35 Forum Posts by "E1EE7"
At 7/20/11 11:42 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 7/19/11 08:54 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Evolution has been proven, just bible thumpers can't accept the fact they aren't god's special little snowflakes and are just simply hairless apes.If it was proven it wouldn't be a theory, now would it?
At 7/20/11 11:42 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 7/19/11 08:54 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Evolution has been proven, just bible thumpers can't accept the fact they aren't god's special little snowflakes and are just simply hairless apes.If it was proven it wouldn't be a theory, now would it?
Well, in that case, we can ignore the theory of gravitiational attraction then!
Here is a HUGE secret of the English Language: Words can have different meaning depending on context!
Cleave can mean to cut apart OR bring together.
In the case of science, Theory means an oversimplification of a set of phenomena. The Theory of Relativity explains that time is based on relative position and curves like gravity dues around planets.
In the words of Stephen Hawking, the world's smartest man and prominent authority on quantum mechanics said in his book, a brief history of time ""A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations." He goes on to state, "Any physical theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis; you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result will not contradict the theory. On the other hand, you can disprove a theory by finding even a single observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory." The "unprovable but falsifiable" nature of theories is a necessary consequence of using inductive logic."
Here is what happens
Palestine shoots rockets at unarmed civilians from hospitals and the like
Israel naturally responds by bombing the fuck out of Palestine
Palestine gets butt hurt and claims it is being abused.
Want to stop Israel from bombing Palestine? STOP SHOOTING ROCKETS INTO ISRAEL THEN PALESTINE!
The reason is simple. First, Palestine is suffering a terminal case of self induced butthurt, which the Muslim Middle east picks up on, because hey, it's not terrorism if it is in the name of Allah!
Not too mention that Israel is the home of Jersualem, which holds holy places for jewish, christian and muslim believers. (if you ask me, if they just nuked the city, the middle east might settle down for once).
Throw in the fact that America supports Israel and you start to get the picture.
At 7/19/11 05:57 PM, Scotty9193 wrote:At 8/26/05 07:50 PM, fastbow wrote:Wrong fastbow, evolution in frequently seen in bacterial colonies in the form of drug resistence, and increased (and often decreased) virulence. Sure, evolution is difficult to prove on the scale of human evolution without some sort of time machine, but to suggest it can't be proven is simply false.At 8/26/05 07:37 PM, stafffighter wrote: The christian motto "If it's at all possible to prove, it's not true." Evolution, holocoasts, molestation, any of itNo. If it has been proven, we will believe it. EVOLUTION HAS NOT, and cannot, BE PROVEN!!!
,
Evolution has been proven, just bible thumpers can't accept the fact they aren't god's special little snowflakes and are just simply hairless apes.
At 7/19/11 12:05 AM, SmilezRoyale wrote:At 7/18/11 11:10 PM, Camarohusky wrote:In theory, any constitutional amendment can be democratically 'voted away', though that may not even be necessary, since the state is the legislator, executor, AND interpreter of it's own laws, the constitutionality of is nothing more absolute than the willingness of said state's subjects to tolerate it's [the state's] existence.At 7/18/11 10:45 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: If the state is the sovereign owner of all property, I suppose it can exclude anyone it damn well pleases.I know, who needs that 'Constitution' thing anyway?
9th amendment bitch
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people".
Also, The supremacy clause overrides state law, along with a waist high stack of legal precendent.
So, rather then jerking off to Aryan Rand in class, crack open your textbook and actually learn something.
Hell, Cali's Prop 14 was a prime example of this. The courts ruled a state constution can not supersede the federal government, even if it was added due to the consutition by populace vote.
At 7/18/11 02:05 AM, All-American-Badass wrote:At 7/17/11 10:44 PM, miner08 wrote:There was nothing insensitive in that paragraph. It was just stating facts that the group needed to point out for their agenda of family values.At 7/11/11 11:24 PM, Iron-Hampster wrote: if you wanna stop being called socialist for not being far enough to the right you have to stop calling people racist for being too far to the right.It doesn't matter what side you are on politically, the pledge still had insensitive, racial remarks.
