3,094 Forum Posts by "Empanado"
At 3/17/04 07:20 PM, IceWraith15 wrote: Also, and more importantly, BOTH the UNITED NATIONS and the HAITIAN REBELS ASKED AMERICA TO PROVIDE PEACEKEEPERS.
THE FRENCH ARE THERE TOO!!
uh, and the chileans...don't forget the chileans....
At 3/16/04 05:47 PM, The_Tormentor wrote: and North Korea, has elections, meaning its not Communist
Ohhh right, i forgot that communist nations can't have elections. Actually, you're wrong. Communism isn't actually a political tendence, it's an economical structure. It's just that it has been put together with dictatorships or authocracies most of the time, but it doesn't mean it should always be that way.
And, back on topic, i'm not even sure if the PSOE is Cold-War like socialism, in fact, im almost 100% sure it's "new" socialism, like, dunno, Brazil or Chile, so i don't see why you're creating such a big deal about it.
At 3/16/04 04:57 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote:At 3/16/04 04:51 PM, ShdowOfTheNite wrote: wtf is that stuff, i say im .... moderate bitliteral... how the hell m i supposed to knowTo make it simple, liberal is left and you believe everyone should do anything they want, moderate is your in the middle, and conservative is thgat your'e right wing and afraid of change.
Wrong. Liberal is right-wing, moderate is more right-wing, and conservative is right-wingest (Oh well, maybe it is the way you say on the States.). Me? Democratic socialist, if anybody gives a sh**.
Who cares? No one's going to even notice the U.S. marines, because everyone will be looking at the... chileans! woo-hoo!!
The U.N. forces sent there are French-American-Chilean. Now that's weird.
And on this very particular case, if eventually this action can be translated into economical help to that poor-ass country (no offence), i'll support it.
At 3/15/04 10:08 AM, D2KVirus wrote:
Yes. I also know they have a long-standing beef with Morocco (admittedly, an Islamic country - WHY HASN'T THIS BEEN NOTED?), and several other African nations. Come to think of it, they aren't thought of too fondly in Latin America, so why hasn't anyone thought the Zapatistas did it?
No, i don't quite think so. We don't really hate them anyways, and even if we did, i don't think the Zapatistas would do something that big.
And news update: The ETA option is now almost completely discarded. Facts point to a Islamic extremist group (NOT CERTAINLY Al-Qaeda), probably organized in Morocco.
Oh, and a funny fact: A party on the spanish presidential elections is actually called "Agobiated and pissed-off citizens".
At 2/27/04 03:24 AM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: Here's what I've heard of the Knights Templar AKA the Order of the Poor Knights of Christ and the Temple of Solomon
They are closely related to the 'Prieure de Sion' or the Priory of Zion, I'm pretty sure that the Prieure de Sion's goal is to restore the Merovingian Dynasty. Some people think that the Merovingians are the direct descendants of Jesus Christ.
Many famous people are rumored to be members of the Priory, including Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo, Claude Debussey, Leonardo da Vinci and Robert Boyle.
They are related to the masons in that many of their rituals are very similar, specifically the Strict Observance rite, which is claimed to have come directly from Templars.
The Knights Templar grew in influence and wealth over the years, until by the end of the 13th century they were powerful enough to ignore, with apparent impunity, the edicts of various European monarchs.
No more Da Vinci Code for you, dude.
I don't care. I'm going to watch it 'cause it's going to be gore-ish. And i can bet that a lot of people will watch it for the same reason.
Ok, here it goes. You see, this book ("Keys to understand the War", by Raúl Sohr) gives us 20 keys or aspects that, more or less, can define who will be the victor on a given war. It can also be useful when discussing issues like the one we have right here. I'll translate the 10 first chapters plus the resume of each:
Key 1: The basic ecuation
- To compare countries is a complex exercise. The mathematic sum of the aspects that conform the national power (Economy, population, arsenals & others) is still, far away from telling us what country will prevail in a conflict.
Key 2: The objective.
-The success or failure of a mission is measured related to the given objective. This is one of the most delicate issues, as it depends of an accurate diagnose of the situation. An error of setup in the objective can easily lead to the defeat or to an unfinishable conflict.
---dammit, i forgot that this can get quite boring after a while. Tell me if you're interested at all.
Oh well, now that we're talking about this, i think i have a book somewhere that is quite detailed on this topic. Gimme a moment.
These threads make you feel so much safer...
Another option is to lock them in a room while showcasing "amelié" a whole day. That would certainly make them nice, cheesy boys. It never fails.
I'll tell you, we need karate classes.
And remember the french fries. You owe them the french fries.
At 2/18/04 07:48 PM, Kyle_22 wrote: Am I sick, or am I right? Or am I a combination of the two?
Another trick question? Dammit!
