Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

No, we can't. Even if a gay was "cured", I wouldn't trust the fucker near our menfolk.

Communism cannot work. Nothing against socialism, but communism cannot work, as society would collapse if it gave the same status to a jobless heroin addict, and a hard-working doctor.

Let's have an example. I'll go for England (not a Communist country), and what would happen if it went Red.

Our NHS is terrible. More administration than doctors in many clinics. Now, imagine this, these hard-working doctors who work for the NHS, instead of higher-paid colleagues at BUPA, are told they're worth the same as an illegal in a boat, coming to this country solely to leech off the state (no arguments about immigration, just bear with me). He could choose to;

a) Accept this classless worker's paradise.
b) Wonder which bastard just made him officially worthless.

If I were him, I'd opt for b.

Let's try another facet of Communism. The need for every citizen to have a job.

A man owns a factory. Not a large factory, not a small factory. His factory employs exactly 500 unskilled workers as assembly line quality control. They check the parts going through don't crumble in their hands, etc. He has exactly 500 points that need quality control.

The government then tells him that to support the worker's paradise, he must take on 300 more workers.

Suddenly, his productivity plummets! His employees can't work; his employees are crowded, annoyed, and thanks to the addition of extra workers, underpaid. So, maybe, an employee wants to quit. He approaches the boss.

"Please, sir, I don't want any more. I quit."
"You can't quit, Johnson. You won't have a job, then."

Strangely enough, the country's economy crumbles. No-one can figure out why.

I've only explored two sides of Communism, and only briefly, so I can understand 11-year olds defending their chosen political views viciously on this thread.

At 6/12/06 07:35 AM, Destroyo wrote: 1.Unless we aussies actualy sell the terroists nukes then they dont have none..

There are many ways to get nukes without Australia.

2.Some of you idiots may say its happend b4.. NO IT HAS NOT HAPPEND B4 what happend b4 as a natural ice age (or a few times) and it was natural. what is happening now is man-made and it is lickely due to the greenhouse gases eventualy burn earth up.

Greenhouse gases will not "burn earth up". No-one said that. The theory is that they will drown us by melting the polar ice-caps.

5. True.. but when the sun does explode so will the whoel universe.. as i cant be botherd explaining do a search on therodynamics and that should explain it.

The Sun exploding will not trigger the death of the whole universe. Many Suns explode all the time - ours is quite insignificant compared to most of them.

6.Its more likely we are the aliens and we will invade another species.

Well, duh...

7.It is a threat..but us humans are designed to be the ultimate living thing. even if we die our ansestors' descendates of human will live on. so we won't die realy now will we?

It's been proved that diseases will NOT destroy us, but not because we are amazingly magnificent evolutionary MACHINES.

PRIEST is heavy metal. PRIEST.

At 9/25/05 04:44 PM, Loch_Ness_Monster wrote: I'd enjoy a democratic school, but I wouldn't get anything done. As much as I hate to admit it, I'm a bit of a slacker and the only reason I behave myself and get my work done is because of punishment! So it probably wouldn't be that good an idea.

I never get anything done with the current system, as I don't do what I don't like.

At 9/24/05 03:25 PM, Jordannguyen wrote:

At 9/24/05 02:50 PM, DarbySniper wrote:

At 9/24/05 02:42 PM, metalmercenary wrote: at least were not EATING babies, XD

Seconded.

wait we arent?

Seconded.

At 9/24/05 02:42 PM, metalmercenary wrote: at least were not EATING babies, XD

Seconded.

At 9/24/05 09:47 AM, bcdemon wrote: I'm fair to the Undead-Americans. I treat them with the same respect as Live-Americans. It's just getting so hard to tell them apart.

Seconded.

At 9/23/05 03:39 PM, radioheaded wrote:

At 9/22/05 04:26 PM, DarbySniper wrote:

At 9/22/05 04:23 PM, Empanado wrote: In these times of...

Seconded.

I agree with the above rant.

Seconded.

At 9/22/05 04:23 PM, Empanado wrote: In these times of...

Seconded.

At 9/22/05 04:17 PM, MasterBlaster500 wrote: I want to punch a baby! Is that on topic? But I seriously think that we could develop a synthisized protein based fuel that could cut gas prices all over America from dead baby bodies and fetuses.

That's the kind of procuctive research I support.

