Get better girlfriends with Brains and Beauty?

Hell, it's what I do.

In order of preference:

Latin.
White.
Asian
Black.

At 9/4/09 05:39 PM, Chdonga wrote: So? Sure furfaggotry is wrong, but who are we to question his or anyone's fetishes?

We're Newgrounds. Therefore we have our rights to say what is wrong and right, who should be punished and who should be rewarded.

At 9/4/09 02:54 PM, speeling wrote:

At 9/4/09 02:21 PM, Rokas1337 wrote: go die in a hole... seriously you prob have no friends thats why u even bothered to go to that table. also u just made me want to vote for wade

Sorry I pissed off a 12 year old.

Forshame, forshame.

morelike8ammirite?

At 9/4/09 12:13 AM, FatJoe214 wrote:

At 9/3/09 11:43 PM, CashClock wrote: I actually daydream in the following places:

Shower.
In bed before I fall asleep.
I used to in class I usu........

I'm sorry I wasn't paying attention

Huh? Sorry, say again?

At 9/3/09 10:21 PM, HeartbreakHoldout wrote: It'll never catch on. The cancer is what gives cigarettes that distinctive taste.

Hmm...Really.

Note to self: Invent Cancer flavoured crisps

At 9/3/09 11:36 PM, Sensationalism wrote:

At 9/3/09 11:35 PM, CashClock wrote: My dog HATES it when you put her in fire...I mean seriously she starts squeling and everything over a bit of fire.

That doesn't mean she doesn't like it. Dogs squealing is really no different from an alarm clock beeping.

lololdescarteslolol

Oh so it's normal? Oh then I'll just throw her in a barrel of Fire since she likes it.

I actually daydream in the following places:

Shower.
In bed before I fall asleep.
I used to in class I usually woke up in the middle of the Lesson and worked like fuck because I just missed half of it so I have to catch up, usually I would.
When just basically doing nothing.

Alot more other places because I daydream ALOT! So Newgrounds, my question is do you daydream?

My dog HATES it when you put her in fire...I mean seriously she starts squeling and everything over a bit of fire.

I've been studying your cat and I've come to the conclusion.: He has Gingeritus. I'm sorry I know your in pain, but you must understand...There is no cure. I'm afraid you may want to...put him down.

As a British guy: Thank fuck the American's rebelled. We'd still be ruled by a king if it wasn't for them.

At 9/3/09 10:12 PM, HeartbreakHoldout wrote: Oh my God I don't think you understand percentages at all. If 50% of Londoners commit crime and only 40% of Liverpudlians commit crime, then that means that London are worse. It means that if the populations were the same, a larger number of Londoners would commit crime.

As it is though, your statistics mean fuck all, because they fail to take into account the race of people committing the crimes. For all you know, 100% of London's crimes are committed by white folk, whereas all 5% of Liverpool's black folk are out stealing cars. You don't know, man.

I'm amazed someone who read my post out of 19 replies. Anyway, on to the point all the violent crimes here are usually commited by White people you rarely see a Black guy here doing a crime and usually the crime are WAY more serious than stealing cars...Hell I think there was around 10 shootings in my neighbourhood just this year.

At 9/3/09 09:40 PM, dontkillkenny42 wrote: First thing, London doesn't have a 50% Black population. Second, in Liverpool there is a 95% White population so that mean there's no black people to do crime, and I assure you if Liverpool was more than 25% black it would be 10 times worse than it is now.

Okay, where's points? Nowhere. Where's my points? IN MY POST! Which most people seem to ignore.

At 9/3/09 09:22 PM, tweekee wrote: People commit crimes. Which race does more is just a steriotype. It's not a race thing, it's personality based. If you have 3 black kids who were spoiled their whole life, and 3 white kids who had a shitty life or hate their parents, of course the white kids are going to commit crime. It's not race related at all, it's about personality.

My post says otherwise, although I had a shitty life and I barely get in trouble with the police...Well excluding my uncontrolled anger days...

At 9/3/09 09:10 PM, tobi0 wrote: A thread similiar to this was locked a few minutes ago, and I'm sure this will suffer the same fate.

But that thread had no points and was actually interesting...It was just a thread saying that Black's do more crime than Blacks.

Also, I can tell Chlonga didn't read my post.

Wow, I really just figured this out on a thread so I did some research and came up with this on why White's most likely do more crime than Black's. Only the Media used to portay the average Black guy as some illiterate fuck that does crime every 5 minutes and now most people even Black's actually believe that.

Here it is...After 10 minutes of hard-thinking research (I copy-pastaed this from my last post.)

