Be a Supporter!
Response to: Dear White People... Posted June 16th, 2012 in General

Dear Black people...

I'm not fucking racist. Stop telling me I am.

With love,
White people in general

Response to: Blacks and Stand Up Comedy Posted June 8th, 2012 in General

At 6/8/12 03:46 AM, BizzarroPMP wrote:
At 6/8/12 03:42 AM, Sensationalism wrote: There's Chris Rock and Kevin Hart
Can't think of anyone else
Except for Slappy

That's only 3.
George Carlin will always be the best black comedian.

And Katt Williams. He's pretty funny.

Response to: Blam everything without a preloader Posted June 8th, 2012 in General

FFS, we already have Insanctuary's need to over complicate his phrasing to prove a point no one gives two shits about. We don't need another one.

Response to: Pokemon you'd have sex with Posted June 7th, 2012 in General

At 6/7/12 10:26 PM, YenMuffin wrote: Off the top of my head, either Lickitung or Reuniclus.

That's a fucking fetus. You sick bastard.

Response to: 46% Americans - Creationists Posted June 5th, 2012 in General

At 6/4/12 03:09 PM, JaY11 wrote:
At 6/4/12 03:02 PM, Ilssm wrote:
For the last time, they aren't retarded-

They're just afraid of their own mortality.
so am I, and so are most people, but unlike creationists not all of us allow this fear to take over and force us to come to radical conclusions on the origin of life

Now hold on, there's a difference in religious and radical. Saying you disagree is fine, saying the other side are idiots is just fine, too. But saying that they've been taken over by fear and that they're radical is a blanket statement that doesn't have any place in this crock o' shit "debate" this forum has. Fucking Newgrounds is probably more biased than Fox. On EVERY issue.

Response to: Zombies Posted May 18th, 2012 in General

At 5/18/12 04:41 PM, Raab wrote: Get the fuck out.

Umm... Over reaction much?

Zombies

Response to: What to do with 100 Condoms? Posted May 17th, 2012 in General

Take them to the desert and use them to store water.

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 16th, 2012 in General

At 5/16/12 04:47 PM, Insanctuary wrote: His stuff.

I believe that humans are all built around a simple principle. Defend. Defense of their loved ones, defense of their countries, defense of humanity in some cases. Defending the environment and a whole host of other things.

I believe they will stand in the face of any danger, come hell or high water, to protect what they care for most.

I believe everyone is inherently good.

I believe in mysteries we can't possibly know.

And I believe that this cycle of life, of death and war, but also of love and togetherness, will never end. That humanity will always find a way to press on into the future. And I think that it's the most beautiful thing in existence.

Side note, I got you to actually talk about it instead of just hinting. +1 to me.
Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 16th, 2012 in General

At 5/16/12 04:47 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Too much.

You wanna do something interesting? You post your beliefs, I'll post mine. Then we let the people take a look at them and let them make their own opinions. Just for fun.

Response to: Should I cheat? Posted May 16th, 2012 in General

At 5/16/12 06:01 PM, Painbringer wrote: I wouldn't know since, I don't personally believe in all that monogamous exclusivity crap.

Well, that raises an important question: Does she share that opinion?

If not, ending it is best, if so, fuck 'em both. You're in a relationship for a reason, it isn't all about you. Just because YOU don't think there's anything wrong with doesn't mean SHE won't, and if you honestly got into this not thinking or not caring about that, I'd go with your option E on this one.

Response to: September 11th Posted May 15th, 2012 in General

Since this is apparently up for discussion again, I'll say this. Even if your immediate family WAS affected, 11 years is plenty of time for you to let go. If you still cry on 9/11 cause your dad or brother died, I'm sure 11 years is enough mourning. Would they want you to break down every time their time to go came around? It's enough. As for the whole "national holiday", FUCK that noise. It was bad, but there isn't a god damn Russian holiday for Chernobyl every April. And that affected WAY more.

Response to: Why can't Koreans just eat cats? Posted May 15th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 09:40 PM, ngman7 wrote: Stuff from the Bible.

You know not everyone is a Christian, right? I'd probably eat a dog too and have no problem with it if I wasn't raised in a country where eating a dog is severely frowned upon. It isn't a religious issue, because they aren't our (me and you) religion. I've they were missionaries, I'd be all "Yo, man, that's not cool." But they aren't.

