Be a Supporter!
Response to: Romney kissing babies Posted October 27th, 2012 in Politics

He's wondering what the baby would feel around is dick.

Response to: Clandestine or modern? Posted October 22nd, 2012 in General

Booby trap is the best.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H91rPIq2mN4

Response to: Possible diamonds on mars Posted October 20th, 2012 in General

Start mining mars; bring back mineral; get infected by some dangerous micro lifeforme from mars; 90% of life on earth died out before we adapt.

Response to: Are you a thread killer? Posted October 14th, 2012 in General

If you want to kill a thread, just call me. But remember, I don't work for free...

Response to: Can we agree Skyrim was overrated? Posted October 13th, 2012 in Video Games

Each time they make a new elder scroll, they take away some effort previously put on gameplay and story. Then they throw it back on graphic. Someday, it will end up with perfect graphic and nothing else.

Response to: Shocking Article About Prison Rape Posted October 13th, 2012 in Politics

Well... A woman can fist another. Force her into oral sex. The list go on... You don't have much imagination I guess.

Response to: How Much Does "freedom" Cost. Posted October 12th, 2012 in Politics

At 10/12/12 11:12 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 10/12/12 11:04 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: A gun and some bullets. Plus the will to do whatever you want.
I would say that's an easy recipe for an 8x10 accommodation + 3 squares a day on the governments dollar for 25 to life.

Never said it would last forever.

Response to: How Much Does "freedom" Cost. Posted October 12th, 2012 in Politics

A gun and some bullets. Plus the will to do whatever you want.

Response to: Evacuate immediatly Posted October 12th, 2012 in General

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1OCNgzyMWA

Response to: Shocking Article About Prison Rape Posted October 10th, 2012 in Politics

Why people do things? Because they can, and because they will get something out of it, even just a little twisted fun.

I just don't get why someone would think women can't do that sort of things.

Response to: Your style of humor? Posted October 9th, 2012 in General

Humor is for kidz. I'm alway 100% serious.

Response to: Bionic implants. Posted October 7th, 2012 in General

I would put my brain into a computer and call myself Skynet.

Response to: your most realistic dream ever Posted October 6th, 2012 in General

Once I was a demon killing people, drinking blood, and doing evil things for fun. I loved the taste of blood and the sensation of dismembering people with my bare hand. But then I woke up...

Response to: Nasty ways to end a marrige? Posted September 29th, 2012 in General

Contamined meat in is food over several days.

Response to: Newgrounds future Posted September 25th, 2012 in General

I'm planning to save NG next summer. Don't worry.

Response to: the problems with being smart Posted September 24th, 2012 in General

The real problem with being really smart, is the fact you may realise nothing really matter. So you'll just start acting stupid.

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 23rd, 2012 in Politics

At 9/21/12 12:00 AM, 24901miles wrote:
We can make robots which stabilize themselves in a split second, robots which jump, robots which run 28 mph, cars which drive 300 mph, helicopters/rotor lift vehicles which move in tandem, and unmanned Mach 20 vehicles.

Can we make one small robot which can do all of these things?

Sure buddy.

Someone will draw the perfect transformer design that actualy work for real the minute they read that post. Check your full list again...

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 22nd, 2012 in Politics

At 9/21/12 03:12 PM, 24901miles wrote:
At 9/21/12 12:34 PM, Dimitrilium wrote:
it would cost more
Money won't fix incompatible design.
Why are you convinced that it can't be designed to do all of these things?

I can. But it would take time and money. Soon =/= now.

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 21st, 2012 in Politics

it would cost more

Money won't fix incompatible design.

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 21st, 2012 in Politics

At 9/21/12 12:00 AM, 24901miles wrote: Makes me wonder though..

We can make robots which stabilize themselves in a split second, robots which jump, robots which run 28 mph, cars which drive 300 mph, helicopters/rotor lift vehicles which move in tandem, and unmanned Mach 20 vehicles.

Can we make one small robot which can do all of these things?

We can't even make a big robot who do half of these things. So definitely no small one for now. We'll see in 10 or 20 years.

