Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

No, Tom, I haven't seen any rogue ads. If there's anything else you need, Tom, don't hesitate the ask.

Say hai to April for me.

At 6/15/11 01:45 AM, ModernPatriot wrote:

At 6/15/11 01:35 AM, EverReady2Kill wrote:

At 6/15/11 01:33 AM, ModernPatriot wrote: Ahhh, yes.... I will make a blog on this very subject, and why male-female suicide rates, and have gone up over the last 50 years.

I assure you sir, that something quite terrible happened in the late 60's, and early 1970's.

The hijakcing of feminism to wage a war against men.

And the blood on their hands is staggering.

The more rights women get, the more men kill themselves. Fact. End of Story.

It's not so much rights. It's preferential treatment. It's men being harmed, and disenfranchised. It's the war against men that is harming men. It is the mistreatment in family courts that is harming men. It is the war against fatherhood that is harming men.

One example

I don't think bias in family courts would so dramatically increase the suicide rates of men 15 to 24, maybe middle age men, but not males this young. The reason is more complicated.

Lol, I'm 16. I'm five years too young to question my life's value and call it enlightenment.

I'm going to rape you, and by rape I mean rape.

At 6/11/11 12:40 AM, Necrodeath wrote:

At 6/11/11 12:36 AM, Dubbi wrote:

17, Female

Honestly, I just don't believe you. I think you are delusional and heading for heartbreak.

16, Male

You ain't Dr. Phil son.

That I'm not. Still, I'd like to think that I have some understanding of the world and relationships, even if it's all just self-deception. The great thing about an internet forum, however, is no one has to listen to a word I say.

At 6/11/11 12:30 AM, xDaniBananix wrote: My boyfriend is the most amazing, handsome and beautiful man to me, I wouldn't trade him for anyone else.

17, Female

Honestly, I just don't believe you. I think you are delusional and heading for heartbreak. Your boyfriend is not your soul-mate; he's probably just some arbitrary guy who you think you're in love with, but will almost certainly forget about within two years. At your age, don't get caught up in serious relationships -- it's path towards sadness. Just focus on improving yourself, and in your relationships try to pursue enjoyment, not deep commitment.

OPtimally jokes are supposed to be punny, onionlike this one!

Lol, by being attractive you fool. There's no magic formula, but if you're good looking, you'll find that girls are much more drawn to you and your junk.

Other than that just try to be funny and a caring guy. Don't overly compliment girls or act too nice, however, or risk being kept in the friend zone.

At 6/10/11 11:31 PM, FuckSandwich wrote:

At 6/10/11 11:29 PM, Dogmeat wrote: Sounds like OD

Yeah it is most likely OD, I don't know I'm not there but i dont want this kids death on my friends conscience, I need to be able to give him advice when he rings, please help

Tell him to get his retarded ass to the hospital.

I don't really understand what people mean when they say they only care about, or at least predominately care about, personality. As long as she's not a complete moron or bitch, I really wouldn't scrutinize a potential partner's personality -- if for whatever reason something existed that rendered us incompatible personality-wise, I'd obviously have to abandon any idea of a relationship with her -- but other than that, I don't value personality as too significant. It's not like I'm going to fine my soul mate at 16, or, well, ever, as the concept is kind of laughable really.

Looks on the other hand probably carry more weight. When looking for a potential partner, it's pretty intuitive that you'd look for someone that you are attracted to. Not that she has to be a supermodel or even particularly beautiful, but I need to at least find her appealing for me to want to be with her.

However, if you choose your relationships based solely on either looks or personality, you will probably be unhappy in them. As the cliche goes, balance is key.

At 5/31/11 03:56 PM, FUNKbrs wrote:
Human beings don't blossom. They rot and die.

This is a terrific line. I haven't had time to read the piece, though I will eventually, but I just wanted to express my satisfaction with this statement. Makes me visualize an exuberant, natural garden juxtaposed with a failing, chaotic human civilization fraught with blood, disease and death.

At 6/9/11 01:53 AM, DeftAndEvil wrote:

Forever separates me from my flying friend.

How so? I feel that at first the poem starts too slow and now is moving too fast.

If whistles are only an escape from

You've lost me here. The induction posed here is faulty. Are whistles only an escape from frustration, stress and regret? How so? Where did this come from? I feel the move from observation to rationalization and induction is detached and too personal.

Kind of trying to say how man will never be as in tune with nature as a bird is. I didn't want the message to be too obvious, but now that I think about it, I should have added another line to clear things up.

