Be a Supporter!
Response to: How to make a generic romance movie Posted June 1st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 10:46 PM, Krbyfan1 wrote:
At 5/31/09 10:24 PM, THEJamoke wrote: You forgot to add, "must star Adam Sandler/Matthew McConaughey/Hugh Grant/Richard Gere"

Can't make mad cheddar without one of those cheesy bastards.
Don't forget Drew Barrymore/Jennifer Aniston/Sarah Jessica Parker either.

Or Jodie Foster.

Response to: How to make a generic romance movie Posted June 1st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 10:43 PM, LethalLockdown wrote:
At 5/31/09 10:37 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: And guy2 has to be really pompous.

He can never be a likable person. The audience can not like guy2
Guy 1:Churchill
Guy 2:Hitler.
Girl:Ann frank.

Get spillberg to do it and you got an emmy and 6000 million.

Something like that would actually be pretty good, too bad Hollywood has no originality.

Response to: How to make a generic romance movie Posted June 1st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 10:28 PM, Skwurll wrote: add vampires and you'vwe got a best seller

Despite following the same formula, it will make all the girls wet their boxers.

Response to: How to make a generic romance movie Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 10:37 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: And guy2 has to be really pompous.

He can never be a likable person. The audience can not like guy2

He is also rude to the girl behind her back

How to make a generic romance movie Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

So lately I have been noticing a trend in romance movies, they all follow ONE formula but do it in different ways. So, seeing as how all of these romance movies are technically the samething, I want to teach you how you can submit your generic movie to hollywood and actually make money off it even though it was already done:

Guy1 wakes up one morning and goes to his (Crummy/Fabulous) work place. He is lonely and seems life is troubling him with no way out OR he thinks his life is great and content. Then he meets woman1 through friends/her own arrival and he is seen looking at her from a distance. Eventually guy1 makes a move on her and she seems to like him. They then have great time together within a few days. But then guy1 finds out woman1 is already in a relationship with guy2 and is marrying him.

This saddens guy1 and he reverts back into his lonely, depressed state as he was at the beginning, or if you chose the second option, he falls into depression and is no longer content with his life. Then a friend of guy1, called woman2 has a secret interest in guy1 since the beginning of the film, woman2 makes a move on guy1, but although guy1 doesn't like woman2, he lets her have her way with him. THEN,

A: Woman1 walks in to talk with guy1 and finds them together and storms out with guy1 chasing her, and her ultimately walking away to prepare for the wedding

B: Guy1 realizes woman2 isn't right for him and he abandons her.

The ending shows Guy1 running to the Chapel just as about women1 is going to say "I do" and he runs in and stops the wedding, confessing his love to her and somehow everything in the past is ignored and they live a happy live together and get married.

That is the formula to making a typical romance movie, I suggest saving this as you can get rich from it.

Response to: Open Discussion- The Bbs Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

To be honest, my posting has REALLY, declined more, not counting my two bans.

I remember in like 2005, although mods were strict, much more fun threads got through, it was a great pleasure coming to the BBS and reading tons of entertaining stuff.

Now I only read one and a half pages of this thread, because I want to type out everything that I dislike about the BBS, so excuse me if I retype somethings said already.

Now we have shit like "No stories allowed on the forums" -What the fuck? We can't have stories on a General forum? What sense does that make? As far as I know, stories of all kinds were entertaining and interesting on what people experience, reactions, etc. They made up a large chunk of the BBS and were overall a pleasure to read.

Then we get a ban on them because there are too many of them? That is like an economy becoming more dependent off of selling sugar, and the government severely restricting the use to sell sugar because too many people do it? As far as I know, users weren't protesting or complaining to have a story ban on the BBS, so why was it made into a rule? I am not going to look through profiles daily to find stories, it much more time consuming. I could understand banning stories that are like a few lines with no details.

But stories were a great addition to the BBS, whether it was a fictional one or a real life encounter or just for laughs. Many people enjoyed it, and POOF, banned.

When that rule came into effect, my posting severely declined as well as a few other users I know.

Now we get stupid shit like postings based on news articles, happy birthday threads, people ranting (Could be good sometimes), complaining, threads attacking America/Britain/Canada, and questions about the site or in real life.

Stories were a great addition because they almost always brought in something new to discuss, so what did we accomplish from banning it? Nothing. It is a stupid rule, and I really can't see how there are any benefits to this except "Well now we don't get these crappy 2 liner stories anymore".

To be honest- I foresaw this at like the beginning of 2008, I noticed threads that were entertaining people, were making people laugh and the BBS a better place were being locked for some of the stupidest reasons that could be overlooked. I noticed that the mods were banning threads more and more, despite if everyone liked them or not. I realized that eventually this is going to cause a huge amount of interesting, active users to leave, and it is, some good users left because the only threads allowed on the BBS anymore are happy birthday threads, or anything that compliments this website. The good users that did not leave are probably in different forums (Clubs and Crews- the only forum that has a few topics that keep me entertained).

TLDR: LIGHTEN THE FUCK UP MODS.

Response to: Dear Newgrounders Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

Sure, I will give you the money, just contact me through PM system.