They're normal people who eat something you won't. I won't because it just makes me uncomfortable to do myself, you won't because of some book humans SAY God dictated. They will because they see no problem with it (at least a few). Hell, so long as I don't HAVE to eat it, too, I'd gladly visit them for dinner and watch them eat dogs.

Response to: Why can't Koreans just eat cats? Posted May 15th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 04:57 PM, MoonCraft wrote: "Customs officials refused to disclose where the babies came from or who made the capsules, citing possible diplomatic friction with Beijing."

Lawl.

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 08:15 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
At 5/14/12 08:10 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:
At 5/14/12 08:03 PM, GodlessDeity wrote: You seem to give plenty. Your comepensations are directly tied to your insecurities.
And there it is. You call me out on my insecurities. The end-all-be-all get out of jail free card when you realize you're loosing. Do tell, exactly what am I insecure about?
You can not accept that I have more experience in life than you do. You are too busy distracting yourself with man-made nonsense while I am disciplining my mind and body and becoming more and more intune with life as a whole. I am a level 99 with all the max gear and weapons, and the only thing I have left, is the never-ending experience. You are a noob with low-level gear.

Can you really blame me for choosing to train day in and day out to achieve my position? Or are you going to be that younger brother that envies his older brother for always making the right decisions?

I'm currently in perfect position for my future. I'm further ahead in my technical courses than people who've coasted through the class for three years, this is my first. I'm already a certified PC technician, work out regularly, and eat a healthy diet. I have a girlfriend who I've been dating for 2 years. I also have my spirituality all sorted out.

My parents are rapidly approaching the upper class both financially and socially. I've been all around the US and am planning to start globetrotting this summer. I've already taken two college courses, and am on an advanced technical diploma with just two years to go, all of which is planned out. All my friends have my back, and I have theirs.

I've got all the keys, all I have to do is get to the age where I can open the locks. You have baseless assumptions you actually believe, I have baseless assumption just to poke fun at you. I'm on these forums to entertain myself, you're here to start a cult.

Sure, you may love your life, but you'd have one hell of a time loving it more than I love mine.

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 08:03 PM, GodlessDeity wrote: You seem to give plenty. Your comepensations are directly tied to your insecurities.

And there it is. You call me out on my insecurities. The end-all-be-all get out of jail free card when you realize you're loosing. Do tell, exactly what am I insecure about?

I'm waiting.

Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much?

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 07:42 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
At 5/14/12 07:38 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:
At 5/14/12 07:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
At 5/14/12 07:34 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote: or are we all done here?
This is coming from a guy who spews accusations and has a colorful repetoire of useless adjectives.
Put away your thesaurus and get over the fact you got third place in the science fair.
First of all, repetoire is not that big of a word. Secondly, I do not care for science fairs. Besides, isn't saying 3rd place complimenting that I can 'do' something? Make up your mind.

You are the most ass-backwards person I've ever seen in my life. Don't you get it? Talking to you is a fucking JOKE. Just like you. You are a joke. We all point and laugh and make fun of you because you think you can actually GET somewhere because you think a certain way? The time where philosophers were actually needed is long past. Even if you are right, it doesn't mean two shits, cause it won't get you anywhere. All the time you've spent figuring it out and trying to defend it? Worthless. Every post you make where you run in circles to try and dodge the truth of the matter? Nonsense. You and your way of thought are useless. Mankind has no need of you.

No one needs you. No one wants you. You can spar with me all day and all night, but in the end, you KNOW that all you're doing is trying to tread water in the horrible depressing sea that tries to suck you under, force you into that dark abyss where those that will make no contribution are damned. And while you float there, in that endless expanse of your own pointlessness, you'll finally realize just how LITTLE you matter.

TL;DR? "Look at all the fucks I give."
Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 07:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
At 5/14/12 07:34 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote: or are we all done here?
This is coming from a guy who spews accusations and has a colorful repetoire of useless adjectives.

Put away your thesaurus and get over the fact you got third place in the science fair.

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 07:16 PM, GodlessDeity wrote: This is coming from a guy who thinks this quote ''Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious.'' is true. I could easily say ''Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is a joke.'' Considering that mankind plays pretend. The world doesn't?

