10,192 Forum Posts by "BumFodder"
At 8/28/12 09:56 PM, RightWingGamer wrote: You clearly need glasses. While that happens to be true for most shooters (not all of them), I still neither said nor implied any thing like that.
nice backtracking
What I did say/imply was that shooters generally have an emphasis on shooting. You can't fault a shooter for having too much shooting, it's just ridiculous.
nice twisting my words. If all a game focuses on is running and shooting then yeah you can fault it for having no depth.
Please explain. How are style and design philosophy dissimilar terms, and how is arcade neither?
How are they in any way the same? And I never wrote or implied arcade was neither of them so thats irrelevent.
Now we're back to the reading comprehension issue. It was in response to your absurd claim that CoD wasn't "skillful or thoughtful," and was drawing attention to that claim.
Theres a big difference between typing "too much focus on running and shooting to be very skillful or thoughtful." and typing "call of duty isnt skillfull or thoughtful". I suggest you take your time to work out the difference and stop deluding things and pretending I wrote them or implied when I clearly never did.
At 8/28/12 09:31 PM, RightWingGamer wrote: You mean to tell me that you played first-person shooters that don't have shooting?
You clearly implied that was all that was in shooters.
Style and design philosophy are analogous terms, both of which describe CoD's "arcade-y" design.
No they arent, that makes no sense.
Exactly the opposite, actually. I was implying that it's impossible for an emphasis on combat to detract from the "skill and thought" required to play a game.
How does "Skillful or thoughtful"? Seriously?" imply that at all?
I could swear they taught reading comprehension in elementary school. Guess you were absent that day. Oh well.
Everyone lives in america.
At 8/28/12 08:52 PM, RightWingGamer wrote: Uh-huh. Call me when you're ready to make sense.
Let me quote what you typed again
1. It's a shooter. It's obviously going to have alot running and shooting.
2. Arcade is a style. You can't have "too much" of it, because it's simply a design philosophy favored by the developers.
3. "Skillful or thoughtful"? Seriously?
Youre saying I dont make sense? Nothing you wrote made sense at all. You made up your own definition of shooter that makes no sense. You defined arcade as something and then as something else in the next sentence, neither of which made sense at all. And then youre implying games dont take skill or thought to play. You have to either be a troll or just an idiot lol.
At 8/28/12 08:53 PM, ScaryPicnic wrote: pony sigs
TOLD
Superfast jellyfish obviously
At 8/28/12 08:21 PM, Mumbo wrote: Because if it were a mac it'd automatically be worthless.
Also this
That graphics card is horrid
At 8/28/12 06:49 PM, RightWingGamer wrote: That doesn't make any sense.
1. It's a shooter. It's obviously going to have alot running and shooting.
2. Arcade is a style. You can't have "too much" of it, because it's simply a design philosophy favored by the developers.
3. "Skillful or thoughtful"? Seriously?
0/10 im not even mad. Theres no way you can be serious unless you were just writing a post to make me mad.
At 8/28/12 06:06 PM, Dean wrote: I'd say that CoD is far from being "shit".
I think its far too much of an arcade-ish game. Far too much focus on running and shooting to be very skillful or thoughtful.
+ the series is completely stagnant
rickrolling was?
I feel so old now I just realised rickrolling started in 2007, and it was so big for so long and now its so dead. memes in general are pretty dead to be honest because its mostly just retards from 9gag and reddit.
Only idiots get riled up about people they dont know on the internet.
I remember cod before mw1. It was one of those many ww2 games but it was the best one, better than moh in my opinion. Cod4 was alright I guess but every game since then has been the same. Id be surprised to find a pc gamer who hasnt played the classic cods and moh.
At 8/27/12 05:15 PM, oobooglunk wrote: Moreover, Discord, the master of chaos, appears to share multiple characteristics with Chaos, the god of destruction.
Discord is obviously based on Tzeentch.
Failing them is pretty bad, if they did that badly then they probably wont care enough to get anything higher, might as well just give them a low pass grade.
lol im not even a big fan of the show and even I know you got most of that wrong.
At 8/27/12 10:19 AM, saqwert wrote: Everyone who makes these lives next to a nuclear power plant
I hope that guy dies.
Steam is perfectly fine. Even if it had 100% of the market it would still do insane deals and stuff like that. If Valve werent around id hate to think what pc gaming would be like.
Youre far too obvious rapacity.
Its really unprofessional and no one enjoys reading a self insert. Its pretty obvious when someone has done it, and yes it can be avoided. You just have to think outside your normal line of thinking more, not to mention some kinds of mary sue you actually have to try to make.
Loved it, I would only say it was slightly worse than oblivion because it was easier and I prefered the old European high fantasy feel of oblivion to the grimdark feel of skyrim.
At 8/26/12 03:02 AM, walkinator wrote: I wish my mother didn't take the bible so damned seriously, she's one of those fools who believes that the bible was written by god and is therefore perfect and has never been altered.
I dont think theres any group of christians that believe god wrote it are there? The closest I can think of is that some people think god directly inspired the king james version. Your mother is a fool.
At 8/25/12 11:18 PM, Protagonist wrote: Over the audio of a clip? Are you guys anime majors Or something? Do you have degrees in anime preference?
nah, stop trying to be awkward for the sake of being awkward. There always seems to be a general lack of interesting threads because most of them are stupid. Right now its better than it usually is, but theres still loads of crap. Seems to be hit and miss here because I can go to other places and half the front page is interesting discussions at least.
At 8/25/12 11:08 PM, Yert wrote: oh my god the rampant stupidity on this site is overwhelming
Well newgrounds has never exactly been a shining light of intelligence.
At 8/25/12 10:43 PM, II2none wrote: Pretty sure threads like these is one of the main reasons you're there. Don't even kid yourself.
Youre not even making any sense.
At 8/25/12 10:39 PM, II2none wrote: Suuuure as long as the majority have a hive mind mentality that subs are better then dubs right? Real stimulating.
Whats that got to do with 4chan lol?
At 8/25/12 10:27 PM, Yert wrote: you cover your finger with toilet paper and scratch it by wiping it
I just use my underwear unless its because I accidentally didnt wipe properly.
