198 Forum Posts by "Dimitrilium"
At 5/17/13 07:49 PM, orangebomb wrote: You do realize that most of these people who vote on this kind of thing are generally indie game hipsters and self-entitled clowns who either have a fictional axe to grind against EA, especially when there are a lot worse video game companies that never get called out upon.
As for online passes, I agree that it wasn't a good thing to impliment per se, but it was never a huge gamebreaker either.
Stfu, who care who's voting? It still hurt the ego of everyone leading Electronic arts.
Wtf are they thinking, they will make some small money on the short term sure. But then they will loose a lot when everyone making money with youtube will totally stop talking about them and talk about any other company.
I guess being named the worst company twice in a row start to take some effect on them.
You know, if you want a conspiracy theory you just have to copy paste it from a facebook page like this one. And there is plenty of those. Why waste time making these up when there is crazy "thinking" for you?
The new world order zionists did it.
At 3/26/13 11:02 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: but the problem is the gap between the two by the time the guy with his fancy karate gets to the guy with the gun the gunmen could put 12 in him by then
You missed the word "opportunity". Meaning it may not always be possible. Also, running toward the guy with the gun is a bad idea, running out of sight and hiding somewhere where the distance will be short if you are found is a lot better.
A gun as self defense is superior to any training, but martial art can be a nice complement.
At 3/26/13 09:31 PM, Ceratisa wrote:All you can in a gun fight without gun, is to stay out of the line of fire until you get the opportunity of being withing range for a proper disarm. And even then, the risk is huge. I agree, being a martial artist is useful, but a martial artist+gun is better.Martial artists do poorly in street brawls.
Agreed, but martial artist often have better reflex and can move around better too. On two equal gunmen, other skills like martial art can make the difference. Giving your money if someone ask it with a gun is probably the best option anyway. Now if someone without gun get the opportunity by hiding behind a wall or is simply close enough, disarm need to be done flawlessly. The odds are always in favor of the guy with the gun but disarm within the human reaction time can be done.
You can't dodge bullet bro, unless your name is Isao Machii, he could even maybe deflect it with a sword with some luck, but he's definitively not some average guy. He have a special perception skill.
All you can in a gun fight without gun, is to stay out of the line of fire until you get the opportunity of being withing range for a proper disarm. And even then, the risk is huge. I agree, being a martial artist is useful, but a martial artist+gun is better.
You seem concern about mass shooting. But even if you take away every guns, crazy people will just use something else like explosive. And if you take explosive, they'll use something else again. It can be as simple as a knife, and it's not rare 7 to 8 people die when mass knifing happen. The only way to prevent that kind of things, is psychological support for those in distress before they do something rash.
And don't hope politicians to deal with financial crisis and stuff if the gun issue is resolve, it's just one of many decoy. They'll find anything to prevent people from bothering the bankers, they are allies you see...
TheMason patience with you is impressive.
Your topic gave me the best idea for a board game I ever had. But it too good to be shared with you, there's money to be made with this idea.
Thant you! And sorry.
Typical bad spirit, they resonate with you and make you fell in love with something beyond what you should be. Then you find out they eat your vital energy and mess with you and your life.
If you had unusual or weird thoughts in the house, or maybe dream where someone or something try to get inside your head... The worst would be if you start touching the house or look at it like you would for a friend or maybe a loved one. Or if you dialogue with the house in your head.
Then run as far as you can from it!
Edykel, are you trolling or does your common sense just lack common sense? I live in Canada where firearm are controlled and getting some illegal weapon is insanely easy, it's harder to buy hunting weapon legally.
And don't you forget crazy does not mean dumbass, they know how to get what they want.
If you got a few millions dollars, we could make a contract for the making of such game.
A decent mother would have a gun in her purse and training on how to shoot from it.
I blame the fact she didn't have gun. And that black guy for being stupid.
Let me rephrase that with "any violent crime".
When someone is the only one with gun, he feel strong and feel he can get away with anything. When everyone have gun, he just feel average and know the risk of being shot is very real if he act stupid.
Ever hear of a gunfight at a shooting range? No? Ever hear of a gunfight in a school? Yes?
More people with gun make a place safer.
Would make sense for Assad to test CW right now. Hezbollah and Iran are preparing for post Assad. They help him just because they want Assad to grind the rebel as long as possible, and top them after Assad fall. But they are waiting for full engagement.
If the US step in, Iran and the Hezbollah loose everything in Syria, but Assad know he die too. He could force the hand of is "allies" with sporadic CW attack until they acknowledge the fact he will use them before total defeat, or maybe they will step in if the US seriously think of interfering over rumor of Assad using CW.
I'm offended that you are offended.
The town is just trying to make money on the back of the victims. They don't really care about them and the money will go somewhere else.
At 3/16/13 01:04 PM, SmartyPants wrote:At 3/15/13 12:46 AM, HighWay wrote: basically be EASums up the thread, honestly
+1
Who spoke of religion here except you Lumberjax? I've been referring to the fact that over-protecting often lead to lost of freedom, can force people into mold they may not want to fit in, and sometime to repression of what someone try to protect. (But I won't deny I wanted to mess with your little head too.)
Any law on sexualisation badly constructed or too broad could be a real problem. Under such law, one could only need to go to court claiming tight jeans sexualise girls since it show girls curves on purpose and it could lead to banning or restriction of that type of clothing if he win. (This is not far fetched, school have gone to court on clothing and dress code issues and they win sometime, such law would bring that kind of ruling to the next level.)
Now I don't understand the paranoia around this document. Those are just calls for this and that, most countries will just ignore it and nothing will change.
Fun fact: It only protect women. Sexualisation of boys is ok for them.
I wonder, does "individuals promoting sexualisation of girls" can be girls themself?
Soon, women will have to hide everything "sexy" and we will let guys walk around almost naked. Wait... Does that remember you of something?
At 3/7/13 07:24 PM, morefngdbs wrote:At 3/5/13 10:55 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Let's just nuke them and get this over with.;;;
gotta be the dumbest comment in the thread !
You can't smell the troll hey?
By the way, missiles and planes are not the only way to send nuclear device. Classic artillery would make much more sense if NK attack the south. It would also deal millions of casualty during the first minute of the war. The US made one of those gun in 1953. It had only 15 kiloton power and a range of 6.2 miles so NK would have to make bigger ones. But still, a better cannon with a 20 miles range mixed with regular artillery would make South Korea very hard to protect.
Dante: Devils never cry...These tears, tears are a gift only humans have.
Let's just nuke them and get this over with.
Take the map with the bigger dick per country and compare it to the IQ per country list.
Seeing some kind of inverted correlation there?
See people? The LAPD is keeping you perfectly safe!
As long as you're not hostage from someone they want dead at all cost. Doesn't look like him. Doesn't drive the same kind of car. Does not get close of a protected individual.
Well... Barricade yourself at home when they operate and they will protect you even better! Unless they think the guy is inside your house, then you may want to run outside before you burn alive. But you should not blame the LAPD and instead blame the fire department if this happen isn't it?
It mean you're a newgrounds attention whore.
I never fap, I don't want to be deaf!
Actually, the Japan was trying to surrender before the bomb, but the US wanted to test those new toy in a real situation so they could study the effects and show the word what kind of power they had. So they closed the door and delayed a little so they could bring the war to this abrupt end.
Also, it was easier to force the Japan to accept any diplomatic agreement in the aftermath. A surrender with Japan untouched could not force the Japaneses to agree for everything the US was going to ask.
Was it too much, or absolutely needed? Actually, it a lot more complicated.