Response to: "that's what she said." Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 05:46 PM, Neenja-SkLz wrote: yeah, that can be really funny if said at the appropiate time

It isn't funny at all.

Response to: U.S. flag thief discovered! Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

At 5/31/09 05:04 PM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote:
At 5/31/09 05:02 PM, homor wrote:
At 5/31/09 05:00 PM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: Why are Americans so attached to their flags? Patriotism doesn't mean blind devotion to piece of cloth.
its symbolic. you idiot.
Do we worship the symbol? Or what the symbol represents? Pacifists don't worship the dove. They worship what the dove represents.

Why do you guys worship the Royal Family?

I mean, it isn't like they actually do anything, except waste your taxes.

Response to: The Girl Effect Posted May 31st, 2009 in General

Wow, that seems pretty easy to do.

Lets just get a bunch of girls in poverty, (Who gives a shit about men?) have them buy cows and POOF, everything is better again!

Seriously, I wish these "CHANGE THE WORLD" videos would just stop, changing the world at this point is unachievable.

Response to: Women used baby as weapon at cop. Posted May 30th, 2009 in General

Guys, we can't say anything negative about this story or else you are a racist.

Response to: Baby Holding a Raging Snake Posted May 29th, 2009 in General

At 5/29/09 04:47 PM, sldghmmr wrote: Here's obama holding a baby

Ah, in that picture we clearly see a snake holding a baby.

Response to: I've got a girlfriend? Posted May 28th, 2009 in General

At 5/28/09 05:47 PM, kingkillah wrote:
At 5/28/09 05:44 PM, Complete wrote: Seems like she is arrogant by claiming you are her boyfriend by herself.
I've never disagreed with it, I don't want to crush her.
Unless you agreed with her.
I said it to the bullies to get them off my back, she seems to have misunderstood me.

You should of said when she claimed you were her boyfriend that you were simply defending her. It might of been harsh, but it definitely would be better then her going to sleep today with her last thought being "I GOT A BOYFRIEND"

Response to: I've got a girlfriend? Posted May 28th, 2009 in General

Seems like she is arrogant by claiming you are her boyfriend by herself.

Unless you agreed with her.

Response to: what is this injustice Posted May 28th, 2009 in General

Also I voted zero.

Response to: what is this injustice Posted May 28th, 2009 in General

Yeah, all your work is so great. God forbid someone may not actually like it.

Response to: Bring it on North Korea! Posted May 28th, 2009 in General

At 5/28/09 02:17 PM, Colombiana wrote: Americans are war machines, the only they ever did, and what they'll always keep doing, is having war or any sort of disagreement/discussion with any other country.
Maybe you should find a solution for the economic crisis first and then go fighting.

See? This is what can happen to you if you are ridiculously brainwashed.

Perhaps if the only thing we ever do is fight, how about your nation finds a solution for the economic crisis? After all, war is the only thing we do.

Response to: Texting. Posted May 27th, 2009 in General

At 5/27/09 09:16 PM, UnknownFear wrote: And they now say that texting is a whole new language. I think it's pretty neat, however, I use proper grammer, not like a bunch of people who text like this:

I liek u nd wnt 2 hng out sumtime

I don't know why, it just erks me when I get these stupid abbreviated text messages without proper grammer.

Look, I feel like being an asshole today.

You misspelled grammar.

Response to: Worst City you've visited... Posted May 27th, 2009 in General

Anyone who said New Jersey as a whole, please go in a hole and die.

Response to: mean bus driver Posted May 27th, 2009 in General

Guys, we might scare him, stop writing graphic things.

Response to: The Mother of Google Posted May 26th, 2009 in General

close your curtains.

Response to: American da or family guy? Posted May 26th, 2009 in General

Hey guys, lets all jump on the "Family and American dad and anything by Seth suck" bandwagon.

Response to: Your country stereotypes, here Posted May 25th, 2009 in General

Alright guys, we are doing good.

Two pages and this thread still has not turned into a "MY COUNTRY IS BETTER" thread.

Response to: Man Punches Blind Lady On The Bus! Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

Haha, awesome.

I need to do that soon.

Response to: New Job Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

At 5/23/09 03:55 PM, vaIentine wrote: you even followed me into one fucking topic just to comment on something I said. Pathetic man, I could give two shits less about your Goddamn level, it doesn't make you superior in my eyes so fuck off, until then - have a nice day.

We really need to start funding for more anger management programs.

Response to: Poll On The Ending Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

At 5/23/09 04:36 PM, Rezolution wrote:
also,if youre here just to post random crap and insult me for setting up an improper poll, don't. I dunno howto set one up.

Just press the "Create poll" button in the post menu.

Response to: YouTube is...Perverted? Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

What site is that?

Response to: England's getting South Park first! Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

After many long, action-packed years, England has finally achieved a milestone over America:

Newer episodes of a TV show before America gets them.

Response to: What do you think of my new haircut Posted May 23rd, 2009 in General

Congratulations, you were all trolled.

Response to: A strange dream. Posted May 22nd, 2009 in General

It means you are being watched secretly.