12 Forum Posts by "ceelar"
Religion is for teh weak-minded.
Nothing more.
Today i woke ap tu faind out dat i lost my brein. wat tu doo? Den i reemembor: ai nebor hed a brein! Demn!
This was pointless. Just tell me if you like crab. i hate crab. Jeesh.
Ohhh underline! God, i need a vacation....
Da fart thingy!
Then i would just light myself and burst into flames to become Teh First Hewman Torch!!! Haaaaaahaaaaaa Satan eat your heart out.
Do you know what PAIN is? Of course not.
I will not reply to your insults, nor to your ignorance. I'll just say this: does your religion turn you against homo- and bissexual persons? Will you agree to linger in disrespect with other's sexual tendencies? Will you let yourself overcome by stereotypes and misconceptions? Will you deny the humanity in yourself? Will you spend your life in a fake illusion of grandiousness, when reality SCREAMS the truth?
Respect others, no matter the religion or sexual tendencies. No matter what. And let us followers of the Darkness be, as we let you.
i think there has been a little misunderstanding here.
i dont, and i never would, follow any kind of dictatorship in any way, would it be left-wing or right-wing.
staline was a dictator. that is a fact. he used his own interpretation of communism to become rich and powerful. this kind of communism i dont agree.
when i say that communism in russia didnt fail, i meant that russia became one of the most (perhaps the most) powerful countrys in the world, along with the US. we cant tell that that's failure. thats what i meant when i said that russia succeeded.
humanly speaking, it WAS a dictatorship, thus the rights of the working class were not respected. humanly, they failed, has any other dictatorship.
having said that, and if everyone else agrees, we should go back to the main topic.
PS: sorry for my english (im calling dictatorship a government ruled by a dictator, i'm not sur how you say that in english)
At 9/11/03 02:11 PM, ngWo_Musical_Pants wrote: Communism in Russia did in fact fail. Nice try on avoiding adrshepard's point.
russia started to fall when Gorbachev applied western politics, meaning, when the strict communist from before has started to be moderated. you can see that on any history book.
PS: sorry for my english
At 9/10/03 05:35 PM, adrshepard wrote:
I find it hard to believe that if money was the only US goal why we would bother to spend so much to help rebuild other parts of the country besides oil production. Spending hundreds of billions of dollars just for some oil sounds pretty stupid to me.
the rebuilding of iraq is being done by alot of american enterprises, and one specificly (i dont recall its name) is or was owned by usa's vice president (i saw this on the news)
If the UN had taken over, there wouldn't be a war. I don't understand how they expected to find anything in the first place with so few inspectors just wandering around the country.
of course there wouldnt be a war. the UN would try to solve things peacefully.
so few inspectors just wandering around the country.
yes and we see now houndreds of soldiers in iraq that find exacly the same thing - nothing
And we didn't mass bomb Iraq. If we didn't care about collateral damage, we wouldn't be spending so much money to help rebuild the country.
of course usa didnt mass bomb iraq. they wanted the oil tanks secured.
And if capitalism is so bad, why has it worked so well for us, Britain, and several other European countries including Russia, where communism failed.
communism in russia didnt fail. russia started to fall when other politics have been applied. now russia is a complete chaos.
i think ther is a little misunderstanding here.
noone can say usa is incompetent. alot of inventions were and are useful to mankind. usa is a beautiful and interesting country, such as many others. they have smart men, advanced research centres and is a very economicly evolved country.
what i dont like in the usa is the government. but not only the usa's.
my opinion about iraq:
saddam was a ruthless (thats how you write it?) dictator, and his reign should be stopped, i agree on that. what i dont agree is that stupid "cowboy" attitude of marching in without any athorization from the UN and start shooting everything.
if the UN had taken over this affair, you should be certain that there would not be the slaughter that was this war. the usa would have the support of other contrys, and everything would have gone smooth and with the minimum of casualties.
but no. the usa thought that they dont need any UN. and they went, along with the UK, thinking that it would be like afganistan (thats how you write it?), just march in, mass bomb the place and the problem is solved. i think anyone can see that it was not that easy.
why did they ignore the UN?, you ask. i have a few suggestions... (greed?)
PS- sorry for my english
You'll find all the anarchists in Africa, starving to death, fighting over grain, while we pleasantly eat a steak.
my point exactly.
If you actually looked at the world, you'd find that the most powerful countries like the US, Britain, Russia, and others are democratic republics.
russia is powerful, but at what cost?
the britain government (spetially Tony Blair) licks USA's ass. so does portugal, my country, and others.
i am not against democracy. i am against a government that fights terrorism blowing up entire countrys, murdering innocents, bringing caos and hatred, and then stands up in front of those that try to solve their problems without involving "collateral damage" and trys to teach them their way of solving things, showing it as the most humain.
Which system of government seems to be more successful?
i never said that the american system didnt succeed. i just dont like power abusers.
PS- i dont mean to disrespect british, american or other people. i fight the government, not the people.
PPS- sorry for my english (although i understand english, im not much of a writer)
draw me me me!!!
jk my name's kinda impossible to explain cus i made it up.. u got talent dud good work
1- having an incompetent persident that didnt even win the elections
2- start wars for oil using reasons unprooved (such as weapons of mass destrucion - may i remind you WHO has more weapons of mass destruction? hint- its not iraq...) and then, realising they messed up, blame it on the UN
3- use power to threat countrys and explore third world nation's natural resources for payment of a help "given by good will
4- (this is personal) allow the destruction and pillage of one of the world's most important museums (in bagdad). some of the pieces stolen are lost forever - world history!
5- impose christianism above all other religions- we hear the president saying "god bless america", maybe forgetting that the president must not follow any religion what so ever
6- force minor countrys to accept theyr way of life - the "american way of life" - not showing any respect for each people's differences
7- murdering innocents in a war that they cannot fight alone (compare the number of victims of the american slaughter in the middle-east with the number of victims in the 9/11 - with all due respect for the victims and their familys)
8- trying to teach europeans how to have a healthy alimentation, when more then a half of the american people are overwheighted
9- showing their democracy as the best democracy in the world, acusing anyone that disagrees of being radical, and "communist"- im anarkist, and may i tell you that communist, not stalinism, is one of the most perfect political systems in the world
10- america doesnt have any history (at least not like europe, no culture (at least not like europe), no quality of life (at least not like europe), no education (at least not like europe), and still they show their guns, forcing coward weak countrys to admit their supposed superiority
etc, etc, etc
why does anyone hate america?
PS: by the way, in europe we ARE pacifists. may i remind you that countrys like switzerland dont even HAVE an army....
PPS: sorry for my english
