Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/9/04 02:45 AM, metalonslaught04 wrote: well the kkk doesn't hate america, they just hate non white people in america

That's exactly why they still fall under the category of a "hate" group. And they don't need to hate America to be called terrorists. They use terror-tactics on their victims! :/ Have read anything in regards to this topic at all?

At 11/9/04 02:17 AM, BeFell wrote:

At 11/9/04 02:11 AM, Maus wrote: Who wears underwear anymore? But in all seriousness, can you wear boxers as your underwear, or does it have to be briefs?

I got stoned, and that question came to mind.

I'm not sure, I haven't gotten to the special underwear stage yet. I they're boxers.

You've got a long ways to go before you can be in the 1337 special thong stage eh? But on a more serious note, in regards to you mentioning baptism earlier, aren't Mormons first baptized around the age of 8 because the concept is that one can rationalize and distinguish "right from wrong" at that age?

At 11/8/04 06:17 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote:

At 11/8/04 05:35 PM, FatherVenom wrote: Ok that came out wrong. I meant don't hold you breath because
1) I don't even really know why you're acting like this.

Isn't obvious? Because he's a republican!

That's exactly what I said about two posts before you.

At 11/8/04 10:11 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 11/8/04 09:51 PM, FatherVenom wrote: HOLY CRAP! It's SNOWING outside!

Yeah, for liek, three hours now.

:/ I somewhat envy you guys. We hardly get any snow here in California. I want to break-in my snowboard already damnit >.<

At 11/9/04 12:00 AM, FatherVenom wrote:

:Besides, school sucks with a hangover.

Amen

And Funk, I think Spanishfli might know the whereabouts of your pen0r. But no seriously, that was a nice song lol. It has good rythm and such, bah I'll just vote and write you a review already.

And I don't think I ever told you guys but I'd appreciate if you took a look at a flash me and my bro made a couple months ago. A vote and some feedback would be most-appreciated.

http://newgrounds.com/portal/view/194905

Thank you.

At 11/8/04 05:50 PM, red_skunk wrote: German rap kicks ass.

What are you stewped?

At 11/8/04 05:55 PM, FatherVenom wrote: It's been three and I know BeFell. He's going to hold this grudge. It's his way.

Can't blame him, he's Republican.

I have symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. It's a type of autism that means I don't usually feel empathy in the normal way.

"Aso, it all suddenly seems so clear." - Bill

But then again, I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, right?

Of course not.

Done deal. See you next Gounds Gold Day.

At 11/8/04 05:35 PM, FatherVenom wrote: Ok that came out wrong. I meant don't hold you breath because
1) I don't even really know why you're acting like this.
and
2) I don't care enough not to hurt anyone's feelings or try to make it up to them if I did trample them. My brain isn't wired for empathy.

I'd suggest just giving him a few days to let it pass him by and maybe he won't be so angry over it then. It doesn't require empathy to not speak to someone and let them have their space, does it?

And what do you mean your brain "isn't wired for empathy"? If you're gonna be engaged, or married bro, you better be empathetic towards your significant other's needs. But then again, I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, right?

At 11/8/04 05:31 PM, FatherVenom wrote:

At 11/8/04 05:24 PM, EnragedSephiroth wrote: Relaxed? You didn't see Skunk and Venom a couple pages ago did you...? Stick around and you'll see some stuff that's anything but relaxed.

Actually it was BeFell and I. Skunk would have been smarter and said stop or just blocked be for a day so that I'd forget the conversation and he wouldn't care anymore.

Ah, my mistake. I got the argument between Skunk and IllustriousPotentate, mixed up with yours and BeFell's.

It's so good to have mommy and daddy back together again ^<^

Um, no. BeFell, if you want an apology I wouldn't recommend holding your breath.

*Cries* no more h8 :'(

At 11/8/04 08:57 AM, -Diddy- wrote: Hey I used to be only in the General and C+C sections but I came over to here for today and its really cool. No bullshit and major spam like in general. I like it better over here its more relaxed :D

Relaxed? You didn't see Skunk and Venom a couple pages ago did you...? Stick around and you'll see some stuff that's anything but relaxed.

