Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/21/07 12:07 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: you can find it http://www.newgrounds.com/rankings/ currently (the time i am posting, it is 1,271,497 Users

sorry, it is suppose to be here (if you arent dumb, youd copy and paste the plink...

you can find it http://www.newgrounds.com/rankings/ currently (the time i am posting, it is 1,271,497 Users

At 9/20/07 04:06 PM, kidray76 wrote: Update to add Sevenseize and Seamonky to that list btw.

i got seamonky... through PM...

i hate you... now i'll have to link them (and that takes forever)

At 9/20/07 03:25 PM, MattHarty wrote: I wouldn't actually want an option like that implemented. I was just making a general statement that some authors act way wrose in their responses then the reviewers did. I mark things abusive in hopes of having them deleted. Not for points.

Thanks

i never noticed that point.... (mainly due to my retarted modem that takes time to load)
also, what if the review mods are against the author? it would have to bring in a WHOLE NEW section...

including author bans, an author flagging section etc. and if it was only for review mods, they might delete comments from authors they dont like etc. (not that i am saying review mods are bias)

maybe if we just flagged the review (I AM NOT TELLING YOU TO DO IT SO DON'T SAY "thanks for nothing cheekyvincent you fucktard, you just made me lose my whistle points etc") but then liljim would have to make a whole new system where mods could delete authors comments (also, you arent gonna give an author an author commenting ban, are you?)

At 9/20/07 02:45 PM, smc316 wrote: lots of spam

dont spam, the BBS is not for spamming. also, its because you flagged the wrong things rpbably...

At 9/20/07 02:52 PM, inclusivedisjunction wrote: I know. I went to garbage, too. I think there's a rogue review mod.

well maybe you flagged the WRONG things, you know, you are human and you do make mistakes. also, maybe you should try not flagging EVERY DAMN THING ON EVERY PAGE

At 9/20/07 02:56 PM, smc316 wrote: .....Who? Kidray and absent are the only review mods I know, who else is a review mod? And also I never would have thought of that on my own!

the list is quite disputed. however, if you read my news post (click my profile) you will see a list (scroll down just a bit) i have absents list and kidray76's list...

At 9/20/07 03:05 PM, inclusivedisjunction wrote: Many of the forum moderators are also review mods. As for coming up with that idea: I was only a normal whistle to start with, so a lot of other people, or a higher whistle must have thought the ones I flagged were abusive as well. And if a lot of people thought it was abusive, then it probably was, so why would it be approved?

maybe it WASNT abusive can people in this thread FACE THE FACT THAT THEY MAY HAVE FLAGGED THE WRONG THING? YOU ARE NOT ALWAYS RIGHT

At 9/20/07 12:27 AM, sonicmega wrote: How come no one ever posts links to AUDIO reviews?

1) dont do all CAPS/Bold/Underlined/Italic etc. posts
2) well you hardly get any goldmines because hardly anyone reviews audio stuff

At 9/20/07 01:46 PM, Little-Rena wrote: Most bad responces are given because the review is bad.

not really, the kk used to spam after they got constructive reviews that were rated 0s or mainly 0s

At 9/20/07 01:23 PM, MattHarty wrote: I wish there were ways to flag the authors responses to reviews. Sometimes they're just as bad if not worse with the way they act...

no, that would make the page:

1) look ugly (due to an added section/gap
2) take the fun out

getting whistle points takes time or the x axis as some cleverer people would say

stop trying to think of new stupid ways, do it like we did

you lucky people get to flag audio reviews now too- we couldnt back in the old-before-the-redesign days

At 2/7/07 12:45 PM, BritZombie wrote:

where you are (part of england) must be scotland... down in London where people are normal, hardly any of these are considered 'chavvy' or it could just be your year 7 classmates that tell you it is (cough 11 year olds)

Wearing trainers

That would mean everyone in bluewater is a chav (thats LOADS and everyone does it...) also do you wear? those gay wheelies or crocs?

Having any kind of fight

so everyone at some crappy school is a chav

Going on roofs

even to fix it?

Not being an emo/goth/skater

you can also be normal you know...

