At 12/10/08 03:53 PM, Aksumka wrote: I have experience with Cinema 4D and Maya.

For simplicity, I do find C4D to be simpler, but I still prefer Maya. I did attempt to use Blender, but it seems way too complicated and I was too lazy to learn it. Maybe one day I'll give it a try again.

Blenders not worth it, bredren.

At 12/10/08 03:51 PM, LOLZILLA wrote: I hate Welsh people.

Fucking Welsh.

For it being simple I would suggest Cinema 4D,

We learned with Cinema 4D for 3d modelling and animation first year at uni, then later years we got to use 3dmax and XSI which is using the same basics but with a lot more choices/tools and power. So for starting C4D is a great place.

Softimage XSI is what the big boys use.

I've met pretty much everyone.

At 12/10/08 02:54 PM, LOLZILLA wrote: GIVE HIM BACK.

Only if you promise to stop setting all my lego on fire.

At 12/10/08 01:21 PM, TacoFreak wrote: halpppppp

Try rubbing your knees with butter.

only just begun to receive our signals? They will see our racist hate and come a calling.

At 12/10/08 09:00 AM, LOLZILLA wrote: I lost my shiny Charizard.

Don't worry man, I've got it round mine.

At 12/10/08 09:00 AM, JarrodK wrote: Then where the f is this guy?

Spinning in his grave.

At 12/10/08 08:54 AM, StephanosGnomon wrote: I don't know what the "official" continuity is, but wasn't John Cleese's 'R' just a replacement for 'Q'? I think Casino Royale is technically the first James Bond story (it was the first Bond book at least) so that's probably why they wouldn't have him in it.

Well that's using your noodle, case closed.

At 12/10/08 08:45 AM, JarrodK wrote:

At 12/10/08 08:43 AM, DaveMan-CI wrote: Maybe he said you were constipated and you miss heard him.

How could he possibly conclude I was constipated IF I WAS URINATING?

Cause in his spare time he's a physic in training and he was testing his mad dog skillz.

At 12/10/08 08:44 AM, JarrodK wrote: And why in the hell did Pierce Brosnan's hair change blonde?

Steroids

Maybe he said you were constipated and you miss heard him.

The Mongolian chop squad?

At 12/10/08 04:32 AM, liaaaam wrote:

At 12/10/08 04:31 AM, DaveMan-CI wrote: It was a little bit more than a tag team, more of a team deathmatch.

Well yeah but what America did was basically take a chair and wrap it around Japans face.

America did about 1% of the stuff they think they did, that's just how they like it. As long as they have poems it's all good.

At 12/10/08 04:29 AM, liaaaam wrote: If he conquered all of Europe and shit, then I don't think so no.. but we tag teamed against him and won, so screw him and all his nazipals.

It was a little bit more than a tag team, more of a team deathmatch.

At 12/10/08 04:23 AM, jokerscard wrote: Even assuming that the German forces capture the majority of abandoned American supplies it would be logistically impossible for an invasion to move any faster than a snails pace through America all the while losing forces.

You seem to be forgetting planes existed with paratroopers and bombs.

At 12/9/08 06:49 PM, LOLZILLA wrote:

At 12/7/08 08:29 AM, DaveMan-CI wrote: Why have I never seen this place.

racism

Exactly what I thought. I blame the enemy.

indubitably, so... what's going on in here, anyway?

At 12/9/08 12:47 PM, GenericName54 wrote: Lucky Star didn't start the Holocaust. It was Hitler Guy and his Nazi Squad.

WAH WAH WAT!

At 12/9/08 08:06 AM, JadeTheAssassin wrote: No, she flung me around angrily by the scruff of my neck. :(

Sounds good.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nz5F2aIWz w

Maybe he's a little bit ashamed of selling out so hard?

At 12/9/08 07:42 AM, Some-Stupid-Idiot wrote: Still how does someone who has been undead for around 100 or so years produce the semen the impregnates the girl. It's impossible none the less creepy. Also that werewolf person claims the baby as his lover, wtf Mormons.

If you're worrying about realism, I suggest you stay away from all fiction novels ;P

At 12/9/08 07:34 AM, Some-Stupid-Idiot wrote: Daveman and JohnnyWang, shut up.

It's called having a discussion, this is a forum after all...

Twilight, hmmmm.... a book targeting at female preteens who don't quiter understand the story. The book is mostly dialog which is just terrible, the girls who read it will defend it with a passion, and well I still can't get over the fact that it broke every rule of vampires.
LIEK OHMAHGAWD U SMELLZ LIEK STRAWBERIES I DONT NO IF I WANT TO EET U OR KIS U

No doubt it's aimed at a younger female audience, it's not my cup of tea, but again no-one asked anyone to like it. I personally think it's pretty good for what it's meant to be and who it's for and as for the breaking every vampire rule in the book? It's fiction there are no rules.

You noticed you have an MSN virus?

At 12/9/08 06:55 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: But it is. First of all, people seem to be buying into the books rather questionable definition of love, and as I said, stealing thunder. There are only so many movies that can be produced, and so few stories that can be hyped by media, and there are more deserving ones than Twilight.

The love story does start as an obsessive love, which is a pretty weak attempt at saying true love, but again it is just a story and it does build up into something a little deeper, but then again I'm not arguing about it's definition on love, as each to their own.

As for the more deserving, I can't really state a comment as life goes on and films get made and don't get made, that's life. You can choose to watch or not to watch. Hating on a film because it got chosen to be developed over something you would prefer is pointless. Life is too short to be worried about things like these.

As for the Discworld, the books are great and a hollywood film would probably be hated for the choice of actors anyway and how they do it, so no-one can win.

At 12/9/08 06:46 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:

At 12/9/08 06:34 AM, DaveMan-CI wrote:

At 12/9/08 06:31 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: Harry Potter at least had a plot.

The plot is the forbidden love, the story is just the outcome.

We have a slight semiotic cofusion here.

The events of a book or a movie etc. is a plot. Everything that happens to the characters and the verse during it, before it and after it are the story, this according to literary analysis theory.

Plot -"The pattern of events or main story in a narrative or drama."

I would argue that the main story is all based around the development of the forbidden love, where as the twists and effort at some action are somewhat just side events. But I'm more than happy with you having your own opinion, but I just see Twilight doing nothing wrong.

At 12/9/08 06:37 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: I tend to agree on that part, but when Twilight steals the thunder of more deserving fiction, and when it promotes questinable values, I find it hard to just sit quietly.

There is always something more deserving, but Twilight is fine in my mind for what it is, I can't complain.

Don't people usually get paid for internet surveys?

RAW DEAL

At 12/9/08 06:31 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: Harry Potter at least had a plot.

The plot is the forbidden love, the story is just the outcome.