Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/9/11 02:15 PM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/9/11 02:02 PM, MrPercie wrote: your ready when you FEEL and THINK your ready

just remember protection

morally wrong? naaaa, nothing wrong about it if you both want it. your both old enough. And wil you pleasure her? no idea so this can be a reason why you dont do it and thats fine.

This can be seen as morally ambiguous and leaning toward wrong. As she's obviously dumb.

It's not morally wrong, as the girl is obviously willing to have sex - hell, she's practically begging.

However, I would not recommend having sex at 14. Hardly anybody is mature enough to make one of the most important decisions concerning his/her sexuality at that idiotic age. Chances are, you and her will end regretting it.

If your well-being is completely dependent on your relationship, you have a problem.

What "Ladies" on newgrounds are you referring to?

At 4/7/11 10:04 PM, mothballs wrote:

At 4/7/11 09:57 PM, Dubbi wrote: I'm sure your looks have nothing to do with it.

I'm going to assume you're being sarcastic...

In that case, I'm not a bad looking guy, other than the fact that I'm short ( about 5'5") and have long hair that can go down to the middle of my back. But I choose what I want rather than what other people want.

In all honesty, if you cut hair, your luck with females would significantly improve. Girls don't really want to date that eccentric guy with the really long hair - they want the conventionally attractive guy. Think about it, would you be more inclined to date a girl with extremely short hair? I think not.

At 4/7/11 09:55 PM, mothballs wrote: This is why I've never had a girlfriend, because I'm too nice of a guy.

I'm sure your looks have nothing to do with it.

At 4/5/11 09:58 PM, MoriChax wrote: I made a sammich for another man.
and he loooooved it.

That I did

But seriously, why do people cheat?

Either because they're just general douchebags with no regard to the feelings of their partner, are in a highly unstable relationship and cheat out of desperation, cheat in a moment of weakness due to alcohol, drugs or just plain irrational thinking, or, finally, just because they are extremely horny.

Cheating is bad, mkay?

Really nice tattoo, some girls look significantly better with the rights tattoos, and you're definitely one of them. Also, I like the video game theme you've chosen for your tattoos, reveals a bit about your personality.

I prefer the version with Zooey Deschanel

At 4/5/11 03:34 PM, Me-Patch wrote:

It was a joke that I made because I found it odd that the new york times pointed out that she was slender.

It's because the New York Times is run by extremely liberal Nazis.

Really informative video, many of the things you mention seem spot-on and I'm going to seriously try to follow your advice. Time to fix my posture, presentation and become more ambitious - no more spending hours on video games, TV or newgrounds...

At 4/2/11 06:44 PM, Elsid wrote: Anyway, I haven't seen a convincing argument for why not wanting to pay taxes isn't greedy yet.

Wishing to not pay taxes is greedy in the same way not donating all your money to charity is selfish...
But that doesn't change the fact that there are serious arguments against paying high taxes, as I mentioned in my previous post, as well as serious arguments donating all your money to charity - ie: you will have no money to buy food or basic resources.

If the woman didn't consent to the sex, it is rape.

By your logic, having sex with a sleeping woman, who somehow doesn't wake up during the intercourse, is not rape - as in this case the unconscious woman didn't technically resist.

At 4/2/11 04:04 PM, hypeserver wrote: Being 6'2" and 200 pounds? That doesn't even seem a little overweight to me. Not for that height and body type.

It's a BMI of 25. 7 - a BMI from 25 to 29.9 is considered overweight. Complete bullshit, though; I'm not overweight, regardless of what the outdated BMI system tells me.

Apparently, I am, only slightly, though. But hell, when you're about 6'2", being 200 pounds really isn't that bad. And compared to all the obese cows I see every day, I'm in pretty good shape, better than most really. BMI is in no way a reliable indicator of whether one is overweight or not.

At 4/2/11 01:14 AM, SmilezRoyale wrote:

Of course the lesson here, The Government Doesn't care if you Murder or rape innocents.

I don't see where you're deriving that lesson from. Where in the article does it imply that the government doesn't care about prosecuting rapists or murderers?

If tax money actually directly went to services that would benefit society as a whole, you may have a point. However, the government wastes our hard-earned money on wars and useless programs. There's nothing wrong with low taxes if they help society, but we are taxed too excessively with our money utilized too wastefully.

The way to improve the economy and our society is to have low taxes and let Americans spend and invest their money in ways they see fit. The collective financial decisions of all Americans - with more money in their pocket due to lower taxes - will help the economy more than any bureaucracy ever can. You're moralizing way too much and neglecting to analyze how a functioning economy works. Not all people are against taxes unilaterally due to their selfishness; they believe that low taxes will benefit the economy and improve the condition of the average American.

The woman, Julia Saner, shown in the picture below is irresistibly attractive to me. She's Swiss and her complexion for some indescribable reason is magnifying.

At 4/1/11 06:31 PM, MoriChax wrote:
We're the best of friends....

You have nice eyes.

The only logical option is for her to abort - she obviously wouldn't make a very good mother judging by her stupidity, and, to put it bluntly, you probably wouldn't make a great dad, at the age of 16 at least. Though if she does decide to keep it, maybe something good will come from this, unlikely but possible. Fatherhood can be a very fulfilling and maturing experience...

At 4/1/11 02:30 PM, MultiCanimefan wrote: >Marriage before 30
>Lol divorce in 5 years

Not necessarily...

