Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

It always helps to put everything on the same layer and add everything to stage so then you can easily remove it. Also, if you want to layer things the make like a HUD layer clip and a game clip and then add those to stage and then add the clips to each of those MCs. It makes life a lot easier.

At 6/27/10 11:31 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote:

At 6/26/10 06:58 PM, Johnny wrote: But now, they're redoing Citizen Kane, and I am NOT okay with that.

I hope they have michael bay directing it

And Arnold Schwarznegger acting Kane.

What a brilliant actor.

Dr Who
Just watched yesterday's Dr Who. So what did you guys think?

I'm currently working with FlashDevelop and Flash MX 2001.

So, UK v USA rematch.

Nonoba API is pretty good.
http://nonoba.com/developers/multiplayer api/overview

Automaton Semi Synthetic Script Engine Xtra

Let's start simply. Let's say I have a shape represented here by points.
(Messy code for presentations sake.)

public class Line extends Object{
           var p1;
           var p2;
           public function Line(){
           }
}


var array = [new Point(0,0), new Point(0,100), new Point(100,100), new Point(50,100), new Point(50,50), new Point(0,50)];

for (i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
          for (a = 0; a < array.length; a++)
                    if(array[i] == array[a]) continue;
                    if(array[i].x == array[a].x || array[i].y == array[a].y){
                              var line:Line = new Line();
                              line.p1 = array[i];
                              line.p2 = array[a];
                              lineArray.push(line);
                    }
          }
}

Here's the basics of getting a line. You can probably figure out the rest. you then need to extend lines across the shape where needed. You need to check what lines are parallel and construct rectangles from these. Nd then you have your shape. The hardest thing is to know when you need horizontal rectangles and when you need vertical ones. Need to go goodluck.

I bet the decepticons blow up the universe.

Does anyone know any good free sound effects websites?

http://www.lemondrop.co.uk/2010/06/19/vu vuzela-danger-woman-bursts-windpipe-at-w orld-cup-party/?icid=main|uk|dl1|link3|h ttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemondrop.co.uk%2F2010%2 F06%2F19%2Fvuvuzela-danger-woman-bursts-
windpipe-at-world-cup-party%2F
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOOL

At 6/18/10 01:44 AM, fluffkomix wrote: i don't want to stop being a teen :c

To be honest, I can't wait to get older. I mean I enjoy being a teenager, it's just in the world there's so much to see and do. I'm probably naive and hopeful though, but I can dream.

At 6/16/10 09:21 AM, Toast wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tax4e4hBB Zc

ill just leave this here

I hope they keep the atmosphere of the first one.
Looks good.

Look guys Wii, Kinect and the gayass wand obviously win as you can frikkin' wave your arms in the air to control. YEAH BOI!!!

At 6/14/10 04:24 PM, Archon68 wrote: I didn't think I needed to explain all of this, but apparently I overestimated most of you.

No, we just know the truth. Want to see how deep this rabbit hole goes?

At 6/14/10 09:13 AM, Toast wrote: does it?

If I could argue with that then I'd have too much spare time.

At 6/14/10 07:08 AM, citricsquid wrote: isn't the difference that math is "absolute". It's based on a few absolute principles. Evolution is a theory because we can't prove it, but we "invented" numbers so we can say that 1+1 = 2 in absolute terms?

MAYBE NOT THIS SHIT IS COMPLICATED

But Godel's incompleteness theorem is about the fact there is no valid reason why 1+1=2. Right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations _of_mathematics#Foundational_crisis

At 6/14/10 06:04 AM, dELtaluca wrote:
Ehm not quite, Godels incompleteness theorem is proven, it is not a theory of science, but of mathematics.

Tt does not state that nothing can be proven only that an axiomatic system cannot be both complete and consistent (Aka, if everything can be proven in a system, you cannot prove that the system is actually right or not. And if you can prove that the system is consistent, there are things that cannot be proven with it)

Doesn't that kind of contradict itself? Also we base most of our modern science on mathematics so does it not relate?

i need to do more research. :(

Also, probably the most important statements in mathematics/logic ever theorised. (Again it's a theory, if it wasn't I suppose it would contradict itself.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godel%27s_i ncompleteness_theorem

The English textbooks lie but in a way that simplifies the things that would need really awkward questions, they're alright.

@Archon, Evolution is a theory in every way, as is the rest of science. Science is about coming up with theories that best fit the evidence. Every time evidence comes along that proves the theory wrong we either rethink the theory (e.g. Introduction of Einstein's theory of Relativity to expand on Newton's Laws of Motion), add to the theory (e.g. Introduction of dark matter) or get a new theory (e.g. the Theory of Evolution after Young Earth Creationism collapsed). The paradoxical thing about science is that nothing can ever be proved correct, things can only be proven wrong.
What's funny is every time we have a chemistry lesson my chemistry teacher will always state 'This isn't actually what happens but it's all you need to know".

At 6/13/10 12:18 PM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote:

At 6/13/10 10:44 AM, Deadclever23 wrote: Kirk went all 'This sentence is false on are asses'.

PROTIP: knugen isn't me.

Pfft. Same level same aura. Your the same mod with 2 accounts in order to look like you have a life.

Also, I smell 'I am legend' coming on.

Kirk went all 'This sentence is false on are asses'.

Also new sig. :)

At 6/11/10 08:44 PM, Archon68 wrote: We dissected pig fetuses in Biology today. Of course, the most mature kid in my grade decided to cut out the pig's reproductive system. Oh, he also cut off the pig's jaw, snipped off all of her toes, popped one of her lungs, and punctured her eyes. Fantastic.

I'd make a joke about pig fetuses but I'm not sure is appropriate when in context.

Happy Birthday.

Thanks guys the Lambert function is perfect.

At 6/5/10 12:30 PM, Diddy wrote:
Yes it's call the log function.

What age are you, and why are you persisting in not understanding this when it has been clearly shown to you.

All the solutions shown rely on having a logarithm of base x which totally defeats the point. I'm saying a function that calculates x when x^x. What you're proposing would be the equivalent of calculating x*x = y by rearranging x = y/x.

Surely there's a function that can calculate x when say x^x = 5.
Similar to how sqrt may work out x*x = 5.

All these solutions have to have x on both sides is the problem. Hmm...

At 6/5/10 10:07 AM, Ejit wrote: maybe this

x=xrooty
x=y^(1/x)
logx=log y^(1/x)
logx=(1/x)logy
logx/(1/x)=logy

etc

It looks promising but I can't see how you'd carry on from there.

At 6/5/10 08:57 AM, Archon68 wrote: Windows 7, of course. You were right, Mike, Windows 7 is great.

Ubuntu rapes Windows up the anus.