraq that they had to defend turned into a nightmare.....

That's what you hear from your corrupt American press, the Americans are the ones who fuck everything up over there. The British are the ones fighting effectively.

I think your forgetting Britain is smaller than Texas alone, what do you expect us to do, we have a very small amount of active troops compared to you, and you started the whole fucking thing in the first place. We aren't going to do ALL of your dirty work for you.

At 5/24/08 09:34 PM, Phobotech wrote: Their army may be the largest in size, but they only have one gun for every third soldier.

I'd be more worried about their Sukhoi's going up against anything that wasn't an F-22 or F-35.

...Plus even though we got the best Navy, I don't even have a thought of what the Chinese Navy comprises...

You don't have the 'best' navy, you've got the largest.

11 A*'s and 5 a levels.

I get 1mb/s and I pay for 4mb/s

Because I'm a 03 user I'm better than users who have an older sign up date, although I'm only equal to other 03 users and anything under 03 is better than me.

At 5/15/08 09:26 PM, Xanthom wrote:

At 5/15/08 09:24 PM, Stomer wrote: FUCKING HELL. STRAP!

STRAP!

I'm too tired ;(

Maybe you're just stoned. Hence the reason your username is Stoner.

Oh wait ... it's Stomer. You typed your own username wrong? Get help.

oh har har har, 'Xanthom'

At 5/15/08 09:33 PM, Hellian00 wrote: Dude, did you know that in the US it's illegal to have all white TV, Radio & clubs. But blacks have BET, Black Radio & Black only clubs.

Now tell me that isn't racist.

I know dude, what the fuck, that's so wrong it's not even funny. What happened 100's of years ago to black people was very wrong, but everything has completely changed now, so why not leave that period of time to rot in the history books?

At 5/15/08 09:32 PM, FullClip92 wrote:

At 5/15/08 09:29 PM, Stomer wrote:
So they can call me cracker and other racist names? and a group of black people can beat up a white guy because he's white but it wont be a hate crime? because over a 100years ago the white people had black slaves? Right then.

and I have to apologize for something me or even my great grandad had no part of?

Who's making you apologize? Has someone made you apologize? Please.
How many times have you been called a cracker, and why? You sure set a fine example dropping the N word all over the place on you tube, you hypocrite.

No, but my government apologizes for it every year, on my behalf, on all of the white communities behalf, which is plain wrong.

I didn't post that comment on youtube, my username on youtube is tehstomer. Someone took my original post on another forum and added the N word in.

I like how you ignored the rest of my post. I'm using my alt to get around the 4 reply limit.

At 5/8/08 05:15 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote: I've always loved DBZ. The original Dragon Ball, not so much.

I've heard of Burst Limit, and I'm definately getting it, but an MMO based on DBZ? Holy shit. I never heard anything about that.

Hell yeah!

Fuck you, it's the best anime there has ever been.

All the new shit just try to copy it.

The best anime in history is making a comeback.

New MMORPG coming out soon, new live action high budget movie coming out next year and brand new HD fighting game for the latest consoles coming out later this year.