Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

A "wet willie" would be a totally new experience!

Geshimine: When a blue eyed african girl tells you she wants to nail your balls down into a desk made i out of oak, and you feel drowsy.

Natalia's hot...but so is the other chick.

Go for personality. I bet one of them is totally bitch while the other one...

...well. Let's just say that I don't know many chicks that would like to watch 300 with me.

On the other hand, Natalia asked YOU. So she might have the hots for you. Or not. It's your choice. Completely. You really shouldn't go around and ask about stuff like this on forums because you will, most likely, fuck things up.

"FIshing In the USA"

"In the game you get a totally realistic experience on how it is to fish in the many lakes of america, wether it is from land or from boat." Sounds awesome...

"Choose from around 40 different types of bait, and 8 different rods. The possibilities are endless." Weeeee!

"Employ your own special tactics to catch just the right fish for you." Now THAT'S entertainment!

"Total realism; you get to wait several hours just like in real life to catch them!" Did I mention I cry and go kill myself?

If you guys can find worse games than this you're really, really, really, really, really, really unlucky.

So that was life...wanna go again?

At 3/31/07 06:23 PM, MARINESGRANDMA wrote: When is April fools?

Normally it is in April.

At 3/30/07 10:08 PM, McJesus wrote: Alphabetical.

First child gets a name starting with A.
Seconds gets B.

And so on.

Yeah! But what if you get like 27 kids? Should you start over again?

How come this suddenly became a fierce discussion about US vs. everybody..

America, please don't get angry. Ok, seriously, we don't fear you, or your government, or your soliders, but we are a little bit worried about your president...it's like giving a "destroy the earth button" to a monkey.

At 3/30/07 05:27 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 3/30/07 12:47 PM, CMon5 wrote: (It doesn't make sense. You barely use your legs in American Football.)

let's see you try to move a 300 pound guy without using your legs

Hmm? And what does the ball have to do with pushing some stocky fellow?

At 3/30/07 05:18 PM, Wraith2000 wrote: Really. Why exactly, should anyone give a damn? They aint the same things, they are slightly different sports suited to the way Americans would prefer to play them. Big freaking deal. Heres something that you can get really pissed about. People calling Shuriken Ninja stars. Start a flame topic on that why dont you.

Do YOU mind people calling shurikens ninja stars? The point here is, American Football and European Football is two different things that can make an awful lot of confusion if you use the word "Football". What really annoys me is that some americans demand us to use the word soccer about football. They invented the word! Why the hell would we wanna use it? Do they think we idolize them or something?

Think about it. If I invented the word "skygekule" as an european-english version of let's say...bicycle... Wouldn't you be a slightly bit annoyed if I demanded you use it when you talk to me? "Look, in order to understand each other better I think you should use the word skygekule."

At 3/30/07 04:53 PM, thenakedchicken wrote: Wow, how origional. I've never ever ever seen anyone bring up this point before

There are almost 400000 topics in this forum. Chances are, everything has been brought up over and over again. So go whine somewhere else and stop posting post where you whine about the inevitable.

At 3/30/07 03:52 PM, HeartbreakHoldout wrote:

At 3/30/07 03:27 PM, CMon5 wrote:

I've never played soccer against an American, being English and all.
And it's still an insult to American Football players to say that soccer takes more skill than American Football. I'd like to see a football player do half the stuff an American Footballer does wearing 5 tonnes of armour.

You've got a point, but being strong is not a specific skill. Skill in the football dictionary = technique. You don't need a lot of technique to run with an oval ball between your hands, although it's suprisingly hard to throw the right way. And American Footballers are athletic. They're strong, fast, explosive, but then again, like I said; my interpretion of skill is technique. Their just in very, very, very good shape. (And many are stuffed with steroids and other drugs.)
Btw, I'm sorry I thought you were an american.

You mean based purely on luck. You tell any footballer to score a goal of great skill twice in a row, and they won't be able to, because they don't have enough skill to be consistent. How come players constantly miss the target, when they get paid millions a year?

Of course they can't score the same fantastic goals two times in a row; that's why they're fantastic! You saying it's based purely on luck though is about the biggest load of bull I've heard today. If a footballer hits the top corner chances are that's exactly where he aimed. The reason why they don't always hit on the spot is because it is hard: In matches you've got all kinds of mental pressure, you must concentrate better and like I said earlier you might be in a tougher position than you would be otherwise.

