4,393 Forum Posts by "DroopyA"
That's a sweet mallet.
At 1/21/09 06:11 AM, JarrodK wrote: Funny factor zero.
Then it'll be a huge hit on every webforum on the planet.
Reminds me more of a camping sim or possibly a modern version of those old California Games, games.
This guys expression never changes.
Sweet deal... those guys are fucking awesome.
Just going off the topic title, I'm going to suggest "Roccos way to love".
It's a murder mystery.
Be warned though, Rocco likes it rough, and in the butt...
The movie starts off with him getting head. But after a few minutes he stands up and the camera zooms out to show you that he was sitting on the toilet. Then he flushes, puts his butt in the girls face and says "Clean my ass bitch". She proceedes to lick his asshole clean.
Later, he puts his big toe in one girls ass, and then makes another girl suck on it.
Rocco has other movies too. In one, he's a secret agent that has to find and defuse a bomb before it goes off and kills a bunch of people. It turns out, the bomb is burried in some girls vagina so he has to defuse it by going in through the butt.
Funny stuff...
At 1/22/09 03:17 PM, Hemlok wrote: I figured though if they are going to be around then might as well have some cool gear to put on them.
Good point.
As it stands now all we get are the occasional clothes packs from MS... and so far, it seems that everybody at Microsoft dresses like a complete douche bag. It would be nice to have a little variety in not only clothes designers, but also character avitars.
Currently, we all have to use the same clothes. But if clothes came with achivements, we'd all look diffrent as not everybody would have completed all of the same achievements. Plus, it's a cool way to brag.
IE: If I could get a Dead Rising Mega Man outfit for my avitar every time I unlocked a peice of the costume in game, that would be sweet!
Too lazy to read the article... but I have to ask...
Why?
Years ago wasn't there a fight going on between who wrote the scrips to the movies and who animated them?
I'm unsure of the details but I think LegendaryFrog was taking all the credit even though he was getting help from other people. or something... I don't really know because I don't really care.
At 1/22/09 01:18 PM, NoodleCreme wrote: Weed is awesome and should be legalized. There is no way weed is worse than alcohol, and people who say otherwise have never done it or are idiots.
Agreed.
People forget quickly that at one point, alchohol was illegal too. The only reason it's legal today is because prohibition caused more problems then it cured.
The war on drugs, and mainly marijuana, was started as a campaign slogan... claiming that Regan would put a stop to drugs insured he would win the middleclass female votes and pretty much garunteed him the election.
You'll notice that as time has gone by, this "just say no" and 'war on drugs" propegandah has faded and all we have left are a few mesly commercials about talking dogs. The simple fact of the matter is, the false scare tactics that where created in the 70s and 80s have been disproven and thus droped, but the criminalization of the drug remains the same.
Instead of "this is your brain..." now all we have is "don't let your little brother see you". But you'll notice that none of those commercials tell you why you shouldn't let your little brother see you... at this point, the war on marijuana is little more then a guilt trip... don't do it or you'll fell bad about yourself... type of shit.
Strangly enough, "feeling bad about yourself" isn't a side effect of the drug itself, but a side effect of the drug campaign. Look at all the negative responses in this post... "if you smoke pot you're a loser". Who knew that biast hate was a positive campaign slogan form the human race?
In the end, marijuana is a harmless drug... but should it be legal? I think not. Call me crazy, but I like buying my drugs from friends or neighbors... for some reason, I don't think marijuana would benifit from complete legalization. I get the feeling that if Marlbro could legally sell us a pack of joints, we'd be getting ripped off. They'd always be trying to figure out how to give you less at a higher price. The illegalization of the drug keeps it clean... if you know your dealer your always garunteed a good product at a fair price.
On the other hand, I think it should be de-criminialized. Nobody should go to jail (or prison) for smoking, buying, or growing pot. A max sentance should be maybe a year but most marijuana releated insidenses should be settled outside of court through community service or fines. Having say... up to an ounce per person should be completly legal... any more, punishable by fines. That way drug use isn't incourraged but we're no longer waisting valubale tax payer money and court time with 'criminals' that haven't done any wrong to anyone.
No idea really...
You might try writing a routine that stops the game from functioning and then calling it in frmGame_Unload
So like:
Private Sub StopGame()
myTimer.Stop
mySound.Stop
End SubThen in frmGame_Unload:
Call StopGame()That way, when you call 'Unload frmGame' the Unload routine gets called that calls StopGame that manually stops all the controls and features from firing off.
I'm not sure if it's the most elegant way to handle it, but it should get the job done.
It's free and there are tons of tutorials and books available to walk you through how to make everything from 2D shooters and tile-based games to real 3D rpgs and game engines.
it's not easy, mind you, but it is free and effeciant... so if you're serious this is a good place to start.
Plus, it uses C# which is a newer programing language from Microsoft that will help you get a job in the future as a programer if your gameing career doesn't work out.