White people are probally worse, no wait...I know there worse, because as I've said three times in three threads I live in Liverpool. Liverpool has a 95% white population and is located in North-West England. We have a outstanding crime rate which I'm not too proud of.

Seriously we have somekind of violent crime on the Echo (Our city's main newspaper.) every night. Here's the crimerate for Liverpool and London(Which people usually believe is full of crime and has a 50% African population.)

London's crimerate:

Population 232,000 -
Households 109,000 -
Violence against the person - 25.9%
Sexual offences 0.8%
Robbery offences 4.3%
Burglary dwelling offences 7.7%
Theft of a motor vehicle offences 3.5%
Theft from a vehicle offences 11.3%
Total: 53.2%

Now here's Liverpool's crimerate

Population 435,000
Households 194,000
Violence against the person 20.7%
Sexual offences 0.7%
Robbery offences 2.5%
Burglary dwelling offences 9.5%
Theft of a motor vehicle offences 3.8%
Theft from a vehicle offences 9.5%
Total: 44.2%

Now before you say "Wait, idiot. London's crimerate is 9.0% higher than Liverpool's crimerate therefore the Black stereotype is right." Well good sir, remember that London's population is only 50% of Liverpool's population therefore to make it fair you need to half London's crimerate which equals to only 23.6% crimerate(But this includes London's population as a whole.)

(Now this is mainly to disprove the Black criminal stereotype.) BUT WAIT, theres more the Black population in population is only 50% of London's population so we have to half the population. Therefore half 232,000 and what do you get? 117,000! So now we have 117,000 of the population but wait, now we need to half the crimerate AGAIN! Which equals *drumroll* 11.8%!

So only 11.8% is the crimerate to London when just including Black's and because Whites pretty much cover up Liverpool and it's crimerate is 44.2% that means White people do more crime than Blacks and Liverpool is more crime-filled than London because when using your head with Population's you'd find out that it's only 23.6%!

(Note: to prove that you've read this: Put Good points and Bad points if you disagree or agree in your post somewhere that why I can tell who actually read the thread and is worth arguing with.)

If your wondering what the point in this research was...It's because I usually like mental challenges to prove that I'm a fucking genius. Also, consider the KKK, Neo-Nazi's and other Racist white groups that just makes it worse.

And if your wondering I have a life: I can easily spend 10 minutes of my SPARE time doing some research for shits and giggles.

So do you agree with my points or don't?

What's with all these Black people stereotype threads?

White people are probally worse, no wait...I know there worse, because as I've said three times in three threads I live in Liverpool. Liverpool has a 95% white population and is located in North-West England. We have a outstanding crime rate which I'm not too proud of.

Seriously we have somekind of violent crime on the Echo every night. Here's the crimerate for Liverpool and London(Which people usually believe is full of crime and has a 50% African population.)

London's crimerate:

Population 232,000 -
Households 109,000 -
Violence against the person - 25.9%
Sexual offences 0.8%
Robbery offences 4.3%
Burglary dwelling offences 7.7%
Theft of a motor vehicle offences 3.5%
Theft from a vehicle offences 11.3%
Total: 53.2%

Now here's Liverpool's crimerate

Population 435,000
Households 194,000
Violence against the person 20.7%
Sexual offences 0.7%
Robbery offences 2.5%
Burglary dwelling offences 9.5%
Theft of a motor vehicle offences 3.8%
Theft from a vehicle offences 9.5%
Total: 44.2%

Now before you say "Wait, idiot. London's crimerate is 9.0% higher than Liverpool's crimerate therefore the Black stereotype is right." Well good sir, remember that London's population is only 50% of Liverpool's population therefore to make it fair you need to half London's crimerate which equals to only 23.6% crimerate(But this includes London's population as a whole.)

(Now this is mainly to disprove the Black criminal stereotype.) BUT WAIT, theres more the Black population in population is only 50% of London's population so we have to half the population. Therefore half 232,000 and what do you get? 117,000! So now we have 117,000 of the population but wait, now we need to half the crimerate AGAIN! Which equals *drumroll* 11.8%!

So only 11.8% is the crimerate to London when just including Black's and because Whites pretty much cover up Liverpool and it's crimerate is 44.2% that means White people do more crime than Blacks and Liverpool is more crime-filled than London because when using your head with Population's you'd find out that it's only 23.6%!

Wow, did I really just work all that out?

Well, my entire CITY consists of white people.

And before everyone says it's probally all safe and everyone's nerdy, you obviously have never seen Liverpool.

