1,469 Forum Posts by "EnragedSephiroth"
At 9/20/04 07:53 PM, BarferPro wrote: My past three girlfriends have called it that. It was always, "This is boring, can I borrow your head for a while?" 'n shit like that.
Ha! You gave head! Lol just playing dude, more power to ya, I just hope you haven't encountered a girl with bad hyegine :/ those are killer. I wonder why a girl hasn't commented on this topic... if she has I haven't noticed.
At 9/19/04 12:16 PM, IWantMyNameBack wrote: well, personally, I like sodomy, but girls never are into it, unless they really love you.
Ain't that the truth...
At 9/19/04 04:04 PM, spanishfli wrote: Sodomy was any sexual act that isn't vaginal-phallus loving, meaning oral sex is also an act of sodomy.
Holy shit you mean I've sinned?! Father forgive me!!! Lol ah well it was all worth it @.@ Oh wait having sex out of marriage is a sin too... I'm so screwed lol gotta love Christianity.
Don't you mean God instead of good. We're not here to educate you to such a degree (at least I'm not) if you would like an explanation on such a broad spectrum of political ways of life you should read "The communist manifesto" by Karl Marx. If you would like to know capitalism, look it up on google or amazon.com. Both capitalism and communism are often misunderstood as they are misused. Capitalism is misused to make money off others often by walking over them economically. Communism is used wrong by... well look at Cuba for one, Fidel Castro can't do it justice like Che Guevara could. If you have no idea what I'm talking about go read the Communist Manifesto and research Che Guevara.
Fuck all black sodas. Give me some orange or strawberry soda and all that tooth-staining coke and pepsi crap can go to hell.
I say bring out the women in scant lace.
At 9/20/04 05:03 AM, DanMalo wrote:At 9/20/04 04:55 AM, EnragedSephiroth wrote: stuffCalm your chickens down, man. It was funny.
I am calm, now that I got that out of my system, it sucks that you can't reply to review replies but then again it doesn't suck because they'd be like another forum @.@ But anyway, you do have a point DanMalo some things people claim are so absurd they're funny, no argument there.
At 9/20/04 12:54 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: I asked because I'm fleshing out a novel right now consisting of four small books about four people given this ability, and how it leads to chaos for all of them.
You can have one person be really nice, one person be really evil, one be really free-spirited , and the other be really perverted. It makes for a good balance of joy, sadness/drama, karma, and comic relief.
And by the way, everyone claims conspiracy, not just black people so quit being auto-racist. The old people claim conspiracy, the illegal latinos claim immigration is on to them (at times when things go wrong), black people claim things like you quoted, and asians claim... well I don't know what kind of conspiracy they claim but I'm sure they come up with their own crap too, and don't even get me started on middle-eastern people claiming conspiracy, now's the best time to do so. The point is, not only black people come out with it, that's why you only have two replies in this post... by me.
There are stupid people everywhere... like you. Well I don't know if you're a stupid person or not, but it shows as far as your flash animation goes. Regardless of what race you are, if you do something stupid, you will earn the right for people to call you stupid and what you did in your little reply flaunting about how you have nine animations and I have none was really quite stupid seeing as none of your animations have won a single prize, and on top of that I just saw your Pube Muppet thing, it stinks. If it gets turd of the week just... don't even animate anymore until you click on the "learn flash" link in the flash portal.
Many previous posts in this thread argue what Hitler's goals were, and they are all right to a certain degree. His ultimate goal was really all of those: to obtain the money from all the Jews that were slaughtered, out of personal hatred, Germany was in desperate need, but he also had a very megalomaniacal goal, to create a "perfect" (by his standards) arian race of people that were all blue-eyed and blond-haired. Evidence of this came about during the Olympics in Germany's participation, unfortunately for Mr. Hitler, he wasn't blue-eyed or blond-haired himself.
At 9/19/04 02:38 PM, KirbyMan wrote: Does that mean we live in an ass dictatorship?
No... it's the ass republican party... no I mean they're asses. No wait... they're fat ass rich elephants afraid of change. I guess that makes the democrats the asses.. well it looks like he was right all along for saying "ass democracy." I'd rather take an ass over an elephant.
