1,469 Forum Posts by "EnragedSephiroth"
At 1/12/06 01:06 AM, Empanado wrote: Seriously though, do you get any of these?
My dad sat down in my seat for a while and he got one... but I've never gotten one >.>
At 1/11/06 06:37 PM, Stayin_tru wrote: btw any boobs are nice boobs
Actually I'd take a pair of proper C's over a pair of saggy-to-be double D's any day. And btw you clearly haven't seen many boobs in your lifetime to make a statement as retarded as that. Has anyone ever banned you for walking in here uninvited, get told by the regulars your're not invited and still be here?
At 1/11/06 10:14 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: Anyone ski or snowboard?
I snowboard... well at least I want to, but I don't have a ride to the mountains and we've had the shittiest snowfall ever, if any at all -.- *sulks and gets emotional* all I wanted for Christmas was some fresh powder... *sniff, sniff, hic*
At 1/9/06 09:50 PM, m0u5y wrote:
:Arigatou.
We can't discuss something of this nature without arguing, it's in our nature to argue. To point something out, if the gay gene doesn't tangibly exist, and isn't proven to tangibly exist, then this topic should be devoid of any conversation. You've jumped the gun by going and talking about something that clearly hasn't been proven yet, and that might never be proven.
To set an example, I might as well talk about the effects on the future if we were to time travel, it's theoretically possible by accelerating things past the speed of light, but it's not something that has been tried and tested yet so my creating a topic of such an issue would be pointless to say the least.
One more thing, in romanji it's not "arigatou" it's "arigato." Domo arigato gozaimasu to be polite. You can "do itashimashite" (welcome) me as well for clearing that one up, if you want to.
At 1/11/06 01:42 AM, JMHX wrote:
Good lord where've you been?
In other news, I bought an Action Replay codebreaker today for my PS2... nifty... does anyone else own one?
Oh and to the person that posted that cat pic about empanado, this cat pwns yours.
At 1/8/06 06:10 AM, fli wrote: Oh crap... did I get the shit rolling?
Oh my lawdy lawd, that ball of dung turned into a jumbo-sized Triceratops turd in no time, nice, you have my admiration.
Now about Uwe Boll... I'd like to thank DonMarco at don'tpressstart.com for creating these two nifty pics, which I crappily put together on fireworks in order to showcase them both at once: tadaaaaaaaargh
At 1/8/06 06:01 AM, Frate92 wrote: The most damage seems to be a guy who posted THIS:
...YOU ARE GOING TO FUCKING PAY FOR THIS AS I AM CALLING THE POLICE FO WHAT YOU DONE
Wow sounds like he's from da hood, careful he could be serious, and packin' heat.
At 1/7/06 04:30 PM, Jinzoa wrote: one movie i would like to see(if made by peter jackson) would be a zelda move
Zelda might be better than Metroid, however, neither Link nor Samus Aran ever talk. But I know my friend would have something to say about Peter Jackson working on Zelda: "I can see it now, Orlando Bloom as Link" yes Peter Jackson's the man for the job. All he has to say is "Bloom, get your Legolas outfit, we're going Poe hunting in New Zealand!"
i always wondered if the concept of a metal gear movie could come to life...not to sure.
It would be one of the greatest pictures ever... no, on second thought... Metal Gear itself is already great enough, it doesn't need a movie.
At 1/7/06 10:08 PM, Stayin_tru wrote: Second, it also looked like instead of finding someone with a likeness to Rayne they just got the first red headed chick with nice boobs.
Her boobs are not nice, and I thought the regular populace did not welcome you here, especially since you have no clear grasp on what "nice boobs" look like. Take a look at Sophia Vergara (google it), now THOSE are nice boobs.
At 1/8/06 12:36 AM, red_skunk wrote: ..('-.-').
.<-||->.
. /__\ .
That... what the HELL is that?!
Congrats to all of you, particularly to PcHolliday JoS and DocArb.
JoS... I dont know if I asked you this a while ago but, what is the name of the dag girl in your sig(s)?
At 1/6/06 11:45 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: I'm sure that it's possible to make a good movie out of a video game, but it has to be a movie first and foremost.
