Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I came up with this a few moments ago.

"In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony gods' blessings. But because, I am enlightened by my own intelligence."

--DOGOGBYN

Just to warn you all, I am not a professional quote-maker.

Are there any good reasons for thinking God does not exist?

Serious question.

At 1/29/14 03:20 PM, LittleWashu wrote: It seems now Justin Bieber is now Obama's problem

What are your thoughts on this petition passing?

I agree with this verdict completely.

Smoking weed leads to Communism by shrinking the amygdala. Communism is anti-America. Banning weed= success for America.

I just masturbated and found that I produced sperm.

But IF evolution were true it couldn't happen like that, only sex would make it happen so we would be more successful at passing on our genes.

Consequently, evolution is false.

Checkmate atheists.

Mary didn't have sex with Joseph. That's why an angel came down to reassure Joseph that his wife wasn't having an affair.

Just to be clear, I’m not a professional ‘quote maker’. I’m just an atheist teenager who greatly values his intelligence and scientific fact over any silly fiction book written 3,500 years ago. This being said, I am open to any and all criticism.

‘In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence.'

Eh?

Diverse enough for the goyim!

At 11/29/13 03:24 PM, 24901miles wrote:

At 11/29/13 02:46 PM, DOGOGBYN wrote: P.1. anything that begins to exist, has a cause
P.2. the Universe began to exist
P.3. therefore, the Universe had a cause

This cause must be timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal, and incredibly powerful. Much like God.

P.1 Virtual particles can exist without a cause within the Universe

Virtual particles are caused by the rules of probability acting upon energy within the Universe. Their cause is energy. They are probabilistically caused. This is different to them having no cause.

P.2 Anything outside the a Universe is currently untestable

P.3 Rules for the creation of the Universe may be causeless or not definable with Universe dependent rulesets such as cause-and-effect

Your objections assume that you have to test the first premise of my argument. But really it is based not only on scientific reasons, but also on a priori analysis of the nothingness which existed before the begnning of the universe. The nothingness must have become something through causes as this is the most simple thing to assume happened to nothing to create something, and the simplest explanation of a thing X is usually the correct explanation of X.

God is an authorship character and plot device in a book which was written by people who didn't have a fundamental grasp of the world around them, much less Cosmology.

The Bible contains many truths (such as the Earth being round and things being made of atoms) that didn't exist beforehand.

P.1. anything that begins to exist, has a cause
P.2. the Universe began to exist
P.3. therefore, the Universe had a cause

This cause must be timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal, and incredibly powerful. Much like God.

4chan is like reddit but on cocaine.

At 11/26/13 06:36 PM, Fim wrote:

At 11/26/13 01:03 PM, Memorize wrote: Personally,

how are any of those things liberal?

Forcing the taxpayer to fund methadone clinics for junkies= liberal acceptance of drug use as a lifestyle choice, something forced on people, not something they chose to do.

At 11/28/13 05:39 AM, The-Great-One wrote: Nice chart there! Where did you get it from?

I forget. I think the data was cited from the Mayo Clinic of Minnesota, just to give you some idea as to it's veracity.

At 11/24/13 10:05 PM, Entice wrote:

At 11/24/13 09:43 PM, MrSoxfan wrote: Brian is a douche. He's one of the reasons I stopped watching Family Guy. Good riddance.

You're just saying that because he's a liberal.

No-one cares about the political views of a fucking cartoon character you fucking autist.

At 11/26/13 03:51 PM, Earfetish wrote: And what's the difference between killing a foetus and killing a cow anyway? Nobody will 'miss' the foetus. The foetus won't notice. There's one less person on this overpopulated world, who nobody met. Does a human foetus have a more intrinsic right to life than an animal foetus? Why? Because of what it 'could' achieve? So what?

Humans have intrinsic moral value to people. Animals do not. That's the difference.

At 11/26/13 03:38 PM, Earfetish wrote:

At 11/26/13 03:33 PM, DOGOGBYN wrote: What's the difference between killing a premature baby and a fetus, hey? Under the current system: nothing. Disgusting.

One is a person who can survive by themselves, the other is not. So 'under the current system', the difference could not be greater. Disgusting?

There is no difference between a fetus and a premature baby. Neither could survive without support. People in comas are still alive but if you unhook life-support they die.

At 11/26/13 03:35 PM, Earfetish wrote: Do you eat meat?

What feels pain more - a cow or a foetus? What is more sentient - a cow or a foetus?

I try to avoid any meat that is factory farmed. However just because I contribute to something that hurts living beings doesn't make my arguments against abortion any less valid. That's a logical fallacy.

I am so sick of people thinking a fetus isn't a person. Just because it looks a little different to you doesn't make it not a human. Do these same people who make this argument think of the disabled as less than human?

Embryology shows that fetuses feel pain at 20-weeks. Yet abortion is still allowed into the 24th week of pregnancy!

Science and logic shows we need better term-limits on abortion. No baby should be aborted (read killed) at the age of 24 weeks. My sisters were born premature, I bet pro-choicers would have had qualms about killing them. What's the difference between killing a premature baby and a fetus, hey? Under the current system: nothing. Disgusting.

And before people complain about me wanting to take away a womans right to abort a baby in the case of rape or incest, these circumstances are so rare as to be non-existant. The majority of babies are killed for convenience, not for any other reason.

At 11/25/13 02:28 PM, Splats wrote:

At 11/25/13 02:07 PM, NewgroundsMike wrote: Did you know the book is banned in Germany?

Seriously?
Whoa. Did not know that. Did not know Germany is fuckin dumb like that

To be fair to the Germans it was banned by the Allies after ww2.

Scientific proof of God's existence, confirmed by scientists all over the world.

Debate= over, God exists.

Inb4 atheists can't deal with it.

At 11/25/13 02:21 PM, 24901miles wrote:

At 11/25/13 01:43 PM, DOGOGBYN wrote: GOD EXISTS FAGGOTS: http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/.

Welcome back.. What nickname should we use to refer to you, since you use so many monikers?

Call me owned, cos that's what you are.

At 11/25/13 01:48 PM, Splats wrote: You know, slavery

::
::
::

Why is saying the n-word socially unacceptable but saying white trash is considered almost normal?

GOD EXISTS FAGGOTS: http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/.