Be a Supporter!
Response to: Take a Myspace Style Photo! Posted January 12th, 2009 in General

At 1/5/09 01:37 PM, Randominator wrote: Yeah I'm legal but no, i'm not interested in having sex with you.

HAWT

Response to: Dreams that effect your body Posted December 11th, 2008 in General

I don't lucid dream very often, but there was this one time where I was sort of half-way between being asleep and being awake. I had control over my body, but my mind was still dreaming, weird as hell btw. Anyways, IRL I walked out to my kitchen, while in the dream I was in a bar and really aching for a beer. So I picked one up off of the counter and took a big drink. It turns out that the beer was actually a bottle of antiseptic throat spray, which woke me up instantly. BLECHH :@

Response to: You gotta be fucking kidding me... Posted December 11th, 2008 in General

At 12/10/08 11:46 AM, StephanosGnomon wrote:
At 12/10/08 11:34 AM, poxpower wrote:
At 12/10/08 11:17 AM, StCyril wrote:
See the issue I have with that is... This is a CHRISTIAN country.
Your constitution is not a "Christian constitution". It provides for freedom of religion hence saying you're a "christian country so people should bow to christians" shows that YOU don't understand how it's meant to work where you live.
Yeah, seriously. This IS NOT a Christian country. If it were, it would be the official state religion... but it's not, so it ISN'T. The founders of the nations were deist/agnostic, the fact that they may have been influenced by the Christian ideals of the time does not make this a Christian nation.

"Freedom of religion" means you can worship however you want or not at all. That's the whole point of it.

The country is Christian. The founding fathers were not deist, deism did not come about until about 50 years after the constitution was written. The only reason that no official state religion was named is because the protestant refugees were afraid that the Catholic Church (which was the prevalent one in Europe then) would take over and make the U.S. into another old-world monarchy.

Response to: Disney Movies with Deeper Meanings Posted October 9th, 2008 in General

A little off the topic of deeper meanings, but I didn't like the way hunchback of notre dame botched the entire ending of the novel it was based off of. In case you haven't read it, Quasimodo dies in the novel, but Disney decided not to have him die beside the woman he loved but could never have, and instead made a shitty sequel. Mike Eisner is a moron