3,942 Forum Posts by "D2Kvirus"
At 12/5/02 07:50 PM, THISISNOTMYALIAS wrote: Blam club member #45 checking in, just letting you know I'm still alive. Haven't been able to dig up much crap lately. Anyone else having bad luck?
It appears that GMT can work for me now. Stop hogging all the crap, guys!!!
That's member #789, still stuck underneath BornMasterbating on the member list. Talk about embarrassing...
Once upon a time a man named Strawberry Clock got a computer and Flash Animator...wait, you don't want nightmares, do you?
Quina from FFIX has to be the most annoying character to control. As for enemies, Proud Clod (FFVII) for the general fact he won't frickin' die, and X Death from FFV, because his name is so cliched and lame, and he's basically just an ass.
At 11/30/02 11:58 AM, Askey18 wrote: the reason the government is warning us now is bc the terrorist are now acting out those plots.
Bullshit. It IS an attempt to scare the genral bovine public into believing that the huge waste of their taxes on this PR campaign against Arabs, sorry, "War on Terrorism" is worth something which the education system isn't. It also has a slght effect on the Opinion Polls - after all, when Bush tries diplomacy, it falls, when he's bombing the shit out of other countries it goes up, so it's effectivly keeping a balence.
Now, living in the UK, we were subjected to a bombing campeign by the IRA for 20 years. At no point did Heath, Thatcher, or Major fearmonger by saying there was an all to real threat that terrorist activity would happen in London, which it did on a regular basis. However, since Sept. 11th Blair has been trying to convince us that al-Qu'eda have plans to aim planes into us - despite the fact we're viewed as an insignificant speck to the rest of Europe (which we are), and won't register to any major terrorist network unless we're selling them cut price weapons. As for the IRA, they have three seats in Whitehall. Spot the double standard, please.
Don't try and convince yourself there will be a terrorist attack on your doorstep every week, just after Bush says so; it's irrational, and playing into his psychological governing.
While I'm on the subject, don't believe every terrorist plot is liken to bin-Laden. There are thousands of terrorist groups across the globe, and they can't all be linked to him. In fact, very few can. This attack in Kenya "has the hallmarks of an al-Qu'eda attack"? What are they, exactly, and how are they different from any other terrorist group? Try to demonise one group into Bond-like supervillainy is beyond incompetence; but then again, what do you expect?
Yes, the Government are now passing the Criminal Justice "Bill", which is nothing more than the Criminal Justice Act rehashed - which is one of the many things that cost the Tories their place in Government.
Not only should it be illegal for Firefighters to go on strike (a low tactic if ever there was one, and there was in the CJA), but it also aims to RE-criminalise Cannabis, due to a suden outbreak of anarchy after the rules were relaxed. Note sarcasm.
Sorry to break it to you Americans, but you don't have dibs on hitty rulers any more.
Sorry about the lack of detail; I got fuck all sleep last night so can't focus for more than ten seconds without zoning out.
At 11/26/02 07:49 PM, Raptorman wrote: A government official acting in official capacity is expected to practice greater diplomacy than to call a forigen head of state a moron. This is why she is now out of work.
You try and do it.
At 11/29/02 01:11 PM, DirtyHead wrote: why?
jealousy. The are all jealous of the UK & USA.
Yes, that's it. You FUCKING moron.
OK, first up, how many, non-UK, users are familiar with this? If the answer is "not many", I'd better get you up to speed in case it goes over your heads.
Earlier this month, the Firefighter's Union had given up on pressing for a 16% increase in their pay, due to the Government not wanting to pay up at any point, and have been on a 24 hour strike between the 15th and 16th, and next weekend will go on another 24 hour strike. In the meantime, the Army is taking over their duties, and not doing that particularly well.
According to Tony Blair, in order to fully fund their increase in pay, and to end the dispute, this would require the cost of £500m over the course of the next three years, which he claims is "unacceptable".
