Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 12/28/08 07:25 PM, BurningWaterr wrote: Im guessing you are the real 'IamtheGang' person

No, just a devoted fan.

Sorry to double post, but the user on youtube will also not be posting anything new until this account is deleted/suspended, and I did enjoy this guy's work.

It has come to my attention that there is an imposter here on Newgrounds, stealing youtube videos. Just to inform all of you, the user:

"IamTheGang" is an imposter, taking this guy's videos, and uploading them to newgrounds.

I would just like to get the word out there. Have a nice day.

At 10/28/08 02:37 AM, MasterOfDaWay666 wrote:

At 10/28/08 02:34 AM, DeathAura wrote: Lolwut?

It's called sarcasm.

No, it's calledfailing to be sarcastic

You first

My cat has bloody stools

At 10/28/08 02:16 AM, MasterOfDaWay666 wrote: FLAME ME I ABUSE CAPSLOCKS AND ARE A GENERAL MORON

LET ME FAIL AT MAKING A CHAIN...OH WAIT I'M STUPID

Lolwut?

Hello biatch. Super bump from the past. Pumped it so far as of years.

cool. "Trick or treat you fucken kids. This will scare the hell out of yah :D"

The gas companies don't want you to know this >.>

At 10/28/08 01:56 AM, Memorize wrote:

At 10/28/08 12:53 AM, MultiCanimefan wrote:

And why do you think it has the highest ratings?

What do you want me to add?

Most viewers?

-Ranked "most trustworthy"

By whom?

-Ranked "most balanced"

By whom?

By Reuters.

The most trusted national TV news organizations, for accurate reporting, in
declining order included: Fox News (27.0%), CNN (14.6%), and NBC News
(10.90%). These were followed by ABC News (7.0%), local news (6.9%), CBS News
(6.8%) MSNBC (4.0%), PBS News (3.0%), CNBC (0.6%) and CBN (0.5%).

In 2003, CNN led Fox News on "trust most for accurate reporting" 23.8% to
14.6%.

I know why they are ranked accordingly as you said above, it's a layering affect.

Sure, whatever helps you sleep.

FOX News tells it's viewers it's balanced, therefore of course it's going to be voted "most balanced" and "most trustworthy." I could also say the same for all news stations, but we're discussing FOX in particular here.

I'm going by statistics...

So because most people in America are stupid, I have to be stupid too?

I think not sir. If their news isn't new, or even existing/valid, It shouldn't be on T.V.

You can has a facepunch? Yes. Here. Have a few.

Bill Maher>Steven Colbert

This is very easy to debate since...

1: you are a complete idiot
2: people like you and Bush got us into this mess
3:Slaver would make rebellion
4:rebellion would kill most of us
5: you are throwing civil rights and our constitution right out the door.
6: Rebellion=less of an economy
7: You are a selfless prick
8: you are a Nazi

Now go die like the Nazi you are. You must be like some dumbass 12 year old that just listened to your redneck dad as he was fucking your sister.

We have gangs if thats what you mean now go away and don't waste my time.

Face punch the Religious
Face punch the Atheists

Neither of you know.
You can't hate religion, it has some benefits you youngsters don't recognize. If you lost a loved one or have nothing else to lose, or are going through a very hard time, you may need something to cling onto.

Religion is bad in the sense though that people try to make choices off of it.
That and the fact that god is "X" since he is invisble and know one knows who he is, so any corrupt man can control multiple people easily and use it for more corruption

Religion+X=2X

X=Corruption

Hey guys, I'm not sexist, but I think the only reason why people liked her was because women voted for her ( who the fuck do I sound like? I know, the idiot who made this thread)

-point: You can't say something and disprove all facts of why you said it.

A bucket of Horse dick *takes scrip and rewrites*

-Obama- hi
-McCain- old
-Hilary- lost
-Nader- 1
-Bucket of horse dick-10
-Palin- +1 hearbeats closer

I have a big dick

(a) yes

(b) I don't

Fake News and friends.

What's that Bill-O, you agnary?

Keith Olbermann face punches his sorry ass 24/7.

No"

Not funny in the slightest bit.