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 21st, 2012 in Politics

That was confirmed fake...

It's a conspiracy!!!

Response to: future robotic law enforcement tech Posted September 20th, 2012 in Politics

At 9/20/12 08:51 PM, naronic wrote: They're mounting guns on these soon, you'll see a lot of quadrators patrolling the streets.
Safer or more dangerous? You take your pick.

Someone did this already.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPJMk2fgJU

Response to: Support Newgrounds! Posted September 19th, 2012 in NG News

Well, Newgrounds is like the only site I turn off Adblock and I kinda enjoy adds over here. Could we get the adds put a the complete bottom of the page so we could look into a (not-flash) time waster some time? Or maybe we could have a turn on turn off on the supporter things? Also I'm lazy and surprisingly I have money right now (sadly it won't last), can I buy it several time to increase the time I won't have to renew it?

Also, are you a little bit too gentle when it come to delete old junk?

Response to: Bipolar feelings about ng Posted September 19th, 2012 in General

Yeah I love posting shit as a time waster. But I hate the fact that half my post manage to stay undelited.

Response to: Iran's nuclear program Posted September 18th, 2012 in Politics

I am so offensed!!!11

...

No seriously I'm laughing as usual. But if I could say anything about Iran, the fact they will not accept some agreements that would let western nations know what they do with those nuclear stuff... That's suspicious at best. And given how paranoid Israeli seem to be, I can't imagine how they would let Iran get away with that.

Response to: Iran's nuclear program Posted September 18th, 2012 in Politics

At 9/18/12 05:53 PM, Saen wrote:
At 9/17/12 11:44 PM, Dimitrilium wrote:

Wow your stupid. They would load it on a boat and set sail for anything on the coast they want to blow.
It's grammatically correct to say "you're". If "they" is referring to a terrorist, that is also incorrect, I shouldn't have to explain that.

My bad, velcro the bomb onto a ship and suicide boat-bomb Israel ahahaha... Holy shit with all of these ridiculous hypothetical scenarios fear mongers like you fabricate, you're convincing me that you actually want Iran to bomb Israel!

Wow attacking how someone didn't took the time to type correctly and stupid joke must be the arguments of someone who have nothing else to say at all. I can fabricate even more ridiculous scenarios you know, it's about 19 terrorists hijacking 4 planes at the same time and killing nearly 3000 people in the end.

Wait a minute...

Response to: Iran's nuclear program Posted September 18th, 2012 in Politics

At 9/17/12 11:51 PM, Feoric wrote:
At 9/17/12 11:44 PM, Dimitrilium wrote:
At 9/17/12 12:55 PM, Saen wrote:
At 9/17/12 12:16 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Even if Iran can't attack Israel without being destroyed, they could give those nuclear weapon to terrorists and it would be a very dangerous situation. So Israel is probably going to attack sooner or later.
Wow it all makes sense now! A terrorist would be able to strap a 2-ton bomb to his chest, run in and suicide bomb Israel!
Wow your stupid. They would load it on a boat and set sail for anything on the coast they want to blow.
Putting a multi-ton nuke on a big fucking ship to set sail for some coast...truly, a cunning masterminded covert assault.

Not so impossible, a container can hold a bomb bigger than the one dropped on Japan. But it's not going to happen anyway because Israel attacking Iran installations is very likely.

Response to: Iran's nuclear program Posted September 17th, 2012 in Politics

At 9/17/12 12:55 PM, Saen wrote:
At 9/17/12 12:16 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Even if Iran can't attack Israel without being destroyed, they could give those nuclear weapon to terrorists and it would be a very dangerous situation. So Israel is probably going to attack sooner or later.
Wow it all makes sense now! A terrorist would be able to strap a 2-ton bomb to his chest, run in and suicide bomb Israel!

Wow your stupid. They would load it on a boat and set sail for anything on the coast they want to blow.

Response to: Iran's nuclear program Posted September 17th, 2012 in Politics

Even if Iran can't attack Israel without being destroyed, they could give those nuclear weapon to terrorists and it would be a very dangerous situation. So Israel is probably going to attack sooner or later.