9,972 Forum Posts by "bumcheekcity"
At 3/29/03 02:45 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote:At 3/28/03 06:23 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: i'd still want to know what the hell the US was doing giving them millions for bombsYour enemy's enemy is your friend. Iraq was at war with Iran, Iran was an enemy of the USA.
although the French do have a lot to answer for.
I'm sure you'll find some way to turn that into Bush being stupid though, go for it.
sure *rubs hands* ill have a go. your enemys enemy is NOT by default, your friend. i have got people i absolutely despise at my school and they hate some other people which i also dont like. if the three of us dislike each other completely where is the logic there
i know im on a bigger scale here with whole countries but i think ive made my point. and look! i didn't turn that into a 'George Bush is an Idiot' post.
lol. you guys take life WAAAAAAAAAY too seriously
At 3/29/03 02:48 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote:At 3/29/03 02:44 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:You have a right to complain about his foreign policy, but you have no right to call him a bad president unless you live here.
i have every right to complain about Bush. he is the reason this country is at war (Britain, that is.) without his ideas, we'd be at peace at the moment.
i dont think i have EVER called bush a bad president i have called him a tosser, a twat, an arsehole, stupid, an idiot, brainless, a madman, mentally unstable and a whole host of other things but i have never calle dhim a bad president.
i dont think that would work, it would have to be completely unbiased and every single person inn the world is biased wither by their left/right wing stance or their religion, their country or their birthplace
good in theory though
nah, theyll probably afghanistan on the 'not quite starving but definately not rich' line and then exploit the poor children to make clothes for rich yanks.
completely true. tye cds must be bought in bulk and cost 0.05 pence, and they are making a profit of 40,000% on some of them. if you tried that with anything else you would be laughed off the globe.
on a side note, why the hell do people still pay that kind of money for music anyway?
At 3/29/03 12:12 PM, Kazuo_Kiriyama wrote:At 3/29/03 04:03 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: september 11 can be stopped by MAKING PEOPLE LIKE US!!!Some people will NEVER like us. We're Western, we're Capitalist, we're successful, we're a superpower, and we're mostly Christian. If you want them to like us, change the things that I just mentioned.
they dont dislike us because of that. they hate us cos we opress them and make their lives shit.
At 3/29/03 12:12 PM, Kazuo_Kiriyama wrote:At 3/29/03 04:03 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: september 11 can be stopped by MAKING PEOPLE LIKE US!!!Some people will NEVER like us. We're Western, we're Capitalist, we're successful, we're a superpower, and we're mostly Christian. If you want them to like us, change the things that I just mentioned.
not at all. we could do things by making them successful, making them just as powerful as us, and possibly by helping them into democracy/capitalism. we dont have to change the religion or western thing
and ANYWAY... they dont hate us cos we're more successful than them. they hate us cos we more succesfful then them and we got there by oppressing them and making their lives shit. they also hate us cos we live in luxury and dont give a shit about them as a nation.
At 3/29/03 10:29 AM, NEMESiSZ wrote: If you don't live in the USA, don't complain about Bush.
i have every right to complain about Bush. he is the reason this country is at war (Britain, that is.) without his ideas, we'd be at peace at the moment.
september 11 can be stopped by MAKING PEOPLE LIKE US!!! the terrorists in Al-Quieda have been treated like shit by the US when they were allies. i will tell you something for free, if i was Bin Laden, i would be planning something much bigger for a few years time.
however... if the Yanks tried to help the Palestinians (something Bin Laden is so pissed off about) then i wouldn't see any need to bomb them, maybe we could re-initiate our trade and become allies.
but.... that ent guna happen, is it?
nope, i cpompletely disagree, but will anyone do it. i know enough people want to
i dont live in the US, so the pipeline isnt what im posting about, but thinking of the war, do you think you could have kept it off oil?
At 3/28/03 04:36 PM, Commander-K25 wrote:At 3/28/03 01:39 AM, TheEvilOne wrote: Well, we can always use more ways to put those unwanted AOL CDs to good use...Sorry, but AOL CDs are explicitly banned in combat by international treaty. They are considered cruel and barbaric punishment and cause the most junkmail induced battlefield casualties per year. Third worlkd nations have been known to use them as instruments of torture.
dont you mean AOL itself is the instrument of torture, logging you off as youre halfway through a four-hour download?
connies the worst though. any AOL users agree with me?
