At 6/19/09 11:56 PM, whitewolfer wrote:

At 6/19/09 11:39 PM, ragingfred wrote:

At 6/19/09 11:16 PM, whitewolfer wrote: stuff

who's the fanboy flamer now?

Not a fanboy when I back my info up. The 360 has been beating the PS3 in sales monthly and in total. Also, I actually like the PS3, it is people like you that make me hate it. Also haven't you seen? Activision/Blizzard might not support the PS3 in the upcoming years. Linky

Ugh...you're not the first person who said this.
It's not ACTIVISION/BLIZZARD...it's just Activision Blizzard,a separate branch of the Activision tree.
If you seriously that it was Activision and Blizzard,then you're retarded.

It's obvious Blizzard doesn't make console games.

And back on topic.
I own an xbox 360,and I'm a huge fan of it,I adore it.
But....you WOULD get a RROD from a fucked up hard drive,I believe,the RROD is an all-purpose "fuck up light".

I'm kind of confused.
your post says you support Palestine,but your signature says otherwise.

At 5/27/09 03:11 PM, zendahl wrote: So does anybody have any argument I didn't cover?

Nope...I think you got 'em all.
Not that it's that hard to prove this people wrong or anything.

How would gay marriage pose a threat of extinction to the human race?

what? you think gay people are out there right now having children?
NOTHING will change.

At 5/21/09 10:37 PM, CousinIt wrote:

god I hope that diagram doesn't come out looking totally screwed up.

FUCK.

You see...that's where you are wrong.

The theory of Evolution never states that Humanity came from apes.
It says that apes and mankind share a COMMON ANCESTOR.

like this diagram:

Us Apes
| |
| |
| |
| |
|____|
|
Ancestor

see?

now you can stop being so miserable.

god I hope that diagram doesn't come out looking totally screwed up.

At 5/21/09 04:07 PM, physicsman09 wrote: I don't get it, isn't it supposed to be a good thing when games try something new?

Seriously the entire reason why the game industry is as large as it is today is because we tried new methods of gameplay/storytelling.

Would you rather be playing pac-man right now?

They tried something new by totally revamping the entire game with a new engine.

Replacing the main enemy was just pointless.

It's a "love" story about highscool students,and one of them is a vampire that's like 1000 years old.

It is also all about mormon ideals and teaching and philosophy but with vampires and such .
For instance,the vampire(Edward) refuses to have sex with Bella because his vampire powers make him so strong that he will hurt her.

When what they really mean is that he's a mormon,and can't fuck her until they marry.

Personally I've yet to do it....but I've always wanted to.

At 5/15/09 08:22 AM, iCurrie wrote:

At 5/15/09 08:10 AM, CousinIt wrote: I love that premise.

I would totally buy it.

I don't know if I detect sarcasm or not :|

No,I was serious.
I'd totally buy it.

Way better premise than Twilight Princess.

I love that premise.

I would totally buy it.

At 5/14/09 11:13 PM, ForcedDj wrote: If China, and Japan team up, without nukes, the US would actually lose. They invested money on those 2 countries and remember, most likely, since it won't have nuclear weapons, they won't surrender.

Now against France, no contest, enter France, they surrender. But mostly, it would take a few months or a year to defeat France.

If all of Asia actually declares war on the United States however, well, it won't look good, and well, it might be classified as raped(that won't happen unless all of Asia realize that they should work with each other).

Pretty sure that Japan is under some type of global law by the U.N. that it is not allowed to have a military over a certain size(because of WW2)
So,Japan's military is not really a huge threat.

I cannot wait for Fight Night Round 4.

I played the UFC demo and liked it.
However,the controls are fucking ridiculous...WAYYY too complicated.

Fight Night is so fluid and easy,just pick up and play(but that doesn't mean a noobie can beat a master)

Also,the UFC game has only a limited moveset for each fighter,for instance George St.Pierre has the alot of the same moves as Chuck Liddel does.
Also their "replay" for knockout that tried to rip-off Fight Night's KO cam(where it zooms into the ounch and you see the persons face get rocked) is a utter failur...it's just the same canned animation every time; it is NEVER EVER what actually happened.

I was under the impression that the game took place during the French Revolution.

So...1400's Italy? Sounds pretty cool,but I'd still prefer 1800's France.

you know....you probably shouldn't link to a porn site...at least you could have put a warning.