And I would like to point out that said group is well known for hypocrisy. Like defenders of family values tend to be divorced multiple times, commit adultery, get caught with their pants down, get caught having buttsex with men, etc.
At 7/17/11 10:16 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 7/17/11 08:03 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Yet it still fails. The Titantic was unsinkable, yet when it sailed, it sank. The hull design was good and flawless but real life showed the facts. Abstinence only sex ed is communism, looks wonderful on paper, fails in real life.Abstinence NEVER fails. People fail it.
Also, 'abstinence' and 'abstinence only education' are NOT the same thing.
:Abstinence NEVER fails. People fail it.
Ergo, Abstinence fails.
At 7/17/11 12:23 PM, Warforger wrote:At 7/17/11 04:08 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:Israel became one of the wealthiest in a few years correct? America was different because the land itself was already a goldmine in tobacco and corn, nevermind the actual gold and trade routes from the Caribbean, as America expanded out west they got even more of that.At 7/16/11 12:36 AM, Warforger wrote: Well yah, when you have loads and loads of skilled workers of course you're going to be able to bring up an economy quickly like in Israel with loads of foreign aid and sympathy, black people? Not so much.America was built by a bunch of broke-ass immigrants and became the wealthiest nation in history in a few centuries.
Africa is rich in mineral resources, diamond, gold, not too mention the straights of Gibraltar and the Suez Canal. Not too mention a cheap labor, yet Africa just has war, disease, genocide and has been listed as the place on earth with the lowest standards of living, highest mortality rate, etc.
At 7/17/11 12:38 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 7/16/11 09:58 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Okay, let's be honest, which do you think teens are going to do if given the chance?This is the reason abstinence only education fails, not because there is some inherent flaw with abstinence.
Are they going to refrain from sex if offered?
OR are they going to engage in sex but use a condom because a condom is the best protection a teen male can get?
Yet it still fails. The Titantic was unsinkable, yet when it sailed, it sank. The hull design was good and flawless but real life showed the facts. Abstinence only sex ed is communism, looks wonderful on paper, fails in real life.
At 7/17/11 10:50 AM, djack wrote: E1EE7 I'm sick of arguing with you when all you do is ignore what I say so I'm ending this argument. This started because you didn't know the difference between a theory and a law and here is the post that you were never able to refute that proved you were wrong.
At 7/14/11 05:54 PM, djack wrote:I won't bother returning to this thread, you've proven to be too stupid to be worth my time.At 7/14/11 04:06 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Theory, oversimplified explanation of a group of phenomena. See Theory of gravity.That idea is obviously false. If that was true the laws of thermodynamics would be called the theories of thermodynamics when taught in physics classes. The law of gravity is the fact that there is a calculable force between any two objects with mass, the theory of gravity is how this works and includes multiple different explanations such as warped space time and gravitons. They are not the same thing. String theory would be a law when talking about the equation behind it according to you which is clearly bullshit as there are 5different equations to string theory. Perhaps you should study actual theories and laws as opposed to the propaganda you've been fed by evolutionists who don't actually study the theory but do preach their belief in it like a door to door Jehovah's witness.
Law, mathematical model of theory. See Law of gravitational attraction
If anyone should be offended, it is me. You are, put simply, a dumbass. Your head is so full of shit, you don't realize what utter nonsense you spew as "fact". The fact you site expelled as evidence shows just how badly you understand evolution.
Your constant idiocy is rather staggering, because I can not fathom how you fail to understand that natural selection is an element of evolution. Odds are, 500 years ago, you would be telling me the sun goes around the earth.
What you fail to understand is, Obama positioned himself like Clinton did. Obama has been vocal about comprise, extending the olive branch, asking Cantor if he would continue tax breaks for corporate jets, etc. If the government defaults, all Obama has to do is point at the GOP and say "Hey, I tried to compromise, they stonewalled."