It's so good to have mommy and daddy back together again ^<^

At 11/8/04 05:13 PM, -Michael- wrote:
That map is a representation of what it would be like if the more liberal states of the US were to join up with the ever more liberal country of Canada.

Those blue states were the only states that voted for Kerry.

Perhaps, and I know which states voted for Kerry, however, that map also makes it seem as if the democratic states shouldn't even be considered part of the United States because of the way that they voted in these past elections. Without your explanation, anyone who sees that map would be led to believe that.

Oh and also, it's people like you, with your comments and your suggestive map, that keep democrats and republicans so harshly against each other. If you ever want to see democrats and republicans reach some sort of common ground, people like you need to be stopped.

At 11/8/04 04:55 PM, -Michael- wrote:

A lot of anti-Canadian caca.

Has this article helped anyone?

Nope. Get out of here with your anti-Canada crap. And since when are California, Oregon, Seatle, Michigan... etc (the states featured on your map) part of Canada? You're saying that we don't act like we're part of the United States because we have democratic elecotral votes? News flash bro, America is a Democracy, nothing wrong with voting democrat. Your Canada-bashing, republican-ass-kissing talk isn't needed here.

At 11/8/04 04:13 PM, Oyster_Clock wrote: Did You Know? If you look the KKK up in the diconary it says they they are indeed a terrorist group! And yet bush ignores them!! weve had terrorsits on this land for years and years all this time and nothing is done to them!

They're probably not as hell-bent on destroying America's economy like Al Qaeda is/was, and besides, they're white! Bush is white! + Bush is an idiot. Therefore, Bush won't see them as any sort of threat. But idiot or not, I also don't see them as an immediate threat, they can keep on playing with their mother's bed-sheets if they want.

At 11/7/04 06:43 PM, Hermannator wrote: I bet I know where the thread starter got all his information from. It's definitely this site:

http://www.costofwar.com/index-pre-school.html

That's great. If he got his information from that site, then I definitely share his view that such vast amounts of money should be spent on something more constructive like, oh I don't know, raising our children, instead of raising hell.

At 11/7/04 01:04 PM, CountPoopoo wrote: I'm sure there are ALOT of Neo-Nazis on newgrounds.

Right you are poopoo... and that also depends on what your definition or concept of "ALOT" is. You could think ALOT are like... 100,000, or just 10, and I think 10 sounds like a much more tangible number.

At 11/7/04 11:14 PM, BeFell wrote: Yay me, every time I take the test I move a little more to the right.

Economic Left/Right: 6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.00

I knew it! You're right up there with Hitler and Bush! *Points accusing fingerzzz* :/ BeFell= Evil. No wait... BeFell > Evil.

At 11/7/04 05:29 PM, Bobbaganoosh wrote: Most people in the rural areas (As like where I live,) Don't give a damn, or know anything about foreign affairs.
A very large majority of them.

"All them frenchies 'r pussies! Bomb all them there' towel heads!"

I have no patience or respect for ignorant and bigoted people like them.

It's exactly that kind of ignorant mentality that got Christ crucified. It is self-evident in the bible and even in the Passion of the Christ. Who's to say that people weren't even more ignorant back then?

At 11/7/04 11:53 PM, AntiangelicAngel wrote: American's give a shit, because people are people. And the government gives a shit too... because theres oil... and 'terrorists' (terrorism is a political term used to degrade people).

Ah, an excellent statement. This is the epitome of exactly what not to do in your Critical Thinking class. And you're right, Americans do give a shit... and a shit isn't much, it's just shit, that's all. Oh and where do you get off saying that "terrorism is a political term used to degrade people"? It is a scare tactic used to opress people by frightening them, not a stereotype.

If you don't believe me see for yourself. Nowhere in there does it say it's used to degrade people (at least not in the manner that you imply).

Oh and in regards to Schwarzenegger: As a Californian I can vouch for Schwarzenegger's public appeal to Californian's, I guess they like his image, sense of humor, and his plans for getting the state out of a billion dollar deficit. I didn't really support him, (and I still don't), I supported his running oponent Cruz Bustamante before Schwarzenegger got elected as governor, but ah well, you can't win em' all.
\
It IS a bit awkward though how Schwarzenegger is republican but was elected by a democrat state. Things should get very interesting if he decides to run for the presidency, granted that his supporters get the constitution changed so that foreign-born people can be president.