I'd like to point out two examples that describe perfectly what you mean Doc. The movie based on The House of The Dead, was a total failiure, primarily because it depended just a wee bit much on the game... like showing actual game footage, I mean it doesn't get any cornier than that.
Final Fantasy Advent Children on the other hand, draws straight from the game's story but you don't see choppy polygon shots of Cloud back in the PSX days summoning Bahamut to help him defeat fiends, he doesn't even use the Omnislash to defeat Sephiroth, that's how independent of the game it was.
A movie that fails to meet your example, and is terrible: Final Fantasy The Spirits Within, because it was just COMPLETELY detached from the game, made next=to=no sense, in fact it was just a pretty-to-look-at-for-a-few-minutes sci-fi movie with the "Final Fantasy" name slapped on it.
Another movie that doesn't necessarily meet your example was Mortal Kombat, it was pretty attached to the game's characters and even theire signature moves, but it was a good movie all-in-all.
And finally Tomb Raider (The first one in particular), didn't depend so much on the game, I mean you could have never played the game and still have enjoyed the movie. I'll admit it was a good movie, possibly even better than the ailing series.
At 1/6/06 12:45 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: To get it you have to pickpocket some girl really early in the game, it's basically a weak version of the Trickster
Ah, thought so. If you walk around with both the Trixter and Mischief equipped, you get an item about every 10 seconds.
The real fun in the game began after arriving at the last guy, Indalecio. But I didn't beat him, instead I went to Private Action in Central City where you see his daughter Filia and she gives you Israfil's Tear. After that, the game is all groovy because you stand no chance against Indalecio. So what you have to do is head to the colliseum and talk to an inconspicuous old man whom lets you try out some "virtual reality" which ends up opening up a whole new playing field for you. But you know what I'm talking about already, right dude?
At 1/6/06 07:19 AM, Lidov wrote: I just have to tell you how funny this joke is!
Seriously, no brain, no opinion!
>:-(
Why thank you!
Seriously, no sense of humor!
:D
El Presidente -- Dr. Arbitrary -- Not just for his forum contributions in the past month, but for being one of the few, rare, SO2 fans.
Defense Minister -- Dr. Arbitrary
Department of the Interior -- Mr. Spanish fli
Economics Advisor -- PCHoliday
Mr. / Mrs. Troll -- red_skunk
Nice Guy / Gal -- Proteas
Best Dressed / Groomed -- LadyGrace --
Best Non-US User -- Empanado
Best Topic Starter -- Dr. Arbitrary
News Story of 2005 -- Hurricanes -- Not just hurricanes, but failiure to prepare for them.
Hm, I don't know much about Zionism. Is it less corny and cliche than satanism? Or is it less retarded than um... lord I forget their names... oh the Raelians? *Laughs heartily*
At 1/6/06 06:51 AM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: SO2 really did it for me when I got the mischief. Everything just became a little more fun after that.
Wait... what mischief? 2 things come to mind... pickpocketing, or the acessory that periodically gives you items (but one of them is called the Trixter). O.o care to elaborate?
At 1/5/06 11:00 AM, MALforPresident wrote: the second one may be more gramatically correct, but the first one gets the point across in two small sentences.
Tch I can do better.
Japan, woman, dead, Kitty Hawk.
Nuff said.
At 1/5/06 08:28 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: You ignorant fag.
I'm well aware of passive voice you ignorant dag fag :D , and that's exactly why I avoid using it when I write, because it sounds weird. Sorry I was just taught in composition to avoid using passive voice.
At 1/6/06 12:32 AM, MoralLibertarian wrote: I'm trying to play Chrono Cross on my PC. And yeah, I own the game. Actually, that game owned a good 3 months of my life...
Has anyone ever noticed what a kick-ass soundtrack that game has? My hat's off to Yasunori Mitsuda. I get all teary-eyed when I hear the Chrono Trigger main theme in orchestral.
At 1/6/06 12:41 AM, fli wrote: Yeah... same thing with Final Fantasy 7 with my life... (I'm still trying to fight Sephoroth in the cave.)
