Be a Supporter!
Response to: France what a joke Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/21/03 09:14 PM, Shrapnel wrote: No more 'frog kicking' or attacks on other groups of people.

Shrikes the worst one for that. In fact, I think he started it.

Response to: YAYAY!!! I LOVE CALI'S GOVERNER!!! Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/19/03 10:52 PM, True-Lies wrote:
At 11/19/03 09:31 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: Governor Schwarzenegger increased California's debt by $4,000,000,000 in his first 12 hours as the leader of the most populous state in the Union. This is shaping up to be good.
Can I get a few links that prove your claims? Let me remind you that all of the candidates were planning on repealing the car tax.

Dont forget, all candidates are ALWAYS planning to repeal almost every kind of tax.

Response to: gay marriage Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 10/26/03 07:13 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: I hate people, cause people suck. Do you ever see animals
-completly destroy their surroundings, then when its gone pack up and do it somewhere else

I know you meant this as a joke, but Gorillas have been seen to invade other 'tribes' of Gorillas, and kill all the males, and the children, then mating with the females.

Response to: Age of consent? Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/21/03 09:28 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: A grade 12 girl at my school got caught giving head to a grade 9 guy in a classroom. It was the com tech studio so there were a bunch of littl ebooths for them to use. The point is its not always an older guy with a young girl. It can happen the otherway around.

True, and girls can be the equivalent of so called "cherry hounds" Theres an article in my local paper about a teacher who got 12 months for writing indecent letters to a Year 10 student (he was 14)

Response to: opinions Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 02:43 AM, tachikawa03 wrote: i guess its however u wanna see it and theres nuthing wron with that... right or are there exceptions

I think that there might be a few exceptions. By the way, you seem like a pretty intelligent guy not to make an ass out of yourself in the first few posts, but do type in proper english here, with proper grammer.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 12:40 AM, JudgeFUNK wrote: send my paypal account $50, and all your errors will go away with the software I'll send instantaneously to your computer.

No! Dont! Send MY paypal account $50 and...

Er... I'll be rich...?

Response to: Bush is the most dangerous man.. Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 01:48 AM, 420_POThead4L_420 wrote: Agree....why the fuck wold u go and spen so much money to rebild a country he blew up what a fucking idiot

Well, after you blow a country to smithereenes and kill a whole lot of people, it's considered good form to help clean up your mess.

Response to: Democracy and famine Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 12:56 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: I say its just propaganda used to try and convert the poorer countries to democracy and become pro-west, or atleast pro-US.

I think every country should have a democratic government, but I dont give a monkeys id they're heavily Pro-US or Pro-West.

Response to: Illegal Drugs Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 12:15 PM, Peter90688 wrote: Listen, drugs screw up families, ive seen it. Id never vote for drugs being legal. Thats just dumb. This shouldnt even be a topic, its never going to happen.

A spliff or two doesn't. True, repeated use of Haroin would fuck a family pretty fast, but if your teenage son goes out and does some pot every other weekend, no-one gets hurt.

Response to: Jean Cretien, PM of Canada Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

When are the elections?

Response to: FREE OR NOT [tell me what u think] Posted November 22nd, 2003 in Politics

At 11/22/03 08:36 AM, Hippy-Flip wrote: People who can't spell "really" shouldn't be free.

People who have 420 tagged on the front and back parts of thier name to be cool shouldn't be free either.

Y on earth would you tag 420 onto your name to look cool. And I agree. Spelling and Grannar are a must, really.

Response to: Illegal Drugs Posted November 21st, 2003 in Politics

At 11/21/03 06:32 PM, Veggiemeal wrote: You think drugs shouldn't be legalized? Well, in my country it is. Jup, I could just go to the coffee shop around the corner and get some weed. Fun fact: Apperantly, people in the US (where drugs are illegal) regularly die because of overdosises, while the last time I heard or read about someone dying of an overdosis in my eeny-weeny country is such a long time ago I can't even remember. Hm...Hm...Hmmmm.............<start thinking>

That's so true. Holland tells its citizens about the dangers of drugs and underage sex, is liberal and answers all their questions, and they have the lowest teen pregnancy rates in Europe, also, very few drug problems.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted November 21st, 2003 in Politics

At 11/21/03 11:29 AM, TheShrike wrote: I think you can force a reload on IE for windows by control-clicking refresh.

It's Shift+Click

Response to: Punishment for burning the flag Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 04:54 PM, Lyddiechu wrote: Basically, its ok to burn the flag when the government is breaking the laws it was put there to impose and defend in the first place.

You could burn the flag anyway. You dont need a reason to do something that isn't hurting anyone.

Response to: Age of consent? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

I dont know which neck of the woods you guys grow up in, but the Culture here is very much different. Of the girls in the 12-14 age band, I should reckon about 25% of them have had sex. We are talking about my county here, and especially my town. Of the girls under 16, about 90% of them have had consentual sex.

Whilst it may sometimes mean more to girls than guys, dont forget things work the other way round. To some girls, it doesn't mean a thing. They lost it at 12, or maybe 13, and have been having sex every weekend since then. Doesn't bother me. They want to, he wants to, and it still doesn't make a blind bit of difference. Dot think that just because someone is female, then it means that sex always means an emotional commitment.