If you pull your head out of your ass, you would realize this is a win win for Obama. If the Republicans don't raise taxes, Obama will veto any proposal they put forth. And since they lack the 2/3rds majority to override it, it will fail.
If the government defaults, the GOP will be blamed. If the GOP, after all their vocal ravings do raise the debt ceiling and taxes, they look like hypocrites.
It wasn't pictures, it was youtube vids.
As for Expelled, that is pure hogwash, a propaganda piece funded by the christian right. It is light on facts and is mostly a "poor oppressed Creationists" movie. Read a review of it and you will find just how much bullshit ben stien spewed.
As for changing species, Evolution doesn't work that way. Over time, two variants of a species slowly differ enough to be classified as separate. Like how a dog is different then a wolf.
As for beneficial mutations, I already pointed out sickle cell anemia. How about bacteria developing a resistance to various antibiotics?
Or how about being Lactose tolerant? Normally, after age 2, humans become lactose interolerant due to us no longer needing to drink breast milk. However, since milk is full of nutrients, those who can drink it are healthier. Hence, why two different gene mutations, one for europeans, and in east africa, a cattle herding area.
emerged in africa around 3,000 years ago
Next, it's not just genes, it's also methyl groups. It is what turns genes on and off.
DNA methylation
As for Haeckle, those charts are real. Ask any doctor and they will tell you that yes, human fetuses have gills and a tail.
At 7/16/11 10:47 PM, Korriken wrote:At 7/16/11 07:51 PM, Warforger wrote: Erm no, Republicans are just saying no to everything Obama is presenting as options...so what does that have to do with race?
from what I've seen the Dems want to raise taxes, without cutting entitlements and republicans want to cut entitlements without raising taxes.
don't let the media blind you to what is really going on, both sides want a win for their party, to make the other cave in and give them what they want. If we default, its the fault of both sides.
Tax rate is at the lowest it's ever been, which has strangled the governments ability to raise revenue. The GOP refuses to raise taxes and only wants spending cuts in certain programs (Despite them, you know, raising the defense budget by a couple billion).
The Dems don't want slash more then they already have (Education for example, has been cut to the bone, yet the GOP refuses to give up tax breaks for oil companies), without having taxes raised.
Either way, if the government shuts down, it will be on the GOP's head.
Let's be honest, the real reason the GOP and tea party hate Obama is because he is a well spoken, black man with a funny name.
Where to start?
1. The sheer amount of evidence presented, on top of the fact that the only other "theory" presented as an alternative to evolution is some form of "God did it" from the religious groups, not too mention that every credible biologist agrees that evolution does in fact occur and can be demonstrated.
2. Evolution is change over time through genetics in one of 4 ways: Natural selection, genetic drift, genetic flow and mutation. You yourself have shown belief in mutation, natural selection.
3. Your explanations for the age of the world is, put simply, half assed. You claims of how the earth changes through natural disaster fails to take into the fact that geologists know the difference between a flood that happened last year and a flood that happened 2 billion years ago in the soil record.
4. Your disdain for macro evolition is puzzling. Maco evolution is simply micro evolution over a long period of time.
6.Evolution of the human skull
7. The reason for my abusiveness is simple, you are arguing the equivalent of the geocentric theory of the universe. Despite all the evidence, you refuse to believe the obvious.
At 7/16/11 12:36 AM, Warforger wrote:At 7/14/11 03:52 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Or, maybe the black community can stop keeping itself down. I mean, there a lot of people worse off and they don't whine.Well yah, when you have loads and loads of skilled workers of course you're going to be able to bring up an economy quickly like in Israel with loads of foreign aid and sympathy, black people? Not so much.
The jews, history's butt monkey, has been beaten down, had a genocide inflicted on them yet they are doing rather well. But Blacks in america and blacks in africa are still stuck in the bottom tier of the world.
