Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I don't think christianity is ruining our nation, I think it's the stupid backward people who do not realize that all people are people... It's just some odd concidence that a lot of these people are christian. I guess Christianity, when improperly used, provides moral justification for the bad thoughts and deeds these people wish to do.

And for the record, I am not Christian.

At 7/7/04 12:54 AM, red_skunk wrote:

At 7/7/04 12:43 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Yeah, you've always been weird like that... fool

Naw, they look cute.

the glasses or the girls?

At 7/7/04 12:48 AM, clichealias wrote:

If this were a sign saying "Whites are superior, negros shall be frowned upon" I think the news would put a much different spin on this story.

Yeah, that's true, homosexuals are getting shafted by the media, and society in general. I say kick over the sign, he can say what he wants, but I can make a statement by kicking it over. Dumb pastor, spread the right message, not the wrong one.

At 7/7/04 12:40 AM, Slimyguy wrote:

I've always had a thing for girls with glasses. Kerry now looks that much more appealing.

Yeah, you've always been weird like that... fool

I'm not sure there is much America can do at this point... I mean if someone is fucked up enough in the head to blow themselves up, I don't think us leaving will change that. If we aren't there, it would be some anti-Isreali thing.

At 7/6/04 12:27 PM, mabzie wrote: why dont you forigeners stay out of our fucking busness.

We made it everyone's business the day we began to step on their toes telling them how to do their diplomacy job. International affairs are much more complex than intra-trailor park arkansas dealings...

At 7/6/04 11:55 PM, IllustriousPotentate wrote:

At 7/6/04 11:32 PM, Gooie wrote:

How can I put this to you...

Don't pet the miniature elephants?

Yeah, cause they bite.

At 7/6/04 10:06 PM, gem1 wrote:

Actually Bush closed off technology trade to China and there was actually disucsions of Impeaching Clinton over giving China the technology to create ICM missles. As far as Bush, which weaponds?

You take an attempt to impeach Clinton as a serious accusation? Come on, you're old enough to nkow that the Republicans were trying to find anything they could to get Clinton out of office.

(And FYI the M in ICM stands for missile, so unless China was making missile missiles, you don't need the extra missile)

At 7/6/04 05:03 PM, CHAOSKILLER wrote: dude it wasnt a link it wuz on the philly news

Then go on their website and find the story link, they should have one...

And anyways, we don't just celebrate 4th of july, ever heard of the 5th of may? Yeah we celebrate that too... all it is is just another reason to get drunk and party...

At 7/6/04 04:02 PM, gem1 wrote: Racism is what people make of it. All people. If you look at people who complan that they did not get a job because of race you have to look at all the factors. Take the presidency. If Jesse Jackson ran for president would Racism be the first thing on everyones mind? What if Colon Powel ran. If Colon Powel ran race wouldn't be an issue.

Yes it would. You may hear people saying that they would vote for him now... But when they really get down to it and realize that they will be ruled by a black man, they would renege on their verbal promises and vote against him... I think we still have a long way to go even before a black man as qualified and great as Colin Powell can even make it in.

Morals are in the eye of the beholder.

Something is immoral if you make it immoral, and conversely something is moral if you make it moral.

Here's the key to Canada...
Rush, Hockey and Beer
Take two of those, and Canada is ours!

The 4th of july , to me, is a day to show my appreciation for my country by blowing shit up. Much the same the English show their pride in their country at a football (and if you're thinking pigskin and linebacker football, please, leave now) game.

And for all you foreigners here, don't blame Americans for what our president does. Shit, I mean more people voted against him that for him, he had less votes than the second guy.

Prune Tracy had a good point about a couple meaning to have a baby when one or both of them change their mind afterwards. I'm sure there were many girls in my high school that were in stable relationships and thought that they would have stayed that way for a child, but were proven wrong after it was too late. What then?
Keep the baby at the family's expense? (I say family because the mother's future becomes the future of all of the kids hse has afterwards, her poor future could be affecting multiple future kids.)
send the baby off for adoption and probably never see the baby again, not even sure if the baby will ever make it out of orphanages and such?
Or abort the baby and essentially forget it ever happened and go on with her life, and have a chance to create a better situation to have future children?

It's a tough choice, but I think that the mother should be able to decide for herself (or with the father depending on the circumstances.)

At 7/3/04 11:22 AM, -theFUNK- wrote:

We don't allow monopolies on any other industry. Why should they be allowed in politics?

Damn straight Funk man.

At 7/3/04 12:06 AM, Captain_Kingfish wrote: I say we start another Civil War and defeat the North!!!

Is it true if they pass the Gay marriage thing South Carolina will Suceed(<<Spelling) from the union? That would be kinda cool cause thats how the First Civil War started

Is this guy really as crazy as he makes himself out to be?

I'm for Kerry, with Bush's rash decisions and multiple unilateral actions, he has turned a once ideological young person, into one who beleives that no matter how hard he tries, he re cannot have an effect on what the president really does... Bush might as well be king for as little as he takes the people into account... (Whigs reborn?)

