Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/25/14 08:27 PM, Natick wrote: you're not supposed to respond these threads twice, you know

I blame Natick for interrupting their amazing dialogue with each other.

At 10/13/14 09:48 AM, Radaketor wrote:

At 10/12/14 06:52 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 10/12/14 02:24 PM, SockeyJockey wrote: because I'm very used to a lively forum with posts coming in basically every 30 seconds

What forum's that?

Gaia's forums, maybe. That's the only one i know that has new posts that quickly.

I know Adult Swim's forums used to easily get that..

People literally live off of it, so that would suck.
Anyway gamers as a whole would be considerably less ..of a coherent group? without something like you tube.

At 10/25/14 10:08 PM, Valfire wrote: This one needs no introduction.

This one, but more often the second one, still play it about once a year doing things the same damn way I always do despite me telling myself "This time I'm going to be EVIL."

When people say "I could care less."

I couldn't possibly find a way to make fun of anything l33t like the name above.

I just don't watch T.V. anymore to really care too much.

First one seemed the best to me, but then again I'd play Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, any day before I played Paper Mario

I know my favorite, but I really feel like I'm cutting dozens of titles short by not listing them..

I'm currently juggling
Tropico 5
Borderlands the Presequel
Diablo III (having a bit of fun every few months with it)
Starcraft II
and Wasteland 2

1. Fallout 2
2. Final Fantasy 6
3. Planescape: Torment

I have logged easily over 500 hours each into the first two.

For "recent" rpgs I'd vote Persona 4: Golden and Dragon Age Origins.

Considering Ebola is spread through bodily fluid the man power isn't so much the issue, the local populaces lack of understanding/education is.

Speaking of FF VII:
Was it ever properly explained how it is possible that Cloud memorizes everything Zack witnessed? If I remember correctly, Cloud stayed outside when Zack and Sephiroth went into the reactor and discovered the biological experiments, so there's no way Cloud could have any memory of what happened in there.

Cloud ran into the reactor later.

Worst UI of the series yet, most mind numbing battles as well. (BORING)

At 9/7/13 07:52 PM, tsukikomi wrote: Not wanting to go to church isn't enough anymore?

It never was.

At 9/7/13 07:34 PM, Rucklo wrote: Yeah, thrad, u so hawt, thred fap mmmm leme cores ur posts, thred mmm yeea

I'm having difficulty with "cores ur posts"

At 9/7/13 07:43 PM, Ononymous wrote: You have to disbelieve ex nihilo nihil fit. Despite this being a fundamental principle in the Big Bang Theory as it stands today.

Welp, I guess I'll never be one.

You're all getting 90 days for insurrection (haha "rection") , especially those users plotting to sacrifice and/or kidnap me.

See you all in, like, January 2014 or something.

I thought we were all Tom clones or something, are you allowed to Ban Tom?

We've talked in length about Civilian ability to counter military force. Unless you bring new points to that discussion why bring it up?

At 8/25/13 11:44 PM, Korriken wrote:

At 8/25/13 09:57 PM, Light wrote:

At 8/25/13 09:52 PM, Elitistinen wrote: NSA is worse than the Soviet KGB.

I wouldn't go that far.

Neither would I, at least the NSA doesn't show up and drag you off, never to be seen again.... not yet anyway.

Please remember, that they COULD though.

At 8/26/13 01:46 AM, Feoric wrote:

At 8/25/13 08:23 PM, Ceratisa wrote: Assad is the one protecting minorities in Syria, because he is one himself.

t you dope.

Ad hominem, very mature Feo.

But go on keep going "ALL HIS FAULT ALL HIS FAULT ALL HIS FAULT."

his blog is dedicated to the struggles of people everywhere to advance human progress and save this planet from the decline of capitalism. 12 February 2013 Now that I have been banned from the Daily Kos for criticizing Obama's stand on the Syrian Revolution, I will start by moving my seven years of Daily Kos diaries to this blog and then take it from there.

So you link me to some blog with a naked bias right there and blast sources with actual VIDEO footage?
A senior administration official said Sunday there is "very little doubt" that a chemical weapon was used by the Syrian regime
No one is going into detail, this is another example even though we don't even have any evidence pointing either way.

But to expand upon their point about the claimed treatment, certain drugs are given if you are the victim of certain toxins.

Ban Ki-Moon has nothing in nearly a year since the first attack right?

Feoric honestly, I want you to explain for reasons other then "Because he thought he could get away with it" "It might not go all the way up to him" What benefit the Syrian government or Assad would see in this apparently massive use of chemical agents.
I linked you an article that was 3 months old if you don't think other quantities could have been captured by then or more left uncaptured I don't know what to tell you.

And by the way on

"Government forces did not appear to be in imminent danger of being overrun by rebel factions in the areas concerned; in fact, many observers believe a bloody stalemate has set in around Damascus. And regime forces have also made gains recently against rebels around Homs and elsewhere. Why would it risk an action that would likely kill hundreds in a heavily-populated area and risk stirring up an international appetite for intervention?

Would it also have risked using an agent as lethal as sarin just a few kilometers from the heart of Damascus -- to both the southwest and northeast of the city -- on what appears to have been a quite windy night?

Some observers also point to claims on jihadist websites that rebels have seized chemical weapons equipment after overrunning government bases such as one outside Aleppo in July 2012.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/08/06/198675/al-qaida-groups-lead-syrian-rebels.html#.Uhr_ahvZiz4

By the way you can stop refusing to mention Al Qaida, they are actively participating in the fight.