At 9/16/04 05:34 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: I see therefore I buy. It reminds me of that Family Guy where Peter works for the cigarette company and they show that one commercial that randomly throws in a guy saying smoke ever 5 seconds in the commercial.
Ah yes Family Guy... that was a great episode, and an even greater cartoon, go DVD collection!
Advertisement dude... it's capitalism... I'm not saying capitalism is bad, I'm all for making money. Just do it the right way, don't try to make money off other people's misfortunes like advertising 9/11 crap, or pumping people full of so many ads they have ads coming out their ass and ears like popups or adware does. There was to be some sort of restraint to how much advertisement there is, those who get carried away with it are the ones who aren't playing fair and want to make money THAT badly.
I haven't run into any in this site... yet... but I'm up to my knees in trojan crap from KaZaA.
At 9/15/04 01:46 AM, FAB0L0US wrote: What, we are paying our taxes to support hungry people across the globe? That is a matter of provate charity, not the USA's job to be the Welfare of the world. Plus, these handouts do not help countries. I read somewhere, I think in my Enviromental Science class, that these handouts we have given just make the recieving countries more dependent, not better off, just like regular welfare does. Sounds nice, but handouts dont work.
Then if that is the case, we can't be getting in to eveeryone else's business just cause, like Iraq's, how come Bush didn't go against N. Korea? I'm not saying that he should have because that would have started some other serious shit. There's nothing wrong with lending a hand to the rest of the world, especially if your country is trying to police the rest of the world. It's true that if other countries become dependent on the "hand-outs" it is a bad thing, but we could do something for them rather then make their situation worse by selling them weapons. The point I'm trying to make here is the U.S. government should stop selling impoverished countries weapons and lend them a helping hand instead. It's better if they become accustomed to getting help instead of accustomed to getting guns and rockets.
At 9/14/04 03:39 PM, specimen56 wrote:
In the bible, it is a widely known fact that God comes down and warns all from the evils of majick using and users.
What the hell is majick? I've heard the widely internet-distributed "magick" but with the j? Stop with the internet lingo and write magic properly, and no it's not pulling a rabbit out of your hat.
Now, once you know the future, it is possible to change it through free will. Human will can change everything. We all have choices, and we can choose to go towards our fates and we can choose not to. So is the thinking of Paganism.
"Human will can change everything" again, what is this? The argument brought up when arguing predestination was that either our lives are fated or our lives are not fated. What I proposed was that perhaps certain things are meant or not meant to be, no one ever brought up that we can go against our fate. How could we go against our fate if we have no fate? Think of it this way... every action we take/don't take affects our "fate."
And on the matter of the tablets Moses bought down from the mountain- I am pretty sure that he was given three, but he dropped one... Can someone check that for me...
Yeah he dropped one... in the fucking comedy skit on MAD TV damnit >.< I swear you just lost all of your credibility and little shred of respect by saying such idiocy.
At 9/14/04 07:41 AM, straight1 wrote: i read an interview with michael moore in 'rolling stone magazine' in which he was asked to say something positive about little bush.
'he's good to his dogs, he makes them feel special' was moores reply.
He IS good to his dogs... now why can't he be that good to impoverished 3rd world countries in need? Instead of selling them arms can't he GIVE them food?
At 9/15/04 01:11 AM, Matty233 wrote:
:do clones have souls?
Only if you believe in a soul.
:: But this is not the real reason for this thread. I am posting this to ask you all the obvious question: is cloning wrong? I think it is, to copy another human being's genetic dna is to steal their identity. And who knows, the goverment may just weed out the weak people and clone the stronger people (yes, it sounds Nazi-ish).
Then why post something that sounds nazi-ish?
:Or what if you cloned an army of assassins or something and decided to take over the world? But even if extreme cases do not happen, I still believe that cloning should be banned worldwide. I am glad to hear that Canada and the U.S. have banned human cloning in their countries, but there are countries out there who would be willing to fund for a cloning device. But would you like to have an exact duplicate of yourself? Would you be willing to give up your name and identity to create your duplicate?
I already made a clone topic previously, people don't care much about cloning in this forum because it's been already debated before. So, is cloning wrong? It's all up to the clone I guess, he/she was the one that was cloned, if they suffer any psychological damage because of it, then yes they can deem it wrong, it all depends.
