3,942 Forum Posts by "D2Kvirus"
At 10/24/02 11:57 AM, SoulRifter wrote:
What I don't understand is why people are so opposed to war? What good is it going to do just sitting here waiting for Saddam to attack again? He won't listen to negotians or peace talks, because he really doesn't care. Saddam is a Dictator, and he wants absolute power. Not just in Iraq, but anywhere he can get it. So he, along with people like Osama BinLaden, uses terrorism to scare people into letting him get his way. He is, and has been for some time, working on building dangerous weapons, which could do a great deal of damage to our world. Letting him do that, and not taking any action to stop him is foolhardy, and people need to understand that. We can't just sit here in America, and hope that it will all go away, because it won't. Like most people, I sure as hell don't want to go fight in a war, but if it comes down to it, I will, because defending my country for the people I care about is more important than my selfishness. It should be important to you too. WHat person can really say that they don't want to protect their country? And if they do, why the fuck do they still live in that country? If you don't like the US, get the hell out, because we don't need you and your self righteous views. Protection ourselves and our interests is our first priority, and ignoring a very real threat to that just because some people might die in the process, defending our freedom as a nation, is foolish. Some must die so that others might live. That's the way it is, and has been forever; and no amount of your bitching is going to change that.
There are so many basic, childish, and factual errors in your argument, I'll just use bulletpoints to save an hour or two;
1. This is not a war. Look at the definition;
A concerted effort or campaign to combat or put an end to something considered injurious.
Yes, in 1991, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Note the fact it was over a decade since this happened. Since then, has Iraq shown any sign of aggression to another country? Compare to the US in the first couple of years of this Century; not popular in Serbia, Albania (Kosovo) or Afghanistan, who they bombed to shit for no gain, while China and Palestine aren't exactly the most US-friendly states either, courtesy of spy planes and selling Israel cheap weapons, and not doing anything about Sharon's genocidal campaign. Who are the aggressors?
2. "What good is it going to do just sitting here waiting for Saddam to attack again?"
Attack who? The US? Jordan? Kuwait? Iran? Be specific.
3. "He won't listen to negotians or peace talks, because he really doesn't care."
Bull-fucking-shit. Twice Saddam has agreed to the terms and conditions of the UN to let weapons inspectors into the country, three times the terms have been changed by Bush. Have you noticed a pattern yet? What is Bush so afraid of finding; all his talk of these so-called "Weapons of mass Destruction" is, in fact, a huge lie?
4. "Saddam is a Dictator, and he wants absolute power. Not just in Iraq, but anywhere he can get it.'
So does Bush. So does Sharon. Note these are the leaders marching armies into other countries with no real justification.
At 10/24/02 11:05 AM, vibes wrote:
I dislike George Bush. I dislike John Howard.
I dislike Tony Blair (AKA Bush's Little Bitch).
What is this, The People Who Hate People Party??? Please Lord, hope somebody gets that one...
of all the Newgrounds users, 808 of you are FUCKING MORONS, while 297 of you are just FUCKING MORONS.
I just needed to get that off my chest , before more votes swing that way...
At 10/23/02 05:51 PM, blkwolf21 wrote:
YES!!! But u know that Bush isnt attacking Iraq, he's just invading and killin Saddam and then quickly getting outta there. Thats dumb as hell. he should tear up the whole fuckin place. Saddam is a major factor in world terrorism, especially in financing terrorists. who do u think gives palestinians and the Islamic Jihad money for shit? SADDAM HUSSEIN
whats the point of the war against terror if u dont kill ALL ARABS?
Fuck, man, Rumsfeld would be proud of your idiotic, brainwashed ass.
Come to think of it, who's selling tanks(I say selling, but it seems to be 10 for the price of 1) to Israel to continue their genocide in the West Bank?
Anyone with an iota of intellect (as in not watching primetime news and swallowing Government bullshit so readily) will realise Sharon is the aggressor, and just wants a little more territory to go with what he owns, especially if that means steamrolling over a different culture, with whom he doies not appear to appreciate in one part. Sound familiar? Yes, Grade School History would give you a hint that Israel are in the middle of Holocaust II: This Time It's Personal, and no-one in the US will admit it.
If Rummy says that bombing the shit out of Iraq to avoid paying the annual tax on the arsenal of bombs they wasted your education on will, in turn, stop the Palestinians rising up (quote, by the way, from mid-September) and you believe it, then I seriously hope that saddm launches his "Weapons of Mass Destruction" directly at you. You'd be a martyr for CNN, which'll make your parents proud...