At 9/22/05 04:04 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote:

At 9/22/05 04:02 PM, stafffighter wrote: Also, yes that particular country has it's highly trained and disiplined military forces keep their guns at home while not on active duty but they don't arm the entire population.

Every adult male over 20. Yes they have manditory military service, but once you are out you still get to keep your guns.

That wouldn't work in the U.S. How many criminals do you know who have auto's? Want to arm them? Have fun.

At 9/22/05 04:01 PM, Sevtron wrote: Perhaps we could privatize this, I mean, there are plenty of babies being born everyday, which means that it could become a whole new market.

And abolish baby killing research? I'll fight this to the death!

At 9/22/05 03:54 PM, Empanado wrote: Now, back to baby killing. What resources should be used? I would suggest the creation of a Department of Killing of babies, financed by billions of dollars cut from Education. After all, less babies equal less students.

Michael Moore said to stop the War on Terror. Let's cut from that too! Hey, Iraq has babes, let's kill it!

At 9/22/05 03:04 PM, Mick_the_champion wrote:

At 9/22/05 02:57 PM, red_skunk wrote: I think we should gas babies.

I think we should start a war for the resources to gas babies.

With a coalition of the willing Nazi's! CHAAAARGE!

At 9/22/05 06:54 AM, altanese_mistress wrote: For instance; time has no beggining or end. So this means time is either like an endless line, or a continuous loop. However, logic dictates that everything must have a beggining and an end, meaning that time is a paradox.

Time begins at the Big Bang.

Another example; the universes, while big, are not endless. There exists nothing outside of the universes, though; to ask what exists outside of the universes is like asking what country isn't on Earth. However, if this is true, then what would there be to seperate the universes? Another paradox.

The universe is endless, because it doubles back on itself. Planets, however, are not endless.

Universes? Explain your reasoning.

At 9/22/05 01:44 AM, Redbob86 wrote: Blaming videogames is just one of many examples of how nobody in this country takes personal responsibility anymore.

How very true.

"I bought my son Grand Theft Turismo, or whatever the hell it's called, ignored the ratings system, and now I'm PISSED OFF that my son knows what a drug is!"

At 9/18/05 03:53 PM, MalcheiorSveth wrote: I would have to say it depends on the game. Games like Grand Theft Auto have absolutely no redeeming qualities about them, and just promote violence. I personally like games with a PLOT. OMG, what's that?!?!? Some games are simply harmless, while others are just made to fit in with our culture. It's not the games that started it, it's what is disgustingly popular in this country right now. I.E. rap, disgusting movies, gunfights, violence, swearing, rape, etc.

I'd like to point out the good plot of GTA III. The plots of the other two games suck, but the plot of GTA III is very believeable.

Personally I love magicians and their crazy antics (HE'S GOT A HAT!!), and wanted to set up a magician's crew.

At 8/7/05 06:55 PM, Gingerwarrior wrote:

At 8/7/05 06:37 PM, RoleplayerX23 wrote: Yes you make vaild points and i appluade you for it,

thanks

but i dont agree. If you look at your threoy if time exsits why cant we travle on it. We cant just change a cups volume so that means space dose not exsits. And we can distort time. The fast you travle the slower time passes for you if you traveled fast enought you could make a day to you 2 days to some one else.

that merely your perception of any situation, say two people are driveing two different cars of the same make acrose the same distance one is traviling at 20mph and one is driving at 40mph now that would seem different, and it obviously is if anyone knows any maths, but if there going at the same speed all the way, but one is listening to his favourite radio station then he enjoys his journey alot more and tends not to think about teh boring jouney so much as his favourite songs, while having so much fun he doesn't want his jouney to end as much as the other driver therefore may lose all sence of time, while the impact of bordom hits the other person making the negative emotion make the jouney seem longer.

Actually you can MEASURE the effect of time distortion... It's not just a feeling.

Another example, two people are watch the same television show one person loves it, the other hates it, one person never wants it to end the other thinks it shouldn't have started, by the end one thinks it was too short the other thinks it was too long, it's all psycology, and in the mind and how you percieve the situation. Just because things may seem shorter or longer than they should is not because you have bent time in any way, but how you see it.

That's just psychology (one of the dark arts!!) not to do with time really.

Time flies when you're haven't fun, a watched pot never boils. there are quite a pharses like these and you see they are linked to emotion, (watching water boil can be very boring) fast time goes by is all psycological.

