Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/4/11 03:13 PM, CharltonChinchilla wrote:

At 5/4/11 03:12 PM, Dubbi wrote: When Bush killed Zarqawi, he had no qualms with releasing the photo of his bloody corpse.

Obama nor Bush have ever killed any terrorists...unless

Yeah, Delta Force to be specific. Bush didn't really do shit, I guess -- his administration was too busy fucking up that war.

Sooner are later the photo will be released so why not just release it now?

When Bush killed Zarqawi, he had no qualms with releasing the photo of his bloody corpse.

Well since frequent masturbation extends your lifespan by releasing stress and exercising the prostrate, the newfound damaging effects of it would probably just about cancel out. So I'll just continue what I'm doing.

At 5/2/11 03:17 PM, Painbringer wrote:

At 5/2/11 03:09 PM, Dubbi wrote: He was buried at sea so that his resting ground does not become a shrine.

JFK's casket was dumped in the ocean.

No, it was not.

Coincidence?

No

I highly that Obama, his administration, the CIA and other intelligence branches, and the military are all lying to us. This is starting to sound like loony conspiracy bullshit. There's DNA and photographic evidence. The reason he was buried within 24 hours is that it's in accordance with Islamic tradition. He was buried at sea so that his resting ground does not become a shrine.

I was behind a computer screen, clicked on general and saw a thread announcing his death.

I chuckled.

Usually around 2 to 3 AM -- I like the night, as it's very quiet and peaceful.

It's war, people are going to die -- people need to die to attain victory.

Gaddafi's a terrible dictator and I doubt his was a son saint either, but still, he's a human being. RIP

At 5/1/11 01:26 AM, killingspreekiller wrote: Colombia or Stanford are preferably, while distance may restrict me to Berkeley.

Lol, don't get ahead of yourself, all three of these schools are very hard to get into. But yeah, good luck -- if I could go to any school it would be Columbia. Hopefully I can transfer there, as I can't get in with my current credentials.

At 4/30/11 11:46 PM, Oldsage10 wrote:

At 4/30/11 11:21 PM, Dubbi wrote:
"For her own good"? What if she just legitimately enjoys sex? How would abstaining from it be detrimental to her? A little judgmental, don't you think?

Well, it's a double-standard. Guys can do things like that and get away with it, girls get judged pretty badly for it.

And unfair one which you should not perpetuate.

I never said "abstain", its just that, being so loose will get a girl a bad rep, no matter what, and that can seriously be damaging to somebody. I was thinking from the mindset of "concerned friend", and I think you might have misunderstood me. Theres not a thing wrong with anyone enjoying themselves, but, you know, (I really hate the cliché sound of this) "Everything in moderation"...

What I mean is, if she truly enjoys sex and regards sexuality with no sanctity, why would you want to "talk her away from that behavior for her own good"? Who are you to say what is good? Shouldn't a woman be able to make her own sexual decisions without fear of being judged?

Also, I know what you meant by "How would abstaining from it be detrimental to her? A little judgmental, don't you think?"

However, detrimental means "damaging", I believe you may have been looking for a word such as "beneficial".

My mistake, I misread my sentence or something.

At 4/30/11 11:35 PM, Jedi-Master wrote:
I think you just expressed extreme contempt and arrogance at the same time.

That is an accomplishment to me. :P

But luckily, progressivism will succeed over conservatism in social matters. Progressivism has a pretty good track record of changing society for the better. Just 60 years ago, a woman who wanted to get a divorce would be looked down upon with disdain. Now, it's normal, lol.

60 years ago, a woman who wished to work outside the home or pursue something meaningful with her life would be looked down upon with disdain.

While I agree with conservatives usually on fiscal matters, there social views are completely out of touch with reality. As a society we are always progressing, straying from the strict sexist, and racist social standards of our past in favor of a more tolerant egalitarian, and individual-orientated one.

At 4/30/11 11:27 PM, Jedi-Master wrote: Lol. Dubbi, BananaBreadMuffin, and I support a woman's right to enjoy being promiscuous without being judged for it.

We're in the minority from what it seems.

Figured as much, I've come to realize that almost the entire world is completely retarded, and fails to adhere to basic principles of tolerance, empathy and acceptance.

At 4/30/11 11:08 PM, Oldsage10 wrote:

At 4/30/11 10:52 PM, Dew wrote: Depends on if I actually give a damn about the girl.

Agreed.

If she was someone I was actually close with, I'd try to talk her away from that behavior for her own good.

"For her own good"? What if she just legitimately enjoys sex? How would abstaining from it be detrimental to her? A little judgmental, don't you think?

Hopefully NYU or a school of the same or better caliber. I don't have the highest GPA, but I'll many AP classes on my resume, and my SATs (taking it in seven days) will probably be north of 2250.

At 4/30/11 10:52 PM, Dew wrote: Depends on if I actually give a damn about the girl.

In all other ways she is optimal -- intelligent, attractive, interesting. A long line of previous sexual partners is the only caveat.

Newgrounds, what are your views on promiscuous females? If you discovered that a girl you knew engaged in excessive sexual activity, would you lose respect for her? Would you be less willing to form a relationship with her?

itd be a bad idea to post my name in case you know PEDOPHILES!!!

If there's a genuine attraction, go for it, just remember that the relationship will probably not last anyway.

At 4/30/11 08:14 AM, Gagsy wrote: Guys;

Would you rather marry a very beautiful amazing woman but never be able to have any form of sexual activity with her or anyone else?

Can I cheat?

At 4/29/11 11:07 PM, Piggler wrote: So hawt. Can't wait to motorboat that shit.

Kiera Knightly is gorgeous

Medium to big sized books are ideal. But regardless, breasts are awesome, no matter what size -- obviously discounting extremes.

One of the worst songs I've ever heard, only watched the whole thing because... well, the girl was kind of hot.

OP's butthurt over only having 10$ shoes.

At 4/29/11 04:54 PM, Gobblemeister wrote: Not as magical as I would have hoped but it was still nice I guess.

Lol, what do you mean by "magical"? It's a fucking marriage, not a Disney film.

Magnificent wedding, Kate and her dress were gorgeous. I hope they have a happy, lasting marriage.

How romantic

My friend once showed me this completely nude picture of some idiotic teenage girl. I got genuinely bothered that he'd saved that picture and felt disgusted with myself for glancing at it -- no matter how you try to justify it, naked pictures of under aged people are illegal child pornography.

At 4/29/11 12:00 AM, HighWay wrote:

At 4/28/11 11:58 PM, Colin wrote: So something with 4 letters or 6 letters is 'original'?

I'm saying that most of the 5 letter usernames are common words.

Four posters with five letter usernames have posted on this thread -- Camas, Aigis, Colin and myself. None of our usernames are also common words.

What's a dubbi?

"Judgement day is coming, folks"

God, what a fucking moron and obnoxious bastard. Just another pompous, self-righteous Evangelist, except this guy so damn holy and enlightened that he doesn't even have to listen when a security firmly tells him to stop -- as he's preaching the word of God!