3,094 Forum Posts by "Empanado"
At 3/3/05 07:13 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: so, it's my birthday everyone...I demand love and good wishes! : P
No.
At 3/3/05 08:28 PM, fli wrote: Jesus Christ! If I hear another snotty wanna-be-intellectual joke about Chaucer-- I'm gonna puke.
Y'know, Chaucer's mom is so fat...
At 3/3/05 12:54 PM, JohnnyWang wrote: Ah, shit. I allways mess things up. I mean old... fuck, countries that were under the rule of others, I don't know it in english, it's not my first language, and those things aren't really discussed on English lessons. Colonies, I guess is the word.
Yes, colonies is the word. The difference probably lies in the fact that they were colonized by different nations. Couldn't be so sure, though.
At 3/2/05 11:17 PM, Jimsween wrote: And at that, Chile was one of the last areas colonized.
Not true. Well, as a matter of fact, it is true, but that didn't make much difference. Santiago was built in 1541, which isn't a lot later that Ciudad de Mexico, for example.
Maybe you mean fully colonized. But Chile was already making money for the Spanish Empire by the end of the XVI century.
By the way, my new school sucks. I R TEH SAD! :(
Dammit, I'm having an erection for no reason again. Y'know what we need? An Erection Bank. We could deposit erections when we're not using them, and then we'd withdraw them when we're old and unhealthy. Y'know, it'd be a great investment, because our e-pen0rs have serious growth potential.
At 3/2/05 04:37 PM, SirCaddy55 wrote: and Pee Wee Hermen
Oh, come on. Personally, I think Pee Wee Herman just has a really shitty luck.
he was caught up masturbating at a XXX cinema, and he had tons of porno at his house. BIG DEAL. There's nothing wrong with peeling the banana once in a while. True, he was "...charged with a single misdemeanor count of possessing materials depicting children under the age of 18 engaged in sexual conduct." But that doesn't put him at the rank of Michael Jackson. There are a lot of more perverted people out there. Like, I don't know, Jimmy Swaggart?
At 3/2/05 04:35 PM, Gutmunchr wrote: I often say I hate France, and Germany, and especially Argentina.
Oh, come on, easy on the Argies. True, everyone else hates them, and there's a special brand of jokes about Argentinians, but they're not that bad.
At 3/2/05 04:27 PM, VerseChorusVerse wrote: Exactly what have Christians done in the past 2000 years that is so sickening to you, Smurf?
Let's see how good I'm getting at this:
"OMG TEH CRUSADES, TEH INQUISITION, THE CONQUISTADORS, TEH PEDOPHILE PRIESTS!!!111!"
I think that's all the major ones. If I didn't miss any, score 1 for Empanado.
At 3/2/05 04:24 PM, Jimsween wrote: I hate you all.
Why, thank you.
At 3/2/05 04:13 PM, PapalSmurf wrote:At 3/2/05 03:35 PM, VerseChorusVerse wrote: That's sickening...Not as sickening as what your sheeple did for the past 2,000 years!
Yawn. Been there, heard that. If you don't have anything new to say, then shut the fuck up until some originality shows up at your mailbox.
At 3/2/05 04:08 PM, fli wrote: Hitler was straight.
Somehow, enjoying to be urinated by your niece doesn't ring the 'straight' bell for me. But that's just my opinion.
At 3/2/05 03:12 PM, EvilGovernmentAgents wrote: Funk pwns you. Bolivian, done Kentucky Style. And these heathens eat little rodents, insolent Chilean. Hampsters aren't Bolivian, and they ain't rodents.
That's true, in fact, they do not eat hamsters, they eat cuyes. But if you ask me, they look pretty goddamn the same. Just check this hideous fuzzball. That's a cuy.
(Remember, they EAT these things. they just kill'em and fry'em right away.)
Seriously tho, EGAs, what's your deal with Bolivia? You really have bolivian relatives or stuff like that, or you just like to mock third-world countries?
At 3/2/05 10:13 AM, Gutmunchr wrote: Food for thought the greeks only penetrated slaves (and not the other way round).
Actually, those were the romans. The greeks were TEH GH3YZ0RZ. Philosophers, apprentices, merchants, politicians... buttsecks everywhere.
At 3/2/05 01:42 PM, Empanado wrote: They don't need that. They already have Bolivian Fried Hamster. I mean it. They do.
Just in case you need graphicl depiction.
Pa', what do we have for dinnerin' tonight?
Oh, We've got one of'em hamenster thingies, boy. Hot daggity dang, I just LOVE Bolivian Fried Hamster!
At 3/2/05 01:03 PM, SkyCube wrote: Wouldn't it be more like Bolivian fried parrot?
They don't need that. They already have Bolivian Fried Hamster. I mean it. They do.
Or was it the Peruvians? Gah, I don't know.
At 3/2/05 10:33 AM, metalhead676 wrote: micheal moore does tell the truth.
No, he doesn't. The real figures are around 3,000 killed, and he stretched it to +6,000 (or so) to make it look more outrageous.
Also, it would help that you specify WHAT part of the thread you're calling "conservative propoganda".
At 3/2/05 05:27 AM, fli wrote:
Bush said, "Hey. That Pinochet over there-- his ideas weren't that bad..."
Big surprise there, pal. I'm astounded :/. (Hint: I'm not.)
Empanado, is this true? Half a country doing well, some especially well, the other half depended on government assistance?
You mean, on Pinochet's government? Nope. "Half a country doing well" doesn't sound like it. Try "1/4 of a country doing well" and we're getting somewhere.