Now you realize... how weak you are before my 1337 soldier status.
At 1/6/06 01:39 AM, MoralLibertarian wrote: Seriously though, everyone play Chrono Trigger for SNES, and then play Chrono Cross for Playstation. If you're a game nerd, that is. They are both really sweet, especially if you've ever wondered about travelling from dimension to dimension.
Chrono Trigger was the 1st RPG I ever played, back in 1998. I actually started playing it again today on my PS2. I've been wanting to get back to Chrono Cross also but I don't own it :(
And if you want a game that abandons traditional RPG styles and blows everything else out of the water with an insane battle engine and masterpiece soundtrack, please I urge you (once again) to take a look at Star Ocean: The Second Story.
At 1/5/06 07:53 AM, BadBit wrote: The Stonewall movement was started twenty years earlier in 1969 when the Stonewall Inn in NYC was raided by police during a gathering to remember Judy Garland, who had died from a drug overdose.
Well there you go.
It'd be interesting to see what would happen if polygamy was legalized. Would there be mass polygamy? Would the nation crumble as some like to think? I see that some Muslim nations recognize polygamy ... do you know of any others?
I think all the "players" and pimps would probably have to retire... it would most-certainly change the face of rap. I'm surprised all the noobs just didn't jump on this subject and go "hell yeah, I'd have like 3 hoes in my bed and like one in every other state."
At 1/5/06 08:04 AM, BadBit wrote: Which laws provide these citizens with these rights? Petitions are public information.
The laws of the constitution. Although not explicitly stated, american citizens have a right to privacy, although the constitution said nothing about the cyber age because it was written prior to that, those rights are also extending into the internet. The only way those people wouldn't be able to sue and win would be if it said on the paper, information about them would be posted on the internet, that is the only way. If they signed it without knowing or without being informed in any way their information would be made public, they can sue and win, case closed.
Where do you see an intent of malice? I don't see anything on the site telling anyone to harass those who signed the petition.
It's not so much a direct intent of malice, rather malice was done to their reputation, and people are threatening them, possibly causing them "emotional grief" (as they could claim in court), and they could sue the site (and win) in court, like I said, given they weren't informed their information would be made public.
At 1/5/06 07:36 AM, BadBit wrote:
Stop triple-posting, or at least excuse yourself. What you can do is open multiple windows and copy and paste the text you're going to reply with into a single window rather than reply multiple times.
And that disclosure of information is a violation of privacy rights, even if the people whom filled the petition are morons, they still have their rights and opinions (as dumb as they may be). These are private individuals not public figures, they could sue the pants off that knowthyneighbor.com if they wanted to, and they would win, because of the intent of malice of the website in putting up their information, knowing they'd get harassed like that. The intent of malice for a private person is a lot more broad than the intent of malice for a public figure. Now if a political candidate were to have filled that petition out, we wouldn't be able to sue and win.
At 1/5/06 07:16 AM, BadBit wrote: There is a pretty distinct difference between homosexuality and blatant promiscuity. Someone being attracted to someone of the same gender does not spread new strains of sexually transmitted diseases. Having sex with multiple partners does.
Dude I wasn't arguing about diseases I was saying people were using that as an excuse.
You make it sound like homosexuality is something that was invented in the past couple decades.
No, it wasn't invented, in fact it's been "in the closet" for centuries, even millenia, since the greek days. What I'm saying is everyone just sorta seemed to come out of the closet within the last 40 years or so. Put is this way... the stonewall gay and lesbian movement was founded in 1989. Just a sheer guess here but I'm imagining this all began to go into motion during the civil rights movement. Blacks got their rights, immigrants got some rights, so the gay and lesbian populous says "where are our rights?" thus the stonewall movement resulted. I'm not saying people weren't gay in the past, I'm just saying it wasn't as widely accepted by society say during the civil war periods as it is today. I hear old people all the time talking about "nothing like that ever came around in my day" which would at least hint to a sign of increased awareness. Anyway, I'm going off topic, all I'm saying is will polyamory cause as much community backlash and outrage as homosexuality did, (and still does)?