\
Oh yah this may be as good as time as any other that one of the events that probably inspired the Holocaust was when Germany performed genocide on Africans in I think German South Eastern Africa, a doctor during this performed loads of crazy experiments on captured Africans, he would then go home and teach at a German university where he would get a student named Josef Mengele.
Dude, Jews have been fucked over all throughout history, from the times of the romes to the modern day. And in your own words, Africa lacks skilled workers. I bet in 100 years, Africa will still be in the shitter, despite all foreign aid sent in. Face it, be it innate or otherwise, africa will always fail.
At 7/15/11 01:05 AM, djack wrote:
Once again you're taking preexisting genetic trait that simply changed in frequency as a result of different environmental circumstance. As I stated before that is natural selection which does not equal evolution. Even the case of E coli is more likely to be a result of contamination than mutation. Most of the changes have been displayed in all 12 cultures which indicates that those were already part of the E coli DNA when the experiment began. Those few changes that only showed up in one or two cultures could easily be the result of a mistake as all of the traits new to E coli are common in other forms of bacteria.
Umm, dear dipshit, that is the definition of evolution. Evolution,is the change over time in one or more inherited traits found in populations of organisms.
As for the Ecoli, honestly, your explanation is bullshit. It was an observed mutation and you simply don't want to admit it.
various famous evolution experiments
Also, FSM is satire.
Okay, let's be honest, which do you think teens are going to do if given the chance?
Are they going to refrain from sex if offered?
OR are they going to engage in sex but use a condom because a condom is the best protection a teen male can get?
The data is clear, the whole "abstinence" sex ed idea is bullshit because teens aren't going to risk being virgins for the rest of their lives.
At 7/15/11 01:39 AM, djack wrote:At 7/15/11 01:32 AM, Camarohusky wrote:Right, because people would have no problem denying something so simple it could be proven in any classroom in America. If he really could prove evolution with just a petri dish and some bacteria then so could anyone and it would be taught early in grade school right along side other easily proven facts like 2+2=4. It isn't because it can't be proven. I've taken college level biology in a public high school where evolution is required curriculum and this experiment to prove evolution was never part of the curriculum.At 7/15/11 01:05 AM, djack wrote: If that were true everyone would believe in evolution.And that is where you are 100% wrong.
As a bio major, my teacher demonstrated it for us.
Scientists observe Ecoli having spontaneous gene mutation that benefits the bacteria
A more simple example is the Peppered moth of london.
the details
the TLDR; verison goes like this:
In London, pre industrial revolutions, the peppered moth population was 99.99% white, with 0.001% black. After the industrial revolution, the smog and coal dust stained the city black. In the span of only a couple decades, the evolutionary selecteed trait of being black was favored, causing a paradigm shift, of nearly 1000% of the black peppered moth population.
Species: Peppered moth
Trait selected for: Dark coloring
Cause:Soot made the white moth stand out.
Result, over the span of several decades, the population of white to black reversed itself.
At 7/15/11 01:05 AM, djack wrote:At 7/14/11 11:44 PM, E1EE7 wrote:Do some research yourself. Seriously, spend some time on google looking up the accuracy of carbon dating. It becomes completely unreliable after only a few thousand years not the 500,000 you claimed. And even if it was as accurate as you say it is that still doesn't validate the claims that those fossils are millions/tens of millions/or even hundreds of millions of years old.At 7/14/11 10:13 PM, djack wrote:1. Carbon dating is used only on organic substances and is highly accurate when used on an organic substance no older then 500,000 years. It is based on the proven principles of radioactive decay.At 7/14/11 10:00 PM, bgraybr wrote:Carbon dating is extremely inaccurate on dating anything more than a few thousand years, so no (there are many sources online and don't give me any bullshit about them all being christian propaganda because I have found scientific websites that attested to the inaccuracy of carbon dating). Also he geological formations that would supposedly take millions of years to form can be formed in just a few hours with a large flood, fossilization can happen within a year, and substances like oil coal and diamonds that supposedly require millions of years of heat and pressure to be created can be made in a matter of seconds by numerous natural disasters such as floods, volcanoes, and meteors.At 7/14/11 05:54 PM, djack wrote: I'm not sure how old the world is. It might be 4 billion years old it might not, I find the "evidence" of the age of our world questionable but even if it is that doesn't make evolution any more likely.We can carbon date fossils, is that good enough for you?