Has anyone else noticed he has the remarkable power to change his appearance at will?
Seriously, think about it. Last Monday, the police were looking for a Hispanic guy, by last Friday he was "of Middle Eastern descent" (OH NO!!!), and today, it's a black guy.
What the Hell is going on??? Are the authorities trying to further persecute every minority in the Virginia/Maryland area, or is it a case of every ethnic minority rising up, simultaniously, with sniper rifles, to fight back against white oppressors at the exact same time? Soon it'll be a Liberal, anti-gun, anti-Capitalist hippy that's doing this, in order to make the NRA look like a bunch of incompetant rednecks with nothing else to do when a KKK meeting isn't scheduled.
But even more seriously, if I had a sniper rifle, in the general vicinity of Washington DC, I'd head for that big white building and make myself a shoe-in for the Nobel Peace Prize. At least they should prioritise...
At 10/23/02 03:47 PM, The_Raven wrote:
Good point, but the phrase "towel heads" just makes you look like a childish retard...
Sorry, I was quoting from the US Department of Foreign Affairs Manifesto...
I shoulda learned by now that sarcasm, irony and dry, wit generally don't carry on Message Boards, and I should be as subtle as a head on car collision in order for everyone to get my point, but there we go.
At 10/24/02 06:59 AM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
i know i have lost this arguement but i will keep insulting u until eventually u stop apoligising for things i have dun i dont have 2 justify myself 2
u just cos ur some big college guy.
u know
well i dont have a problem with u ubt u know what im saying??
In.sult.ing
v. intr. Archaic
1. To behave arrogantly.
2. To give offense; offend: a speech that was intended to insult.
Spam.ming
Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
Dron.ing
v. intr.
1. To make a continuous low dull humming sound: “Somewhere an electric fan droned without end” (William Styron).
2. To speak in a monotonous tone: The lecturer droned on for hours.
3. To pass or act in a monotonous way.
All I can see you doing is the latter pairing. An insult does not constitute in saying "FUCK U U PRICK" or whining "THIS GUY MADE ME MAD" like the pre-pubescent waste of organic matter that you clearly are.
Maybe you live to pollute message boards with your inane ramblings, but that is the main reason that you should go out once in a while and partake in activities that involve friends, if you understand what I'm saying - I know it's difficult to understand proper spelling that isn't all in caps, but at least try.
If you're willing to wait until I apologise to you, you're in for a long wait, mes amigo. At least until you hit puberty and, you know, MATURE A LITTLE. Maybe then you could justify your pitiful existence to Tom & Wade, after all, it's their site you're spamming incessantly. As for now, you can't justify yourself to me, that would involve your life having some substance.
Go out, learn to communicate, talk to girls, learn to type properly, and function in social situations. Still, at least your immature outbursts are amusing to me and the Psychology Department, who I've posted many of your insightful comments to. You'll be famouse, when they publish the paper on the life of the sad teenage flamer, with that charming photo from your profile on the front page. In facct, they're very interested in why you tried to gain sympathy by acting like you were American or something - either you hoped for a little US ympathy, or truly believe you are American, because your heroes in Slipknot emanate from there.
Very basic stuff, but they needed entertainment.
At 10/22/02 02:27 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
fuck u u prick
how obut u go out and get a job if ur 22!!!
I am devastated by your comeback. I don't think I could possibly come back from it, considering I've got GCSEs, A Levels, a bachelor Degree and am currently doing a Master's degree, whilst you...oh dear.
Seriously, why do you keep trying to get the last word? It's clear to everyone you've lost this argument because you don't have the raw intellect to partake in one, so kindly bugger off and do your homework like a good, normal 13 year old should. And learn the structure of insulting people - typing "FUCK YOU" and "PRICK" makes you look like a whining little cum wad, and typing it in caps doesn't come off as big, clever, interesting, original, insulting - do you get my gist, or did your attention span wander after the first sentence?
At 10/18/02 02:46 PM, Slizor wrote: What's everyone's opinion on this?
So, Bush says that the Commies have nukes (sorry, "Weapons of Mass Destruction"), as well as the Terrorists and the Towel Heads.
Please, your country has spent BILLIONS of taxpayer's money on a whole arsenal of nukes (22,000 to be precise, more than enough to annihilate the planet), so until you understand the phrase "double Standard", tell Cheney to stop writing such crap for you to read to the gullible moron majority. Which exist because you, like numerous other Governments before, decided weapons spending was more important than education.