Yeah, but I'm not english, so I'm excused.

This is an English speaking forum, so no it's not.

I know. It was a joke. Sarcasm. But I'm shure you understood.

Football skills are in no way neccesary to be able to play football. In fact, a minimal number of footballers actually do those skills, so what makes all the others Gods?

Actually, an average professional league footballer has great technique compared to the average joe footballer. Striking a straight pass exactly where you want it is much harder than it looks. But you wouldn't know, because you haven't played football (most likely not) and if you have you've only most likely played against weak opposition. The average american kind.

And I could score goals like that, all it takes is being able to kick a ball. Honestly, it's not that hard.

Yeah, honestly it is. Sometimes the ball blasts into the goal at speeds around 120 km/h, and sometimes a lot faster. Placing the ball into the top corners like that, WHILE maintaining speed and curl, and doing this while the ball is in movement and you are running/jumping is pretty hard. I should know. I've played football since the age of four.

Also, it makes me laugh that one of those links you posted calls Football soccer.

Yeah I know. It annoys the crap out of me.

What the hell do you mean? I don't care about amreican football, I care about FOOTBALL. ("soccer" you dumbass.)

Well, you care enough about it to make a topic complaining about it. If American Football was nearly as shit and unknown as you say it is, then surely it wouldn't bother you about what it's called.

Let American Football be called American Football. And may everyone call football football and everyone is happy. Aiight?

What-what-a-what-what? I think I've explained badly, or you misunderstood, or I misunderstood, or whatever. My head hurts.

No, you just explained it really badly. Really really badly.

Yeah, but I'm not english, so I'm excused.

At 3/30/07 01:47 PM, Jizzlebang wrote: American and English are seperate languages.

There are seperate spellings and pronounciations.

Let them call it what they want.

k?

American is not a language.
It's a dialect of english.

yes, american football is also called gridiron or gridiron football as football refers to what americans know as soccer in other parts of the world.
strewth! i dropped a HUGE hint and no-ones picked up on it yet!

WTF? I've never even heard about the word gridiron. You really think most non-americans refer to american football as "gridiron"?

At 3/30/07 01:35 PM, TheDepthsofHell wrote: first of all, this has been said so many fucking times it's ridiculous.

second of all, barely use your legs? are you on crack? do you even know what american football is?

Look, you run around with the ball in your hands. MOST OF THE TIME...if you count running as using your feet and by that making football a logical name for the sport you're just as retarded as you're accusing me of being.

Mybe it's because the players all smell like foot and balls:p

At 3/30/07 01:12 PM, HeartbreakHoldout wrote:

At 3/30/07 12:58 PM, CMon5 wrote: The stars of football are gods among men for some people, because they need so much more skill than American Footballers.

You need to be able to control a ball with your feet, what's so special about that?

Lemme see you do something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhfN4BMRXT8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnl4Yts8TXI

No American Football-player would ever recieve the fame and honour a footballer do.

So why do you care so much about American Football, if the players don't gain so much fame?

What the hell do you mean? I don't care about amreican football, I care about FOOTBALL. ("soccer" you dumbass.)

No. What about american rugby then? It's still more similar to rugby than to football; after all it got inspired by rugby.

There's a sport called American Rugby?

What-what-a-what-what? I think I've explained badly, or you misunderstood, or I misunderstood, or whatever. My head hurts.

At 3/30/07 01:02 AM, JustyHakubi wrote: "High Kicking! Low Scoring!! And Ties! Ties! Ties!!" - Simpsons' Soccer Advert.

I'm sorry, but Soccer is boring as hell. Its pales in comparison to what is known by Man as The National Football League. There is action, strategy and athleticism displayed constantly.

If you're trying to tell us that there is no action, strategy or athleticism displayed in european football;
1: You haven't watched football for a single minute of your life.
or
2: You're an idiot.
or
3: You have very, very, very different opinions from the people that likes football.
American Football < Football btw
I gave Soccer a try. I really tried to get into it, to find out what I was missing. Then I realized there was nothing to miss. Sorry guys. If you like Soccer, hey that's cool. Just don't preach it to an American but we just aren't into it. Besides we already have enough professional-level sports compared to what the rest of you guys have.