2. Stratigraphy is used to date things in the millions and billons of years.The Earth is constantly forming new layers in a rotation. Magma rises through cracks, pockets, and vents forming a new layer on or near the surface forcing previous layers down deforming the nearby layers and pushing the lower ones into the liquid core of the planet. There are also new layers that form near the bottom layers deforming those above them. Stratigraphy is about as useful for measuring the age of the Earth as glaciers are for measuring and predicting climate change as they both form layers by similar principles and methods resulting in similar deformations.
3. You fail geology and minerology. Diamonds require intense amounts of heat and pressure over time to form. A flood can not form a diamond. Seriously, the people who don't believe in evolution don't do their research. Saying evolution is wrong is like saying the geocentric solar system model is right. Despite all evidence (and believe me, there are tons of it), you seem to think you know a basic fact of biology is wrong.Have you ever heard of the Washington scarlands? They were formed by flooding lakes which sent millions of gallons of water (that much water would hit any substance with massive amounts of pressure) flowing with a high enough velocity to literally rip open the ground and hurl boulders miles away (large amount of material+high velocity+frictional forces=heat) scarring the land it flowed through (hence the name scarlands). Do your research, there are plenty of natural disasters that create large amounts of heat and pressure in extremely short periods of time sometimes even producing materials harder than diamonds. It isn't unheard of and it happens in seconds as opposed to the millions of years that these materials supposedly take to form.
DO YOUR RESEARCH!If that were true everyone would believe in evolution.
I mean seriously, with a petri dish and bacteria, I can prove evolution to you.
1. Carbon dating is used on organic items, dinosaur bones are dated with radiometric dating of other elements.
2. Those natural disasters leave distinct geological footprints. As for diamonds, the pressure and heat required are immense, due to the fact that diamonds occur only at a certain triple point when the heat, and since Diamonds are a crystalline structure, it takes time for them to grow.
3. Stratigraphy can tell the difference between new rock and old rock. Go talk to a geologist, or you could just look it up in wikipedia and see just how wrong you are.
All the things you claim "distort" the timeline are accounted for by the scientists who spend their lives doing this. For example, if there was a universal flood, there would be a worldwide universal layer of silt and debris the world over at the same depth in the soil. There isn't one. Ergo, no flood occured on a global scale.
At 7/14/11 10:13 PM, djack wrote:At 7/14/11 10:00 PM, bgraybr wrote:Carbon dating is extremely inaccurate on dating anything more than a few thousand years, so no (there are many sources online and don't give me any bullshit about them all being christian propaganda because I have found scientific websites that attested to the inaccuracy of carbon dating). Also he geological formations that would supposedly take millions of years to form can be formed in just a few hours with a large flood, fossilization can happen within a year, and substances like oil coal and diamonds that supposedly require millions of years of heat and pressure to be created can be made in a matter of seconds by numerous natural disasters such as floods, volcanoes, and meteors.At 7/14/11 05:54 PM, djack wrote: I'm not sure how old the world is. It might be 4 billion years old it might not, I find the "evidence" of the age of our world questionable but even if it is that doesn't make evolution any more likely.We can carbon date fossils, is that good enough for you?
1. Carbon dating is used only on organic substances and is highly accurate when used on an organic substance no older then 500,000 years. It is based on the proven principles of radioactive decay.
2. Stratigraphy is used to date things in the millions and billons of years.
3. You fail geology and minerology. Diamonds require intense amounts of heat and pressure over time to form. A flood can not form a diamond. Seriously, the people who don't believe in evolution don't do their research. Saying evolution is wrong is like saying the geocentric solar system model is right. Despite all evidence (and believe me, there are tons of it), you seem to think you know a basic fact of biology is wrong.