This coming from a guy that thinks sigs are an accurate measurement of a person? Wow, you must have recieved severe brain damage when your mother's strap on skull fucked you. Any more tit-sucking you intend to do from the teat of Dadaism to promote your "hip new rad" way of thinking, or are we all done here?

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 07:09 PM, GodlessDeity wrote:
At 5/14/12 07:05 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:

nonsense
Someone is turning into a troll again. You should go take your shots.

You responded, you are now my thrall.

Now make me a sandwich.

Response to: Why Is Philosophy Hated So Much? Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 06:17 PM, ILoveToGrok wrote:
At 5/14/12 06:10 PM, Ilssm wrote: we get it.
No, you do not get it - thus you would not be making me post this response - so I will elaborate.

I brought it up because I was expressing how I do not care whether someone - or even a God - may see me. I was emphasising the sheer amount of insincerity that lies in the folds of another's subjective perception of me. Regardless if it in a mere human's eyes or an otherwordly being's eyes.

Your mother ass fucks you in the shower. You hide a bag o' severed dicks under your pillow and rub it over your face when you can't sleep. You're an emotional cripple, your soul is dogshit, every single thing about you is ugly.

Now spend the next hour telling me how you don't care.

And if you don't say you don't value my opinion because I told you to, that means you do and think it's all true. If you DO say it, then you bow to my will, slave. In fact, responding means you care, and not responding means its true.

I can play the 'make up my own reality' game, too.
Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/14/12 06:06 PM, DarkShadowblade wrote: This is kinda wrong. Even in Banner form, instincts kick in near death and he transforms/reverts back into the Hulk instantaneously. Using Bruce Banner isn't going to change much, since he can revert back at will at times as well.

Hulk's Intelligence now a days is extremely high as well, which is another clear cut advantage over Solomon Grundy.

Well, it be what it be. I want Hulk to win, but I'm trying to be as objective as possible. Also doesn't help that I don't know absolutely EVERYTHING about him, like the "change at will" part.

Even though that sounds real fuckin' important. CF=Nub
Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 14th, 2012 in General

At 5/13/12 11:03 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:
At 5/13/12 10:42 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote: I'd say hulk would win in a good 95% of the time, the remaining 5 being when Grundy could get him back to Banner and kill him before he changed back.
How would Grundy make the Hulk change? Once Hulk is mad then he is ready to smash.

This is all assuming they're both at their absolute peaks. I'm sure there's a way to DO it, and I can recall it happening, but I couldn't post an example. And Grundy could be fairly intelligent, so it's being assumed for the sake of argument he has a way.

Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 13th, 2012 in General

At 5/13/12 09:32 PM, ngman7 wrote:
At 5/13/12 09:30 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:

I'd also like to say, in match-ups like this I prefer to consider the characters working at their absolute max.
If Grundy was at his full potential I would still say he would have a shot.

If he could find a way to finish Hulk off BEFORE Hulk's strength surpassed his own, then sure, but going with the full-strength requirement, Hulk would already be past that point. If Grundy could somehow get Hulk back into his normal Banner form and kill him quickly, then fine.

But I think the change would revert instantly back into Hulk as soon as Grundy got aggressive, as Bruce can very rapidly change. It isn't always ten minutes of more groaning than the porn industry. All in all, anyone CAN beat the Hulk. It's just not likely with ANY of them.

I'd say hulk would win in a good 95% of the time, the remaining 5 being when Grundy could get him back to Banner and kill him before he changed back.

Also, remember Bruce isn't ALWAYS unconscious. In fact, most of the times he switches from Hulk mid-fight, he's fully aware, so he'd have plenty of time to change.
Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 13th, 2012 in General

At 5/13/12 09:18 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:
At 5/13/12 09:14 PM, ngman7 wrote:
At 5/13/12 09:11 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:

Hulk - 1, Grundy - Goose Egg.
I doubt it- Batman fought the Hulk and won. All Grundy would need to do is use whatever Batman used.
Hold on, are you citing CROSSOVERS as a legit reason? Crossovers are ALWAYS non-cannon, literally anything can happen in them. They have as much pull as that Marvel manga that said the Punisher was a female Geisha in medival Japan that TICKLED warlords to death.

I'd also like to say, in match-ups like this I prefer to consider the characters working at their absolute max.