Well, I kinda respect your opinion. I know lots of people that aren't into football. It's the same way around for us who aren't into american football. (The tackles are fun though:D)

A football is called a football because it is an object that is kicked by the foot. If you notice in a football game the kicking of the ball plays an important part. You guys have your football we have our football.

Actually you carry it around a lot more than you kick it. It should have been called American Rugby, Touchdown-Ball, Carry-round-ball (yeah i know, the last ones sucked.) or something that-a-likish.

At 3/30/07 12:51 PM, HeartbreakHoldout wrote:

At 3/30/07 12:47 PM, CMon5 wrote: What you americans refer to as soccer is called football. It was you who invented the word soccer to separate it from the crappy wannabe sport you call american football. (It doesn't make sense. You barely use your legs in American Football.)

This has bothered me for a while and it felt good to let it out.

Why does it bother you? Terminology is not what soccer is all about. Apparently, soccer is all about drinking and jeering the players even though you couldn't do what they do in a million years. Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong. Well, for some people it might be drinking and stuff...but not for me and millions of other devoted fans.
And what's the point of cheering for someone if you can do what they do? That's lame, boring, i don't get you man. The stars of football are gods among men for some people, because they need so much more skill than American Footballers. No American Football-player would ever recieve the fame and honour a footballer do.

At 3/30/07 12:48 PM, LJT07 wrote: Well good for you. And American football is reall should be called rugby... as it is basically..... rugby.

Rugby players can't throw the ball forward.

No. What about american rugby then? It's still more similar to rugby than to football; after all it got inspired by rugby.

What you americans refer to as soccer is called football. It was you who invented the word soccer to separate it from the crappy wannabe sport you call american football. (It doesn't make sense. You barely use your legs in American Football.)

This has bothered me for a while and it felt good to let it out.

At 3/22/07 07:09 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:52 AM, No-oneSpecial wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:40 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Stuff

I'm not really boasting, I'm just telling the truth. It's a simple fact that the US military, both our nuclear power and conventional military power is unrivaled. Yeah I'm proud of it, but its just a simple truth that one of your compatriots was unaware of, so I had to correct him.

It's true. You are the big guys,
...BUT! I think if someone with the power to do so would go ahead and attack the US, they must have done something really offensive. Other countries would join in and it would've been america vs. just about anybody, Not a very healthy situation for anyone.

Well first of all, I make a distinction between killing for your own gain (murder) and killing for your country which I consider to be a heroic and selfless act for most circumstances.

I admit, I am a patriotic person and an American idealist, I believe in what we are doing right now in Iraq and Afghanistan so I have no problem with our troops killing for our country. And like this thread talks about, if the US was attacked by the rest of the world, I take great pride knowing that we have the military power to win.

Now I believe this is what makes most of the hateful people hate you. Most americans have such a strong sence of national pride that they don't have any qualms about "killing for their country", even if they were the ones who started the war.
I still don't get the full picture of what you're actually doing in Iraq. Yeah, I know soliders get killed, people get killed and so on. It doesn't look like it's helping and that's what puzzles me. (Good thing you got Saddam though.)
Yeah, and: "If the US was attacked by THE REST OF THE WORLD?" Shit, you're big, but you ain't that big. If the whole world were to jump on the US, it would either lead to the end of the world or the end of the US.

Well, you know. The people who actually think its a good idea to nuke eachother are just the 13 year old morons. Everyone who has posted in this thread so far pretty much belongs to a country that is allied with the US and probably will never go to war with the US any time soon, so it's all hypothetical really.

You're absolutely right. I do not doubt the least that an attack on america would result in nuclear missiles flying about like rockets on New Year's Eve. I think the US is gonna tear itself apart before anyone else does.

The military competance of the british army and the technological advance of the US army.

Well, I still think the US military is more competent than the British military. It's a myth that the US has poor training, and so forth, it's just that since the US military is bigger, its slightly less efficient than the British military in some areas.

I know nothing about the competance of the british army, but I'm pretty shure that the americans outclass you in almost every aspect of technology.
HEADS UP: If anyone feels like arguing who has the most disciplined and competent army, don't even bother. After a global researching survey it became clear that Israel has an army of such discipline and skill that it outclassed everyone.
I'm norwegian, we came 5th (weeee).

