2,100 Forum Posts by "Ceratisa"
I'm sorry I can't take someone seriously who wants someone to work for 1 day in a single school for the entire school year as a guidance councilor.
One guy who is needed to be available to students running around 44 schools for one, two days max. And you want this one part time guy (Who would want to get a masters to get 14k?) to help the 40,000 students in those 44 schools.
At 1/25/13 12:22 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:At 1/25/13 12:14 AM, Ceratisa wrote: Police respond, not prevent. We are constantly cutting down their budgets and making them cut personnel. Murder =/= Self Defense by definition.Bull shit America is a Police State there are cops everywhere you look.
You can say that all you want, but until you turn this country into minority report police can't prevent crime. They can discourage, stop, and respond.
At 1/24/13 05:31 PM, TruBluFoxx wrote:At 1/23/13 06:29 PM, Ceratisa wrote:Bullets beat swords as well.At 1/23/13 01:24 AM, supermofo wrote: I don't think the jounin would be able to break the power armor though, it would probably just be a stalematePretty sure basic fire techniques would be enough to cook them alive. But dodging lasers seems a bit much for a generic jounin...
High velocity projectiles can be stopped by basic earth style etc. But we also need to consider the use of explosive tags vs rocket launchers.
Police respond, not prevent. We are constantly cutting down their budgets and making them cut personnel. Murder =/= Self Defense by definition.
I don't see the harm in splitting them up to better reflect the voting. Since hey, you know it wouldn't of mattered anyway?
At 1/24/13 07:18 PM, MultiCanimefan wrote: What about a simple deathmatch to decide who gets elected? Obama could have had a hammer and sickle, and Romney could have used a sock full of silver coins along with a shield made out of the skins of brown people.
That is called leather...
At 1/24/13 07:35 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 1/24/13 04:34 PM, Ceratisa wrote: So you choose to ignore the fact that you want one guy who normally makes 55kish to work part time covering 44 schools? for 14k?1 day a week going to the schools he/she is needed at. Still 1,000,000,000,000,000 times more useful than that amount spent on assault rifles.
No that's bullshit just admit it.Just one person, to cover 44 schools and 40,000 students. And considering the amount of traveling they'd need to do. And parents, what about the parents demanding time. No one person is not enough to cover 40,000 students.
The travel alone would rack up cost unless you want their part time 14k job to pay for travel expenses as well. Or how bout their office? You are talking about 180 divided by 44 so each school will never have their counselor for even 5 days. Assuming he worked every day (which isn't full time)
At 1/24/13 04:24 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 1/24/13 04:14 PM, Korriken wrote: this school will probably never get shot up.Which is why spending so much on guns is a waste.
So you choose to ignore the fact that you want one guy who normally makes 55kish to work part time covering 44 schools? for 14k?
At 1/24/13 04:04 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 1/24/13 03:58 PM, Ceratisa wrote: Oh look, you can't read? Did you see the cost comparison? IT isn't even close, that is like not being able to afford a new company fleet of cars vs getting some high quality office paper.$14,000 is more than enough to get a school counselor to come on part time. Seems to me that a school counselor is a heap load more useful to students than a pile of fancy and shiny cobweb launching points.
So, you were saying?
One guy who makes on average 50k a year split between 44 schools? just part time? Yeah cool brah.
Dude you are the most hateful person here. Some people chose to talk about Multiculturalism instead of responding to racism that didn't merit a response. If the mods feel it requires a lock, it will be locked. IF they feel it requires a ban, he'll get banned.
At 1/24/13 11:54 AM, Fim wrote:At 1/23/13 07:45 PM, wildfire4461 wrote: I honestly can't believe this happened in California:Truly scary stuff. I can't believe they'll spend money on this before school counselors.
http://news.yahoo.com/fontana-calif-schools-high-powered-rif les-184934771.html
Oh look, you can't read? Did you see the cost comparison? IT isn't even close, that is like not being able to afford a new company fleet of cars vs getting some high quality office paper.
I still feel that killing is wrong, even if you're killing some one who is trying to rob you, and I morally resent anybody who thinks that killing another person is something that they should prepare well for, but if you're going to have guns in society this seems like a pretty mature way to do it.
So do you feel it is inappropriate to kill someone who is raping and killing your family? Let's be calm and understanding. I guess if it was just your wife being raped then getting her throat slit, it wouldn't be appropriate to kill the guy. I mean we haven't even tried to understand his feelings yet. We just saw our family in danger and responded, I can't blame you for resenting someone who is prepared to kill another to defend their family.