Your appeal to emotion BS isn't making you any more credible.

The end of the siege that had clamped down the airport since last October began Monday, when two non-Syrian nationals drove an armored personnel carrier, loaded with explosives, into a position manned by defenders of the regime of President Bashar Assad. The explosion devastated the Assad troops and allowed rebels to overrun the Mannagh Air Base in Idlib province.

Those rebels included multiple units affiliated with the Syrian Military Council, an umbrella group with U.S. backing. That poses an uncomfortable pairing of a group supported by U.S. resources with Islamist organizations Washington has labeled as terrorist.

So the guys we are backing work openly with Al Qaida forces, capture an air port and you don't think they have access to the equipment to deploy an attack which would benefit Assad in no way?

Assad is the one protecting minorities in Syria, because he is one himself.

Donkey Kong was never "dark."

At 8/25/13 05:47 PM, Fim wrote: I don't think you should ever use the death penalty for the simple reason that the jury might get it wrong, simple as.

So how could the Fort Hood Shooter for example be innocent? Just as an example, we can go over more.

At 8/25/13 06:35 PM, Profanity wrote:

At 8/25/13 06:27 PM, Kel-chan wrote: Does anybody realize that the US has been backing the rebels (AKA ALQUEDA) for the past 2 yrs??? The only reason this has continued is because the US has been continually arming these mercs

There are a dozen different groups in the Syrian Opposition. Some of them have ties to Al Qaeda. Some of them are ex-Assad. Mostly, they're just local Syrians.

Do you want to know WHY they have ties to Al Qaeda? Because Al Qaeda is financed by oil rich nations in the Middle East. They have a large anti-government network which is already in place all throughout the Middle East. If they weren't in contact with Al Qaeda, they wouldn't stand a chance of fighting against Assad.

No they aren't fewer and fewer Syrians are actually "rebels" We know the "rebels" have Sarin gas Turkey said so, Turkey is not on Assad's side.

At 8/25/13 04:33 PM, Feoric wrote:

At 8/25/13 04:06 PM, Ceratisa wrote: Like I said the U.N. believes the rebels are behind previous Sarin gas use, not Assad.

No, you're wrong. Carla Del Ponte is not the UN. She doesn't even work there anymore.

GENEVA — Syrian rebels have used the deadly nerve agent sarin in their fight against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, according to evidence from victims and doctors, UN human rights investigator Carla del Ponte said.
"According to the testimonies we have gathered, the rebels have used chemical weapons, making use of sarin gas," del Ponte, a former war crimes prosecutor and a member of a UN commission of inquiry on Syria, said in an interview with Swiss Italian broadcaster RSI on Sunday.

So your right Geneva not the UN muh bad so totally worthless right?

Turkish security forces found a 2kg cylinder with sarin gas after searching the homes of Syrian militants from the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Nusra Front who were previously detained, Turkish media reports. The gas was reportedly going to be used in a bomb.

The sarin gas was found in the homes of suspected Syrian Islamists detained in the southern provinces of Adana and Mersia following a search by Turkish police on Wednesday, reports say. The gas was allegedly going to be used to carry out an attack in the southern Turkish city of Adana.

On Monday, Turkish special anti-terror forces arrested 12 suspected members of the Al-Nusra Front, the Al-Qaeda affiliated group which has been dubbed "the most aggressive and successful arm” of the Syrian rebels. The group was designated a terrorist organization by the United States in December.

Police also reportedly found a cache of weapons, documents and digital data which will be reviewed by police.

Following the searches, five of those detained were released following medical examinations at the Forensic Medicine Institution Adana. Seven suspects remain in custody. Turkish authorities are yet to comment on the arrests.

Russia reacted strongly to the incident, calling for a thorough investigation into the detention of Syrian militants
in possession of sarin gas.

So Turkey which is not on Assad's side (quite the opposite) knows the rebels have Sarin gas.

At 8/25/13 04:00 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Estimates goes from claim of 1729 dead to 355 confirmed dead from MSF, a reliable source. Because it was a night attack, complete familly may be rotting inside some houses and nobody will find them for a while.

Concidering casualty and the scale of the attack, the report of only 20 rockets seem slim for even the lower estimate. There was probably more to find. If I was a rebel, I would definitivelly not waste this kind of arms on my own position hoping for outside help. Especially after the outside help refused to move in several times already. At least I would not poison some of the most strategic and significant positions I need to hold.

You wouldn't use it on Assad to openly make it obvious which side is willing to use chemical weapons. But what would Assad's motivation be for using it on civilian populations instead of rebel forces?

Like I said the U.N. believes the rebels are behind previous Sarin gas use, not Assad.

At 8/25/13 02:32 PM, BrianEtrius wrote:

At 8/25/13 02:29 PM, Ceratisa wrote: The 1300+ dead compared to 300 something, ya big difference ACTUALLY.

Oh, so there's different values for unarmed civilians' lives being shot by the military?

Good to know that people's lives aren't valued the same. Glad you're not running foreign policy.

In terms of value yes, it does make a difference, I never said it wasn't terrible.

At 8/25/13 02:17 PM, Feoric wrote:

At 8/25/13 01:59 PM, Ceratisa wrote:

At 8/24/13 10:45 PM, Dimitrilium wrote: Rebel would need shitload of sarin to kill 1000 individuals. It is extremly toxic,

Less then 500 dead according to aid groups

Oh, what a difference.

The 1300+ dead compared to 300 something, ya big difference ACTUALLY.