Response to: Do Any Of You Believe In... Posted May 13th, 2012 in General

Fairly good indicators of stress and other psychological issues. Not anything paranormal, though.

Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 13th, 2012 in General

At 5/13/12 09:14 PM, ngman7 wrote:
At 5/13/12 09:11 PM, CommanderFalcon wrote:

Hulk - 1, Grundy - Goose Egg.
I doubt it- Batman fought the Hulk and won. All Grundy would need to do is use whatever Batman used.

Hold on, are you citing CROSSOVERS as a legit reason? Crossovers are ALWAYS non-cannon, literally anything can happen in them. They have as much pull as that Marvel manga that said the Punisher was a female Geisha in medival Japan that TICKLED warlords to death.

Response to: Solomon Grundy Vs. The Hulk Posted May 13th, 2012 in General

Hulk literally has no limit. With every punch Grundy threw, he'd piss Hulk off more and more, with his strength growing proportionately. Let's look at it this way. Thor = Demigod. Hulk can go toe to toe with him, and in some cases win. Batman = Not a demigod. Batman has kicked Grundy's ass six ways to his deathday.

Even if Grundy was intelligent, hell, Steven Hawking level genius, no trap or trick he could set up could get the better of Hulk, because Hulk would get angrier and angrier at the fact he was trapped/tricked. Thus, he would become strong enough to break free or otherwise overcome it. All Grundy can do to win is overpower him, and, as earlier proven, he doesn't stand a chance there.

Hulk - 1, Grundy - Goose Egg.

Response to: Right Here / Right Now! Posted May 11th, 2012 in General

At 5/11/12 11:05 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
At 5/11/12 10:58 PM, II2none wrote:
At 5/11/12 10:48 PM, TecNoir wrote: I believe I'm the only person in this thread that understands what he said. I just don't agree.

Well according to him I don't understand it but I appear to be the only person he explained it to.
His stance is simple, his plans are in riddles.
Yes, exactly. I do not have the words to express the abstract ideas inside my head. I don't think there are very many words to express most of my philosophy to begin with. So I use metaphors like any wise man would. They always use metaphors to create imagery inside other people's heads that encompasses an underlying message. It is how I - for the most part - get my message across, but even with metaphors, my philosophy is nothing to alot of people because of their POV that was socially conditioned. Alot of what they think they see is, is what prevents my philosophy, when their POV is the illusion and my philosophy is the fundamental truth.

Okay, you're the one having trouble understanding. I'll break it down VERY SIMPLY for you.

If you go somewhere saying "I'm better than you, I know all truth, you all don't", people aren't going to take you seriously. I have no idea what you want to accomplish, but unless it's trolling everyone, saying shit like that isn't helping. You want to show us how smart you are? Come up with a non-pretentious-asshole way of saying it. And stop copping out with "your view points are melded by society", because so are yours. Human society a penetrated literally EVERY aspect of this planet. There is literally nowhere you as a human being could go and survive where you would never feel the effects of human society. Which means, weather you hate them or love them, you're a conformist.

You either conform to those that follow the rest of humanity because of their own reasons (mine being a belief in inherent good), or you join the side that says they refuse to follow society, again, for their own reasons. You will always be an individual, just like everyone else, so stop living in your fantasy that you'll ever be anything more than human.

Response to: Right Here / Right Now! Posted May 11th, 2012 in General

At 5/11/12 09:09 PM, Insanctuary wrote: People making up excuses for their own pursuits is not the same as a simple understand of the world. Stop questioning
it. Accept that this world has no answers. Life is a beautiful void.

Let's just face facts, since you seem so butt-fucking happy bout that. You're a douche bag. More than likely, you've always been a douche bag. Sure, you might be smart, and hell, you might even be right. But no one cares. Is it a void? Maybe. Is it all really pointless? Perhaps. But the fact is, they'll keep on living, while you seem to want to drift through life. Maybe that makes everyone else much stronger than you.

This is in response to your LAST post, which is the only one I could actually read without needing to take medication.
Response to: Right Here / Right Now! Posted May 11th, 2012 in General

At 5/11/12 05:55 PM, ILoveToGrok wrote:
At 5/11/12 05:53 PM, Sinitech wrote: Philosophy isn't a real thing.
IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE PHILOSOPHY.

But you called it a philosophy...