Someone has broke into my house, let me calm down and take five and try to figure out if they just want to rob me or if I should fear for my own life or my family. Maybe I could go up and ask them if they mean to assault me or my loved ones.
Hell he is probably high, it isn't his fault it's the drugs. Maybe we should help pay for his rehab, him taking your money and your ability to care for your family isn't wrong, he is just taking what he needs. You have a house and family you can afford to give a little more to the guy who frequents the crack house.
You are willfully close minded to the actual danger present in these situations. You don't know shit other then someone is in your house who shouldn't be. Sure they might be stealing your stuff, but it might also be a serial rapist or some druggie suffering from major paranoia and violently unstable. You don't have the luxury to just wait until it is over sometimes.
Not only that you shamelessly compare two amazingly different countries to each other and say, this works here.
Gun crimes are usually committed by criminals, guess how criminals get guns, hint hint not legally.
At 1/24/13 03:09 PM, Fim wrote:At 1/24/13 03:07 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Also this thread was started by a racist with the intent to spread hate violence and he should be banned.I love the fact how he's trying to troll people, and people are actually agreeing with him.
It doesn't really matter when the topic is enough for people to respond to.
At 1/23/13 08:49 PM, MsBobman20 wrote: it depends on how it is intended to be used. If it's for cancer then yes
This is about recreational use, don't be a tool.
At 1/23/13 07:15 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 1/23/13 05:35 PM, Ceratisa wrote: What about examples where in Ohio districts more votes just for Obama were cast then there were eligible voters.What about them? (Ive been through this with others, there is NO proof of that)
Obama still won enough electoral votes to win without Ohio.
No proof? Look at registered voters how is 108% of an entire district voting for one candidate not fishy?
At 1/23/13 06:08 PM, T3XT wrote: You know a horror game is truly horrific when this happens.
I can only recall not being able to finish this game because it was too scary.
Has there ever been a game you were too scared to finish?
Eh, Amnesia?
At 1/21/13 07:16 PM, MsBobman20 wrote: i might as well try it. I mean it couldn't be that terrible
Depends on if they continue to just make TES with guns...
At 1/23/13 01:24 AM, supermofo wrote: I don't think the jounin would be able to break the power armor though, it would probably just be a stalemate
Pretty sure basic fire techniques would be enough to cook them alive. But dodging lasers seems a bit much for a generic jounin...
At 1/23/13 03:30 PM, Camarohusky wrote: There are 2 million more votes for Obama that say you're wrong.
You lost. BYE.
What about examples where in Ohio districts more votes just for Obama were cast then there were eligible voters.
Information is free though...
What you said are my thoughts exactly! There is no taking away of firearms either... Now I don't agree with the assault ban and clip ban but it should be a helluva lot harder to get these guns, show you've earned your right to bear arms.
You seem confused. The right to bear arms is a right, not a privilege you earn.
Thank you Tremulos you expressed it well.
Camor your real life examples can be shown to actually cost something in comparison. So, poor examples.
At 1/20/13 09:16 PM, RightWingGamer wrote:At 1/20/13 09:10 PM, Silverchaos wrote: Apparently that leak from before was a lie. Shame.Lesson learned.
Never trust Reddit.
You don't already know that?
Piracy isn't theft. You need to physically take away something to steal something. You cannot compare real life examples to internet piracy because you can't duplicate someone else's matter and take off with it IRL.
I'm not sure why you think that stupid figure with 98% agreeing means anything when only less then 100 scientists asked were actually educated in that field to answer, and most didn't answer. And don't forget who pays these kind of scientists either.
Billions of species have probably gone extinct in the Earth's life. Many, well before humans had anything to do with it. The natural warming cycle of the Earth is something (Which will happen regardless of humans) should be stopped to prevent extinction is laughable and reckless.
Qualifying pistols as "Assault Weapons" is a pretty sickening leap honestly.
At 1/19/13 07:33 PM, Camarohusky wrote:At 1/19/13 04:22 PM, Ceratisa wrote: Well lets be honest about it. There would be less fatalities and more wounded if "Assault Weapons" were the only things ever used in mass shootings.You make many assumptions in that statement.
IF you bothered looking at statistics and knew about bullets and firearm design you'd know that an "assault weapon" was never designed to make death inevitable. But the use of HP rounds most certainly does, and those are used in pistols.