Sure, most marriages seem to fail or go sour, but no one aims to let that befall them. I don't believe we live in a world where true love and a joyous marriage is unattainable. A large percentage of people who marry before 25 get divorced, but, remember, a very large percentage of people are morons, so only the individual matters; one can't look at a trend describing the majority of people and expect to garner any value from it. And the individual needs to strive to happiness and meaning, which can be partially delivered through marriage and love. Hell, if only 1 percent of marriages lasted, there's no reason to believe that she can't fall into that one percent.

Glad to see that whatever relationship problems you were going through worked out. He's undeniably a very lucky guy who has made a terrific choice. I truly hope you have a blissful and lasting marriage.

Continue living, as I try to raise a family, achieve my goals, and understand the world and who I am - basically try to find self-meaning in this meaningless world. Sure, we older, less attractive and weaker, but who would want to stay in their 20s forever. Life is a journey, one which I want to pursue to end, and hope, just hope, that I'll gain something in the process.

At 3/30/11 01:47 AM, Andre wrote: Quickly, praise this picture!

No

Sharapova's about my height, which is pretty gigantic for a woman. She's pretty hot, though.

no photoshop, but hot pic instead

At 3/28/11 10:37 AM, chiefindomer wrote:

At 3/27/11 11:40 PM, Dubbi wrote: No all girls - and guys - who enjoy promiscuous sex are std ridden whores; protection exists, you know.

Christ what is it with you people. I'm not literally saying she has an std (although she might) and I'm not literally saying she's a whore, as in someone that has sex for money. It's an insulting way of saying she probably opens her legs for just about anyone.

And I'm saying you shouldn't insult someone a woman solely for being promiscuous, as it's just a lifestyle choice - some people like sex - and I doubt you'd apply the same unfair standards to a man.

Some people - gasp - just like to have sex and hold it to no arbitrary morality.

Yes and many times it's with someone you have at least known for a bit. When you're willing to have sex with someone you have just met on the internet, I find it to be rather trashy. Oh wait, I better not say that or you might think I'm literally saying she's a piece of trash rather than a promiscuous female.

Some people like meaningless sex, because it's pleasurable. Also, how is hooking up with someone you met on the internet worse than hooking up with someone you met at a bar. Don't give me that safety bullshit; since they were directed by a mutual friend on facebook, and have talked to each other, it's fair to assume neither one of them are secretly predators. In many ways, he knows the girl more than during most hookups.

You shouldn't so rashly insult this girl without knowing anything about her.

I know enough about her from the OP's description, I'm not attacking anything else besides what the OP has told us about her. If she can take a cock from someone she just met on the internet than she can take an insult as well.

Except your insult is baseless. There is nothing wrong with enjoying sex, and you are holding women to an unfair double standard.

You're post comes off as rather misogynistic - if the roles were reversed, I doubt you'd be calling zalecot an "std ridden whore".

It sounds like it was her idea to begin with. However, if the OP were to actually go through with it then he's just as bad.

Is there really something wrong with having the opinion that you should know somebody a little better before you decide to have sex with them?

It's wrong to think that opinion is absolute. My philosophy on sex is, it can be as meaningful or meaningless as you want to make it. If you think you should know your partner first and that sex should have some meaning, that is perfectly fine. However, many other people feel differently. There's nothing wrong with a woman enjoying sex and deriving pleasure from meaningless hookups, and your insults were uncalled for.

At 3/27/11 10:53 PM, chiefindomer wrote: If a girl is willing to send naked pics to a guy she just met on the internet and tells him that she will have sex with him whenever they meet, then she's probably an STD-ridden whore.

No all girls - and guys - who enjoy promiscuous sex are std ridden whores; protection exists, you know. Some people - gasp - just like to have sex and hold it to no arbitrary morality. You shouldn't so rashly insult this girl without knowing anything about her. You're post comes off as rather misogynistic - if the roles were reversed, I doubt you'd be calling zalecot an "std ridden whore".

At 3/26/11 10:40 PM, Food123 wrote:

At 3/26/11 10:11 PM, suprememessage wrote:

At 3/26/11 09:59 PM, Food123 wrote: I have never cheated on a person

So you have cheated on animals?

No. I have never cheated on Animals either

So you have cheated on plants?

At 3/26/11 04:41 AM, RobJohnson wrote: If he is smarter than Einstein at age 18, it will be something.

Einstein isn't well known for having a remarkable IQ - many people had IQs far higher than him but did far less - he is known for remarkable scientific discoveries.

Natural talent hardly impresses me - it's what you can do with it that counts.

Exactly, in our contemporary society it is women who are the more repressed gender, bombarded by economic inequality, double standards concerning being promiscuous, unfair appearance expectations, unfair and unequal parenting expectations, and unfair domestic responsibility expectations, among many other forms of harmful sexism.

Anyone who claims men are persecuted against more than women in our society is an ignorant douchebag.

As I try to live by some moral standard, I would not strike a girl unless her behavior was a threat to my life - if she had a gun, knife, bat, etc. I'm a big guy, and I really doubt any girl could render me incapable of restraining her without violence. Hitting a woman is just something I won't do, though I can definitely understand why other guys would in certain circumstances: women do demand equal rights after all. Thus, I believe women should legally allowed to be struck if they strike first - I just won't be the one doing the striking.