Wearing a hat/hoodie (who cares if its freezing cold??)

beanie hat?

Slang

everyone uses it... everyone MUST be a chav (noting that chav is slang (i think))

At 9/20/07 11:43 AM, Mechabloby wrote: Why would I count?

only very lonely people would...

well, u might have a secondary email, otherwise, start a new email

1) its not advisedto make alts while banned
2) just ask for it unlocked, why do you want to?

At 9/19/07 02:05 PM, kidray76 wrote: admin or mod deleted them

before you start asking, its because they break rules

At 9/19/07 12:04 PM, BlueHippo wrote: a vagrant used to be one without a profile

by that, it means that you havent added any one of these:

1) a news post
2) audio submissions
3) favorite audio
4) favorite audio author
5) flash submissions
6) favorite flash submissions
7) favorite flash author

(i.e. if you havent added any one of these, your a vagrant i.e. you need to add JUST 1 of these to go from a vagrant to a user)

At 9/19/07 12:39 PM, Haggard wrote:

At 9/19/07 10:44 AM, noidtluom wrote: I find it a bit irksome that Newgrounds keeps it to itself. (Of course, there is nothing really wrong with that, but it's just a feature suggestion).

NG doesn't keep the flashes to itself. NG doesn't give out the flash to ANYONE. That way, movies can't be stolen (if some random guy comes in and claims that this or that submission is his and NG hands it out...).

but you can download popular stuff...

(the kirk_cocaine way)
Downloads ---> Ipod Videos

(or for PSP)

either your mum so fat, when she steps on some scales it gives you the weightwatchers numer or the best comeback ever... (or worse)- my mums dead

wait, this thread IS serious?

first one ive seen in a time

it alreaaady has, something like 50 stick flashes get blammed every day
and im already bored of madness

At 9/19/07 06:36 AM, AKLEMO wrote: here are some of my flashes and about 2 or 3 are pics ok?

well, they WILL be blammed however good they are... however, you can submit it... if you dont wwant it blammed, post it in the Art Forum
but read this if you dont want to be banned...

At 9/18/07 12:35 AM, kidray76 wrote: Honestly, I say just repost that. That submission can't relaly give the standard review for because mostly just a flash to say "lol, i got this number in the portal"

yeh... its driven by n00bs HUNGRY for damn whistle points... they're so greedy... as if they were free runescape points or free pokemon red games or something like that (not that i would want it though the average 11 year old newgrounder would...)

At 9/18/07 11:09 AM, talbond wrote: ddy? Sorry. It won't let me do more. The name says it all!

unfortunatly, some people are greedy and won't give out 100 lines of pure actionscript that they spent months in... also, its gonna be flagged stolen anyway as it will be the same except you change the library items... make your own game... from the very start

it may have beenn STOLEN, look at the eulogy page and see if the dates are more then 1 days apart...

At 9/16/07 11:32 AM, smc316 wrote: I only went from being garabage whistle to bronze??

something called time?

At 9/16/07 10:40 AM, KyleTheMadcap wrote: I doesn't make your "wall paper move for an hour".
It just makes everything funny to you, and food tastes better.

so thats one way of gaining weight... right?

At 9/16/07 10:50 AM, LiveBreatheTom wrote:

At 9/16/07 10:48 AM, Cheekyvincent wrote: the real piano man was this guy... it was even on the news...

did they have a sample of him playing? if there was in the link i couldn't find it

the people that cared for him said so anyway...

the real piano man was this guy... it was even on the news...

and you can really enter a casino at 13 years old

so, if you have aids, you would live in a bubble and survive, right?

At 9/16/07 08:17 AM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /399253/3 homer42 , meangrl and spongebob65
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /388291

your help is good... but could you try to put tonnes of reviews in one post rather than tonnes of posts with few reviews?

learn Deutsch, theres hardly any the words are pronounced how they are written

playing real guitar can also be done when theres a powercut

At 9/15/07 10:08 AM, GUTHRIE wrote: Certainly.
www.anywho.com

thats kinda freaky... i dont know if theres one in england, but say you wanted to huint someone down... you could do that just with their name...