At 11/8/04 03:34 AM, BeFell wrote: Hmm... I just finished my five pages. I actually expected to go later. Thank goodness for the easy BSability of that load of crap known as philosphy.

"BS your way to the top", that's the Republican motto! Wait... or was it "fake it till you make it?" :/ I forget.

At 11/6/04 11:32 AM, mrpopenfresh wrote:

At 11/6/04 05:50 AM, EnragedSephiroth wrote:

At 11/5/04 10:12 PM, mwazzap wrote:

At 11/4/04 11:34 PM, El_Chabre wrote: What's 'yaoi'?

Yaoi is gay hentai. *grin*

Anyway. Yaoi is a weak form of gay hentai (toon porn). There's a much more explicit type but I don't know the term for it and I don't care. There's also Yuri, but that's a weak female form of hentai.

And you know all these different types of animated japanese homosexual pornography how?

Ex g/f... she was Bi so she was interested in that a bit, plus she wrote stories about it, she even had fans asking her to write yaoi or yuri about famous anime female characters and such. I personally never read any, or was ever interested in any, just in her. *sigh.*

At 11/6/04 11:51 AM, Maus wrote:
Your knowledge of anatomy is incomplete. The female G-Spot (Grafenburg spot) is high inside the vagina. It's in different spots for different girls. The clitoris is sometimes a separate erogenous hot spot.

Alrighty then, you got me there. I guess I trusted my sociology professor a bit too much on that one. Out of personal experience though, I don't think I've ever found any sort of prostate-stimulating acts a turn on though :/ And yes I am aware that the g-spot varies from woman to woman. "No two are ever alike, and after me, no two are ever the same" - Giggolo Joe - Artificial Intelligence.

At 11/6/04 12:49 PM, red_skunk wrote: omg omg, keep talking Maus, yeah, yeah, talk medical terms to me.. come on... Grafenberg, Grafenberg...

A scene from Ace Ventura When Nature Calls comes to mind... You know? That part when Jim Carrey is beating off in the straw hut, and all you can see is his shadow?

At 11/6/04 04:31 PM, spanishfli wrote: That stuff scared me... I got to see a preview, and even though it is cartoon, it felt so wrong. It was about a teen experiancing his first with an older man. It felt I was watching rape, especially when you see tears falling off the teen while he screamed, "Mother! Mother!" And the old man was just smiling saying poetry cooly like Max Cady ala Cape Fear shit. Jesus, I am never watching anime that isn't Inuyasha or Adult Swim stuff...

Of course not man! That ain't no Cowboy Bebop, or Trigun, or Aqua Hunger Teen Force, or Sealab... w/e it's called. That anime stuff can get pretty weird at times. Take La Blue Girl for example, I only saw one episode and really that was all I needed to keep me away from it. Dragon Pink is much better.

Some people like certain arousing places. For me, I like the nipple play. For my partner, it's his entire back.

Good for you! *Sarcastic thumbs up* :D

Time for you to get your nipples pierced bud... or a prince albert.

Pardon me for not being able to find the meaning in this, but... what exactly is a "prince albert"? I'm not as up-to-speed on these terms as you are spanishfli.

At 11/7/04 04:28 AM, ColonelAngus wrote: Ok a hate group would be defined as any group joined in their hate of another group correct? Wouldn't hating hate groups be a hate group in itself? Wouldnt that make all of you massive hypocrites? I have no problem with hate groups as long as they hate their designated people without causing undue harm upon them. Once they cross that line, then they are criminals and deserve the appropriate punishment. Do not judge a person by their belief structure, judge someone by their acts as a human.

I agree thoroughly with you there Colonel.. <.< it's difficult not to chuckle whenever I write your username but anyway. The way I see it, it's like two negatives canceling each other out. Although some people would like to argue that "two wrongs don't make one right" the hatred towards hatred wouldn't exactly be wrong, because it's a desire to end the hatred, and nothing else. If I can present this in a mathematical perspective, take two negatives, multiplied/divided together, they make a positive. Or a negative added into a positive, they each take from each other.