But then again, since WWII, it's actually been the British who have adopted American tactics and military doctrine. The current British military is actually intentionally modelled after the US military in order to merge into the US military in times of war. The Gulf War and the Invasion of Iraq are examples, the British use the same communications systems and unit organization/ tactics to be able to work seamlessly when under US command. In the Invasion of Iraq in 03, the UK military units were under command of the US Marines.

And not to rag on the British military, but I don't see where the idea that their military is superior comes from.

Yeah, you're pretty much self contradictory here.

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

Because some people are rational enough to avoid people they hate. + attacking the US would probably end in a massive nuke war where the earth gets blown to shreds.

Why do you think [we] hate the US? [We] just don't understand you, that's all.

Mine used to be: "Hello it's Simon...(pause)...yeah hi...(lenghty pause)...mhm...(pause)...ok...(pause...right.
..(long pause while the caller asks if you're actually listening to him)...stop talking you big retard. Please leave a message instead when you hear the funky beeping sound...(then i would make a beeping sound with my MP3-player, sounds exactly like the one on our answering machine)...(lenghty pause)...ØØØH screwed you over!!! Ok seriously, leave a message after the beep...(wait for like half a minute before the beep).

Changed it after I got about 12 angry messages from my friends:)

It's also a game you'll have to PAY once A MONTH to play.

Communism FTW

So basically, what you're saying is that people playing games you only have to pay for once like BF2 or CS ar all commies. Uuukaayy.....

It also seems that some WOW-gamers get completely addicted (don't ask me why)

This might be beacuse the game is good and unlike most games (name ONE good game) grants atleast somewhat alterning new gaming experiemnces indefinately. This is something no adventyureplatformershooterfighter can do.

And you write very well english yes indeedy. Didn't understand shit except for the fact that you like WOW.

and their way of talking changes overnight. (Let's say they were all like: "Wazzup man." they're now: "Hey dewd you wanna know what I did yesterday? I went to Daggerfall and all of a sudden I get recruited into this clan named Blurp of Azeroth, and we went on the Quest for the Fallen King and farmed and then I was all like dingdingdingding." I get sick by the way.)

Talking the way you want to is a CRIME m'kay...

No, but talking only about a computer game as if it is your life is very, very annoying. Especially when you do it all the time.

There are a lot of WOW-ers who call it a "social" game. There are others who refer to it as "a second life". I just gotta say:
YOU SUCK!

Thats you'r opinnion on the matter. Stop being such a nazi.

I must say that I find your opinion very rude. Telling people that they suck doesn't automatically make them nazies.

YOU HAVE NO LIVES!

Define "life" you nazi. go back to saluting your little ass-posters of Britney Spears.

What's up with you and nazis? You think WoW-players should be considered an own race? I'm with that.

GO OUTSIDE AND GET SOME FRESH AIR.

FINALY a GOOD argument. But what if they do that on a daily basis like I do?

Then they're okay. But the facts are some WoW-players are lifeless.

TRY TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE FOR A WHILE!

Just about everyone does. You are jsut too busy being a superman to notice.

Again, some WoW-players are lifeless.

TRY SPORTS!

WE MUST TRAIN HARD FOR THE FUHRER!

There you go all nazi again. It's true, being fat is not a crime, but there's no need to get all fascist for it.

; DRINK BEER!
Liver cancer > Internet

So you're a healthy boy aren't you.

HAVE SEX!

STD's > Internet

You can't be paranoid vs. sex. Then you're really missing out on something.

AND STOP PRETENDING YOU'RE "GOMGROTH FIREFIST"!

HEIL!

That one was just lame.

There. Someone else take over now.

Arguments counterargumented. Mission Compleate. Terrorists Win

Counterarguments counterargumented. World saved! Good guys win.

At 2/28/07 10:41 AM, SBB wrote:

At 2/28/07 10:39 AM, CMon5 wrote: Try argumenting for WoW. I know that's funnier than being burned and told to "go kill yourself". (Although he's probably looking to get even.)

well what about no what's the deal about arguing about some stupid friggin video game

Well some retards get so attracted into the game that they ruin their lives. I think that's worth arguing about. Don't you?

I completely agree to everything. Then again, I am a member of an anti-WOW-group.

WoW-lovers. Be nice to the guy. He might be a little harsh, but he's got some good points. (Used plenty of times earlier.)

Try argumenting for WoW. I know that's funnier than being burned and told to "go kill yourself". (Although he's probably looking to get even.)