Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I consider them idiotic and careless -- however, I don't consider them sluts or trash or deserving of death. People make mistakes and most girls who get pregnant at such an early probably didn't receive a proper upbringing or sexual education. And I really don't see how having sex and getting pregnant makes a girl any more of a whore than another girl who has sex but uses protection and doesn't get pregnant -- stupider, yes, but not more of a whore, which is a misogynistic term that I try not to use. And I'm sick of all this self-righteous, highly vicious condemnation. Though these girls may have made a very damaging error in judgment, they are still human and should be treated as such.

Teenage pregnancy is a serious crisis that needs to be dealt with but I'll reserve my hatred for something else...

At 11/6/11 07:31 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: I've heard a few theories as to why women are attracted to morons. First of all there's the confidence thing, like you already mentioned. Another one is that women have this maternal instinct that makes them recognise a "bad boy" because they want to change that male's behaviour, which is why they pay more attention to these bad boy types, and it can become sexual attraction.

I've always found the idea that girls go for bad boys in order to improve them to be retarded and supported by no real empirical evidence. No girl wants to out with someone due to her maternal instincts. I don't see these girls trying to act like their boyfriends' mothers; rather they embrace their behavior: they are attracted to their over confidence, muscles, sexual appeal.

And honestly, I consider unpopular guys complaining about this hypocritical - guys look for the same superficial thing in girls - sexual attractiveness, and when these girls reject them for the douchebag guys that, unlike them, do have this all important trait, they rush to the internet to complain...

You do understand that your contention that your system of morality is objective relies solely on your subjective definition of what morality it is? Yours is just one interpretation of an infinite amount of interpretations of the universe, to say that it is universal and objective is arrogant and foolish.

There's nothing inherently right or wrong with any human action, murder included. We interpret it to be wrong, as it ends an innocent life, but there is nothing written in the cosmos saying it's wrong. All of our morals are interpretations -- it's indeed possible to form a rigorous moral code, using unnecessary suffering as a basis for what's wrong, but this cannot be called objective. If a person believes that unnecessary suffering isn't wrong, he'd be contradicting the objectivity of the moral system.

At 9/4/11 11:38 PM, Piggler wrote:

At 9/4/11 11:21 PM, Dubbi wrote: Find something you're interested in and pursue it steadfastly.

Tried. I get really excited and then I find out about learning the skills then I'm like fuck it.

With that attitude, you will amount to nothing...

At 9/4/11 11:14 PM, RobJohnson wrote: lol @ going on dates then wondering why they are thinking "relationship"

Lol, but he's not really wondering why the girls are concluding that a relationship is forming; he's lamenting that this is the reality of dating in high school.

Find something you're interested in and pursue it steadfastly. If you can't think of anything, why not devote yourself to your studies? Doing this will distract your mind from depression and will allow you desirable opportunities. Doing well academically opens many doors.

Most attractive teenage girls are incapable of separating any concept of sex and flirtation and fun with love and monogamous relationships. You're just going to have to deal with it; girls, for the most part, aren't mature, experienced, and intelligent enough to participate in the relationships you desire. Things should get better once you're older, though. High school just kind of really sucks, you know?

At 9/4/11 07:36 PM, Dubbi wrote: Younger, which is pretty typical. The average age difference between husband and wife in the U.S. is, I believe, two years, with the husband older.

2.3 years to be exact.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201 0/05/100512062631.htm

Younger, which is pretty typical. The average age difference between husband and wife in the U.S. is, I believe, two years, with the husband older.

At 9/1/11 09:50 PM, Dromedary wrote: I sit down to pee
I stand up to poo
At job interveiws
I knitted my hair into a beanie
I threw it off a bridge

If anyone can remember which flash that's from, I will give you sexual favours

I'm so post modern.

pm me with the specifics of these sexual favors.

At 9/1/11 10:42 PM, GrandePlatano wrote: where do i get this "growth hormone" from? The stuff i can take not the one thats being made by my body

Only a doctor can prescribe HGH, which actually is produced by the human body. You would probably have to speak to an endocrinologist, but one might not be too eager to prescribe you it -- HGH can have serious side effects and unless you're height is seriously stunted, taking it is not recommended. 5'7.25" really isn't terribly short.

I turned 17 today. I think I'm too old for this joint.

At 9/1/11 03:46 PM, CorpseGrinderClock wrote:

At 9/1/11 03:37 PM, Dubbi wrote: The issue really isn't whether abortion is morally wrong; it's whether the government has the right to enforce this belief on women and their bodies.

Okay this is the fundamental problem with this debate, and the names they choose for themselves make it clear: "Pro life" and "Pro choice"

"Pro life" don't see it as an issue of what women have the right to do to their bodies, they see it as an issue of what a human being has the right to do to another human being. They see themselves as fighting for the rights and the lives of the as-yet unborn children from being killed because they lack voice or recognition of humanity in the matter.

The "Pro choice" side do not see it as an issue of the rights of the unborn child, for various reasons. The arguments put forth tend to be either that the child is "not alive", that the child would "not want to be born" if it was unwanted, or that to ban abortion at all would be a slippery slope that would lead to unjust suffering forcing women to carry rape babies and suffer the health effects of unwanted pregnancies. They argue that the baby is essentially just a part of the mother's body, and the mother has the right to do what they want with their own body.