At 10/21/02 02:46 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
FUCK U, U ELDERLY PRICK!!!!!!!!
I know being 22 makes me the best part of a decade older than you, but judging by the intellectual worth of your responses, I'm several million years of evolution older than you as well.
And don't worry, I'm sure the whole UK thinks you "suck", as you so eloquently put it.
What's your next, Pulitzer nominated comeback? Making light of the fact I'm a lower level than you? Ooooohhhh, tough guy...
I forgot the damn thing was there. Nix it, nobody will shed a tear or anything.
At 10/18/02 04:15 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: shut up
england sucks!
ok
america rules!
UK SUCKS!
AMERICA RULES!
NOW GO AWAY!!!!
I HATE U
WELL ACTUALLY I DONT
ITS JUST UR A BIT GAY!
U KNOW AND WELL I WANNA APOLOGISE FOR THIS GUY
HES SAD AND WELL THINKS HE COULD BE THE NEXT TONY BLAIR WELL HELL I COULD HE DONT DO MUCH!
THANK YOU
Damn, you're one whiney, pathetic little bastard, aren't you? One with a laughable control over grammar, and thinking that typing all in caps is big & clever.
What a pity I made you mad. That wasn't my intention at any point, you sad little man. Respect your elders, and your superiors. That means me on both counts, if your underutilised cerebellum couldn't handle the strain. Now go back to what you do best; masterbating.
I would like to apologise for Phantom_Spancker being such a sad, pathetic waste. Do not blame me, I didn't know him as a child, so have an alibi for not giving him any attention he so desperatly craves, nor did I give him a computer or internet connection.
Not all Brits are like him, as much of the British population has grown the fuck up at some point, and don't needlessly spam the crap out of message boards for that half second of attention, which he probably creams himself whenever he receives it. Which reminds me, you can bill me for your dry cleaning...
At 10/10/02 10:45 PM, Baiwan_Fuong wrote: Do you think that "Dubyuh's" moronic war against Iraq gonna trigger armaggedon(sp?)...?
I feel that "dubyuh" doesn't relize how dangerous the situation he has put the entire world in is...It might get ugly!
Personally, I think his little bitchfest is going to backfire on him, when UN Inspectors are allowed into Iraq when Bush fails to move the goalposts in time - twice Iraq have allowed them to enter the country, three times Bush has changed the stipulations - which in turn will lose the US many allies.
Take into account that the Middle East is a volatile place, and having this jumped up little shit running around declaring war on anything with a towel on its head will rapidly create support for Iraq. If the US go it alone (oh yes, and Tony sends in our army to help the PR exercise), they won't get such an easy ride as they would think. Carpet bombing doesn't work, unless you want a high civilian body count (look at action in Kosovo and Afghanistan for that).
This bee in his bonnet about deposing Saddm will fail miserably. The US tactic of killing the head of state, thus ending the tyranny, has failed spectacularly in the past. The new Afghan President has had several attempts on his life already, and let's not forget that Chile used to have an "Evil Liberal" in charge...until the CIA moved in, blew his brains out, and put in a far more preferable leader, going by the name of Pinochet if memory serves correct. Similarly, Saddam has a network lined up in his place, from his son downwards, and they can step into the breach and carry on regardless.
After rattling a few sabres, Bush is going to have to face up to the fact he will face stern opposition from the UN, especially if the weapons inspectors are actually allowed to venture onto Iraq (again, it's Bush holding them up), and prove that he is making all this shit up.
Carrying on where his father left off is what we can oly hope for. No, not Persian Gulf Distraction Mk.II, but getting his ass voted out of office at the next election.
The truth is, he won't act on his intentions, he just wants us to believe he will. The possibility is that other countries will turn against the US, not Iraq, and that is something that his cabinet of horrors do not want, even if they will not admit it.
So, the latest highly sensible utterence from the mouth of George W. Bush (and the pen of Dick Cheney...) is that the bombing in bali was, of course, perpetrated by al-Qua'ida (or whatever this week's spelling is).
Now, for anyone who's head isn't firmly rammed up their illiterate, incompetant, Christian Fundamentalist, warmongering ass, this statement is another entry to bulging file of terrorising the US citizens into getting a better rating on the opinion polls.