A couple years ago I remember a certain government official (can't remember whether it was a representative or senator) hell I can't even remember whether he was democrat or republican, I believe he was from Utah though, and he was deeply-frustrated with government for allowing homosexuality yet not allowing polygamy, not that he was against homosexuality in the first place it's just that he was angered government overlooked polygamy.
At 1/5/06 07:04 AM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: http://mdn.mainichi-..2a00m0na019000c.html
YOKOSUKA, Kanagawa -- A U.S serviceman aboard the USS Kitty Hawk has been taken into custody by U.S military officials over suspicions about his involvement in the murder of a 56-year-old woman, it has been learned.
Now... is it just me or is that horrible sentence structure? "It has been learned" when the fuck to you end a sentence on that phrase? -.- Lord help these people find other jobs.
At 1/5/06 06:36 AM, BadBit wrote: That's so 70s.
That saying is SO 80's.
In this age of many sexually transmitted diseases and resistence being formed to antibiotics used to treated those diseases the idea of polyamory could be devastating to society. Not that it doesn't already happen to some extent.
I heard the same argument time and time again when homosexuality began to take form in the U.S. "Oh they're going to spread aids to everyone, everybody's going to get diseases." That was also what I meant by "the new gay" because initially there was an extremely powerful resistance towards homosexuality, although there's still a strong resistance today, more and more people seem to have accepted that way of life.
So what I'm saying is, will people put up such a resistance against polyamory? Or will they welcome it with open arms? *laughs*
On someone mentioning something earlier about fresh, or original topics (something along those lines, I'm too lazy to go back and check): http://www.newground../topic.php?id=408857
I tried... now I have to wait and see if the spark can at least ignite the kindling. That's not a noob trap either, I seriously want to hear what people have to say about that. With the exception of BeFell, I have forseen what he will say @.@ "mumble... mumble.. Mormon... mumble... special underpants... mumble mumble... George Bush... mumble Bob Dole... Bob Dole... Bob.........Do...l....e..." - BeFell <.<
I have not seen this topic brought up in Politics, and I'd like to hear what people have to say on it. Although we probably won't get anywhere but... what the heck?
Polyamory: 1. (poly=many; amor=love) The practice, state or ability of having multiple sexual love partners at the same time.
2. The core concept of polyamory is being involved in or open to multiple loving relationships, in a context of honesty and negotiation. The word roots are poly = multiple, and amor = love (specifically the sexual/romantic kind of love).
Here's a somewhat spun definition: 3. The nonpossessive, honest, responsible, and ethical philosophy and practice of loving multiple people simultaneously.
I say spun because of the use of "nonpossesive" someone apparently had issues with regular relationships.
4. Polyamory is the practice of having more than one loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved. The relationships are long-term, intimate, and usually (but not necessarily) sexual. Persons who consider themselves emotionally suited to such relationships may define themselves as polyamorous, often abbreviated to poly.
So.... with these four similar definitions... is Polyamory the new Gay? or is it... not" here to stay"? Will it ever even have a shot at becoming legal? Does it even need to be legalized? Please... share your thoughts.
At 1/3/06 05:13 AM, fli wrote: Highway 5 North has to be built by Satan.
Naw, just someone who likes to bore people... because it's so boring. El Espinazo Del Diablo in Durango (represent) Mexico, however is said to have been fabricated by the devil :P The name simply translates to "The Devil's Spine" and boy is it ever bumpy, what with the Mexican government not being able to afford to permanently fix the potholes, and the impossibility of widening the roads that aren't even two car widths wide and teeter on the edges of steep jagged cliffs. When a semi comes barelling your way downhill when you're headed up, there's nowhere to go but reverse.
The deadliest road in the world though is the trail in La Paz, Bolivia, ironically translated to "The Peace." It's so steep you can only descend the incline while on the breaks, and you can only climb it in first gear. It's also famous for it's beautiful scenery, not just it's savage terrain and sudden dropoffs with high probability of death.
I present to you a pic taken from the Devil's Spine by a photographer. Funny you can't even see the road because of how unstable and inconcise it is.
