1,469 Forum Posts by "EnragedSephiroth"
Dude... (thread creator) stfu for a sec with that paranoid nonsense. Bring some evidence to the table before starting a topic. Anyway... if Hillary IS elected in the future, all I have to say is "at last! a female prez!" and "it's back to the good ol' Clinton days!" Maybe she'll get in trouble for getting oral in the oval office by an anorexic intern male, you know... just to get back at Bill.
At 10/22/04 02:43 AM, Damien3003 wrote:
George bush believed the intelligence reports, the global ones, mind you, that stated iraq had weapons of mass destruction. John kerry believed the same intel. The UN believed the same intel. The entire rest of the world believed that SAME intel that bush based his decision on. It wasn't a lie, it was a worldwide intelligence error. Whoops!
Therefore, you could conclude that both Bush and Kerry flip-flopped (according to the topic starter). Even when the truth is that neither of them did (according to your newly-shed evidence).
I've done all i could, and i'm voting for bush.
As have I, and I'm voting for Kerry. Why? Because I want to succeed in college damnit, I want someone who supports education.
Hey I'm for Stem Cell research also, in a controlled manner though, however, I diskile Arnold's decision to sign a 6 billion dollar bill that would fund Stem Cell research in the state of California... 6 billion? Aren't we just a bit over that in debt? I don't understand Arnold... I think he just likes to spend and borrow. This is looking ugly... like his face.
At 10/22/04 02:27 AM, Zendra wrote:At 10/22/04 02:24 AM, Zendra wrote: So, if there is a good he could be 'created' by the Big Bang, aswell.good has to be God. Sorry.
No... but what if Evil is God?! Dun Dun Dunnnnnnnnn! No j/p lol, I know you were correcting your typo. Play Xenogears if you ever have time, it gives an insightful look as to the existance of God "a wave of creation".
At 10/21/04 11:31 PM, MisanthropicFUNK wrote: Heavey stuff:
Lamb of God (as the palaces burn)
Absolutely Kick-ass, I agree with you 100% on that one.
Shadow's Fall
Heard of em', haven't heard em', yet...
Slayer
Pretty good.
SlipKnot
Also very kick-ass.
Children of Bodom
I have to check these guys out after all I've heard about them.
Pantera
So-so, I got their "Best of Pantera" Cd.. it's aight, not enough technique.
Anthrax
*Calls the FBI*
\Light:
Frank Sinatra
Classic.
Johnny Cash
Also classic. You've got some good tastes.
Willie Nelson
x.x 3x the classic.
Nickel Creek (WARNING! Not For the unappreciative of technique!)
This ^ I haven't heard of, I must check it out if they're as good as you say.
Jimi Hendrix
DUDE! Legen-fuckin'-dary, best one on this list.
Stevie Ray Vaughn (DUDE! SERIOUSLY!)
Heard a lot of good stuff about him, must check it out.
Lynyrd Skynyrd
Another classic band.
Pink Floyd
Ah yes... I'm about to listen to Dark Side of the Moon for about the 89th time.
ZZ Top
You mean the dudes with the beards?
The Doors
More classical masterpieces.
The bands that were deleted from this list were bands that I haven't heard of and that I must also look into. Nice list though, for the most part, but, you left out one band that would've topped them all in my book (with the exception of Hendrix) Led Zeppelin. It's funny that no one posts in here about rap though... so refreshingly nice to get away from that mostly no-talent crap. Your bands pwn Funk.
At 10/22/04 01:25 AM, BeFell wrote: I think humans are walking down a very dangerous path if we begin engineering our offspring to be perfect individuals.
But think of it!... We wouldn't have anymore people like... YOU! Nah I'm just joking BeFell, I saw a potential joke, had to take it. I agree with you though, I don't think it's a good idea to try to get that close to perfection, it puts others and our sense of morality and equality at stake, and we all know you love your equality. No seriously, you do, right? You've got the whole Yin-Yang thing going on.
At 10/22/04 01:52 AM, MuyBurrito wrote:
even if this is a political forum...
zing
Quite right... well I mean c'mon, the man tries to accuse Kerry of doing stupid things and all he has is 2 accusations that's all? Just two was all he could dig up? Wow.... you could dig up more crap on Clinton, and he was a kick-ass prez.
At 10/22/04 01:49 AM, Blitz_Mage wrote: Wait..... can Arnold actually do that? Since when could the states collect taxes from casinos in Reservations? I always thought they were tax-exempt. In fact, I could've sworn that state governments couldn't get involved in Indian issues on Reservations under any circumstance whatsoever. That's the reason marijuana use is allowed in certain Reservations..... at least, that's what I thought.
Nope, apparently the State has been very deep in the Indian Kool Aid for a couple years now.