At the exact same time, however, Blair is planning to placate his good friend George Warmonger Bush by spending £7.5bn, in one lump sum, on going to "war" against Iraq. Also on the agenda is the cost of paying the Army to put out fires, as well as keep their "Green Goddesses" (Army fire trucks, in other words) on the roads, despite being woefully inadiquate, and not having their own water supply, making them reliant on the nearest hydrant. There is also the minor fact the Army aren't specifically trained for tackling fires.
Blair backs up his claim that there can't be an increase of more than 4% in pay, saying that the strike "cannot succeed." However, there are two different takes on this statement;
1. He meant to say "will not succeed", and call in the strikebreakers. That's the exact same tactic Thatcher used during the Miner's Strike in the 1980s.
2. Already, it is a matter of saving face, and he's hoping that the firemen back down before he does.
His behavious during this matter has been intriguing to say the least. Just over a year ago, he was hailing the New York firefighters for being "heroic", and "vital to everyday survival." So, what makes them different to our firemen, and how? Is it because ours don't have a building collapsing on them, or the small matter of not actually being payed by the British public, which makes them superior in every way?
If he is more intent on spending thirty times what the firemen want on this charade in Iraq that only the idiotic actually believe is about anything but oil than on the infastructure of his own country, he is more delusional than previously feared.
But there is one obvious solution to the whole matter that is so simple it's unbelievable. Hope that a fire breaks out in Downing Street; within 10 minutes he'll be signing any deal the firemen want in order to prevent his bubble of reality being singed.
Saw it a couple of weekends back. Apart from being bloody brilliant, I have to say that Charlton Heston might have to reconsider his stance on gun ownership. Then again, weren't the NRA a sports group before Chuck turned them into this huge Right wing organisation?
You can't go wrong with Final Fantasy VII. Go on, try, you'll fail.
I remember it. I also didn't particularly like it, either...
Their inability to keep quiet for, like, five seconds. Courtesy of a whole pack of them, I spent the majority of Spider-Man's running time wishing I had a machete or something. Two hours of "Aww. he's so cute" and shit like that reminds me why I hate Cinema Twats so much...
At 11/21/02 05:42 PM, IZAX wrote:Ever tried it? Looks like you haven't.
My advice is, make some decent flash.
Nice, cheap, all to common response. Tell me how to get past all the Uni computer admin blockers so I can get at the Flash creator, then we'll talk like grown ups. OK, it'll be a one-way conversation on my part, but at least I know what I'm talking about.
And using profanity is a cheap way of stimulating the importance and absurdity of your rhetorical question isnt it? Fucking hell yeah!
As above. Man, did you get yesterday's Guardian? That would clear it up somewhat...
"Banana." Hey, man, I was hungry...
At 11/20/02 10:25 PM, EZ3 wrote: Convinient how here you wont take any credit for how much flash the BC destroys yet on the front page of the BC website a member claims 50% of Ng's flash was destroyed due to the BC. And I think argueing over the internet over things we share over the internet is logical enough. And yes, the ongoing arguement in the ADG forum is sad. Its funny I remember Cauldron once telling me that if i didn't stop complaining he wouldn't talk to me anynmore. He posts in Anime Girls. Foolish of me to think his threat truthful. Anywoo, BC members often don't watch. I've seen many admit to it. Only on ur forum though. Was it you who tried to satrt a protection part? What happened with that?
Ever pause to think about what you're saying? Go through the Daily Entries, and you'll find that out of the 200 or so that get submitted, you're likely to get barely half a dozen good ones, about 20-30 decent ones, and the rest are either pure crap, pre-loaders, nothing (literally, blank files), and the remainder just about scrape to survival. Go through te most recent, and the statistics work out.
What's more, many users submit crap just for a few points, even if it gets blammed, and some resubmit the same flash time and again, only for it to get the treatment it deserves - blamishment. I speak, of course, of the likes of Happy Guy, which makes up for several of my own blams because it keeps appearing (three times in one day once), and is still pure shite. Deserving of a place? Fuck no.