Your ARGUMENTS are psychological, not time itself... True, time is a complex subject, and our understanding will radically change constantly forever, but one thing I am ABSOLUTELY sure of is; time exists. It is not a 'perception'.

At 9/15/05 08:56 PM, Blackhawkdown wrote:

At 9/15/05 11:19 AM, DarbySniper wrote:

At 9/14/05 11:40 PM, Blackhawkdown wrote:

At 9/14/05 10:54 PM, mofomojo wrote: American History is mostly patriotist propaganda..

I think we all should've known that by now.

So Men didn't give their lives to create this country? No Decleration of Indpendence? We actually have no freedom? We didn't fight the British? There really is no Constition? Or maybe you're talking about some other kind of propaganda?

Oh dear it's a retard. If we could get back to the topic at hand, instead of going off on trails that will end in you being ridiculed and becoming bitter? Men gave their lives because they were told to. Declaration of Independence is a glorified Declaration of War. Freedom is relative. Fighting the British with ambushes and guerilla tactics doesn't sound so great as a righteous struggle does it? Your constitiution is a bit of paper telling you you're free...

Oh boy an asinine jerk, lets begin shall we?
Men fought and died for their freedom, not because they were told to, but because they wanted to. Leave it to somebody like you to understate the importance of the decleration of Independence. It was a document declared that the American people would be free from the tyranny of an unjust king, a document which changed the course of history. The Americans fought with the same kind of tactics that we use today, as well as engaging the British in the traditional engagements as well. Lets see a group of poor farmers, fighting off the might of one of greatest empires in world, for their freedoms. It sounds like a pretty righteous fight to me. Yes the constitiution is a bit a paper telling me that I'm free, and that's what makes the most valuable document in the US. And if you don't understand that you really are a Fucktard

Shush now.

I think I will, I proved you wrong, that's all I really need to do.

Because they wanted to? 'Attack that <whatever>' leaves you so much choice. Read an unbiased source. Even a horrible histories book can teach you such simple facts as; soldiers obey orders. Are you denying the Declaration of Independence is a Declaration of War? Or saying war is good? I can tell you one thing... The American Army today don't kill people on Christmas Eve at night, when the enemy is asleep... I think they'd be quite offended if you said that to them. They WERE free. They were an unimportant colony who weren't represented; English industrial towns weren't represented at one point! It's a valuable bit of paper because of idiots like you. I understood every word of that, and as a consequence, you've made yourself look idiotic. Please don't try again.

At 9/15/05 06:55 PM, Gunter45 wrote:

At 9/15/05 06:47 PM, mofomojo wrote: What would that language be : American?

Actually it's English, a NON-AMERICAN language.

An language that was NOT derived in the US. Therefore, someone must've kept some NON-American culture to get this American language.

Do you really think your argument is fair?

It's the American dialect. American English is more widely spoken than the vareity spoken in England. We have, in effect, hijacked the English language.

That's a regional dialect, not a whole language. I don't regard Geordie as a language for example (more as an insane babble :P). But the next point is valid, English is a manic mix of Germanic, French, Latin and a bunch of other crazy stuff. Some of it's Chinese too (even though they're ages away).

Harabec's brother. He slaughtered those fucking martian miners, so they kicked his UCKING ASS!!

^Starsiege.

At 9/15/05 11:48 AM, conorschild wrote: Associates with other people that dress, act or speak eccentrically

thank god for that! I only follow a tall bearded man who wears a cloak and sandals, and keeps taking out the evil spirits of lepers!

Darn him! Alms for an ex-leper?

At 9/14/05 06:04 PM, Nomader wrote:

At 9/14/05 05:44 PM, Soviet_Guy wrote:

At 9/13/05 10:34 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:
And we all know how much fun it is to judge people before you meet them and get all self righteous on their ass for disagreeing with you.

Did you read my earlier posts? I said I've been to America many times, and seriously America is not filled with smart people, or for that matter average minded people.

I obviously don't know where you visited - Americans are just as good and hardy race as any I've seen (I've been out of the US so you know... not like I could base my opinion on Canada cause one american's there)

In my idea, if you have a problem with something in America, why don't you talk to Congress about it? I'm sure that they'd never hear your call

And on top of it all, why don't you convince your country to invade America? They wouldn't - because America has developed its own weapons to the point where no other country is as highly technological in that standpoint - and Americans developed it... my you haven't met the brighter minds of our society...