And MyBurrito... my curious burrito lol, I most certainly didn't do anything to the natives (I wasn't around them) and yes, they do deserve to be taxed like every other business in California is taxed no more, and no less, but it shouldn't suggest that they in-fact "owe" us anything like the Governator suggests.
At 10/22/04 01:01 AM, dark_man_KUSANAGI wrote: Fine Ladies and Honorable Gentlemen of the Free World:
Let me tell you about a man, about the indecisive, unstable SOB this free world has ever known, and that, Ladies and Gentlemen, is John Kerry. Here's why he's so indecisive:
1) He is supposedly against the War on Iraq, but he admit he supported the War on Iraq.
Yes, you idiotic SOB, when Bush LIED about Iraq being an imminent threat and having weapons of mass destruction. After Kerry found out Bush was full of as much shit as you, he immediately retracted his vote on Iraq.
2) He made an ass out of himself when talking in front of America, saying: "I will not raise your taxes", when the go-happy moron voted for tax increases of almost $600 Billion, and voted for gasoline prices to increase dramatically. That makes America unstable, in a bigger National Debt, and puts our country's good reputation down in a pig sty.
Give me some tangible proof and your argument can at least be valid if your premises are true.
I'm not supporting Bush, just to make things clear, but if you want to vote for Kerry after these events have come to light, then be my guest.
Yeah, you make it pretty obvious you've got your head so far up Bush's retarded ass you can see what he ate for Dinner. Go do some research on Bush for a change and then you'll be knee-deep in shit.
"The Indians are ripping us off!" said Schwarzenegger in regards to proposition 70. All proposition 70 (for California) is, is just a countermeasure for proposition 68 (which would allow club cards and horse racetracks to build Las Vegas-sized casinos in crowded areas across California). Proposition 68 would also tax indian casinos 25% of all their income, and not a cent of it would go to California.
Proposition 70 counteracts 68 by keeping the taxes indian casinos pay the same "no more, and no less" (says a comercial) "just like every other business in California, we want to be treated equally." Money from this proposition would go to California and help out the deficit and the education systems. Apparently Schwarzenegger dislikes Indians being treated fairly so he opposes 68 as well as 70 (I don't know why 70) in a comercial saying "Let me negociate the indian taxes, the BILLIONS from indian gaming our state deserves."
Since when are we owed anything by native americans? I don't know who the fuck told Schwarzenegger that we are owed "billions" by them, but clearly, it is this nation which owes them after stealing their land and raping their women, sad but true. Once again this goes to further-prove why at least I didn't vote for Schwarzenegger and why I wouldn't want to see him as president.
At 10/22/04 01:10 AM, MuyBurrito wrote: Interesting point.
Have you seen Gattaca (movie)?
That's what I was gonna say but... you killed it for me... curse my slowness.
Tom, you're too nice to people lol. You'd make one hell of a C.E.O. Go, go, The Behemoth.
At 10/21/04 08:45 PM, TitusRevised wrote: Yeah you little British bastard.... you probably searched how to spell Schwarzenegger...Excuse my incorrect english...and if spelling a father freakin last NAME incorrectly once in a while, especially a freakin long one like ...that... then just about everyone I know is an idiot, becuase I don't know anyone who has not made a spelling error before. AND FURTHER MORE, there is not a specifif way to spell a name in the english language, you could say JO or JOE. So go stick your finger up your vagina and moan
No thanks, I'd rather do that to your mom, but anyway, let's avoid a flame war here. I know Schwarzenegger is difficult to spell, it's just that the way you spelled it made me laugh a bit, that's all. That still doesn't change the fact that you have bad premises for your argument, anyone else in the political forum can tell you so.
At 10/21/04 08:27 PM, NotYouZ wrote:At 10/21/04 06:02 PM, Proteas wrote: Supposedly, this year's flu strain is the same one from last year. So if you got the shot last year, it should (in theory) hold well for this year.Heh, I'm sure that's just put out for the public just to prevent a panic.
I agree. Since the Influenza virus is relatively simple in its form, it can easily change, so it would be a bit awkward if it didn't change from one year to another. Therefore, to say that last year's flu virus vaccine will work on this year's virus strain, is hard to believe.
Oh, and Vote Kerry 2004 :D
At 10/18/04 11:50 PM, TitusRevised wrote: Bush and Kerry suck my ass every night, but Kerry is better since we HAVE to have a president. Bush is stupid and put us it tight situations the last 4 years. and Kerry seems smarter.
You obviously don't know how to start a valid and truthful argument, thus, the entire premise of your topic argument/main idea is null and void.
At 10/19/04 12:04 AM, TitusRevised: Could not spell Arnold Schwarzenegger, instead he spelled it "Swortszinegar" thus proving once again and reassuring us of his idiocy.