If you don't believe that statement, here's a dictionary definition;
TERRORISM - The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Every time he says there will be another attack on the US, or makes shit up about Iraq having "Weapons of mass Destruction" (another buzz word), is that not threatening the people with intended action?
Anyway, as I was saying, the attack in Bali on Monday was perpetrated by, to quote Jello Biafra, Osama bin-Werewolf, because we know for a fact they are the only terrorist group in the world that will do such a thing. Certainly not the IRA, those lovable Irish scamps, with a history of such acts, as well as being harboured in the US in the past, and supported by Blair et al straight into Whitehall. Clearly, the Birmingham Bombings were just a harmless prank that went wrong.
But for all his flapping that Ossie's back to his best/worst, he's making himself seem more desperate than ever. even his little bitch, Tony Blair, has momentarily grown a pair and gone on the record to say it was more likely Jemaah Islamiah, an Indonesian extremist group, although he then said, because they're Muslim, they're linked to al-Queda.
But why would bin-Laden's cronies bother bombing Indonesia? Bali is hardly an example of Westernised culture, due to being in the Pacific rim last time I checked, and I doubt their President ordered Afghanistan to be bombed at any time to divert media attention from the story that he got blown by an intern or two - yes, I remember that one, and the strange incident when Pakistan reported bombs hit them, then mysteriously recanted the report about 4 hours later. In fact, most of the victims of the attack were Australian, with a couple of Brits - hardly a worthy target, unlike The Pentagon or World Trade Center.
The only surprise is that The Puppet didn't use this as a shining example of Iraq testing out their "Weapons of Mass Destruction" on unsuspecting Balinese. By the way, a nuclear warhead (which the US has 22,000 of) has a range of 500 miles at best. Unless Saddam gets in the good graces of Castro (terrorist/Communist, same difference), the only worry is a stray missile might destroy the shipment of weapons coming into Sharon's possession for his own personal Holocaust, which neither Blair or Bush is batting an eyelid to, apart from the rare instance of saying they killed a few too many Panistinians this time, or the rental on their bulldozers just ran out.
Besides, if Saddam somehow reduceed Sharon to a pile of ashen dust, how could anyone claim he's evil, after oing millions a favour - although the deficit in the US economy will mysteriously start growing again...
Spancker, or whatever his name is. Spamming motherfucker, with no use for an opinion.
Personally, I believe the greatest scourge in the music industry (barring all the capitalist scumbags that dictate what we should listen to) is, well, CANADA.
After being pissed off greatly by Nickleback for six months , they unleash Avril Lavigne upon my consciousness. Do they seriously think that having a song called "Sk8er Boi" and wearing a sideways baseball cap would fool us into thinking she's more than another teen Alanis who'll hopefully vanish into obscurity after one album? don't encourage the Sum 41 kids to visit the record stores, especially for this crap.
At 12/25/01 11:51 AM, The_crazed_one681 wrote: your fucking retarded
Don't you mean "you're"?
Learn to spell - it might make you look un-retarded, or at least be a start...
At 2/25/02 08:42 PM, Commander-K25 wrote: For all of you who love to point out how the US as an "Evil Empire," I think this makes my case against that assertion. It's all true.
Taken from Adbusters. I used the same on the IMDb during Patriotic Tourettes Syndrome outbursts.
America vs The World
In the last 60 years...
WORLD WAR II 1941-45
Fought Axis forces for three years; first nuclear war, against Japan.
GREECE 1947-49
Supports and directs extreme right in civil war.
PHILIPPINES 1948-54
CIA directs war against leftist Huk Rebellion.
PUERTO RICO 1950
Nationalist insurrection challenges American occupation; US command operation puts down rebellion.
KOREAN WAR 1950-53
Joins South Korea and other allies to fight China and North Korea.
IRAN 1953
CIA directs overthrow of elected left-leaning government, installs Shah.
GUATEMALA 1954
CIA directs exile invasion and overthrow of leftist government; military junta installed.
LEBANON 1958
US occupation ends under UN Observer Group.
VIETNAM WAR 1960-75
Fought South Vietnam rebels and North Vietnam forces; 1-2 million killed.
CUBA 1961
CIA-directed "Bay of Pigs" invasion.
LAOS 1962
Green Berets active in training, military buildup, support of rightist forces during guerrilla war.
PANAMA 1964
Control of Panama Canal Zone challenged; rioting against US forces.