Now I'll readily admit that the pro-life people, generally speaking, have the more obnoxious and insane supporters. That doesn't mean they aren't right, but it doesn't help either.

Well, kind of.

Pro-life: Against the existence abortion
Pro-choice: Supports the existence of abortion

The problem is pro-lifers spin it and make it out like Pro-choicers are pro-abortion when this is not always the case, and usually isn't. Many pro-lifers are morally against abortion, but believe women have a right to make their own decisions and the government doesn't have the right to enforce its beliefs onto them.

This is why I say the debate is over whether women have the right to an abortion, not whether abortion is right or wrong.

At 9/1/11 03:29 PM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: I'm pro-life. I think abortion is morally wrong, and I will never support it. Ultimately, it comes down to opinion. What does each person consider to be a person? Thus, the debate will never end.

The issue really isn't whether abortion is morally wrong; it's whether the government has the right to enforce this belief on women and their bodies.

CGC, I highly doubt Jedi-Master was being all too serious when he called the girl in the video a cunt.

At 9/1/11 02:43 PM, Lorkas wrote: My dad isn't that tall, he's about 178 or something like that. It's just that my mom's pretty tall for a woman, stretching as far as 175.

I've read that Lithuanians are pretty all. Is your height of around 6'3.5" (fuck the metric system) uncommonly tall in your country? It would be in New York.

At 9/1/11 11:26 AM, k6ka wrote: I do agree with this video.... fetuses are humans, even when they are so small and young, and that they are dying due to abortion from their own mothers.

A PERSON IS A PERSON NO MATTER HOW SMALL!!! YAY DR SEUSS

But in reality, that is fucking retarded -- a zygote is not a human being and if you can't realize that, there is something fundamentally wrong with you.

Mother: A person who gives birth to a human and takes care of it and loves it.

In the Utopian world, yes. But that is not always the case. Unfortunately, unwanted pregnancies occur to women who unwilling, unprepared, and unsuited to raise a child.

Abortion: An act done by a mother who hates her baby and wants it gone.

Abortions aren't always done out of hate; oftentimes it is just the least bad option.

How strange us humans are now today!

Humans today? You absolute dunce, the history of abortion dates back to the Ancient Egyptians.

At 9/1/11 11:16 AM, JonWB2005 wrote:

At 8/30/11 09:29 PM, ChopstickClock wrote: Ahh, it's good to be 6 foot +

6'6" here, must suck not being able to reach shit.

Must suck being gawky and awkward and having cardiovascular problems later in life.

6'2 -- the perfect height :)

You'll probably reach 5'8; 5'9 is uncertain, but not impossible. Do you have any older brothers? If so, how tall are they and how tall were they at your age? How tall are your grandparents - if the men are 5'9 or taller, your chances of reaching this height will be much higher.

I'm 6'2, by the way. My mom is 5'6.5 and my dad 6'1. Some sons grow taller their father's; some don't. It's not really a serious matter.

At 6/27/11 11:27 PM, Xmenace wrote: Sorry for the "Christianism" confusion; that's actually how you write it in Spanish.

As for my "afterlife":

I think our own subconscious tells us whether we've led a good life or not; and at that point where you die, your mind sends itself to where it thinks it belongs, sort of like a dream. A glorious (or infernal) dream, from which you never wake up.

Interesting idea, but where the hell is the evidence for that? It sounds cool is not good enough.

The afterlife most likely does not exist, as there is no evidence of it and and the concept is illogical -- how exactly do our souls travel to another world?

Most likely when we die it is it. We stop sensing the world; however, it is impossible to know what really happens when we die. But don't count on an afterlife.

You're obviously too young and immature to have sex, but, hey, it's your life. Do what you want.

At 6/28/11 12:02 AM, PhyroDragon wrote: I just turned 18 like 2 minutes ago! When do my special powers that everyone keeps talking about arrive?

When you turn 21...

At 6/27/11 09:45 AM, Elfer wrote: Yeah, because sex is all about making pros and cons lists.

Agreed.

Also, I imagine a significant reason that people use to try anal is the psychological thrill delivered by doing something dirty and taboo.

At 6/23/11 02:47 PM, Scarface wrote:

At 6/23/11 02:36 PM, Dubbi wrote: When I was like 8 or something I thought I saw him at a hotel while I was on vacation. I ran to my parents and tried desperately to convince them that I saw James Bulger, the 2nd most wanted man on the FBI's most wanted list with a bounty of a million dollars.

They didn't believe me. They just laughed...

It was most likely someone who looked like him.

Yeah, obviously

And for the record, what fucking 8 year old knows who James Bulger is?

I was a weird kid I guess. But really, the FBI's most wanted list always interested me, even when I was a young lad.

Seamen

c what I did thar?

When I was like 8 or something I thought I saw him at a hotel while I was on vacation. I ran to my parents and tried desperately to convince them that I saw James Bulger, the 2nd most wanted man on the FBI's most wanted list with a bounty of a million dollars.

They didn't believe me. They just laughed...

At 6/22/11 10:28 PM, Lagatag wrote:
Guilty
But seriously I like eyes. Zooey Deschanel has nice eyes.

Zooey Deschanel has a nice everything

I can't imagine that her life was all too great at the age of 114. She lived a long life and was probably very prepared and ready for death.