Here's another zen poem I wrote:

Nature's Intervention

Drowning in thoughts
Stolen from dead, depressing
Philosophers --
A butterfly's graceful flight:
Joy reminded.

Obviously fight, logically, my clone would probably be a fucking pussy.

At 6/7/11 12:02 AM, Shauna wrote: lmfao I look like a tard.

You're pretty.

Better proof

Yes, as my parents don't understand the concept of privacy. Probably the most mortifying experience in the world...

At 6/6/11 08:12 PM, LlamaReaper wrote: I don't believe God exists. The fact that it's called faith is very amusing to me. Faith is simply belief without evidence. There is no evidence to god existing so why should you believe in it?

Some people are drawn to the idea that there is something beyond them, that there lives aren't just completely meaningless...

I'd like to say I'd have to will power to, but honestly, probably not.

Personally, I prefer rape.

The lives of nearly 7 billion people are more important than the lives of a few children, as innocent as they may be, so I'd feel obligated to commit the sinful act. And if the guilt in too much to bear, there is always suicide. Hell, I'd die either way.

Not a big deal by any means, but I made a few errors in my original post. This is how the poem should read.

Limitations

Glittering jadeness of grass
Contrasts soothingly with the faint blue hue above;
Gracefully, a white, pure dove chirps upon a tree,
And underneath, shyly, in response, whistles me.
Cognizance of nothing more than that his tune seems right
Forever separates me from my flying friend.
If whistles are only an escape from
Frustration, stress and regret, then
Frustration, stress and regret are
Impossible to transcend.

I haven't posted anything in awhile, but I'd like to resume my activity here. I've been having a bit of a zen vibe, and consequently produced this poem. Tell me what you think of it and I'll be glad to share more.

Limitations
Glittering jadeness of the grass
Contrasts soothingly with the faint blue hue above;
Gracefully, a white, pure dove chirps upon a tree
And underneath, in response, whistles me.
Cognizance of nothing more than that his tune seems right
Forever separates me from my flying friend.
If whistles are only an escape from
Frustration, stress and regret, then
Frustration, stress and regret are
Impossible to transcend

I wonder if they were successful. With all the bigfoot sightings, we're bound to capture one eventually, though the sasquatch is very elusive.

At 6/6/11 12:46 AM, Balazeal wrote: He was all like "lsdfjaflsdj!" and I was all like " : O " and then that other guy was all like ">:("

Lmao

And, yeah, I agree with irrelephant, all the fights Twilight got into were pretty hilarious, the kid knew how to insult.

At 6/5/11 11:38 PM, Bacchanalian wrote:

At 6/5/11 11:10 PM, juytedawirldz wrote: in this way, i come to the conclusion that i would rather not believe in god. and since god is not something that can be proven to exist or not exist, that's really all that matters.

So as long as you can excuse your belief or opinion via an appeal to the supernatural, all that matters is that you want to believe or think it? You do realize this is in no way an issue unique to the matter of a god, and that anything can be abstracted into allegedly supernatural terms - that essentially anything can become as a god, 'not something that can be proven or disproven'?

The very argument you make renders the distinction between refutable and irrefutable null and void. It's self defeating.

Except not everything can be related to the supernatural. For instance, a debate about what economic policy to pursue is not a supernatural or metaphysical debate -- it's is concerned with graphs, data, logic, numbers, history, philosophy etc. The debate on God on the other hand is entirely supernatural, as it's concerning something that is allegedly beyond us, beyond humans, unlike economics, which is a purely human invention. Thus you can't prove disprove God with numbers or graphs; either the logic of a divine being makes sense to you - intuitively resonates with you on a deep personal level - or it does not, However, you can never prove or disprove his existence.

I think plenty of soldiers if put in his position would have responded just as heroically. Still, what an utter badass.

Real men don't use the word "proliferation".

Sometimes the police act completely retarded. Even if their was a law against dancing at the memorial, don't the police have bigger problems to deal with? And wouldn't they realize that this would just cause outrage and even more anger towards the police?

If th logic of a God makes sense to you, then to you there is a God. Reality's dependent on our perceptions.

At 5/28/11 08:51 PM, GhilliemanEnt wrote:

Just because it makes you happy and fills you with hope doesn't mean its not insane.

Insane to you maybe; however, it's not insane to them. If the logic of a God makes sense them, they have every right to believe in Him.