The problem on installing this program in the U.S., in my own opinion, is that CHile is much different from the States, socially speaking. There's a really SHITTY distribution of wealth, one of the worst of the hemisphere, in fact. Now, I couldn't tell if thesocial security issue deals with it, helps it or makes it worse, but I'm pretty sure that it's a program that works better with countries with a shitty distribution of wealth. Now, I'm no economist, so maybe I'm just babbling a mouthload of crap, but hey, each one entitled to his own, right?
At 3/1/05 11:08 PM, BeFell wrote: I know I will never donate any money to animal habitats or sanctuaries because I'm a bastard.
Well, DUH.
Personally, I don't care. Let's leave this issue to those PETA psychos. Let'em bomb zoos dressed as cows while advocating for vegeterianism, or whatever the hell they do.
At 3/1/05 10:38 PM, red_skunk wrote: oooooh, Bakshi's so cuuuuuuute!
Let's just hope this ensues enough buttsecks for the rest of the week.
At 3/1/05 08:04 PM, Mr_Biggles wrote: OMG BEAR SUIT SKIN VIRUS!!!
Stop. Please. My eyes are bleeding.
At 3/1/05 04:39 PM, EvilGovernmentAgents wrote:At 3/1/05 04:33 PM, Empanado wrote: Seriously though, where do I sign?For a seriously filthy (even by your country's standards!) Chilean, you sure know how to hold your ground against Mormonism!
Mormons killed people. THYE R TEH BAD!!!111! :(
At 3/1/05 04:16 PM, BeFell wrote: Honestly doesn't anyone read my blog.
Oh! Oh! I want a stupid blog so I can whine as a recently devirginized little mormon girl about people not reading it!
Seriously though, where do I sign?
At 3/1/05 12:04 PM, JohnnyWang wrote: 'ur' is not a word.
You ignorant anarchy fish! Ur was the name of the capital of the Mesopotamian Empire. And he's obviously trading "Your" for "Ur" as a post-existentialist tribute to the Ancient Cultures, by stating that our interpelor is, in fact, derived from the races of Old as well as we do, thus, engaging in a bound of milenary brotherhood and the...
..Oh, what the crap. He's just a n00b.
At 2/28/05 09:06 PM, Proteas wrote:I end my post with an example of the FOX's lying:You know, this is the digital age, you could have posted a link to a transcript of the show if this actually happened. Nothing like having backup to prove your point.
The day after when a son of a 9/11 victim, that was anti-war had been O'Reillys guest. He said that the guest had said that America had planned the 9/11 attack, wich he never said.
We've past this point already, but I think that I found it. Not sure if it's the one you were talking about, and it's a transcript of that part of the O'Reilly show, not FOX's.
But O'Reilly gets pwned, and that's the important thing.
(Scroll down 'till you get to "The Infamous Glick Interview".)
At 3/1/05 01:48 PM, TheShrike wrote: Who is that, fli?
Well, in all that concerns fli, I'd say he's JAILBAIT.
At 2/28/05 04:29 PM, Jimsween wrote: There are people that think Pinochet was good?
Certainly. Without going any further, current opposition presidential candidate, Joaquín Lavín, was a collaborator of the military regime. I think he even participied on the 89' campaign to keep Pinochet in power.
Of course, now he tries to evade this issue as much as he can. He's also a member of the opus Dei.
And yet, polls give him about 45%. Yay.
The U.S. don't need to invade Canada. Because us Chileans are going to. We want their maple syrup.
At 3/1/05 01:48 AM, Maus wrote: I work for a film and video production company. That's all I can really say.
Oooh, I understand.
...
OMG TEH PR0N!!!11! PR0N MAUS!!!MAUS IS TEH PR0N STAR!!!! OMG OMG WTF LOLROFLMAOSTFU!!!
Uh... whatever. By the way, I insist, check out Capoeira Fighter 3. It takes a ritual Brazilian dance/martial art created by the opressed black slaves to fight their slavemasters, and it carelessly exploits it to appeal to the white male capitalist consumer, by defiling the whole centuries-old tradition that capoeira represents.
Plus, it's got hot chicks.
Shut up. I'm playing the coolest game around,
Capoeira Fighter 3.
It's Capcom vs. SNK meets Brazil. Yay!
At 2/28/05 10:06 PM, Empanado wrote: ...and CHOPS IT OFF!!! ...".
(Remember to make a guillotine-like motion with your hand when you get to that part.)
At 2/28/05 08:37 PM, Proteas wrote: And finally - this is more funny than anything else - the local foreign exchange student from South Korea who is staying with a family that belongs to our church, asked "What ees circumseesun?" when the word was brought up during Sunday School yesterday. No one in the room had the heart to explain the concept to her.
Ha-ha! Well, you've just gotta explain "That's when somebody grabs a guy's pee-pee and CHOPS IT OFF! Or, uh, a part of it".
For real though, I just can't understand why 80% or so of American males are circumsized. Here, we go au naturel. Elephant, baby! Except for Jews, of course. But nobody cares about them. They just sit on a corner and cry.
At 2/28/05 05:40 PM, FAB0L0US wrote: Do you not realize this thread was started out almost totally about JAPAN?
That was just because the Swedish guy went all OMG TEH JAPAN!!!!1111!!!111!
...Um, no offense.
Oh, but come on. The Pacific front is like, the Ringo Starr of WWII. Underrated, and nobody cares. It's like... the Canadians.