DO YOUR RESEARCH!
I mean seriously, with a petri dish and bacteria, I can prove evolution to you.
At 7/14/11 05:36 PM, Warforger wrote:At 7/14/11 05:22 PM, E1EE7 wrote: Why no one believes Palestine's whining about being "abused" by Israeli.Wait what? While the kids were bad yes, the driver was even worse because he simply drove away and didn't stop to help out.
Note the presence of adults with high end cameras, meaning the parents endorsed the rock throwing at the Israelis driving past. If you ask me, the guy should have backed up over the kid.
And that has like nothing to do with anything.
Oh, you mean he should have stopped to help the kid who tried to kill him and his 4 year old son, while an angry rock throwing mob tried to kill him?
Why no one believes Palestine's whining about being "abused" by Israeli.
Note the presence of adults with high end cameras, meaning the parents endorsed the rock throwing at the Israelis driving past. If you ask me, the guy should have backed up over the kid.
At 7/14/11 02:48 PM, ModernPatriot wrote:
...
Now these idiots have even gone as far to say that there is a such things as black male privlege. I'm stereotyped as a violent, stupid, fried chicken loving criminal. I have no privlege.
You really need to take a statistics class. Blacks are statistically more likely to be arrested, at least 60% of black males have had some form of legal trouble in their life. Blacks have a higher rate of committing violent crimes, etc. Even stereotypes have some truth to them.
At 7/14/11 04:32 PM, Mark-er wrote:At 7/11/11 09:37 PM, Camarohusky wrote:Nope. Sex has many great health benefits. When you and your partner are both clean, self control isn't making anything more healther, in fact, it can be said that it's unhealthy, because you would be losing out on those health benefits you get from having sex.At 7/11/11 03:48 PM, Killersepp wrote: sex is one of the healthiest activities imaginable, both emotianly and physicaly.You know what's healthier than sex? Self control.
Your "self control is healthier than acting upon" logic makes about as much sense as saying "have self control from your hunger, because not eating chicken, beef, pork, veggies, fruit, and pretty much every other piece of edible nutrition, is the only way to prevent food poisoning!"
At 7/14/11 02:19 PM, djack wrote:At 7/14/11 02:04 PM, Warforger wrote:Once again anyone who says that evolution isn't a fact gets a lecture about how theories are facts and how microevolution is all the proof necessary to make macroevolution a fact. If all scientific principles are just WIPs then what the fuck is a law? Everyone who claims evolution is a fact because it is a theory ignores the fact that the scientific method doesn't end at theory it ends atlaw and until then there is still plenty of room for it to be disproven. If theories were facts we would have the laws of thermodynamics or the law of gravity or any of the other laws of physics. And microevolution is just natural selection, the only reason anyone calls it microevolution is so that they can say "evolution is real microevolution happens all the time". And before you go on about how natural selection is the mechanism for evolution, it isn't. Natural selection limits genetic variation, macroevolution requires lots of genetic variation and random beneficial mutations to occur and it has never been proven that beneficial mutations ever occur let alone in sufficient frequency to create a new species.At 8/26/05 07:50 PM, fastbow wrote:Erm what? Evolution like every other science is a WIP, a scientific theory isn't a idea someone wrote out and pretends to be true, it's something backed up by loads and loads of evidence, it's basically for all intents and purposes fact. The reason however it is not called a scientific law is because we don't know everything about it and a new theory could come up and trump it if the existing one can't be changed anymore, this is the same with all science, cells for example are still theories but we can tell they're there, germ theory, gravity, electricty etc. etc.At 8/26/05 07:37 PM, stafffighter wrote: The christian motto "If it's at all possible to prove, it's not true." Evolution, holocoasts, molestation, any of itNo. If it has been proven, we will believe it. EVOLUTION HAS NOT, and cannot, BE PROVEN!!!