Most inventions are stolen and adjusted. How hard is it to guess that a faster firing machine gun could kill more people? How hard is it to design a rocket with longer range by, get this, giving it a bigger fuel tank? Christ you people have bad arguments. I'm not against or with patriots or racists, and personally I think that unless you are bright you're retarded. HOW MANY BRIGHT PEOPLE ARE IN ANY COUNTRY? To quote Einstein, countries are the 'measles' of the human race, as they breed patriots and racists. Both kinds of people can go die.

At 9/14/05 10:50 PM, mofomojo wrote:

At 9/14/05 07:13 PM, KrazyKool wrote: God damn it, wow. Nobody actually cares about major political issues in the politics forum.

That's odd.

It's not a major political issue...

In fact, I don't think this really matters. The pledge was geared towards religion, irrelavant of the nations history or whatever...

History is History, get over it, we don't need to follow in the footsteps of history. That's just redundant and works against progress.

What about athiests?

Or Hindus? Or Buddhists?

Overall, if you're offended by this(or if you even care about this...), then you're a douchebag.

I completely agree with this. What kind of retard calls taking a word out of some patriotic shite a major political issue? They took our words pee em gee. Get over yourself. America will be no less American if that word is taken out. Go outside maybe, or at least make better posts.

Cock mangler.

At 9/14/05 11:40 PM, Blackhawkdown wrote:

At 9/14/05 10:54 PM, mofomojo wrote: American History is mostly patriotist propaganda..

I think we all should've known that by now.

So Men didn't give their lives to create this country? No Decleration of Indpendence? We actually have no freedom? We didn't fight the British? There really is no Constition? Or maybe you're talking about some other kind of propaganda?

Oh dear it's a retard. If we could get back to the topic at hand, instead of going off on trails that will end in you being ridiculed and becoming bitter? Men gave their lives because they were told to. Declaration of Independence is a glorified Declaration of War. Freedom is relative. Fighting the British with ambushes and guerilla tactics doesn't sound so great as a righteous struggle does it? Your constitiution is a bit of paper telling you you're free...

Shush now.

At 8/24/05 10:17 AM, MikeZan wrote:

At 8/24/05 10:08 AM, mofomojo wrote: It's a fascist government.

Under the disguise of communism?

We oughtta just nuke china.

Yeah great idea we might as well nuke the whole fucking planet just to be sure...

Just what I woudl say. Except I'd be abusive.

At 9/7/05 07:46 PM, Nitroglys wrote: ok i saw the topic where someone called america the next rome. good thought but i find us closer to the communists. when veitnam was on the brink of bankrupcy and in many problems. and communism(in itself is a great idea) offered a way out. we didnt like and went to war. now we say iraq has problems and we offered our democracy(good but expensive) and now we find out selves in the midst of a war between us forcing our goverment on people and the people that dont like it are fighting us.

Ah, the banishment of idiots. An old hobby revisited.

First, Communism depends on the ABSOLUTE honesty of all government ministers, and you complaining about them doesn't help that image. Iraq had an autocracy problem which we (by which I mean you) replaced with anarchy. Of course anarchy's all well and good in, say, sweden, where the people are cool, but in a country where the most respected profession is warlord, it doesn't work.

Second, the USSR pushed THEIR government on EVERYONE. Explain how you pushing democracy on anyone is the same as shooting people for questioning the system. The USSR at least made sure the local people attacked them and not each other.

Third, if you understood communism, you'd understand that it is fundamentally flawed. It is riddled with classes, even though it purports to be equal, and it was DISASTROUS in the USSR. Ask the average American if they can afford lightbulbs. I'm guessing yes. Plus, the US hasn't used tanks on protestors in a while, to the best of my memory.

At 9/13/05 04:19 PM, SoldAsFreedom wrote: However, recently that beast has reared its ugly head once again. Now, schools are trying to actually ban the entire sale of soda in its vending machines and cafeterias. Yes, the same people that brought you the "red is too harsh and violent, so lets mark papers in purple or green pen" scheme are attempting to cripple to sale of carbonated drinks in public schools across the country.
Any thoughts or comments?

How very pointless... Why not ban fat people and carbon dioxide while you're at it... You're not going to change anything...