Languages like Python are a bit dated and not in that much demand these days. Knowing it won't hurt your chances, but if I had to choose to know one or the other, I'd much rather learn C#.
I must be old, I have no fucking clue what you're talking about right now.
Me and my roomate where talking about this.
It's really strange to see people wearing shirts and holding up Obama calanders... it's like he's a rockstar or a star athlete. I don't think I've ever seen a politition garner so much widespread fame.
My roomie claims he's the anti-christ. I kind of hope he's right...
At 12/19/08 12:46 AM, Jonas wrote: This topic must be one of those stoner pity threads.
Pity then, the lack of stoners.
Fuck it... it's just a mans life.
I mean, it's not like this is anything improtant...
The lack of on screen zombies and the loss of the time limit is going to really change the feel of the game.
Playing it on the 360 was intense... you only had one save file, one chance to save the people, and one chance to escape. Fucking up anything ment not being able to save all 50 survivors and starting all over. It was aggrivating and annoying but it really put the intesity of the situation firmly on your shoulders.
It was like a real zombie invasion... never was there a time where I felt like I could just jerk around killing zombies with a golf club. It was serious shit... there was always somebody that needed help, a story that needed to be uncovered, and a safe area I had to get too.
Worse yet, there where very few safe places to run... the mass amounts of zombies made you really question the risk of going out vs the risk of leaving those people to their own wits. I was always asking myself, "Do I have time to make it there and back?" or, "Am I strong enough to not only survive the journy, but also protect the people on the way back?"
Time management became a big issue and it wasn't uncommon to have to fight bosses with 3 or 4 survivors standing by in a near-by store front.
But the Wii version is going to remove all of that. The intensity of the situation is gone and the lack of zombies really opens up a lot of room to run removing the need to plan your routes or really optimize the use of your 'Survivor Waypoint" system.
If I have as much time as I need to save everyone, what's the rush to do it? Or worse yet, why try to save more then one at a time?
The game, it sounds, is going to go from a survival game to a strickly action game... and although that might be entertaining it would be nearly as instense as the 360 version, at which point, why even play it?
It would be like reMaking doom but insuring that the power never gets cut so the in-game lights remain on allowing you see the monsters way before they attack. It may still be fun, but no nearly as fun as it originaly would have been.
It would be cool... but at the same time, completly pointless.
360 Avatars have no reason to exist... besides displaying in your friends list, there is nothing you can do with them. It's not like the 360 has a version of Home or anything.
In the end, as much as I'd like to see this, I recognize how pointless it would be and agknowledge that I don't really care if it doesn't happen either.
The Dreamcast failed because there where no games for it.
The games that existed where fun, but there where very few of them. Sega was really bad about that... the same thing happened with the SegaCD and that other 32X thing.
At 1/21/09 03:30 PM, HellzYeahCCR wrote: And that show is "It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia."
I second this vote... when Danny Divito shows up, it becomes the funniest fucking thing I've seen in years.
I like Paint... I have other programs (like Gimp) but often times that's too much for what I'm trying to do.
I don't need, or want, to wait for a huge app like Photoshop to load just so I can put Text on an image or draw a dick in someones hand.
Paint is usually more then enough for about 90% of what I need to do on a daily basis. The only time I don't use paint is when I need to make something that looks professional. And even then Paint can usually handel the job, it just sucks at saving one filetype as another...
Krut deserves better then somebody making a shitty movie about him.
I'm sure this is the LAST thing he would want.
Beautiful Katamari (Xbox360)
It's not free, but each stage has it's own leader board. I was obsessed with reaching the top 10 on at least one of them for a while... but I don't have enough time.
It's a diffrent type of game so you might want to rent it before buying if you never played it.
Ken... or Ryu.
They where the only characters whos special moves I could not only remember, but actually pull off. That is, out side of ChunLi and EHondas fast attack. But anybody who used those always got accused of cheating so I avoided those characters just to avoide that accusation.
At 1/21/09 11:50 AM, idiot-monarch wrote: It would be perfect if there was some bloom and lens flare in there.
This game actually has more lens-flare per screen then any other game in the history of gaming. It's actually top of the line technology that renders it all.
But, because the game is so good, it's too dark to see the flare.
That's just how awesome this game is.
His videos are entertaining but I can't say I'm a big fan of his sudden "lets do 7 video games in one 6 minute video" style.
I liked it better when he just had one or two games and really dove into the depths of how much they suck. You got to see multiple stages... now days, you get a 30 second clip of him dying in the first stage and 5 minutes of him in a stupid costume shouting "fuck".
Sweet game... although it really sucks that there are only 2 multiplayer maps.
What the fuck was Valve thinking?
At 1/21/09 10:24 AM, desert116 wrote: This is going to be the best selling game ever!
Oh I know... it's so dark and hard to see. Obviously the best game ever made.
After reading this, I went searching for videos and found this:
New super cool screenshot of an epic boss fight... notice the darkness of the castle and the awesome use of the light emmiting from the flames of the burning lava.
So dark... so awesome.