Evolution has mountains of evidence, countless fossils, countless findings etc.. People who don't believe in it either a) don't have any knowledge about it at all or b) refuse to believe in it because they are stubborn and want God to create everything. You can observe evolution happening, we have observed it and it is happening. But to give you an example
In Uganda in Queen Elizabeth's national park in the early 1900's, a scientific team decided to make a survey of the tusks of the Elephants in it, they found only 1% had no tusks, they kept doing this over generations and a couple years ago they found 10% of the population had no tusks. They found out that poachers kept coming in against the law and killing the elephants with big tusks they can sell, and so the elephants with no tusks survived through that and became more prevalent. That's how Evolution works, then over millions of more years they end up as new species etc. etc.
Theory, oversimplified explanation of a group of phenomena. See Theory of gravity.
Law, mathematical model of theory. See Law of gravitational attraction
Also, the whole micro macro bullshit is idiotic.
Micro evolution x times=macro evolution.
Once you accept the world is 4 billion years old, +/- .3billion, your mind will find the theory easier to understand. Otherwise, saying nothing changes over 4 billion years is just simply retarded.
As for beneficial mutations, sickle cell anemia springs to mind. Sickle cell anemia is a recessive genetic disorder, requiring two genes to present. It is only found in people of african descent. The thing about sickle cell anemia is, they are immune to malaria. The malaria parasite infects the cell but the cell sickles and dies before it can spread. Genetically speaking, having 3/4 kids immune to malaria, the number 1 killer in africa, is genetically sound.
Or how some descendents of black plague survivors are immune to HIV. HIV, which leapt species from SIV (Simian Immuno virus).
Seriously, it might help to crack open a dictionary before spouting off on shit you clearly don't know anything about.
At 8/26/05 07:50 PM, fastbow wrote:At 8/26/05 07:37 PM, stafffighter wrote: The christian motto "If it's at all possible to prove, it's not true." Evolution, holocoasts, molestation, any of itNo. If it has been proven, we will believe it. EVOLUTION HAS NOT, and cannot, BE PROVEN!!!
I can prove in 48 hours with a petri dish. You are related to apes. You are not a special snowflake in some deity's eye. Get over yourself you animal.
Or, maybe the black community can stop keeping itself down. I mean, there a lot of people worse off and they don't whine.
The jews, history's butt monkey, has been beaten down, had a genocide inflicted on them yet they are doing rather well. But Blacks in america and blacks in africa are still stuck in the bottom tier of the world.
At 6/13/11 11:04 PM, Proteas wrote:At 6/13/11 09:58 PM, qwertyfreak wrote: Again, I'm not against teaching the dangers of sex (STIs, pregnancy, etc), and that abstinence is the only 100% protection, (condoms rate 98% with perfect use, the pill at 99.7%). I'm just against teaching that abstinence is the ONLY way to protect yourself from those dangers.Name another 100% successful method for preventing sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancies, then.
Meanwhile....
The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) showed an uptick in abstinence among 15- to-24-year-olds. It revealed 29.9 percent of men had not had any sexual contact ever, while 28.3 percent of women had abstained.
In the 2002 NSFG, only 22.7 percent of women and 22.6 percent of men reported they were abstinent. The survey defines "sexual contact" as engaging in vaginal, oral or anal sex with an opposite sex or same-sex partner.
....
The NSFG, which aims to assess the overall sexual behavior, sexual attraction and sexual identity of 15- to-44-year-old Americans, polled 13,495 men and women over a two-year period from 2006 to 2008 using a random sample from the U.S. household population. The interviewing technique used allowed those surveyed to enter in their answers without the knowledge of the interviewer.
Click.
100% if actually used. The CDC even says that abstinence only sex ed is such a waste of money, it would be easier to simply burn it in a barrel.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/
db46.pdf
I mean hell, there is a movie based on a texas school district that, despite recieving the most federal funds for abstinence only sex ed, had the nation's highest rate teen pregnancy and teen STD rates.