Also...does anyone else hate the massively politicaly correctness that everyone nowadays has to use? Im White. Ive been white all my life. Im not Irish American. Im barely even Irish. In no way do i feel racist when i call a black guy black. Hes not African American unles he just got off the boat from Nigeria or wherever. If you don't thin i have a valid point then try this. Find your original nationality. Make everyone refer to you as (nationality here) American. (If you are white this will piss a lot of people off.) If you take standarized tests like i used too in high school look for your classification. If they do not have it, complain until it is put on the form. If everyone does this then i suggest that this trend of political correctness will come to a screeching halt whe the tests require over 40 different nationalities to be represented.

This is a sound and valid inductive argument (stating the obvious). I actually had an experience like this back when I used to work at an amusement park. The managers would ask us to be extremely careful with what we said to people, how we spoke around people, and even what we thought around people. It got to the point where I couldn't even find anything to say because I didn't want to run the risk of offending anyone by making them think that I was mocking their culture, instead of admiring or appreciating it. Mind you, where I used to work was a hotbed of mixed cultures visiting from all over the world so I saw a lot, but said very little. That's one of the reasons I quit, I couldn't stand so many retarded restrictions on my freedom of speech.

At 11/6/04 04:10 PM, OmniLogic wrote: I dunt really need to test... im supremly left

You n' me both bro.

Turns out I place right next to Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, and the Dali Lama. Totally opposite of Mr. Bush and Ms. Tatcher... so that explains why I hate them so much, they're so far away ^>^

At 11/7/04 03:19 AM, stafffighter wrote: I hate it when mommy and daddy fight.

I smell divorce... no wait that's my dinner burning.

At 11/6/04 10:56 PM, -Wraith- wrote: Hey, anyone know some good techno or trance songs? Preferable without vocals please.

Ferry Corsten. You can't go wrong. If you need a couple songs to get you started try Right of Way, Kyoto, Sublime
Also Indra by Thievery Corporation is a good one and the Hybrid Finished Symphony. That is... if you haven't heard these already :/

At 11/7/04 04:57 AM, ColonelAngus wrote: But you forget the massive amount of money that is gained by corporate America in dealing with the nw government over the oil situation. Those people get a lot of money. And as we know..corporations represent the good of America.

Omg cunnilingus! I mean... colonel Angus... I haven't seen that in a long time. >.> yeah, but anyway.

The massive ammount of money gained by corporate America, goes to corporate America, not to the government. Only the taxes go to the government. After the impending attack our troops are expected to deliver to Fallujah, the cost will only be higher.

And of course, the supporting crew, stalking, questioning, and dispensing seemingly-endless supplies of pamphlets left and right with expected campaign contributions ($5) written on the covers, and that famous Larouche quote "it's the economy, stupid!" written all over the damn place. This is not the right way to do democracy, people! >.< It gets highly-annoying when they get in your face and invade your personal space.

I don't know what's up with the wording in his signs, really.

Just who, this gentleman is, or why he is running for office, I don't know. What I do know is he led a very shitty campaign (had less votes than Leiberman, I don't know how that's humanly possible) and he scared a lot of Kerry supporters away with his young supporters raiding college campuses (such as mine) and questioning your political views every time you pass by their table. I know he's a democrat, but he seems to be a bit extreme, and unextreme at the same time. Does anyone else know who Lyndon Larouche is? Or why he was running for president, and reportedly will be running again in 2008?

I will post a couple of pictures in this thread, so you all can see the kind of propaganda I see in college every damn day. Please share your knowledge or opinions on this guy.

Oh and one thing I forgot to mention, he even had political carolers on campus at one point... the whole quartet... it was quite pathetic. I don't know what they were singing about because it was THAT annoying, but I remember hearing political verses of impending economic doom in their melancholic tones.

At 11/5/04 03:00 AM, FatherVenom wrote:

Some maximum pwnage on Peeweeherman.

Anyway, since you folks have mentioned the lovely and annoying Ann Coulter many times... did anyone see the speech she delivered in Arizona University before the election? It was when two guys tried to hit her with two pies, and she dodged them matrix-style. Unfortunately, the guys missed, and she hid behind the curtains. The two gentlemen *ahem* were shortly apprehended afterwards by campus authorities. The dean had this to say: "I with those had been bricks instead of pies." All I have to say is... kudos to you sir.