At 9/14/04 12:56 AM, BeFell wrote: According to NG time it's tommorow, why can't I access my account.
*shakes fist*
DAMN YOU MR. FULP, WHY DO YOU TORMENT ME SO?
I need to collect B/P points.
It would appear Mr. Fulp is a Kerry supporter... or at least anti-Bush... way to go. Or maybe he's not paying attention to you.
They both talk a lot of shit. Only difference is Bush can't pin anything on Kerry because Kerry hasn't been president. Kerry, however, can pin an ass-load of things on Bush like misleading the U.S. into war, not finding Osama, not worrying about education, cutting back on medical benefits, not fixing the financial problems we continue to face, or not decreasing the national deficit. As patriotic as Bush may be, I'm not buying his and Dick Cheney's bullshit. Regardless of his military bullshit, Bush does not seem to be the candidate that is for higher -less-expensive education and cheaper health benefits, he seems to be the guy that's for keeping corporate america alive and walking over everyone else, and dragging our asses to war whether anyone supports him or not, and then failing msierably to find his man.
At 9/13/04 07:48 PM, KirbyMan wrote:At 9/13/04 06:42 AM, EnragedSephiroth wrote: Thank you KirbyMan! For once you say something awesome.You mean I don't usually, now I'm going to cry.
No No! I mean that your other posts are cool and all but... I think I might have had a couple disagreements with you in earlier topics, I'm not sure, but that one by far was the best by you I ever saw.
Furthermore, I still haven't seen anyone point out something good George W. Bush has done, excluding those retarded policies I mentioned in my earlier posts... I'm still waiting.
At 9/14/04 01:04 AM, BeFell wrote: You can remember because six sounds a lot like stick and Link kills people by hitting them with Duku sticks....
Link's a sinner, I should have known he's always hanging around with faries.
Just as much as Link is a killer, Tingle is a sodomizer... or at least one whom likes to be sodomized, but anyway that's besides the point.
The point is... oh wait I already posted, yeah just check on the first page it's in there somewhere.
And did it ever occur to you that maybe some people "accidentally" switched up a commandment or two?
Obviously, some people consider it disrespectful, others don't care. It varies. In the long run, you owe them the same respect they give you.
At 9/12/04 09:14 PM, KirbyMan wrote: Well, I'm bored so why not, but seriously you heard it right out of the horses mouth, Bush is portraying the country in a worse light than it is usually.(which was bad to begin with)
Thank you KirbyMan! For once you say something awesome. I am thoroughly in agreement here with you, it would appear that Bush is doing little or nothing to strengthen international elations (except with his good ol' chap Blair) and it's making the country look worse with every passing day. Bush had a chance, in 9/11 to take the country and lead it into a great and prosperous era, and people would have been with him too. After 9/11 millions of Americans were feeling quite patriotic and needed a strong leader to stand by them and say "we dill get back on our feet and we will be even stronger" but no, what does Bush do? Forget schools and healthcare and taxing the rich! Let's go to war!
So now we've captured Saddam Hussein (who had nothing to do with 9/11, and this was reported by the 9/11 comission and admitted by the Bush administration) and we killed his two sons Uday and Kussei.. or w/e. But where's Osama? Like Bush when he was supposed to serve in the military, NOWHERE TO BE FOUND! (sorry about the caps).
Anywho, the point I'm trying to make is, Bush and his fake ass wannabe patriotic republican party has to go, we need someone who can lend a helping hand to countries instead of anal probing them with U.S. soldiers looking for "nukular weapons of mass destruction" and all sorts of other fake shit Bush doesn't even have tangible evidence of. You tell me one good thing Bush has done for this country's education system, and don't give me that (No child left behind act) bullshit because many people will have something to say about that crappy ass anti-minority program. Name one good thing Bush has done for this country's safety, other than that retarded Patriot Act that violates our right to privacy as U.S. citizens. Go on name one, please, I'm drying to hear the plethora of good things Bush has done while in office... I bet I won't be able to use all of my fingers on one hand.
And by the way, don't even mention the war on Iraq as a good thing, just leave the forums or sit and watch the argument without contributing if you are going to do so, your war-monger crap is uncalled for here.