At 7/3/04 12:11 AM, pierrot-le-fou wrote: As much as i don't want to say it, i have to say Bush.

And yet that is a picture of Lenin in your profile... tsk tsk...

At 7/2/04 10:41 PM, witeshark wrote: I say that at some point the extremist moron has to see HEY it doesn't work and people shouldn't have to think like cops on patrol 24/7

Maybe this is just me, but that made no sense

At 7/2/04 08:42 PM, Justin12 wrote:

At 4/21/04 07:44 AM, NoHitHair wrote: Where I stand is simple. People under 18 are allowed to drive, get jobs, pay taxes, go to adult prison, be executed and other instances I'm sure I'm forgetting. But those same people aren't allowed to vote on any of the above issues. Additionally, the ones

Thank you so much!!! You've just helped me with my debate! Thanks!

The jobs given to peopel younger than 18, driving, taxes and one's own conduct are all a lot simpler than the political system. Amd I seriously wouldn't trust someone who hasn't even graduated high school to have an impact on the way that I live for the rest of my life.

At 7/2/04 08:48 PM, Justin12 wrote:
I've got your good reason... if people 16 and older can drive(depending on the state they live in), go to prison, be executed for certain crimes, etc. why shouldnt they be able to vote on these things, like, why shouldnt they be able to vote against a law(the death penalty) that they dont like, if they may be subjected to it in the future. Its just like in vietnam, like you said, 18 yr. olds couldny vote against the war, because they were not 21 or older, yet they still had a chance of being drafted into it. Its the same thing. It has to stop!

Oh boy, I know some war vets who would hate you for what you just said. The death penalty being given to 16 year olds and 18 year olds being able to be drafted is way different. When you are given the death penalty, YOU did something that deserved it. When you are drafted, you did not do anything to get drafted, you were just unlucky enough to be born at the wrong time.

People aren't subjected to the death penalty, they earn it, people don't earn the draft, they are forced to do it.

At 7/2/04 08:24 PM, Justin12 wrote:

At 7/2/04 08:14 PM, PsychoMonkeyParade wrote: I think the voting age should be 16.

They oppress us by forcing education on us and restrictions... it has to stop!

Forcing education on you?! You say that's a bad thing?! No wonder they don't let people vote until they're 18.

At 7/2/04 08:02 PM, Justin12 wrote:

because we shouldnt have to wait. Why do people like you think your better than us?! The whole reason why were "inexperienced" is because the government holds us down. If they'd give us more chances, maybe we wouldnt screw it up so much!

There is no reason why the government should give minors anything they don't have now. Find one and maybe we'll listen.

At 7/2/04 06:14 PM, ReiperX wrote:

3000ish was the WTC on 9-11, he may be talking about the Madrid Bombing though. Not sure of the death toll on that though either so can't say for sure.

Which were ya talking about Cama?

I was talkin WTC, I just got my numbers mixed up in my head, but 3000 is still a hell of a lot of people.

At 7/2/04 06:10 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote:

At 7/2/04 06:07 PM, Camarohusky wrote: Well, I don't really think that memorials are a bad thing, I mean 6500 people died.

Where did you get that figure? LAst I heard it was just under 3000.

hmm, it was from memory... but i guess my memory isnt working as well in old age...

At 7/2/04 06:08 PM, ReiperX wrote:

At 7/2/04 06:03 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote:

Like how to wrestle a crocadile?

Nah, easier ways to stay cool in the heat, ways of keeping some of our equipment operational beyond the norm and stuff like that. Although my shop especially don't like what they do to the radios to put them past their limits though since when they come back to the states we gotta fix all kinds of shit that blew out. But it got the job done very well. Just killed the longgivity of the equipment.

Well, the equipment's reliabiolity and ability to last during combat is much more important than the longevity outside of combat.

At 7/2/04 06:03 PM, The_Bacon_Jesus wrote:

So by brushing off attacks and not dwelling on them we're actually doing more good than holding huge memorials and mourning for years on end.

Well, I don't really think that memorials are a bad thing, I mean 6500 people died. Might as well have something honoring their death. But to make it such a huge deal in our everyday lives will kill us.

At 7/2/04 05:58 PM, ReiperX wrote:

I may not like the Iraqi/American War, I dont think we should have been there the first place, but I got a lot of respect for the people over there, both the ones that agree and disagree with being over there, doesn't matter what country your from.

I'm damn glad that you, especially being part of the military, can say that. Many people try to criticize those against the war for being against the troops, and conversely that if you support the troops you must support the war. This has caused many problems, and I'm just glad that someone especially in the military can understand that.

At 7/2/04 05:48 PM, 1Shot-Paddy wrote: americans need to take the blame for what you did on the Native Americans you acted just as bad as Hitler and nearly wiped out an entire race.

Talking about past racism is a dead end road. I didn't oppress any Natives, my ancestors may have, but there's nothing I can do about that. The racism we need to focus on is present and future racism.