Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

ya, well, I still see them as pirates, mainly because they still commit piracy

I don't find it a threat, I just oppose it being forcefully done in a church, mosque or in any other place of worship in which that religion does not support homosexuals being married.

At 5/26/09 05:58 PM, DaEchoo wrote:

At 5/26/09 01:28 PM, dudewithashotgun29 wrote: They are communists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fuck you dude, leave communism alone. :d

wow, good job on only taking a piece on what I wrote, I said I dont think anyone goes like "They are communisists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" for the government advocating condoms

At 5/26/09 01:55 AM, kraor024 wrote: Theres no way for the government to reduce unwanted pregnancy with out the religious nut jobs saying that it's fascist or communist or some other kind of ist

I'm sorry, but what? Sure, I'm Catholic, but I don't go like HOLY SHIT! They are telling people about condoms!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are communists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

At 5/23/09 10:25 PM, All-American-Badass wrote: I consider myself pro-life but i do believe abortions are necessary in cases when the mother's life is in danger becuase of the baby or possibly rape if that excuse wont be abused. otherwise i think the baby should be put up for adoption after it can be released from the hospital

I would agree to that, but how much people are in such fragile condition that they could not be able to have a child and live? but, I kind of am undecided on the rape issue, I think that it is still a life, but on the other hand, it was put there by a rapist, I cant really decide on one end or the other...

I think the government should really be limited, and not even have an option for this stuff. The only thing that I can see coming from a large government is eventually oppression. The smaller the better. I think we should have an army and all, but only for national protection.

Even if this was a shift to conservatism, why the hell is that a bad thing?

Wow, the problem with this argument is the fact that abortion was not always legal d. only about thirty years ago did it become legal. Alcohol was always legal, but then it was banned for some time, then became legal again. abortion was always ILLEGAL until the sevnties. so if your logic is correct, that something that is changed will eventually be changed back, then wouldn't abortion be changed back to an illegal status? also, do you think that people will go like "Oh no! abortion is banned!" I was going have this child, but now it looks like i need to abort it!"

One reasons the founding fathers actually made the second amendment is because they figured that if the government is indeed to powerful and oppressive, the civilians should have a chance at an armed rebellion, like the patriots did against the British when they did not want to be oppressed. Another reason is for self defence. If a criminal wants to commit a crime, and guns are illegal, what is going to stop him from illegally getting one? It will only stop the citizen to protect himself and his family from the criminal with the gun.

At 5/17/09 07:12 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 5/16/09 11:32 PM, X-TERRORIST-X wrote:

At 5/16/09 05:38 PM, Al6200 wrote: Poll: More Americans Identify as Pro-Life

It's weird, my position on this has always been pro-choice, until I saw a clip of how they perform an abortion. It's really bad. They have to like crush the skull of the infant in order to get it out, and it looks like a regular baby. So that made me sick to my stomach.

Wow, something is yukky so I think it should be banned.

What about torture? Cant we just rip people arms off, but it shouldnt be banned, because it is just "Yukky"

At 5/23/09 04:06 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 5/23/09 01:16 AM, Memorize wrote:

At 5/23/09 01:11 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

Only of human life though.

What is considered human?

Mm as soon as I posted I thought this would happen. Let me clarify what I mean.
In my post i was not necessarily saying that I classify fetuses as "human" (or not human), but rather the point I was attempting to make was that most pro-lifers are not vegetarians and thus obviously don't have a problem with the killing of animals, contrary to the apparent message of the post I was replying to.

Ya, well, I have no problem eating animals, because hell, if i had to choose between an owls life and a life of a human, it most certainly will be a human. It is our human nature to eat meat. But, it is in our human nature to reproduce, which is what sex is for. Im not saying that only have sex for children, but you have to be ready if you do get a child, and not just kill it off for your own self. If you honestly dont want kids, then go get a vasectomy or go get your tubes tied. murder is punishable for years in prison, but as long as the human is an innocent baby, then according to the government it is ok. Undo the murder laws, and the abortion law will make sense, but to have murder laws in place, but to have another law completely violating it is retarded.

At 5/16/09 06:21 PM, Soapbubble wrote: Well... That sucks. Norway is pretty much the opposite. I can't see how people can be against abortion...

Because they're against the killing of innocent lives?

I believe torture is only acceptable if it could help get information that could save lives. Anyway, the people who water-board the terrorists are water-boarded themselves. Also, the things we do at guantonamo are nothing compared to the shit that happened to POWS during WWII by Japan, and Vietnam. I think McCain would be better for this Guantanamo bay issue, because he wasn't water-boarded. He was put in solitary confiment for two years. He had his arms broken repeatedly. That is far worse, and the only reason the Vietnamese were doing that to him was to make him sign a paper saying he was a war-criminal, not even for some military intelligence.

what about the majority of soldiers? Straight men, and how would you feel if some flaming homo-sexual is taking a shower with you? wouldn't you feel a little odd?