Yup. There are more important things to care about. And about that thing, i think that, even if it should be okay for them just having civil unions and marriage if they want, they must stick with the law while they wait for gay marriage to be legal.
At 2/18/04 07:20 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: Yay for shrike. Although this doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with politics, but I dont care, because I like cookies too.
It will have to do, when we start voting for the candidates of the UCP (United Cookie Party)
If atheism is a church, then i wonder how are the preachings on sunday. Like, "And then God did not create the man on the seventh day, and he did not create him out of mud and he did not blow the essence of life on him and then he did not..."
...Interesting...
At 2/13/04 02:37 AM, Fiend_Lore wrote: its a made up satanic scripture. no more, and no less
Oh yes, and all those evil heavy metal bands are corrupting our children because they're satanic. Please.
I have to say that i agree with Jimsween. Something smells fishy on that, there must be something else. I don't quite think that Musharraf is such a Mr. Nice Guy.
At 2/11/04 11:05 PM, JudgeFUNK wrote: Wow, that video was great.... I can't wait to see it on TRL....
But in all seriousness, who the FUCK are they fooling? I notice they didn't have the ballz to do that shit without their masks on. And why the hell was all that KKK and Nazi shit in there? This pisses me off, because I have muslim friends who aren't like that, and it gives them a bad name they don't deserve.
Actually, it was kinda catchy.... nah nah nah nah nahnahnah dirty kuffaaar...
But i don't think that they'll get any grammy for that anyway.
Oh, and thanks for the link.
At 2/10/04 06:54 PM, IceWraith15 wrote:
Uh....Politicians don't make much money, they actually LOOSE A TON while campaigning. Therefore people don't enter the government for profit, but for public service. And NO, they don't just argue about made-up issues...
You're being sarcastic, right?
At 2/9/04 11:54 AM, Kyle_22 wrote:At 2/9/04 09:45 AM, TheShrike wrote: liek omg.I agree with TheShrike. As long as no one is trying to change anybody's views, keep the tradition.
I don't really care, so long as they aren't forcing christianity down my throat, to be honest.
It's just me, or Shrike was actually talking about all that child abuser priests thing? (forcing christianity
down my throat ...)
Nah, forget it, it's just me.
And i wish i never had to. The way of the freedom fries is still mysterious and dark for me.
But i don't get why they are called french fries! They're not even frech! And they certainly do not give freedom, so they can't be called freedom fries! They're snacks, not liberation armies for god's sake! The only truth about them is, that they are potatoes, and fried. Therefore, its name should be "fried potatoes"! Why do you want to confuse your people by calling them "french fries" or "freedom fries"? Why? It's madness!
At 2/9/04 10:50 PM, Dagodevas wrote:
:: Seriously? It was some anti-French guy's bright idea to change the name of “french fires” to the more patriotic name of “freedom fries”. Mindless propaganda.
Why the hell don't you just call'em "fried potatoes" as we do?
At 2/9/04 10:21 PM, Dagodevas wrote: And I say it's the stupidest thing I've heard of since "freedom fries".
What the hell are the freedom fries??
At 2/9/04 06:21 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: Could you post a link to the site?
Well, it's in spanish so probably it won't be useful to you, but Here it is anyway.
I'll let you know if i find one in english.
No, this topic is not about any flash film posted on this site. What happens, people, is that, according to what i've just read on a website [a quite serious one] a rap video-clip created by a group that is supposed to be strongly connected to Al-Qaeda, is currently on the web, and is a total success so far. It features Sheikh Terra and the Soul Salah Crew, muslims currently living in London. The name of the video is "Dirty Kuffar"(Dirty Infidents) and it encourages young muslims to go on jihad against "christians and infident arab leaders", that will "burn on the fires of hell". Quoting a part of the catchy song:
"Dirty Kuffar wherever you are, from Kandahar to Ramallah, OBL (Osama Bin Laden)'s squad is like a brilliant star, just like we destroyed your two towers, ha-ha."
The video features Ayman Al-Zawhri (second-in-chief of Al Qaeda) transforming into a lion, Dubya Bush becoming a chimp, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia becoming a demon,etc. Ariel Sahron becomes a pig, while Yasser Arafat is labeled as a traitor.
I'm not sure if all this is true, maybe it's just a trick to degradate even more the image of Osama Bin...i mean, OBL (that sounds much cooler anyway), but maybe they ARE that desperate like to do that kind of crazy stuff. I'll leave it up to you.
At 2/5/04 11:25 PM, 70TA wrote:At 2/5/04 05:12 PM, darkphantom wrote: Oh my your infallable logic and ad-homning strikes again...Hey retard, go home and get your fuckin' shinebox. Now be gone.
What a toughtful, cunning, yet familiar response. Bravo!