At 9/12/04 08:59 PM, straight1 wrote: what is it in the american psyche that allows this to go unchecked?
I knew it! It's the aussie! No but anyway, the answer is simple, greedy republicans that care little or don't care at all about healthcare and the lower class, but instead care only about making wealth even if it IS at the cost of "faceless [fucked over] foreigners." Now not all Republicans are bad, I'm only adressing those that meet the description above (which are quite a few).
Please don't start with that pro-capitalism pro-corporate crap because I'm studying to be a corporate administrator and I'm all for capitalism and good globalization, just not in the way that the current administration does it (at the risk of the rest of the world's economy).
At 9/13/04 01:03 AM, spanishfli wrote: This argument really reminds about Oedipus Rex, Fate vs. Free Will...
You will have to forgive me for double-posting, (if I did after posting this) but I waited a while and no one posted after me for some minutes, but anyway; can this situation not be seen from a Deist point of view? Or at least a partial Deist point of view?
What is a Deist point of view you ask? A Deist belief is that God created... and left, that is, he left us to be the masters of our own destinies. In the aspect of Jesus, let's say that God left us alone after Jesus, so once Jesus died, God has left us to make most decisions by ourselves our of our own free will. Now then (this is so complicated I know you can tell by reading it) Judas killed himself after Jesus died, therefore, what he did could have been done completely out of free will. Like someone posted earlier, Peter (I think it was Peter I have a bad memory, bare with me) rejected Jesus three times and he didn't kill himself but went out to preach the word. Could it not be that most possible that the subsequent events that took place after the death of Christ up until now have been induced by pure human will?
What I'm trying to say is that, God could choose to influence our decisions in certain ways and at certain times to give us certain signs or "miracles" but what if he doesn't do it all the time? That is to say that, he will not influence whether we go to "the lake of fire" or "eden" but instead it is ultumately up to us as to where we end up in the end.
Does this make any sense at all? I'm kind of sleepy... 3:30am...
At 9/12/04 08:30 PM, Thelonius wrote: DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread for your brainless irreligious rhetoric. Please take that elsewhere.
Christ picked Judus, caused Judus to betray him and left the burden of murdering the Messiah on Judus' shoulders, resulting in his suicide. Therefore, in effect, Christ murdered Judus.
"God" works in mysterious ways does he not? He has the power to give life, therefore, he has the power to take it away. If it took the death of a person to put the ultimate sacrifice into motion, then it is because that person was weak enough to succumb to the temptation of betrayal, you say God influenced Judus to betray Christ, but then again others say that Satan also influences us to do other things. If God can influence us to also do bad or harmful or sinful things, then doesn't that nullify the existance of Satan? Or have I over-stepped my boundaries?
At 9/10/04 11:34 PM, FatherVenom wrote: Anyone tried touching the flash files on the portal banner?
So this is what this great topic has become of after fivehundred god-knows-what pages...
And yes, those flash file flies are addictive... fifty minutes damnit... fifty minutes of blowing them up... lol j/p more like fifty seconds... >.>
At 9/11/04 12:35 AM, GodsScope wrote: DOES ANYONE THINK ITS SAD THAT KERRY IS RUNNING AGAINST THE MOST HATED, MOST DISLIKED, MOST UNFAVORED HORRIBLE PRESIDENT THIS CENTURY AND THE POLLS HAVE THEM ABOUT EVEN?
I agree throroughly on Bush being just that horrible, Kerry all the way.. Where's Spanishfli or FatherVenom or AntiKlaus when you need em'?
It's pretty sad that most of the people who have posted on this topic so far until you and I all seem to be idiots that can't provide any good evidence of why Bush should actually win, but instead they would rather just root for the guy already in office thinking he's doing a good-enough job when the fact of the matter is that (like you said) he's one of the worse things to happen to America in a long time, all you Bush supporters... go do your homework and read up a bit before posting nonsensical bullcrap like you have done above.
At 9/11/04 01:45 AM, straight1 wrote:At 9/10/04 11:10 PM, -YO- wrote:very sorry, 'in my humble opinion'At 9/10/04 07:19 PM, straight1 wrote: imho this is a forum with some real thinkers. i like that.WHAT the fuck is imho?
For a second there I thought you were implying that you were a "ho" of sorts.
