Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Only Robin Williams is cool enough to purchase an RV - and it didn't work out too well for him.

At 7/10/10 10:20 PM, C-Doodlez-Man wrote: Here's what I say: Christians say life is God's plan. Well then it was god's plan for there to be porn, and God's plan for me to view it.

Except for the fact, Christianity dictates that God gave us free will.

I would write, "TL;DR" but I did read it, and I now feel bad about myself.

Well your username sure fits you - if that's what you mean.

I'll be the first to say it: fapfapfapfapfap

At 7/9/10 03:30 PM, Strength wrote:

At 7/9/10 03:29 PM, Dubbi wrote:

At 7/9/10 03:21 PM, Strength wrote:

At 7/9/10 02:53 PM, Dubbi wrote:

Do you really mean that?

no. no i really don't.

You're not Sekhem, silly

you'll come to learn that i am in fact, sekhem.

as we're both the same person caught in alternate realities soon to collide and cause mass destruction.

Very clever, but if you were, in fact, Sekhem, you'd know how to capitalize.

At 7/9/10 03:21 PM, Strength wrote:

At 7/9/10 02:53 PM, Dubbi wrote:

At 7/9/10 02:42 PM, Sekhem wrote: most of the '10 users are pretty great

i like most of them

First time I've heard a NG regular praise 10ers.

Do you really mean that?

no. no i really don't.

You're not Sekhem, silly

At 7/9/10 02:42 PM, Sekhem wrote: most of the '10 users are pretty great

i like most of them

First time I've heard a NG regular praise 10ers.

Do you really mean that?

My Regents and Finals:

World History Regents: 97
English Final: A+ (No number grade)
Spanish Regents: 89
Biology Regents: 87 (With a crazy, terrible teacher)
Math Regents: 81 (Fuck Math)

Anyone but Dubbi - that user is genuinely retarded.

At 7/9/10 11:54 AM, 111122223138 wrote: about time women equality does some good

Exactly, feminists are only allowed to achieve victories when they benefit men.

At 7/9/10 12:09 PM, weirdoo wrote: What's it about?

Jesus

And porkchops

Mal gave my first ban that was over one day - a three day ban for posting "cool story, bro". I was upset for a bit, but quickly got over it. I didn't waste my time ranting on the bbs even though nobody cares. In fact, I learned something from it - and I haven't been banned since.

Last I heard, Egoraptor was fighting dinosaurs in jurassic park 4. Spierberg probably killed him off...

Daniel Tosh

At 7/6/10 12:25 AM, ItsRangasLife wrote:

At 7/5/10 11:57 PM, Scarface wrote:

At 7/5/10 11:55 PM, Dubbi wrote:

At 7/5/10 11:54 PM, Scarface wrote: Does anyone over the age of 9 even watch that show?

OP: Age/Gender: 13, Male

Oh, Dubbi you little rascal.

I doubt the OP is 13

3, b-day 2nd Of July 1997

Objection! On the grounds that this birthday information is fabricated!

At 7/5/10 11:54 PM, Scarface wrote: Does anyone over the age of 9 even watch that show?

OP: Age/Gender: 13, Male

My parents don't know how to knock!

The conversation you recorded is fascinating, while comical at the same time. First, let me say that I frequently partake in religious debate, and am deeply interested in the matter, so the this topic really resonates with me. I really feel that it exemplifies the spirit of of most religious debates these days - newgrounds ones included. That is, several people holding opposing views, with no progress made

TG is the classical evangelist; DH is the depressing atheist; AR is the douchebag; GG is the person who's trying to be funny, but fails; and UA is the intelligent person who tries to remain neutral.

And, unsurprisingly, the debate came to nothing. I guess religious debates can never bear any real fruit - unless no debator is dogmatic, which, on newgrounds at least, never happens.

At 7/4/10 09:58 PM, Lost-Chances wrote:
I nudged people into the idea they missed the point and then in my second comment displayed what the topic is about and an appropriate response. More than can be said about you.

Lolwut

Who exactly did you 'nudge' into realizing they missed the point? I can say my post caused NGers to reexamine the thread, because, since I didn't understand what to post in the thread, they decided to read it again. That doesn't make it true.

You only did that after you were called out, as some sort of dilatory consolation.

Wait for my next post

Watch out - Rig will call the cops!

At 7/4/10 09:38 PM, Lost-Chances wrote:

At 7/4/10 09:32 PM, Dubbi wrote: Are you this dense. You posted a 'one up post', because there was nothing really to discuss, as I did the same. Yet your acting as if your so much smarter and superior than me. Your impressive post count doesn't allow you to be a dick.

Commenting about the lack of something to say in a topic screams of one up.

And so does, pretentiously stating that all other posts in the thread or useless - without contributing to the thread, yourself.

You missed my point completely.

At 7/4/10 09:21 PM, Lost-Chances wrote:

At 7/4/10 09:14 PM, Dubbi wrote:

At 7/4/10 09:11 PM, Lost-Chances wrote: See above to see people who didn't read the topic or just didn't understand it.

You've really contributed to the topic, too.

I've at least pointed out that people don't understand this isn't a serious topic. There wasn't much to discuss because it's satirical. The best one could do was carry on the act by posting an extravagant comment about religion like:

However, I figured I'd help nudge people along by informing them that they've missed the point.

Are you this dense. You posted a 'one up post', because there was nothing really to discuss, as I did the same. Yet your acting as if your so much smarter and superior than me. Your impressive post count doesn't allow you to be a dick.

At 7/4/10 09:11 PM, Lost-Chances wrote: See above to see people who didn't read the topic or just didn't understand it.

You've really contributed to the topic, too.

I don't realy understand what we're supposed to discuss. I'm all up for religious debates, but what's the debate?

At 7/3/10 11:49 PM, Yamor wrote:

At 7/3/10 11:48 PM, Alaska wrote:

At 7/3/10 11:46 PM, Yamor wrote: Even worse was the morbidly obese couple riding the carts. God forbid they burn a few calories by walking.

You're just a giant ass hole aren't you?

The store only had about two carts, what if an old couple needed to use them?

That's poor logic, my friend. The circumstance didn't arise, so you don't know what would have happened. For all you know, the pair would glady relinquished the carts to the eldery couple.

There's a few grammatical errors, but, overall, it wasn't terrible. The beginning should probably be in italics, though. I like the plot for I'm a writer, too, and I sympathize with the protagonist. There really wasn't enough written for me to critique much more, so I hope you continue this. I am interested.

At 7/3/10 12:38 AM, DOCoSPADEo wrote: Holy shit, he's beaten me every fucking time...
I'm sure a community of internet nerds work on his answers.

Couldn't defeat me.

I chose Misa from Death Note; I won.

At 7/2/10 04:23 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: I agree with all that RNNR said; I'll throw in some other thoughts that I had.

The pacing of this well done. It transitions nicely from one of his mindsets to another.

Thanks youz

I was afraid at first that this would become another "character has an epiphany, gets motivated and changes everything but we won't describe that per se" kind of flash fictions, but it turned out not to be, so that was good. However, I don't feel like this is entirely complete. It doesn't seem to encompass all of the story enough to stand alone.

Lulz, that's why I wrote chapter 1. My work is not complete.

I do like the interjected musings about humanity's traits that you slipped in there. They're placed just right and you flow from story to thought without it seeming chunky.

Glad you liked it. I put that in there, (is the comma after "there" neccesary?) in order to give my piece a bit of originality and interest - I didn't want to, as you said, one of those boring ephiney stories.
Also, tell me if you saw any grammar mistakes. My school never taught grammar to well, and I've been forced to pick it up on my own.