At 3/28/03 11:41 AM, Dig_the_Man wrote:At 3/28/03 11:40 AM, Kazuo_Kiriyama wrote: I agree. I think they should decrease their military power and just fork the nation over to the UN. I really don't agree with Bush's idea of bringing Democracy to Iraq.But the fact of the matter is shouldn't the Iraqi people first taste Democracy before they decide it is sweet or sour?
i think the iraqi people would prefer democracy to fashism, somehow. but the US should hand the country IMMEDIATELY over to the UN. no fuss and no hassle
At 3/27/03 09:24 AM, NSS-SEPP wrote: "innocent human life?"
i hear that quite alot now.
can someone define "innocent"?
an 'innocent' is someone who wasn't going to shoot at you, in the purpose of a war.
At 3/28/03 04:16 AM, MarijuanaClock wrote: com'on you lazy fucks, read the article!
its bloody long, you know. credit to you for posting it, but could you not have summarised it a little?
At 3/27/03 01:19 PM, BinLadenmustdie wrote: Arms sales to Iraq from 1973-1990:
USSR -- $25 billion
France -- $5 billion
China -- $5 billion
USA -- $250 million
So much for the propaganda argument that we were the ones who built him and kept him in power.
one minuite here... from 1973 to 1990? i want to see the figures from 1990 to 2003. i think they would be MUCH more interesting
i'd still want to know what the hell the US was doing giving them millions for bombs
although the French do have a lot to answer for.
top banana. i hate the drug laws here. i think we should bring back the death penalty. but not the electric chair. it should still be humane.
lol. are you sure that isn't doctored now?
if thats your opinion, then youre the kind of person that causes 9/11. its you, who dont try to understand people and constantly try to get them to obey, not like you, that makes terrosts attack the US. thts quite a shame cos i think the States is actually quite a good country, but it has too many enemies.
ive said it before but you can't stamp out terrorism. you have to be nice to them and then they wont bomb you because they like you.
are some of you saying that we should torture our POWs because our own soldiors are getting tortured when they are captured?
At 3/28/03 05:30 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: We had 3,000 civilian casualties a year ago, Iraq can handle 50.
You hd 3,000? Take a minuite of your time and do a bit of research onto how many people die on the roads each year. Then, how many civilians have been killed by the US in the last 20 years. Then, see what the US did to Bin Laden to change him from a very close friend into their Arch-Enemy.
Saddam has killed more Iraqis than any man alive, but personally, I wouldn't mind if Bush broke his record, we gave these people plenty of time to surrender.
The PEOPLE aren't the ones who have the choice about surrender, but in your book, they have to pay? Please explain your logic.
i dont think they'll do anything. people will learn how to counterfit them and that will be that. theyve tried that in britain but nobody took it seriously. im suprised the Bush Administration gave it a second thought.
the only way to combat terroism is to make peace with everybody. extend friendly relations to poor african countries who will someday get nukes and blow us to smithereens. we bomb people, make them hate us and then cry when they bomb us. its just stupid.
lol, very good. it must have taken some skill to hack. whats al-jazeeras web address?
i think the war will last no longer than a month. the diplomatic repercussions will go on for decades
At 3/25/03 10:14 PM, Darth_Buehler wrote: why some people are agiast the war is because they don't like the right wing or people they don't like being right. They don't want to stand down and admit they were wrong on this issue.
Nobody is 'wong' on any opinion they have. Hitler wasn't 'wrong' when he gassed millions of Jews. He was just a bastard. I generally, as a left-winger ahve no problems with right-wing people, unless they are very right wing. You've got to let people have their own say on thing, otherwise debated on this board will become boring very quickly.
Sorry about the spelling.
If you had the time to go and write that, couldn't you have checked the spelling beforehand?
At 3/25/03 10:56 PM, thenark wrote: Allright, well, just as long as you dont support the republicans, you're fine by me
which is the mark of a pure bush supporter
they area absolute bastards, the Iraqui Government and although im against war, now we've started we have got to get him out of power very soon