I'd prefer to run any day...Especially since I have a dark fear of deep water.

Which I probally started the phobia when I fell off a ferry at the age of 4...Ever since then I can't stand the sea or deep water.

Fucking scary shit man...Drowning is probally the worst way to go.

At 9/3/09 06:26 PM, kidd25 wrote:

At 9/3/09 06:24 PM, Jerich0 wrote:

At 9/3/09 02:28 PM, Emomudkip wrote: Before i say anything, fan boys out there, im not saying "Halo 3 sucks" its a good game.

I'm saying Halo 3 sucks.

im asking why it sucks.

There's no point in asking...All he's going to say is that it's overated, which it is but it's a great game, most people that hate Halo provide no reason to why it sucks and just say it's overated and probally never played the game to realize how well thought-out the storyline is(And ironically say the story sucks.) and how great the graphics and gameplay are and don't get me started on the soundtrack.

They also sometimes say they hate FPS...Which means they hate FPS and not Halo.

Not only that but he's an idiot for trying to bash people's opinion on a thread about a game.

At 9/3/09 07:05 PM, PsychStrategies wrote:

At 9/3/09 07:01 PM, newgeneral wrote: Croydon is safe. Move to it. It has green parks and a lot of trees around streets. You'd love it. Perfecto!

Yeah I'm gonna move to the UK, where I'll probably be the only none-white-looking kid unless I live in London.

I know your being sarcastic, but DON'T MOVE TO LIVERPOOL! I live there and the place is full of crime and shitty scallies drinking cheap cider and smoking weed which they stole the money for because there parents can't afford shit.

London may be bad...But it's fucking heaven compared to this shitty place.

At 9/3/09 02:33 PM, OneWordName wrote: Black suit spider man isn't emo, he's being merged with the venom sybiote. So you can't have black suit spider man fighting Venom, it makes no sense.

Also, Hulk would kick Spider man's bitch ass any day.

Because senseless destruction with no strageties always wins a Smart guy that always looks out for weaknesses and makes a stragety before he attacks...Yeah, Hulk would win alright.

Sarcasm.

{insertwittyracistjokehere}

At 8/11/09 11:38 AM, WadeFulp wrote:

At 8/11/09 11:25 AM, Elfer wrote:

Yeah, I know, I was just trying to come up with some kind of scary disaster coming up on you from behind. If you're on a limited access highway you have no choice but to drive one direction, so if there was a tornado you could either stop and let it pass infront of you, or if it's coming at you from behind, you have little choice but to try and out run it until you can find an exit so you can travel in a safer direction. Either way, you wouldn't want to be in a car that has a top speed of 55MPH, etc. :)

Wade...are you high? Just wondering because your talking in all BOLD and just not seeming yourself.

At 9/2/09 11:51 PM, Goldfire64 wrote:

At 9/2/09 06:52 PM, zee666 wrote: Is it wrong that I wanked to that?

as long as you didn't finish.

Does this mean I can rape some hot chick and legally I can't be jailed as long as I don't finish?

Also, this is EXTREMELY late...I remember this like 10 years ago.

At 8/7/09 12:24 PM, Yhtomit wrote:

At 8/7/09 11:12 AM, killerjeff wrote:

Three main death cases: LiveCorpse (murder/suicide), SirTom93 (bullshitter), and now Cyberen (cold blooded murder). Those are the only ones that I know of.

You forgot me, CashClock (Serial Killer, never been caught and murders have never been discovered.)

At 9/2/09 08:09 PM, grounds-master wrote:

At 9/2/09 08:04 PM, CashClock wrote: Drive-By's would be so easy with this bitch.

Is that a warthog?

Oh, and I want a '69 charger. Boom!

Yes, it's a Halo Warthog.

To answer your question: Never use google images, because the full-size image is too big and the display image is too small, so basically I couldn't upload the big one so I had to resort to that shitty pic.

At 9/2/09 08:09 PM, grounds-master wrote:

At 9/2/09 08:04 PM, CashClock wrote: Drive-By's would be so easy with this bitch.

Is that a warthog?

Oh, and I want a '69 charger. Boom!

Yes, it's a Halo Warthog.

To answer your question: Never use google images, because the full-size image is too big and the display image is too small, so basically I couldn't upload the big one so I had to resort to that shitty pic.

Drive-By's would be so easy with this bitch.

At 9/2/09 07:02 PM, 1Tyla1 wrote: The only fast food that works for me are KFC's and chippies. Apart from that? Home foods, fucker.

Chippies are Take-away restaurants, not Fast-Food restaurants.