Response to: Which is worse? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

Either way, in the end, theres still hundreds upon thousands of people being bused by companies to make shoes and stuff for us.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 02:31 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: I saw an interview on TV with the dude who runs Iraq right now. He said that America will go from an occuping force to an invited prescence.

I was unaware they were invited into Iraq. they invited themselves, but that doesn't count.

Response to: Which is worse? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

Very true. Sure, they make less per hour than their American Counterparts, but they dont go to the toilet, have coffee breaks, have lunch breaks, work twice the hours and get paid 2% of the American Workers wage.

Response to: 50 ways to fight censorship. Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 02:39 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: Movies here get rated like PG-13 or AA-14 while in the States they are like 18+.

What are the ratings in Te US and canada?

U - Universal (Suitable For all)
PG - Parental Guidance. Some scenes may not be suitable for young children.
12A - Under-12's MUST be accompanied by an adult.
15 - No Under 15's.
18 - No Under 18's.
R18 - Hardcore Porn. Over 18's only, and you must have a license.

Response to: president= democrats complaining Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 07:31 AM, Chaoslight wrote: We as a country did NOT vote for him.

You as a country do not bleeding vote. I read that there was only about 30% turnout across America in 2000. This can't be true, can it?

Response to: Rational American Thinking Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 11:15 AM, Jal wrote: Thank you DK, thank you for showing me that there are still thinkers out there, people who use their brains and don't just believe whatever's on TV or in a newspaper. Poeple do need to think, and I would add they need to get an opinion on their own.

Well, in England we aren't being presented with a one-sided view here. Out of the 10 or so major daily Newspapers, 8 of them are running Anti-Government headlines.

Response to: Illegal Drugs Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 12:39 PM, diazepim wrote: Your point? Imagine your buddy if he wasn't snorting crank and shooting juice in the veins of his eyelids... (okay I'm exaggerating his soft drug abuse... but he will soon get there.. into heavy duty crack lube jobs if you get my drift).

No. That's the point. He wont and hasn't. I didn't make myself clear enough. For this I apologise. He's left the drugs behind now, and he's been clean for a good couple of years. The only thing he's done is weed. He used weed, liked weed, and had fun with weed, then he stopped using it.

Just imagine you buddy without being on drugs... 11A's he could have gotten 38 of them... and remember more of the thing he did on Saturday night. Granted, there might be something he, or you or I might not wanna remember...

Well, he's got some interesting stories of standard student plastered antics, but no more than any other. No, he couldn't have got more than 11A* (not just A) because the school wouldn't let him take any more. Dont be stupid. No-one could get 11A*s. Anyway, face it. If he hadn't been stoned at the weekend he'd have been pissed anyway.

Drug is bad, n'kay. You shouldn't do drugs, 'cus it's... bad. N'kay?

No. This argument has no merit. Drugs is not bad. Drugs is bad in large amounts. Drugs is good in moderation, for both recreational and medicinal purposes.

Response to: Definition of Terrorist...? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/18/03 07:43 PM, Jimsween wrote: I think I'll add something, a terrorist is someone who [u]intentionally[/u] strikes terror into civilians. Meaning serial murderers are probably not terrorists, unless thier goal is to scare people, and not neccesarily to murder people.

So, jim, that would make the US Government Terrorists for intentionally trying to strike fear into the hearts of its citizens, to get support for Iraq.

Response to: liberal guilt Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 01:27 PM, Lyddiechu wrote: ahahahhaha I can't believe someone else knows about that site here but me.. oh man, i'm so glad that site's love is spreading far and wide.. hahehehehhe

That site rings so true, though,

Response to: 50 ways to fight censorship. Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 12:54 PM, TheShrike wrote: I don't think you understand. They censor porn here. Well, they try to, anyway. It's always a good idea to let them know where you stand.

You mean, you can't buy a Pornographic Vid from a licensed store? Geez, I can buy one from a corner shop. It's not... strictly legal, but no-one cares.

Response to: Punishment for burning the flag Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/19/03 11:22 PM, TheShrike wrote: NEVER SURRENDER YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

So true, Shrike. Our most important right is freedom of speech. If you are burning the flag, that should be legal, unless you are trying to harm people with it, or trying to set fire to something else.

Response to: 50 ways to fight censorship. Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 12:39 PM, TheShrike wrote: Too strict.

Ah, big deal. If they're too strict on movies and shit, then you just gotta wait until you can find them on Kazaa. Either that or get an older brother/mate to buy it for you.

Response to: UK = The death penalty ? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

I personally believe that in cases where the people are the lowest of the low (Paedophiles that own the sites, and the big Drug lords etc.) And there is evidence that shows that they did it, no questions, then we should execute them.

Currently in the UK, guilt must be proved 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' If we are to execute soemone, then guilt must be proved. If it is proved 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' then we should not execute them.

Response to: Gay marriage? "thas Wack"? Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/19/03 10:15 PM, DeAdKoRnFrEaK wrote: Is it just me, or has the world gone insane?

I'll give you a clue: It's not just you. The world is very happy being mad though.

Response to: The Weasel Has Landed Posted November 20th, 2003 in Politics

At 11/20/03 10:34 AM, Veggiemeal wrote: Fuck that fucking fucker.

I second everything D2KVirus said, and also this quite good quote.