At 10/25/09 08:14 AM, robin1232 wrote: because of incompatability, macs are way faster, macs look awesome, windows blocks openoffice so they make more money

Speed is based around hardware, not operating system. Windows doesn't block openoffice, of course they don't, who told you that? Macs have more incompatibility, most programs and games are built for windows, not macs.

come on, even I knew what a 401k was! you guys!

At 10/24/09 02:58 PM, Jezuz wrote: I already played it. It was okay. Came out about a year ago.

That joke is so unfunny, I've heard it about 6 times already. So what if the games work under the same premise? Why don't you bitch about every CoD game? Oh no, because it isn't trendy to do that!

L4D2 != L4D in many many ways.

press it lots

At 10/24/09 06:39 AM, Zendra wrote: Oh? "Lurk first, post second. Read the entirety of every thread you post in before you post."

I've read the entire thread, then what? It doesn't say I can't repeat what someone else said. General is full of repeating posts, the only place it's annoying in is wi/ht, when it really isn't needed.

do you like chocolate in your pasta? I know I don't.

It's just an image of all the parts that make up the Newgrounds design, so if you were making a flash and wanted to use a button that matched the style of newgrounds you could download the raw materials and cut out the button.

It's just an image.

that's not nice, have some ravioli.

http://petersonkid10.newgrounds.com/

At 10/23/09 02:20 PM, Calintz wrote:

At 10/23/09 02:06 PM, citricsquid wrote: a sneaky method would be to remove the account from your co-authors.

What do you mean?

I assume your problem is that you don't want these flash submissions to show up in your account, correct? Because you're only a co-author you cannot delete them, this is what you're saying and you no longer have access to the account that did submit them, right? If you remove that account from your co-author list they will automatically be dropped from your userpage.

go here and tick the box next to "expired4postlimit" and click remove users, then go to your userpage (calintz.new...) and it'll show no flash submissions because your account is no longer associated with that flash.

Not an ideal solution, but I think that's what you're after isn't it?

At 10/23/09 02:47 PM, liljim wrote: It's pretty funny that he's also filed a complaint against the BBC for being biased in all of this. The truth of the matter is that he's probably not been in front of a forum of people who don't all agree with him, so when he got nailed on pretty much everything he said, it must have come as a bit of a shock to him.

I didn't notice it myself but I was told that he was shaking really badly during the booing, so maybe.

a sneaky method would be to remove the account from your co-authors.

At 10/23/09 09:01 AM, hdxmike wrote: None of you know anything.

Neither do you.

To become an affliate you must have some kind of history with NG and have amazing(funny)flash work that you can deliver reasonably regularly, like ego raptor or adam philips or JAZZA.

No, that's not right. The value of affiliation is that it drives traffic to newgrounds, newgrounds affiliates with other websites that have a reasonable amount of traffic and the potential to drive traffic to Newgrounds. So, if google came to newgrounds and said "hey we have this website and we want to get some of your members to use it, will you affiliate with us? You'll get some of our traffic because users want flash games on our website we'll link them to here!".

I think the whole affiliate section died though and they removed it, people like glaiel only have it because they didn't want to remove it, nobody else will be accepted because the websites are displayed nowhere, you can use the fan net if you need somewhere.

At 10/23/09 08:58 AM, Luis wrote: That it sets a bad example to young people walking by.

If they see you smoking, they might think it's okay to take drugs and joyride! You're an awful influence Luis!

At 10/22/09 07:30 PM, Lizzardis wrote: Or I'd recommend changing your password to your steam account just in case someone has got access to it and downloaded a game or something.

I'd also recommend wiping your arse in case someone smeared poo on your bum

I can give irrelevant advice too!

At 10/22/09 07:04 PM, liljim wrote: The primary discussion I intended to spark on this thread was to do with the show, not the politics that Griffin represents, which could be summed up in a few words.

Sieg Heil?

At 10/22/09 06:50 PM, liljim wrote: The bbc is supposed to be impartial, they can't account for the audience, though. If the majority of the audience is against him from the start, then the bbc can't do much about that.

Not sure if other outlets that they use count under impartiality, but the twitter account for the show was tweeting things that were clearly anti nick griffin and bnp, which I'm sure they aren't supposed to do. this account had a tweet earlier saying something about nick griffin being a dick, but it's since been removed, but it still has only negative things about him when there are people saying positive things. Regardless of whether or not these things are right, surely by only displaying the negative they're being totally bias.

silly bbc

At 10/22/09 06:39 PM, Gagsy wrote: Also I don't agree with children being taught about homosexuality at young ages and I'm pro homosexuality. Perhaps I can admit that because I'm not part of the biased Question Time audience.