Well Xenosteel I'd say you've hit the nail right on the head.

As an American citizen I can tell you that from my point of view, the people of here are mostly concerned with the events that ocur here or affect this country in one way or another; if it has nothing to do with us, we really don't care.

Especially when it comes to cold-hearted corporate entities. Now don't get me wrong here, before I begin, let me state that there are other corporate entities out there that give back to the community and that do care about the effects their company(ies) have on the world and the environment. Now what I was saying is that cold-hearted corporate entities, especially the ones that globalize at the cost of other countries, are the ones that really don't give a rat's ass about the other countries. This is the reason as to why I didn't mourn Ronald Reagan's death and why I dislike Margaret Thatcher: they are/were for globalization to the utmost extent, anything to turn a profit. Now I'm not trying to say that Reagan was a bad person with bad ideals, he did a lot of great things for the U.S..... once again (at the risk of sounding like a broken record) for the U.S., however, he did little, or nothing for the rest of the world.

The way I see it: when companies grow so large that they choose to globalize to turn out even larget profits, they should not only give back to the community, but to the world. The fact that they have globalized should urge them to also consider the world as part of the community. It's the same with the U.S. as the "world watchdog, or police." Cops give back to the community, why shouldn't the world police give back to the world?

I say, instead of selling over-priced, and outdated weapons and military arms to poor 3rd world countries, the U.S. should give them food and funding for improving the quality of life of the citizens of those countries, not their leaders, like when the U.S. used to be friends with Saddam before the 1990's.

Point: If the U.S. is gonna act like it takes care of the world, then it should start acting like it cares. If large companies (usually from the U.S.) are gonna start globalizing/expanding to other countries, they should start caring about how they affect those countries.

How true. It's true what many people say: we take our lives for granted, and we're not grateful enough, however, that should not suggest that we could still be better off. I guess you could say it's the American way to never settle for less.

I'm watching you browse the forums. Why? :/ you're the only one on besides me and the mods, lol.

At 11/5/04 10:12 PM, mwazzap wrote:

At 11/4/04 11:34 PM, El_Chabre wrote: What's 'yaoi'?

Yaoi is gay hentai. *grin*

Watakshi wa hentai desu.

Ano.... omae wa baka desu... nihongo wa hanashimasen. Arigato gosaimasu.

Anyway. Yaoi is a weak form of gay hentai (toon porn). There's a much more explicit type but I don't know the term for it and I don't care. There's also Yuri, but that's a weak female form of hentai.

But anyway. If I may impart my two-cents in this lovely post... According to whom, is the male g-spot located on or in the anus? Males and females only have one, but one, biologicaly placed g-spot. For the females, it is the clitoris. For the males, it is the area around the head (for circumcised males, usually around where the foreskin has been removed, on the underside). I for one, don't know how you could consider the anus a g-spot for a male, but it sure as hell is not one for me.

If you say it is a g-spot it is because it's a socially-developed g-spot, which you learn from other people. There are many of these, and each varies from person to person. Take the neck for example, collar bone, earlobes, chest, stomach, shoulders... and feet... yeah I don't know why, but feet. These are all socially-learned g-spots. If you touch them, not everyone will be aroused by them, because not everyone cares for them. Your biological g-spot, however, will get you aroused, no matter what the case or no matter whom is touching you. Why? It's your body's natural response to it. As far as your "anus g-spot" statement goes, that is questionable.

At 11/6/04 03:31 AM, spanishfli wrote:

Something that I pray never happens or I'd be convicted of murder or cruel and unusual punishment.

Holy shit that kind of stuff still happens in California? How old were those "people" (if they can be called that) in the theatre? You should have asked for a refund.

Oh and what chain of theatres was it? I need to know who has the maladministration practices and poor enforcement of rules and regulations.

I'm glad you at least did something about it, but... Wayne Brady? *holds back laughter through his nose.*

Hey, if it made it on Frontpage... It's good for the eye, and what's good for the eye is good for the gander.

What's good for what gander? Are you illegaly harbouring animals within your domicile?