INDONESIA 1965
Army coup assisted to an unknown degree by CIA; left-leaning elected government toppled; between 250,000 to 1,000,000 lives lost.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1965-66
Troops invade during election as pre-emptive action against leftist rebellion or communist government.
GUATEMALA 1966-67
Command operation; Green Berets aid in combat against leftist rebels.
CAMBODIA 1969-75
War against leftist forces; intense bombing; up to 2 million killed.
OMAN 1970
US directs Iranian invasion in support of Omani government against Marxist "Dhufar rebellion."
LAOS 1971-73
US directs South Vietnamese invasion.
CHILE 1973
CIA-backed coup ousts elected leftist president; rightist dictator installed.
ANGOLA 1976-92
CIA assists South African-backed rebels.
EL SALVADOR 1981-92
Advisors aid government forces against leftist rebels.
NICARAGUA 1981-90
US directs guerrilla exile invasion ("Contra war") against revolutionary government; US forces plant mines.
LEBANON 1982-84
Marines help police negotiated evacuation of Palestine Liberation Organization; US forces combat Muslim and Syrian fighters in support of Christian government.
HONDURAS 1983-89
Military bases established for US-backed "Contra war" with Nicaragua.
GRENADA 1983-84
US troops topple pro-Cuban government.
LIBYA 1986
Air strikes against nationalist government with terrorist links.
BOLIVIA 1986
Operation Blast Furnace; US troops and Bolivian police face peasant resistance in cocaine-producing regions.
IRAN 1987-88
Intervention on side of Iraq in war against Iran.
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 1989
Troops restore order after civil unrest spurred by Hurricane Hugo.
PHILIPPINES 1989
Armed US aircraft support constitutional government against failed coup.
PANAMA 1989-90
Nationalist government ousted by 27,000 US soldiers; more than 2,000 people killed.
GULF WAR 1990-
Operation Desert Storm drives Iraq out of Kuwait; 200,000+ killed. No-fly zone ongoing; periodic bombing.
SOMALIA 1992-94
US-led United Nations occupation during civil war.
YUGOSLAVIA 1992-94
US troops in NATO operation to enforce sanctions against Serbia and Montenegro.
BOSNIA 1993-95
Operation Deny Flight patrols civil war no-fly zone; air combat, Serbs bombed.
HAITI 1994-96
Troops restore elected leftist president to office three years after coup.
CROATIA 1995
American and NATO forces attack Bosnian Serb airfields prior to Croatian offensive.
SUDAN 1998
Pharmaceutical factory with terrorist links bombed; retaliation for terrorist attacks on US embassies in Africa.
AFGHANISTAN 1998
Bombing of Islamic fundamentalist military camps; retaliation for terrorist attacks on US embassies in Africa.
YUGOSLAVIA 1999
US aircraft play the key role in heavy NATO air strikes against Serbian forces in Kosovo.
COLOMBIA 2000
Special Forces train anti-narcotics and anti-rebel battalions, supply combat aircraft.
MACEDONIA 2001
US forces in NATO's Operation Essential Harvest partially disarm Albanian rebels.
AFGHANISTAN 2001
In retaliation for terrorist attacks in US, forces attempt ouster of Afghanistan's Taliban government, attack bases linked to Islamic militant Osama bin Laden.
If anything, it makes them sound like the family on the street that make life very difficult.
At 4/24/01 09:58 AM, Freakapotimus wrote: Tuesday April 24 12:57 AM ET
New Report Seen Slamming U.S. Music Industry
By Sue Pleming
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The music industry is expected to come under fierce criticism on Tuesday in a new U.S. government report on the marketing of violent and lewd entertainment to children.
The Federal Trade Commission study, due for release on Tuesday at around 10 a.m. EDT follows a scathing FTC report in September that said the entertainment industry ``aggressively'' marketed adult-rated films, video games and music to under-age audiences.
A source familiar with the FTC's progress report said it came down hardest on the music industry, while the film and video-game sectors were found to have made some headway since last September but still had work to do.
``The music industry comes off looking the worst of all three in terms of progress they have made since the last study was done,'' the source said.
He said the report did not propose any specific actions to be taken against the industry, preferring instead to rely on self-regulation and public pressure.
In the past, the FTC has balked at policing Hollywood, citing constitutional hurdles.
Last September's FTC report on the entertainment industry was ordered by former President Bill Clinton after the massacre in April 1999 at Columbine High School in Colorado raised new concerns about the effect of violent entertainment on young people.
