ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww enoll likes willy ewwwwwwwwwwwwww

http://xkcd.com

MIND BLOWN

It's nice to see the rate at which new signups occur, anyone could generate the first 50 users list, you could if you like.

You don't, you stop using the wrong medium. This site has no reason not to be built using xhtml and css, flash is unnecessary.

At 10/25/09 04:17 PM, AlternativaPlatforms wrote: You think a site ran by the fucking staff of WIKIPEDIA is a trap?

Wikipedia is user contributed. Wikia is not owned or ran by the staff of wikipedia.

Wikia is operated by Wikia, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California and was founded by Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley in 2004. Gil Penchina is the current CEO.

At 10/25/09 03:41 PM, Slosha69 wrote: Social networking is lame, especially when it's you telling everyone that you're taking a shit or taking a shower. It's very stupid. I mean, whatever happened to just plain Myspace. That's acceptable for me.

Everytime I see topics entitled "twitter" I know some fucking moron is going to post exactly that; "I don't care when someone is taking a shit.". I've given up explaining to people that this IS NOT what twitter is used as and is for, so instead I just say this:

I didn't get to use the internet until 2005, got my own computer late 2005 and I've been "addicted" since then. Although it's not an addiction, I could stop using my computer at any time, although I wouldn't like that.

At 10/25/09 08:40 AM, gumOnShoe wrote: That's actually incorrect and I'd expect you to know better. :/

of course operating system has an effect, but the main speed is down to the hardware. My point was that he's complaining vista sucked but that wasn't because of vista as such, it was because he was running shitty hardware. Maybe I should have clarified.

man I'm such a dick, wow I can get away with doing nothing, awesome, oh shit.

At 10/25/09 08:34 AM, robin1232 wrote: hell no it isnt, just as internet speed is not only based on your connection but also on your browser

uh, yes it is. of course some speed is down to your operating system, but if you're running on suitable hardware you'll notice no speed problems. I've been running windows vista and windows 7 from this computer for a while now and it's super fast.

have you tried using openoffice since the vista service pack 2 update? doesnt work anymore does it?

I haven't, but that's most likely a software problem, not microsoft pro-actively blocking it. It runs on windows 7 fine.

At 10/25/09 08:14 AM, robin1232 wrote: because of incompatability, macs are way faster, macs look awesome, windows blocks openoffice so they make more money

Speed is based around hardware, not operating system. Windows doesn't block openoffice, of course they don't, who told you that? Macs have more incompatibility, most programs and games are built for windows, not macs.

come on, even I knew what a 401k was! you guys!

At 10/24/09 02:58 PM, Jezuz wrote: I already played it. It was okay. Came out about a year ago.

That joke is so unfunny, I've heard it about 6 times already. So what if the games work under the same premise? Why don't you bitch about every CoD game? Oh no, because it isn't trendy to do that!

L4D2 != L4D in many many ways.

press it lots

At 10/24/09 06:39 AM, Zendra wrote: Oh? "Lurk first, post second. Read the entirety of every thread you post in before you post."

I've read the entire thread, then what? It doesn't say I can't repeat what someone else said. General is full of repeating posts, the only place it's annoying in is wi/ht, when it really isn't needed.

do you like chocolate in your pasta? I know I don't.

It's just an image of all the parts that make up the Newgrounds design, so if you were making a flash and wanted to use a button that matched the style of newgrounds you could download the raw materials and cut out the button.

It's just an image.

that's not nice, have some ravioli.

http://petersonkid10.newgrounds.com/

At 10/23/09 02:20 PM, Calintz wrote:

At 10/23/09 02:06 PM, citricsquid wrote: a sneaky method would be to remove the account from your co-authors.

What do you mean?

I assume your problem is that you don't want these flash submissions to show up in your account, correct? Because you're only a co-author you cannot delete them, this is what you're saying and you no longer have access to the account that did submit them, right? If you remove that account from your co-author list they will automatically be dropped from your userpage.

go here and tick the box next to "expired4postlimit" and click remove users, then go to your userpage (calintz.new...) and it'll show no flash submissions because your account is no longer associated with that flash.

Not an ideal solution, but I think that's what you're after isn't it?

At 10/23/09 02:47 PM, liljim wrote: It's pretty funny that he's also filed a complaint against the BBC for being biased in all of this. The truth of the matter is that he's probably not been in front of a forum of people who don't all agree with him, so when he got nailed on pretty much everything he said, it must have come as a bit of a shock to him.

I didn't notice it myself but I was told that he was shaking really badly during the booing, so maybe.

a sneaky method would be to remove the account from your co-authors.

At 10/23/09 09:01 AM, hdxmike wrote: None of you know anything.

Neither do you.

To become an affliate you must have some kind of history with NG and have amazing(funny)flash work that you can deliver reasonably regularly, like ego raptor or adam philips or JAZZA.

No, that's not right. The value of affiliation is that it drives traffic to newgrounds, newgrounds affiliates with other websites that have a reasonable amount of traffic and the potential to drive traffic to Newgrounds. So, if google came to newgrounds and said "hey we have this website and we want to get some of your members to use it, will you affiliate with us? You'll get some of our traffic because users want flash games on our website we'll link them to here!".

I think the whole affiliate section died though and they removed it, people like glaiel only have it because they didn't want to remove it, nobody else will be accepted because the websites are displayed nowhere, you can use the fan net if you need somewhere.

At 10/23/09 08:58 AM, Luis wrote: That it sets a bad example to young people walking by.

If they see you smoking, they might think it's okay to take drugs and joyride! You're an awful influence Luis!

At 10/22/09 07:30 PM, Lizzardis wrote: Or I'd recommend changing your password to your steam account just in case someone has got access to it and downloaded a game or something.

I'd also recommend wiping your arse in case someone smeared poo on your bum

I can give irrelevant advice too!

At 10/22/09 07:04 PM, liljim wrote: The primary discussion I intended to spark on this thread was to do with the show, not the politics that Griffin represents, which could be summed up in a few words.

Sieg Heil?

At 10/22/09 06:50 PM, liljim wrote: The bbc is supposed to be impartial, they can't account for the audience, though. If the majority of the audience is against him from the start, then the bbc can't do much about that.

Not sure if other outlets that they use count under impartiality, but the twitter account for the show was tweeting things that were clearly anti nick griffin and bnp, which I'm sure they aren't supposed to do. this account had a tweet earlier saying something about nick griffin being a dick, but it's since been removed, but it still has only negative things about him when there are people saying positive things. Regardless of whether or not these things are right, surely by only displaying the negative they're being totally bias.

silly bbc

At 10/22/09 06:39 PM, Gagsy wrote: Also I don't agree with children being taught about homosexuality at young ages and I'm pro homosexuality. Perhaps I can admit that because I'm not part of the biased Question Time audience.

Exactly, he made a perfect point about that, homosexuality happens but why should we subject primary school children to it? Not even homosexuality specifically, all sex isn't suitable for 8 year olds which is what he reiterated. They asked if he didn't want homosexual people to kiss in public and he said yes, they didn't say "Do you only want to ban homosexual people from kissing and not straight people?".

At 10/22/09 06:39 PM, liljim wrote: I thought he made some valid points NOW AND THEN, but he still proved to be a total and utter cunt overall.

What gets to me is that they ignored all his valid points totally, which I guess is understandable but this is supposed to be bias lacking but oh no, they ignore them totally and then Jack Straw only waffles about irrelevant shit and nobody boos, they just ignore it as if he's a fucking saint.

He says he's repulsed by men kissing = booed
She says she's repulsed by straight people kissing = clapped

nice work uk