Good lord. So I decided to see what the Ultimate Warrior has been up to these days, and what do I find...
"Writings about discovering my love for America and American History. Writings about my self-learning journey with The Great Books of the Western World (the writings by mankind's greatest original seekers of knowledge). Writings about my unusual exposure to the philosophies other adults hold, philosophies that are anti-life, anti-American, dependent and pathetic -- literally subhuman. Writings about other wrestling talent who have died while bent over their dirty little bags of street drugs, cowered to their filthy refusal to grow up and become real men. Writings that refuse to cut anyone any slack at any time when it comes to the inescapable fact that there is an undeniable responsibility that comes with the inalienable right. And writings about that there is an irrefutable line between what is right and wrong, good and evil, true and false -- and how the tolerated blurring of those lines has spawned the gravest dangers we face today in our society -- Political Correctness and Moral Relativity."
Source: www.ultimatewarrior.com
Now is it just me or... is anyone else offended? I've never seen someone vicariously bash Plato's Allegory of The Cave so much >:/ things in life aren't always black and white, there are shades of grey, wtf is up with Jim Helwig (Warrior)?
You know what sucks? The fact DSL is currently cheaper than the Dialup I'm paying for, yet the DSL is not available in my area, but people across the block can have it... wtf mayte? If worse comes to worse I just might have to resort to Broadband ;o here come the unnecessary expenses.
At 12/28/05 06:53 AM, LordXanthukah wrote: That's exactly what it was. Isn't some guy singing "la la la" part of the song? In any case, I love that game.
That's exactly what I mean. It took me that long to figure out you were doing the vocalization acapela(sp?) to "Katamari On The Swing" from the file-select screen. That game has a stellar soundtrack. I should go e-bay for it right now. I'm personally fond of the "Angel Rain" song from We <3 Katamari. Anywho, not too long ago I rolled up a 2000M (2Km) Katamari, and came but a few seconds away from rolling up The King of The Cosmos with it >:\
At 12/28/05 06:44 AM, LordXanthukah wrote: La, la-la-la-la-la-la...
You know what sucks about written communication? You can't detect sarcasm unless someone points it out by going "(sarcasm)", and you have no idea what the person is singing. I'll just pretend it's something from Katamari Damacy.
At 12/28/05 12:56 AM, MALforPresident wrote:At 12/28/05 12:45 AM, stafffighter wrote: Here you and George Carlin are. Born to be kings. You and George Carlin are the princes of the universe. Guitar soloand then i kill him and become king of the universe. ^_^
Yes but you will never be... THE KING OF THE COSMOS!!!
... A little Katamari Damacy worked into the conversation at last :D
At 12/27/05 07:22 PM, Proteas wrote: Somewhere around here I've got a low quality boot leg copy of Dream Theatre performing the entire "Master of Puppets" Metallica album, live. John Petrucci not only played every Kirk Hammet solo note for note during that performance, he played each solo (IMHO) better than Kirk ever could.
Kirk never was much of a show-stopper live really. I noticed this when he didn't play the Master of Puppets solo, Ride the Lightning solo, and Disposable Heroes solo note-for-note in the concert. I was like "hmm, either he's getting rusty, or he's being lazy, or like Zeppelin, he wants to avoid sounding like a jukebox during live gigs." I don't mind the band sounding like a jukebox though because then I can follow more-closely.
I heard a song by Petrucci called "Jaws of Life" once. Since I don't have DSL I dare not download it but needless to say, it had some of the wickedest solos I have EVER heard.
At 12/27/05 10:03 AM, Samuel_HALL wrote: 'The gallows pole'? C'mon. Tell me that's not Zep's best song.
It's a huge tie for me between Stairway to Heaven, Kashmir, The Rain Song, Since I've Been Loving You, and I Can't Quit You Baby.
Actually I think "Since I've Been Loving You" takes the cake just barely. It carries so much soul and emotion, and I mean... that solo is just wicked.
Speaking of guitar solos, has anyone heard the works of John Patrucci (from Dream Theatre)? I don't have any music of his, but I've heard some in the past and I'm taking an interest.