At 5/20/09 10:25 PM, dudewithashotgun29 wrote: well the U.S. government thinks the same thing, but instead of joke racism, they have Affirmative Action, which requires you to have minority groups and women before majority group men, which is retarded.

whoops, kinda worded it wrong. I mean to say that they make you get quotas of the minorities, and then you can add the majorities, not just add who ever you think is eligible for the work or college they want to do or join.

well the U.S. government thinks the same thing, but instead of joke racism, they have Affirmative Action, which requires you to have minority groups and women before majority group men, which is retarded.

At 5/17/09 10:30 AM, SonicSheep wrote: I personly have no interest nor want for a gun. Its ok for me, since I live in the UK.

However, for Americans, my theory is simply this.
Since the Birth of the US, they have been allowed and encouraged to have guns, and many Americans view the 'right to bare arms' an essential Freedom.

What? We view it as a needed thing? No, some just view it as a freedom that should not be infringed, since it says so in the amendment it self, the right to bare arms, and a well regulated militia, shall NOT be infringed. So, some people think, hold on, I think this is infringing something in our constitution, I think they shouldn't do that, So i will oppose it. We view it as something that shouldnt be messed with, not as a needed freedom. We want it to be a freedom, but not as a "Essential Freedom"

let him die, if he refuses medical tretment because he thinks that only "natural" ways of healing are acceptable.

wouldnt we have had to kill all children as well?

the common mis conception about the civil war was that it was started to free the slaves. It actually was started to make the south rejoin the northern states. Abraham Lincoln later added the freeing the slaves part later on, during the war, so that he would get more backing from the abolitionists.

At 4/22/09 10:20 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 4/22/09 10:16 PM, dudewithashotgun29 wrote:

But you forgot that we just need a space ship to fire a missile into a hole, and the death star goes BOOM!

Which spaceship is that again?

The Space shuttle, we just need to fit it with a ion cannon

No, the people who will pay for it throught taxes probably have another healthcare provider, so they will pay for other people, which is real retarded, and I think we should focus on getting rid of our 11 trillion dollar dept

At 5/7/09 04:01 PM, SonicSheep wrote:

At 5/7/09 03:49 PM, Nosferatu-of-Worms wrote:

We're not the problem, the world is the problem. Compared to us, the rest of the world is immature and naive.

Rest of the world=Children
The U.S.=The Parent

No...
The US is kinda like the big boy on the playground. He can be an arsehole at times, but he mostly means well.
The problem with the US is that he's brash, and rarely listen to the advice of the older kids, so he gets stuck in problems that make them look like a dick.

Basicly Nosferatu, just reverse what you said and your basicly right.

We look like dicks for trying to rid pakistan and afganistan of Al-Queda, supplying great Britain with American supplies while the supply ships were getting blown up during 1940's, and trying to help countries to not fall to communist countries? ya, we really are dicks for looking out for others, I mean, damn, we are big jerks for not just looking out for our own well-being, but for other countries

At 5/7/09 11:48 PM, HandsomePete wrote:

The only thing I've heard him try to do with guns is re-banning assault rifles, which serve absolutely no domestic purpose. They're a weapon of war, and nothing else. There's nothing practical at all about them for home defense, and if you hunt with an assault rifle - I say this with 100% certainty - you are a MASSIVE pussy.

Who here think that a gun, MEANT to kill someone is a bad idea for protecting your family from a dangerous intruder. Banning assault rifles will do nothing to stop criminals form getting them, but only taking them out of the hands of trained people who want to protect their family from the criminal who illegally bought the weapon

At 5/5/09 11:14 PM, GrammerNaziElite wrote: Any war in between the West and the Middle East would be a slaughter. I'd worry more about Russia and China.

ya, well they may end up backing the people we are attacking, then before you know it, global war

At 5/5/09 11:22 PM, xolta wrote: Well in China the gun control capital of the world home made guns are as bad as drug here in the usa. Out in out banning of product just leads to a demand which the criminal underworld well meat. Like drugs. Plus ban guns and people well just find a new way to kill each other

ya, next will be power tools, or even kitchen cutlery, or baseball bats. there will always be murder, And I would probably choose a painless bullet in the brain by a murderer than being repeatedly beat by a lamp

well it does seem smart. lets say that the governement may decide to raise the tax on the cars, so you buy one now, instead of waiting 4 months in fear by then there may be a tax. Whats stupid about that? So now it is stupid because instead of a car, it is ammunition? I think that not everyone needs to own a gun, but to everyone who would like to, and does not have anything restricting him, such as pass crime, to get one, if they so desire.

Why would you play a board game on a console? A table would be a lot bigger, and more stable :)

My 360 crashed alot when I first got it, but then I realized that I was making it have a hard time to ventilate. keep it in a nice open cool ventilated space, and give it a brake every once in a while, you shouldnt be on it all day, unless you truelly have no life at all.

At 4/21/09 09:46 AM, ParadoxVoid wrote: Basically what Shreddy said.

If you're so fussed about it, just go and buy a Wii. It's got barely any hardware in the damn thing, so no worries about it overheating.

Ya, ut that would be a waste of money, since their online games are nothing compared to 360 & stuff, and the games, for the most part, either suck, are made for kids, or are both