Exactly, he made a perfect point about that, homosexuality happens but why should we subject primary school children to it? Not even homosexuality specifically, all sex isn't suitable for 8 year olds which is what he reiterated. They asked if he didn't want homosexual people to kiss in public and he said yes, they didn't say "Do you only want to ban homosexual people from kissing and not straight people?".

At 10/22/09 06:39 PM, liljim wrote: I thought he made some valid points NOW AND THEN, but he still proved to be a total and utter cunt overall.

What gets to me is that they ignored all his valid points totally, which I guess is understandable but this is supposed to be bias lacking but oh no, they ignore them totally and then Jack Straw only waffles about irrelevant shit and nobody boos, they just ignore it as if he's a fucking saint.

He says he's repulsed by men kissing = booed
She says she's repulsed by straight people kissing = clapped

nice work uk

At 10/22/09 06:22 PM, SuspiciousPenguin wrote: Im quite worried, citric and gagsy are starting to sound like BNP supporters.

but canada sounds nice

I'm worried you're a fucking moron. I do not support the racist policies of the BNP and as far as I know gagsy is the same HOWEVER I am perfectly capable of identifying that this program is ridiculously bias and he has made a few good points. THIS DOES NOT DISCOUNT HIS RACISM THOUGH. Is that clear for you?

At 10/22/09 06:23 PM, Gagsy wrote: As long as you bring that wonderful tea-towel.

I'm there, you have to use it though.

At 10/22/09 06:19 PM, Gagsy wrote: Also, yeah this country sucks. Let's move to Canada.

Is that an offer to move in with you?

At 10/22/09 06:08 PM, Gagsy wrote: Especially being a woman. Any woman in this country would agree that it is a wicked religion based on how they treat women, but not when Nick Griffin says it. He made a fair point there too about the Tories sending troops there to kill and how he wouldn't.

I find it amusing how the audience is full of a load of opinionated uni students. Couldn't get more biased.

This is even better, sure nick griffin says some stupid stuff but at least he's too the fucking point. He has evaded nothing, yet jack straw spends the entire time waffling and they clap him? I fucking hate this country, also the bbc twitter stream is hilariously bias. They're retweeting the anti-griffin comments. This sucks, fuck you BBC.

At 10/22/09 05:56 PM, Gagsy wrote: And no I don't agree with his views but yeah they are just ganging up big time.

Exactly, this is why it sucks. He has said some things that if anyone else said them they'd cheer him but oh no, it's nick griffin! He just made an amazing point about islam just then.

If anyone else said "why should we trust any politician?" they'd get cheered, he doesn't. Bias audience.

my dad is better than your dad

At 10/22/09 03:54 PM, EagleStudio wrote:

At 10/22/09 03:35 PM, liljim wrote:

Alright thanks man. Just to note - first time paypal user so I'm very cautious lol.

Don't be afraid, if you don't get up to any mischief you won't have any problems with Paypal, I've had nothing but exemplary service from them and love them, I personally prefer them over a bank account because of the ease of use, wide support and security.

fuck yeah pre-order :D Can't wait!

At 10/22/09 03:15 PM, Dogbert581 wrote: Play the Nick Griffin drinking game, every time he says something ignorant/bigoted take a drink

please don't encourage such dangerous drinking!

At 10/22/09 02:46 PM, Ass-Crumb wrote: But still, they're fucking fanatical, which probably isn't helping their cause.

oh god let me find the article that had an interview with one of the younger members, they flat out say they want all blacks out, pretty much, it's dreadful.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/the_p_
word/newsid_10000000/newsid_10002000/100 02087.stm

At 10/22/09 02:02 PM, liaaaam wrote: I picked up Orange Box a few months ago in a weekend deal for £5 :3 Though I already had TF2 (and orange box on ps3)

Anyway, this weekend, Killing Floor for free.. hell yeah. I've wanted to try it for ages, got a new graphics card a couple of weeks ago.. so.. awesome :-)

Me and my friends have got it (3 of us) and I've set up a UK server for us to play on. If you're interested in joining us for some fun (we've all got mics and stuff) then you're welcome to join us (assuming you're after somewhere to play!). If you do want to (or anyone else reading this from the UK or europe) then add me on steam or something.