At 5/29/08 01:34 AM, P-I-N wrote:

At 5/29/08 01:15 AM, hocusPokus wrote: I can't beleive how soft we are on illegal immigrants! To summarize they get to come here, take up social services, schools, hospitals, that stuff. They get welfare and medicare, and yet they dont pay a dime in taxes! Hardworking citizens pay for their 6 kids!

Screw amnesty we should find a way to keep our cheap labor BUT be able to tax them

I think you only heard what your parents told you.

Yes, there is a problem with immigration, but:

Border patrols are not soft with them.
They do not have social services
...or a school
...neither hospitals
They pay for them 6 or 7 kids
They are more than 30% of hardworkers trying to live the "american dream" and have to hide from everyone.

We don't have hospitals in a sense too sometimes. If your Healthcare denies you like they usualy do, your screwd. Proof-My mother had to go to court over the such case.

At 5/19/08 09:29 PM, FairWeatherFriend wrote: I have a question about it:
When it says that the people have the right to keep and bear arms, is it AS part of a well regulated malitia, or is it as a citizen that is not part of a State Guard (look um up, sort of interesting)?

As a gun owner I of course say that it SHOULD be for individuals, but the writing confuses me a tad,

Opinions/Clarifications?

I respect that your making opinions (And I'm going to be as neutral as possible because I usually have a bunch of retards that think different and act like asses to me), but don't say it's a fact until your not confused. Just a word of advice.

At 5/19/08 03:47 AM, qu3muchach0 wrote: i find it somewhat odd that atheists, people who i view as some hardcore mofos, don't quite know how to deal with the aspect of death and dying... some even converting to a religion when death happens to someone they know/love.

my question is simply this:
if atheists are strong willed and independent, why do they fall back upon some form of religion when death or disaster strikes?

i'm not dissing them, but it was always something that intrigued me and really speaks volumes about the frailty of mankind. anyone care to discuss?

I'd like to see your proof that people "convert" when a loved one dies. I just had a loved one die and I didn't convert. I feel much more happy that I know the truth and not something garbled up to be me "feel" better. And heaven would be more like hell anyway, considering you have to live forever. The first million years will be cool, but I don't think I could take any more.

At 6/4/08 09:35 PM, LordJaric wrote:

At 6/4/08 09:31 PM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: It looks to me that Obama is going to be the next president, Mccain should just drop out now lol.

Stop reading there and would like to ask for your arrogant ass to leave.

If your going to try to own someone, and start trolling, shouldn't you cover it up by at least explaining yourself? Who's really the arrogant one?

At 6/4/08 06:59 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: For those of you who enjoy the idea of the government paying for every single persons healthcare, and think it's POSSIBLE, by simply raising taxes on those top 1% or 10%?

Do you realise...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H99Kl4n_s 0k

The country is completely bankrupt.

Can you imagine with 80 million Americans retiring over the net 20 years, giving all of them that kind of service?

Actually, England pulled together free healthcare after WW2, when they were completely broke. And if we got out of the Iraq war, we can use the money we usually put into this war to not only switch to the more efficient, Hydrogen fuel cells cars (or hybrids); as well as switch to universal healthcare. And hydrogen fuel cell cars can be cheap. I've made to hydrogen fuel cells before under 20 dollars. That will also get most of us out of debt from how cheap it costs and how cheap the fuel is (almost nothing-just put electricity in water, and electrolysis will make hydrogen)

At 6/5/08 12:28 PM, ILovezoms wrote: nuclear war will it happen if we stop nuclear wepons will minor countries follow or if we throw away nuclear wepons will some countries say ha they havent got nukes now we can attack them

There would be no way to take away all the nukes. People can still secretly make them, so throwing away the nukes is a bad idea. Think of the power one country can have if they have the only nukes, you can't exactly fight them back. People aren't going to nuke eachother to begin with, since when one is launched, the target will launch one back, or even some of the target's allies.

I live in America, and I have to say much of America is corrupt by greed and religion. Not all of it though, there are still some decent people out there.

At 3/10/06 07:21 PM, Fuckle wrote: Im from England and alot of people on NG hate us,why?

Because some of us retards watch Fox news. Sorry, but I'm from America and I applaud England. This may be the land of the free, but I see more free things there like the freedom to live without 10,000 dollar medical bills and college fees.

Raise taxes for the rich. Its the best strategy out there unless you want to be like Bush and tax the poor and middle class which gets you no where.