At 10/21/04 06:50 PM, BeFell wrote: I'm working at the Latah county republicans campain headquarters. They were kind enough to provide me with a computer with a high speed connection.=)
Makes your blam/protection points stack up faster doesn't it?
At 10/21/04 12:54 PM, Camarohusky wrote: Hmm, this post has lasted too long without any religion... There's something wrong here...
Yes, for a while there I thought we had evolved into intelligent, self-governing beings...
...and then Season of Mist and Zendra had to bring the "big G" into it.
I've got dibs on a pre-order.
Both Bush and Kerry don't support a draft (and that's about all they agree on) and we are not in a large enough war to demand a draft, so stop your paranoia.
I have heard from Ph.D's at my University that it is mathematically impossible to have ocurred, yet it is still a highly-probable theory. I have come up with a theory of my own which I mentioned back in the "Does God Exist?" old topic on this forum. The theory of which I speak of is a sort of universal pulse, in which both the theory of the Big Bang and the Big Crunch are combined to create a theory which suggests that the universe is in a perpetual pulse/flux. If the universe (as finite or infinite as it may be) collapses under its own cosmic mass, then it will result in a big crunch, condensing everything in time and space into a singular point in a void, which could result in another big bang, re-expanding the universe and beginning life anew which would ultimately lead to the universe re-collapsing into itself and so on in a perpetual state of one giant universal pulse.
Such a theory would only work if the Big Bang and Big Crunch theories are proven though, and that has yet to happen, because they are theories, theories are not facts, just merely suggestions of gathered evidence and a hypothesis, take them or leave them.
Yes he does, and so do you, and your topic, which I am anticipating will be locked shortly. *Crosses fingers* C'mon capn' bob.
At 10/20/04 11:34 PM, FatherVenom wrote:At 10/20/04 11:08 PM, -Wraith- wrote: I've only met door-to-door Bible beaters once in my life.We lock the doors and hide. Then jump out and yell BOO! They stopped coming to our house too.
They stop by every Sunday, or at least they try to but I just blast my Metallica too loud to hear their feeble knocking.
Stupid Red Sox.
Give em' a break, the Yankees have won it way too many times. It's like after the Lakers won 3 in a row, I knew they had to loose sooner or later, and I didn't whine either, it balances things out.
When did Fox change to 30th Century?
I noticed it shortly after Futurama premiered... around the end of 1999.
At 10/20/04 11:05 PM, mofomojo wrote:At 10/17/04 08:20 PM, secondmessiah wrote: Before I say anything, I honor our troops and their sacrafices.You said it yourself man....
Two reasons your logic is flawed.
(if the orders violate other rules or the commander appears to be insane , etc).
If the vehicle is unarmored and you travelling into a warzone, would you do that , tell me would you?
I would... if I didn't value my life. If I had children waiting on me to return home, and I'm their main source of income, heh, good luck getting me to follow orders.
At 10/18/04 12:15 AM, BeFell wrote: ooh my first client.
And your only one apparently.
At 10/17/04 11:57 PM, Maus wrote:
Why not read the last few pages and find out what fun shenanigans we've been up to?
It's really quite amusing. The power goes out in my neighborhood for 6 hours late at night because of rain and I miss 1 Grounds Gold day, then I return to see 3 pages in the regulars politics forum of freshly-produced and packaged insanity. What a treat. Speaking of the new Grounds Gold Day..
At 10/17/04 11:37 PM, theburningliberal wrote: I'm thinking about affixing a Kerry-Edwards sticker to my sousaphone bell. Hehehehe... I enjoy dissent.
That would be most-admirable on my behalf. If you have the balls to go to a Republican campaign and do that, I will bow to you lol.
See? I'm so bored that I can't even post properly! I forget to delete or rearrange quotes x.x I'm even trying to figure out how to solve algebra for fun. A minute ago I was even looking at this page's html source for entertainment! So sad... anyway, I'm getting out of here before I start getting fingers pointed at me for attempted spamming. And if you have a minute, feel free to check out my Post in this forum, titled "Not Equipped for War?"
At 10/17/04 11:18 PM, -Wraith- wrote:At 10/17/04 11:10 PM, BeFell wrote: Wraith, what exactly are we solving for here? The equation of the line a specific point within the line the zeroes? Show me word for word exactly what the instuctions tell you."Write an equation of a line through points."
1. (1,6) (6,1)
2.(7,2) (3,2)
I believe that here you have to substitute the ordered pairs into their respective varibles (x,y) which would mean that you can graph this equation and then substitute the values into a linear equation where Ax + By = C ... but then again I'm not even sure of that... that was two quarters ago @.@ and right now I'm dealing with Matrix and 3 linear equations with 3 unknowns.
I hope this was of some help to you.
3. "Using the substitution method, find the solution of problems 1 and 2"
