Monster Racer Rush
Select between 5 monster racers, upgrade your monster skill and win the competition!
4.18 / 5.00 3,534 ViewsBuild and Base
Build most powerful forces, unleash hordes of monster and control your soldiers!
3.80 / 5.00 4,200 ViewsAt 9/23/09 02:46 PM, sharpnova wrote: Environmentalism is just a bunch of young hippies who have nothing better to pour their energy into (due to lack of intelligence enabling them to pour it into something constructive) and instead want to force their will on others.
Well, actually, it's the world's largest corporations backing this new environmentalism -- because there is a lot of money to be made out of it.
See article: http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Green Business/idUSTRE58F5R320090916
At 9/23/09 01:03 PM, AapoJoki wrote:At 9/23/09 01:01 PM, Mr-Money wrote:By what year?At 9/22/09 04:29 PM, Patton3 wrote: Showing an extreme side of any group proves nothing.I'm sorry... but Gordon Brown's adviser calling for a 50% cut in world population
Well, the thing is: he doesn't specify. Most of them don't. What we're seeing is an attempt to gradually introduce the concept of population reduction to the general public, to see if people will accept it.
And by the way, when Obama's science czar calls for a planetary military regime to enforce population control, that IS Nazism. That isn't me exaggerating. That isn't me calling people I don't like Nazis. It is in fact, cold blooded Nazism.
x10hosting.com is quite good, as is freehostia.com
At 9/22/09 04:29 PM, Patton3 wrote: Showing an extreme side of any group proves nothing.
I'm sorry... but Gordon Brown's adviser calling for a 50% cut in world population is not an "extreme side". Obama's science czar calling for mass sterilisation is not an "extreme side". These people are as close to the men in power as you can get.
Yeah, you go fight those cavemen! I'm sure they're a real threat to the world.
At 9/22/09 02:51 PM, poxpower wrote:At 9/22/09 02:08 PM, Mr-Money wrote:That is correct. I never said they wanted to kill people off.So what exactly do they have in common with Nazis?
I can't really think of a single thing.
They both believe in cutting the population dramatically in a top-down fashion. How's that?
At 9/22/09 02:29 PM, StCyril wrote: Plus it does damage to the body's immune system and although not as quickly CAUSES THE SAME PROBLEMS AS SMOKING!
No, I'm afraid it's the tobacco that causes health problems. Tobacco is not found in marijuana.
And news flash: drinking a can of diet coke causes brain damage. Let's ban Coca Cola!
At 9/22/09 02:28 PM, AapoJoki wrote: Those who have no children at all are doing a great environmental deed.
Wow.. even though every human could fit into the state of Texas and have an acre of land, you continue to believe this propaganda..
At 9/22/09 02:22 PM, StCyril wrote:At 9/22/09 02:20 PM, Mr-Money wrote: You have no answer to that question because there is no answer. It is pure hypocrisy. Weed must be legalised.Actually jerkoff, I do have an answer. Cigs SHOULD be illegal, and they are getting there. There are now all kinds of laws making it illegal to make outside of designated areas, and tolerance for it is quickly shrinking away, plus they are $5 a pack now. Cigs killed my grandparents and I would rather they be illegal now.
OK, that's fair enough. At least you believe that both should be illegal. That is a start. However, weed is not harmful.
And if I want to harm myself, I have the right to do that. Think about that for a while.
At 9/22/09 02:16 PM, StCyril wrote: Stop trying legalize your drug habit under the guise of good intentions!
CIGARETTES ARE LEGAL. They are proven to kill people. So why should weed be illegal, when cigarettes are legal?
You have no answer to that question because there is no answer. It is pure hypocrisy. Weed must be legalised.
OK, so which gene pools will be continued and which will be killed off?
Or will we have a one-child policy like in China?
At 9/22/09 01:58 PM, Ericho wrote: I think what they mean is that they want birth control and fewer people being born, not to kill the people that are living.
That is correct. I never said they wanted to kill people off.
You can have any freedom you want if you just get up off your ass and do something.
At 9/22/09 01:49 PM, Victory wrote: You must acknowledge that, speaking from a purely environmental point of view, in our current lifestyles large numbers of humans have a devastating impact? That is.. obvious.
Really, what point are you actually making? Environmentalists have a secret agenda of pursuing National Socialism? I know you have a history of whacky conspiracy theories, but damn..
No....... The point I'm making is that they openly believe in cutting the population by up to 80%. That's what I'm saying. Now, if you think that's a good thing, you sicken me and I don't even want to hear any future responses from you. If that is not your opinion, please continue with your argument.
Here are some more sources
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1107696/
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/en vironment/article3908588.ece
A new meme has been born
I find it funny how most prominent environmentalists just happen to believe in cutting the size of the population dramatically
Here are just a few articles I've been reading in the past few months:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/po litics/article5950442.ece
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0 8/07/having-children-brings-high-carbon-
impact/
http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/
04/01/why-does-anyone-have-children/
Feel free to bring on the debate
Were you one of the soldiers who were paid to stand around all day and guard the opium fields?
Speaking of history.... how many of you know that the Gulf of Tonkin attack, used to justify the Vietnam war that killed a million people, was completely staged by the US government..?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Ton kin_Incident
"In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded[3] that Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated
[I]t is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night. [...] In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.[4]"
Now you do
Newgrounds needs to have the word "flash games, free games, online games" or something in the title of the page. Then it would go right to the top of Google searches.
Good to see Muse have done their research for this album.
Most people are stupid. Both atheists and Christians fall into that category.
If you can't see that this whole thing was staged, you'e a little naive.
At 9/13/09 01:10 PM, Dew wrote: You want drugs to be legal without the consequences, which is kind of ignorant in reality.
People will get drugs regardless of their legality.
By making them legal, you drive down the price and reduce the violence and profiterring by drug cartels.
Look at countries in which drugs have been legalised. The world hasn't ended yet! Now stop being an ignorant shit.
Crossdomain is definitely set up properly, and it is not a cache issue.
When I use
blah = new XML();
blah.load("http://www.myhost.com/myfile.
php");
it works fine when testing on my local computer. I run
blah.onLoad = function(success) {
if (success) {
trace(blah); // this will open the page
}
}
... however, when I upload the SWF file to a website, e.g. Newgrounds or SpamTheWeb, it just flat-out refuses to work. I have installed crossdomain.xml on my website, as follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<cross-domain-policy>
<a llow-access-from domain="*" />
</cross-domain-policy>
So this should be working, but it isn't. Does anyone have the solution?
Hell no, I am not getting vaccinated. Especially not for swine flu, which is less harmful than a regular flu.
The majority of the 9/11 families believe the attacks were done by the US government. You should join them.