There are religions that allow gay marriage(I don't know any by name,but I'm sure there's at least one)

Also,you can be married by a judge,and not a priest.

arguement invalid.

I've actually heard that the game doesn't take place in Africa,but rather India instead.

I heard it from a friend,so I don't know if it is true,but frankly,I'd rather it in India.
India just seems like a much better setting.

At 1/10/09 03:41 PM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:29 PM, CousinIt wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:27 PM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:24 PM, CousinIt wrote: Notice he said party?

You can't vote for a PM by voting for the party your MP's a member of.

Nobody votes for a PM.

Nor the HoS, which is the HoS of Britain retaining ownership of other nations through "separate" crowns. The GG's appointed.

Yes....I know all this,and understand it.
But I'm not the one with a problem about it.

At 1/10/09 03:27 PM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:24 PM, CousinIt wrote: Notice he said party?

You can't vote for a PM by voting for the party your MP's a member of.

Nobody votes for a PM.

At 1/10/09 03:23 PM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/10/09 03:21 PM, Prinzy2 wrote: And here I thought that the party with the most votes was elected to power. My mistake.

Do we elect the PM?

Notice he said party?

At 1/4/09 10:18 AM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/4/09 06:06 AM, CousinIt wrote: You obviously don't understand.
You're proposing we make Canada for Canadians only.....something Mussolini and other fascists proposed for their countries.

You're making less and less sense as this topic grows longer.

What you also don't understand is that once you use Hitler, Nazis, Mussolini or Fascists as an example, you lose the argument. For example: "Vegetarians are bad. Hitler was a vegetarian."

You already lost that argument, anyway.

Nobody said anything about vegetarianism,or Hitler.
I merely compared your stance to a fascist viewpoint.

You do not automatically lose a debate for comparing them to a fascist.
You only lose the debate if you compare them to a fascist for no reason,not because they actually are one.

However,you ARE sharing components of fasicsm,so the argument is therefore valid.

At 1/3/09 07:24 AM, mikailus wrote:

At 1/3/09 05:44 AM, CousinIt wrote: I just read your post a page back...and holy shit,reincarnation must be real because Mussolini is alive and well.

Because I should be the yes-man to everyone's views you say this? I'm not a mod and I didn't ban you and people tell each other to shut up all the time.

Also, PENIS!

You obviously don't understand.
You're proposing we make Canada for Canadians only.....something Mussolini and other fascists proposed for their countries.

You're making less and less sense as this topic grows longer.

Yeah...I wish the Queen would fuck off too....I'm sick of seeing her ugly mug on our money.

I just read your post a page back...and holy shit,reincarnation must be real because Mussolini is alive and well.

At 1/2/09 06:15 AM, mikailus wrote: TWO people! Out of the entire thread! You assume that's the entire population of Canada? Fuck you!

What the hell are you talking about?
Your reply had nothing to do with my post.

You seem to think that a Minority Government means he didn't win the election but became PM anyway.
Minority Government means that the Conservatives got more votes than any one party,but combining 2 or more parties will out number him...that's ALL it means.

How hard is it to see you're wrong and admit it?
Nobody in this thread has agreed with you on ANY of the points you made(mostly because there aren't any),it's very clear you are wrong.

You seem to think we still live in the 19th century,and that The UK is taxing the shit out of us.
You also seem to think that the GG holds any power whatsoever.

The GG only does what the PM asks him/her to do,and nothing else.
Just because we have that fancy,ceremonial "I swear loyalty to the Queen of Canada" bullshit is written there means nothing,she has a fake loyalty the crown,and a real loyalty to the PM.

The real Queen has no interaction in our politics,except maybe making an appearance at an important event,and even then she just smiles and waves.

Making Canada a republic would not only be costly,but it would server no purpose.
Canada is already free,independent,and strong.
A rose is a rose by any other name.

At 1/1/09 07:10 AM, SonicSheep wrote:

And Canada kicked America's arse when they tried to invade

I hate double posting,but this is a big pet peeve I have.

Canada did NOT defeat the American invasion of 1812.Sure we were there to see it,but The UK did all the work,we just tagged along.

You're asking that Canada become a republic,and just rename a bunch of things,and have them serve the exact same purpose.
Having a GG elected,or appointed means nothing....the GG DOES nothing.

You cannot simply sever historical ties to another nation.
You can't change history.