Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/2/11 07:49 AM, Jedi-Master wrote: It's as if adults are completely unaware that children are capable of distinguishing between fantasy and reality.

This. I honestly blame all the psychotic individuals out there for wrecking our already terribad rap.

ITT: more Fox News bashing and all.

I mean, it's very much rightfully deserved, but all the bipolar emotions towards the show are getting a wee bit old.

Let's talk Newgrounds instead.

At 10/2/11 07:31 AM, BumFodder wrote: I dont even want to bring my first post up, so I dont know why im posting here.

Psssh, you should of never even mentioned it! G'damn, and I thought you were a good poster. :D

I - on the entirely other hand - have devolved as both a writer and in terms of wit. Here's da list already:

Acid-Paradox
FatKidWithAJetPack
SineRider
midimachine

Yay.

If I was a furry, would the attraction still be a fetish?

At 10/2/11 07:15 AM, RandomRoarness wrote:

At 10/2/11 06:24 AM, Rivergrey wrote: Plus, goddamn can she sing!

may i ask who is that good sir?

That would actually be Bizooey, or - in other words - one of my favorite Soundcloud artists/singers. I'm quite happily surprised someone on here knew the gal!

At 10/1/11 06:41 PM, HotActionYiffFur wrote: Ey girl you don't know shit about how it is

*Guy*

And I don't, but whatever - do what you've gotta do.

At 10/1/11 06:39 PM, Otto wrote: I try to keep it quiet I guess

There's nothing wrong with trying to hide your furry username of a past.

I think.

Maybe...

I honestly wouldn't care.

As long as I don't get pregnant - that is.

At 10/1/11 06:27 PM, daethdrain wrote:

At 10/1/11 06:24 PM, HungarianSupermarket wrote:

Ugghhhh this website is making me gay!

Welcome to the incestuous, furry flurry that is Newgrounds.

Enjoy your stay.

At 10/1/11 06:13 PM, EoD696 wrote: >speakers are better<

I know all about that already and have amassed four different sorts of speakers AND two other extremely cheap headphone sets with drastically varying sound qualities - not including the car stereo. I'm more fond of speakers anyways, but headphones enable you to tweak the intricacies more and more accurately. Plus, a lot of people DO listen on headphones, hence the usage thereof. :D

At 10/1/11 12:38 PM, Mismo wrote: My picture was cooler.

'Sup bro?

At 10/1/11 12:39 PM, Suprememessage wrote: ctrl + f, I would like to tickle each and everyone of you with a tooth pick.

More like ctrl + F. U.

Mismo, how do you feel aboot the postsplosion you have just caused?

At 10/1/11 12:23 PM, Scarface wrote: (*Sniff)....no sir.....but nobody wants to fuck me.

*Winks dramatically, hoping against hope that Scarface notices this gesture.*

At 10/1/11 12:18 PM, Scarface wrote: Ctrl+F Scarface: No results.

Are you straight? Tell me boi!!!

OF COURSE a thread about 4chan was going to get derailed by furries, trolls, bad humor and alts. How else could it possibly have ended?

At 10/1/11 11:40 AM, Bryan wrote: OH GOD!

WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT??

Ah - the occasional brilliant, outside-of-the box thinking user!

Newgrounds needs more of those folks. I can practically taste the air of unoriginality.

At 10/1/11 07:19 AM, SBB wrote: If that's the case then that's incredibly weird because headphones and speakers aren't just different in their frequency response curve. The dynamic range is different, the type and amount of distortion is different, the volume they can produce is different, and speaker elements and other parts are built with materials of different quality. Also, if it was a cheap-ass set it probably can't even reproduce the lowest and highest frequencies that a more expensive monitoring headphone can, and you can't fix that with any amount of EQ.

With "cheap-ass" I meant a twenty-dollar set, not some 1-buck schmuck's earbuds. The frequency range goes from 20Hz to 22000 - the brand being Maxell - and that being all I know aboot 'em. I don't really see how a difference in material composition would benefit the wideness, the quality, or the degree as to which the sound may be panned if you can manually alter that anyways.

These buds have no distortion, no real downside save for a lacking >40Hz response, and barely any coloring. All the problems can be ironed out nearly entirely with a very precise, arduous equalizer job and a good-quality but very slight bass boost.

Plus, this is the first time a listening experience on headphones has ever sent shivers down my spine - so I guess that's another pointer. :D

Yeah, hey everybody.

I recently bought a moderately good set of headphones with a low, low price at a local hardware store. While I wasn't quite 100% happy with the sound initially, a friend let me borrow his incredibly good-sounding Sennheisers as a method for direct comparison.

An idea struck me then and there. "What if - what if I use my friend's set as a basis in terms of sound and use the built-in EQ function on my MP3 to modulate the quality of my own cheap-ass set to imitate his?"
Well, turns out this approach worked. The new-found sound turned out to be damn close to that of the expensive Sennheisers, almost - almost - exactly the same.

So here's a question - would it be possibly, and advisable, to set the same EQ parameters on tracks I produce on the computer temporarily as to imitate the listening experience of those INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE studio headphones before rendering the song? Or is there still a huge, important difference here that I should be aware of?

At 9/30/11 02:31 PM, SineRider wrote:

At 9/30/11 01:23 PM, Natick wrote: Anything with glitch effects might do.

Telefon Tel Aviv
Chris Clark
Ceephax Acid Crew

Going to approve of these three as I haven't heard the others. Good stuff.

Hey, didn't have this problem at all the last time i got mine dilated.
I do however blame 90/50 vision and being used to a slight blur, though.

At 9/30/11 02:30 PM, mattuiop wrote: I cant replace the mp3 due to their popularity!!
when you say "mine", do you mean your own music. if so, was do my tunes sound like?

I don't think that replacing the MP3 of those songs using the Edit function would affect anything other than the song itself. Again, contact the help forum or something if you want a good answer.

With "mine" I'm talking about my own music, which while shitty compared to yours still functions properly.

Mine are all fine, however...

Have you tried going under "My Account", then "Audio Submissions", followed by clicking Edit and replacing the MP3 yet? This may help solve your problem easily.

Next time I think the Audio Forum or How To? section would be better. ;)

At 9/29/11 02:45 PM, Sevkat wrote: Ladyboner +1

Fixed that - get it right next time. :33

At 9/28/11 03:06 PM, Rivergrey wrote:

Which is why you always read through things fully, girl.

Well, second to C would have to be River, but only due to her sheer aderpability.

I vote Confucianism, since he's on a trip in Majorca and wont have any qualms aboot it.

At 9/28/11 01:12 PM, Rivergrey wrote: So I could potentially sue Skrillex if I bought a CD from them? This demands investigation. :P

... No.

Why would you sue for paying for prostitution? Where is the Logic in that? :D

At 9/28/11 12:29 PM, Mismo wrote: Did you know it is not prostitution as long as you film it and sell it?

Present me the evidence of this or be ignored forever.

At 9/27/11 04:35 PM, kakalxlax wrote:

At 9/27/11 04:16 AM, BaronVonBadGuy wrote: Lolicon > Furry, such is the ways of science.

Those are not mutually exclusive

No, no really. Stop the picture dump. While the discussions may be weak and done by now, they do still have valid points that can keep this oft-kool thread alive.

At 9/27/11 04:32 PM, ModernPatriot wrote: No! Don't touch me!

Now where's the love?