The music industry, in particular, has been criticized for not providing ratings according to age for the sale of recordings with sexually explicit, homophobic, misogynistic and violent lyrics such as those by Grammy Award winning rapper Eminem.
Music Likened To Books
Amy Weiss, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America, and other music industry sources defended the music business ahead of the report.
``Music is unique for the same reason there are no rating systems for books. The works of musical artists are not rated. It's virtually impossible to rate words,'' Weiss told Reuters.
For 15 years, record companies have been placing ``parental advisory'' stickers on albums that have profanity and explicit lyrics but have never suggested an age limit for albums with ''parental advisory'' stickers.
Connecticut Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman is expected to introduce a bill later this week aimed at punishing firms that market violent media products to children.
The proposed legislation would target ``false and deceptive advertising'' of adult-rated films, music and electronic games to under-age audiences, an aide said.
The bill, co-sponsored by Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Herbert Kohl, is likely to face opposition from Hollywood lobbyists who say it amounts to cultural censorship and is contrary to First Amendment rules protecting free speech.
I propose a new law.
Any organisation containing the letters "TC" making up two thirds of their abbrieviated title should be ignored, told to fuck off, then shot out of a cannon into a Chinese airspace.
All they do is bitch, moan and bullshit us thinking thy're important.
At 4/29/01 11:30 PM, P-Chan wrote:At 4/16/01 10:52 AM, GameboyCC wrote:Good point. And that raises an interesting question...At 4/6/01 08:00 AM, Mos wrote:So...? American would do the exact same thing if we caught a spy plane from a communist country.At 4/6/01 02:09 AM, P-Chan wrote:Because China is holding 24 people hostage.If China just lets go and both sides back off, the situation will fade out and no one will have to save-face.I'm unfamiliar with the situation, but your comment "if the chinese just let go" sounds rather US-centric.
Why not if the US just lets go and both sides back off, the situation will fade and no one will have to save-face?
How many countries out there perform similar survelliance scannings around US waters?
Anyone?
Probably very few. Dub-yuh being a little too close to The Button would scare the shit outta me...
At 4/10/01 03:13 AM, Pantomime_Horse wrote:At 4/9/01 10:14 AM, D2KVirus wrote:Let's have em, all the brits I've met were quite clean, Let's make French jokes, nobody likes them much.At 4/7/01 12:41 PM, shorbe wrote: I'm going to set the cat amongst the pigeons, and say it's just cause the English are a dirty race.How many Aussie remarks per square foot do you want?
Invading armies do...
It seems that the Chinese fighter pilot would be the one at fault, but the Chinese are treating the captives well, all the Chinese want is an apology(despite being probably at fault), Georgy boy should just apologise & that should start the ball rolling in the right direction.
The odds of that happening are how many million to one?
At 4/7/01 01:08 PM, Bugger_all_99 wrote:NATO and the UN are both bugger boys for a handful of countries. Anyone who believes otherwise is naive.Not saying I don't view them as "bugger boys" but calling people naive is a stupid thing to do, since it will just get you called cynical.
Hey, cynical is a good thing!
At 4/7/01 12:41 PM, shorbe wrote: I'm going to set the cat amongst the pigeons, and say it's just cause the English are a dirty race.
How many Aussie remarks per square foot do you want?
Because China is holding 24 people hostage.If China just lets go and both sides back off, the situation will fade out and no one will have to save-face.I'm unfamiliar with the situation, but your comment "if the chinese just let go" sounds rather US-centric.
Why not if the US just lets go and both sides back off, the situation will fade and no one will have to save-face?
This is from the same US spy plane that was doing a Cold War tour of duty in Chinese air space despite warnings not to, isn't it?
At 4/6/01 01:34 AM, Mos wrote:Can Robin Cook be next? After all, NATO killed more civillians than the Serb army a couple of years ago, with plenty of taped evidence on MissileTV.How many did the Serb army kill?
How many did NATO kill?
How many times did NATO try to dupe us into believing the Serbs hackied into the database and aim missiles at civilians?
i think society is a virus fed to us through tubes....!
m'kay?
I think I'm gonna nick that graphic...
He didn't even know there was a cold war to begin with! He just thought "Russia was mean..." I can't wait until I can vote his ass out of office!
If someone doesn't add him to the Hall of fame occupied by Lincoln, McKinley and JFK first...
At 4/4/01 12:08 PM, Bugger_all_99 wrote: Beef shortage my arse, its about money.
That's what I said. At incredible length...