Stop castigating the Blam Club out of habit. If it weren't for us, Newgrounds would be submerged with crap. We merely clear the decks, and if anyone submits the URL for a quality entry, it doesn't automatically get blammed - they automatially get thrown out for being retarded.
My advice is, make some decent flash. Ever pause to think that could be why it gets wiped out? 100 votes can't all have an agenda, or be wrong. Why else does Xiao Xiou last, when there's an anti-stick movement out there?
At 11/18/02 04:26 PM, juzamscuta wrote: could someone please explain to me what exactly that movie was supposed to be???
Errm...no. But it gives you extra Experience Points, no matter what the badness. I'm just bitter I can't get a Flash builder on Uni computers, really. Damn admin...
At 11/11/02 03:50 PM, Quicksalvador wrote:
How do you blam a movie after it passing the 100 votes? You just keep voting 0?
The worst part is that it was submitted before the BLAM function came into being, so will always remain like a blot on the landscape, for the five minutes there isn't another submission of Happy Guy.
Oh, and all these morons whining "They want to BLAM it, yet never made their own Flash, so I'll give it five." Stupid, whining, incompetant little bitches that they are...
At 11/18/02 11:21 AM, AbbAsilli wrote: Ramen is good and almost healthy!
Eat ramen!
I asked to have a Wagamama in my bathroom, but they refused...
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=10831
How can this, possibly the worst flash in the history of NG (even including all the non-existant ones) live on to haunt our collective consciousness? It is pure EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!
Seriously, though, there is something seriously wrong if this can survive for so long, almost arrogantly waving it's ass in the air in defiance...
At 11/5/02 11:00 AM, anti-hero0 wrote:
HOW DO YOU GET SO MANY BLAMS!?
It's called "Happy Guy." I swear repeated submissions of that movie contributes a significant percentage to my Blam score...
goodAt 10/29/02 11:38 AM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
Yes, for all my friends reading this.
At 11/2/02 09:36 AM, Mangeta wrote: I once voted a 3 on a movie, and it got blammed cause that was the fiftieth vote...I did get the point btw...
That doesn't work - 2 or above is a Protection point.
At 10/29/02 11:38 AM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
ke yourself a punchline?
HOW BOUT U KISS MY ASS!!!!
Stop typing, you're embarrassing yourself.
At 10/29/02 02:12 AM, aherdofgoats wrote:
im back, and theres more shit on the portal than ever
You are so wrong. Now people are trying so hard they submit below average movies instead...
What am I, the Blam Squad version of Private Hudson?
At 10/28/02 12:39 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
how bout a nice cup of shut the fuck up
How about you learn to formulate proper insults, rather than make yourself a punchline?
At 10/25/02 03:45 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
wot eva
Well, since Half term is finished, you're supposed to be in schoole getting an education. That means doing your homework, since you need qualifications to get a job in the future, since bosses don't accept you whining "But I'm a Level 11 user!!!"
I'm afraid to tell you that Half term is over. Go back to school, and do your homework, little boy. Flunking out will make your life a greater waste than before, and I doubt employers will accept you whining "I'm a Level 11 user".
At 10/26/02 11:20 AM, ps2_lover_666 wrote: Hewwo post youre popularity rankings!
mine amazeingly is
1,203 out of 90,904!!!!
HOLY SHIT MONKEY!
429, out of 91,194. I was outside the top 1000 until I started slagging off the_phantom_spancker. Remember, kids, rip the piss out of a spamming little bastard, see your popularity soar!!!
At 10/24/02 11:28 AM, the_phantom_spancker wrote:
i dont know what u just said but ok
You just proved my point. Thanks.
5. "So he, along with people like Osama BinLaden, uses terrorism to scare people into letting him get his way.'
