Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Can't be president, was born in england, even though i was only there for the 1st 6 months of my life, and both my parents where american. Would be nice though...

i got it for the pc, and I'm lovein every single game on it.

I dont care if he is a talented actor, and that he did this long ago, and that people persieve 13 yr olds differently in europe, or all this other shit celebrities are saying to back him up. He should be fuckin' jailed for a long, long time.

At 9/25/09 10:05 PM, gumOnShoe wrote: Consent. A young person's brain isn't fully developed and they can't understand fully what getting into that sort of relationship means. A fully grown gay man can decide whether or not really wants some hot stud to put a penis in his butt.

But, the same aged girl could have a girl on girl(if the other girl is also the same age) experience with no repercussions? Just saying, they want to talk about consent, yet most people find it ok if 2 of the same age people have sex? If anything thats worse, sence both of them have no idea what they're getting into. Note, i don't condone pedophiles, i actually find them disturbing, I'm just pointing out a hole in your idea

Apparently, no one has ever stepped in a public building in they're life. I hear 10 year old kids curse so casually its not even funny.

At 9/25/09 10:00 PM, blackattackbitch wrote: Well, seeing as my mom is a member, and the house I'm living in right now wouldn't have been affordable without Acorn..........

I just dare you to say something.

Something

I'm not saying some of the media is liberal biased, but its funny alot say that fox is still conservative biased, while all others have no bias what so ever (Note, i dont watch fox, I actually just read what evers on google news.)

Now they're suing the undercover people because the undercover people "Where trying to undermine an organization that was created to help poor people"

At 9/26/09 09:00 AM, dudewithashotgun29 wrote: i whole heartedly agree. I think the backers for Obama call the opponents racist to try to silence or discredit them, like opponents of Obama call the proponents fascist, socialist, or capitalist.

whoopsy, i meant to say communist, not capitalist

i whole heartedly agree. I think the backers for Obama call the opponents racist to try to silence or discredit them, like opponents of Obama call the proponents fascist, socialist, or capitalist.

Nothing here is Illegal, I mean they are providing services, although overpriced.

At 9/14/09 02:00 AM, Acid wrote: The Taliban cares about the people they're oppressing?

well, you have to realize that the taliban dont view what theyre doing as oppresion. they are doing it as what they believe the divine Allah wants

ANother question is if obama has done anything "Good" Some say trying to get healthcare reform, and passing the stimulus bill was "good" But others think that those where "Bad" pretty much up to who you're asking on whether he was "Good" or not

i own CS:S, DOD:S, HL2: Deathmatch, and the orange box for the pc, and cod 4, cod:waw, and l4d. I like the pc because you can type and stuff when playing multpilayer, as well as have different graphics settings. I also like console games because you dont have to constantly update your pc with new graphics cards. Both have flaws and weaknesses.

At 9/18/09 04:41 PM, Jereminion wrote:

At 9/18/09 04:37 PM, akmeteor wrote:

At 9/18/09 04:17 PM, Jereminion wrote:

At 9/18/09 03:41 PM, Lagamuffin wrote: I heard Killzone 2 is quite good.

xbox 360 cant handle killzone 2 it is too advanced

Actually it can dumbass. The technology used is actually the same one used in Gears 2 with a different engine name.

yea why dont you go buy an xbox 360 blu ray player

No..... All the blu ray disc does is allow more memory on the disc, hense why they use that for high-def. Also, an average dvd holds 8.5 gb, so unless you have a game that maps the entire earth, i dont see why blu-ray would make any game superior

if you dont like the playing computer games, get the orange box, although the pc version is better...

At 9/17/09 12:08 AM, Jerkapotamus wrote: It's about time an entire nation got behind the L4D2 boycott.

its about time you stop bitching about how you want free stuff. Its a whole new game worthy of the money, not just an add-on they are selling for full game price

I hate ideas thinking taxing something will curb a problem with it. look at smoking. they tax the shit out of it, but do people not smoke because of it? No! they still do, but end up just paying more for it. People need to learn that it is the consumers fault to over indulge in soft drinks, and there shouldn't be a tax. Should we tax driving in general because there is a higher risk of driving a car than staying at home? should we tax people when ever they si because they could be burning calories by running? All this shit is retarded. The last thing i want to do is give the government more money when they already cant handle what they have.

must get it. i only have a 20 gb hard drive.

half life 2 is hard at becoming a rocketship to go to uranus

I mainly have conservative views, but I hate when people go about saying shit like hes a nazi, communist, socialist, etc. I don't agree with his views, but he is no where near a socialist, communist, nazi, or whatever

fuck, wrong link, heres the link for the right one, sorry.
http://www.gateway.com/systems/product/5 29668289.php

Ok, i got a new laptop, and its pretty much the only thing i use now, because somethings fucked up with my desktop. Anyway, I was wondering if my laptop will be able to handle some of the newer games, like left 4 dead 2, or modern warfare 2. I have been succesfully playing counter strike: source, day of defeat: Source, and half life 2 on highest graphics with no problems, but I am still concerned if it can play the newer games successfully, even on lowest specs.
Link to Laptop description: http://www.gateway.com/systems/product/5 29668269.php

they havent even made call of duty 5, so why go call the next one 7 already?

i hate people who call obama a socialist. I appose the healthcare, but not because i think all the liberals are evil communists or something, but because I don't think our medical system can manage adding what? 50 million or something people all of a sudden, and not expect any problems, and its not like you can just go get more doctors, because now a days, the average person who gets out of med school is in almost 100,000 dollars in dept, sometimes even more, which is never an encouraging thing, especially with all the years of school and stuff needed to become one. I mean, eventually we may get it evened out if this does get passed, but in the mean time, having an overcrowded medical system is not going to improve anyones health by much.

wow, someone did his research

At 8/22/09 12:45 AM, xlh2000 wrote: motion controlers for games are like touch screens for phones.they suck.

unless they work right, like an iphone...

i like the natal, it looks really neat, and the fact that there is no controller seems to be great, if created well, which i think they will. it also seems great to use in controller games, like to throw a gernade in a fps, just mime throwing one while with a controller.

the rapist, he will pounce on anyone, and rape them, he doesnt do any damage right away, but he gives the survivors super-duper-uber aids, and the survivors will slowly die

I actually wouldn't of cared about the celebrity deaths, as i tend not to care about people more than other people because they molest children, or because they invented electric guitars, but then billy mays died, and by god, now who will yell at me to buy new products to make my life easier?