Give the man a job at CNN. Lumping Saddam and bin-Laden into the same sentence is pure idiocy at the most retarded, or uneducated, of levels. Do you even know the definition of terrorism, or are you using the Bush version, where anything in a turban or of Middle Eastern descent is, by definition, a terrorist waiting to fly a 747 into another national landmark?
All you got right is the fact bin-Laden is a terrorist, because he is the leader of al-Qu'ida, a non-Government organisation. Saddm is President of Iraq, and does not have terrorist connections. Putting two and two together doesn't make international terrorist conspiricies, you know, and the sooner the brainless masses of Bovine America work this out, the better for the other 5.5 billion people on this planet.
6. "He is, and has been for some time, working on building dangerous weapons, which could do a great deal of damage to our world."
Proof, please. Bush reading it off a piece of paper in an unconvincing manner doesn't count.
And let me recite the staistic once more, and hope you get the Goddamn point;
AMERICA HAS 22,000 NUCLEAR WARHEADS AT ITS DISPOSAL, AT THE COST OF SEVERAL BILLION DOLLARS OF TAXPAYER'S MONEY.
Clear enough? That money could well have been spent on your education, for one thing. Perhaps, better yet, on feeding the starving of the world. But no, they need the nukes, just in case.
7. "Letting him do that, and not taking any action to stop him is foolhardy, and people need to understand that."
See above.
8. "We can't just sit here in America, and hope that it will all go away, because it won't. Like most people, I sure as hell don't want to go fight in a war, but if it comes down to it, I will, because defending my country for the people I care about is more important than my selfishness. It should be important to you too."
Quick math question. The average distance a nuclear missile can travel is 500 miles. The distance between Bagdhad and Washington DC is 6211 miles, to Los Angeles is 7665 miles, and toNew York is 6009 miles. For added clarification, to London is 2549 miles, Paris 2406 miles, Berlin 2035 miles, Rome 1830 miles, Moscow 1588 miles, and Tokyo is 5204 miles.
Meanwhile, Israel and Iran fall within the trajectory. So, if one hits Sharon, that's a good thing, and if one hits Tehran, you'll probably all be cheering anyway.
A bomber is rather easy to spot on radar, last time I checked, too.
9. "WHat person can really say that they don't want to protect their country? And if they do, why the fuck do they still live in that country?"
There's a difference between protecting your country, and mindlessly supporting a warmonger after more oil to fuel your SUVs. It's not a war, it's a PR campaign. Learn to differentiate.
10. "If you don't like the US, get the hell out, because we don't need you and your self righteous views."
Thank Christ I live in England. I have the option of listening to Blair agreeing with Bush, just to get in his good books (which so far hasn't worked), or moving in with my honorary countrymen in Slovenia.
11. "Protection ourselves and our interests is our first priority, and ignoring a very real threat to that just because some people might die in the process, defending our freedom as a nation, is foolish."
In other words, fuck the Iraqi's, they're all terrorists, so can die for all I care. Or was it the fact you need petrol for your SUV?
12. "Some must die so that others might live. That's the way it is, and has been forever..."
Yes, look at the track record; The Crusades, The Holocaust - that was the whole plan; the inferior die, the superior live. Twisting your words, yes, but it is the same pitch in spirit as it is in intention.
13. "...and no amount of your bitching is going to change that."
Who are you referring to? Board users, perhaps, but the entire UN? They can shut Bush up and treat him as he should've been from the start; I wait to see Kofi Anan spanking the little brat in front of the world's media, because that is his mentality.
Throwing around buzzwords and scaremonger propeganda isn't an argument, it's a behavioural disorder that is called Republicanism, which needs to be treated soon. Swearing allegence out of habit is the true foolish action, because you should never be so blind in the face of such overwhelming fact. Wake the fuck up, and formulate ideas that haven't been imbedded in your skull by Bush, Cheney, and all the yes-man media that haven't got a set of testicles between them, and castigate the true visionaries.
