Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 2/17/04 04:32 AM, Baron_Von_Bad_Guy wrote: Look forward to your next secret, it's not as good as the last piece of cake but it's the last secret you'll have forever plus I don't even want the next secret (No offense Tom).

We'll never get the last serey. That'd be icky.

I reckon you've got Spyware. Have a sweep of your machine with Ad-Aware and Spybot

I'm sorry, your site didn't work well at all for me. Anyone else have the problem?

At 2/17/04 02:45 AM, BeerClock wrote: Ahh, I remember when I accidentally found it....those were the days...

"Accidently"... yeah...

At 2/17/04 02:06 AM, Vowl wrote: It makes you look important.

Not when they're all called "delete poop"

At 2/17/04 06:11 AM, crimsonedge38 wrote: Ahh k, my bad, I thought you had made a typo. Try a search on google or Kazaa =P.

I found it on Kazaa. It didn't work on my machine though, I'll warn you.

At 2/17/04 06:12 AM, alexsmolik wrote: Oh well, it's not an A of Anarchy.
It's more of an A for Alexsmolik or Alex, whatever pleases you.

Mine'a an A for Anarchy! ANARCHY RULES!!! Well, it doesn't, but...

I suppose I will...

When one couple confirmed they were French Canadian separatists, the grouchy puppet said, "Listen closely. Hear that? It's the sound of no one giving a," followed by an expletive bleep.

"You're in North America, learn the language!" he hollered at another.

Triumph asked a rotund man if he was a separatist, then suggested he might want to separate himself from doughnuts for a while. The skit also replaced street signs with insulting replicas, including one that mocked Canadian singer Celine Dion.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Entertainment/ap20040216_1111.html

Have a dekko at that.

But Affirmative Action only states that you can't iscriminate on race, doesn't it?

This would be a good itme ot tellk us what he said.

Right... I'm Level 13 now... I'll bloody well hav o stay like that... *grumbles8 Stupid demotion system... humantarget.... depositing...

At 2/17/04 04:59 AM, Best_Of wrote: A gun should anyway not be available for purchase without a license of carrying a gun wich can be gotten from a test.

You should be able to carry a gun in a public place anyway. The probably of shooting someone when you have a gun is infinitely higher as the probably when you dont have one.

At 2/16/04 09:55 PM, -redskunk- wrote: Hmm.. Illustrate some choices that people would want. I wouldn't allow them to have several vehicles, or a huge house. They would be allowed to buy specific clothing, household items, and decide where they would be employed. Yes, I would be limiting their choices in some aspects. But, hmm.. The effects of this? It would take getting used to.....

I gotta say, i think we should allow people SLIGHTLY more freedom. If they've studied, and worked, and became a consultant or a lawyer for instance, then they should have the right to a nice house, and a nice two or maybe even three cars. They should pay quite a bit of tax, but I dont see how restricting the amount and quality of their houses and cars will serve anyone.

At 2/17/04 02:58 AM, Vowl wrote: I was really pissed when they executed McVay, He should have spent more time rotting in jail. He wanted to die. He should have had to live out his full life with the feelings of guilt he felt for killing all of those people.

So, we should what? Get torture back as a method of punishment? You're saying give them pain first, then death.

At 2/16/04 08:53 PM, -redskunk- wrote:

At 2/16/04 06:17 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: So we only let people who can write, vote? People would only vote on issues they felt strongly about.

Then it wouldn't be a democracy =P

Yes it would. They COULD vote on EVERY issue. They don't have to though.

At 2/17/04 12:08 AM, DigitalWaRfare wrote: o fuck off him your discondoning attitude to spelling makes me sick.

We just think that the Politics Forum should have people that can spell properly at least. That's all we ask. A Capital Letter, and a full stop here and then, is enouhgn to keep us old regulars happy.

At 2/17/04 12:42 AM, Jimsween wrote: I really don't think American's biggest concern is to look smart to the type of person that would base thier opinion of Americans on one man.

Isn't it? If Osama Bin Laden based his opninion on America thinking that all Americans were like Michael Moore, he'd love you. Also, this means you dont have many [Read: Any] allies, because everything thinks you're a load of Bible-Bashing Conservative Rednecks.

At 2/17/04 12:58 AM, Jimsween wrote: ..... Because they hate eachother... and try to kill eachother all the freaking time.... Duh....

I was kinda IMPLYING that they should, you know, put an end to all the bombing and shit...

At 2/17/04 01:08 AM, Jimsween wrote: First of all, that photo looks pretty damn fake, I'd like to see where you got it.

Just to point out, that it can be found at about a hundred different places in the net.

At 2/17/04 02:21 AM, TheShrike wrote: Which brings us full circle to: 'they didn't seem to think it was torture'

I dont quite understand where you['re coming from there, Shrike...

At 2/17/04 02:36 AM, Vowl wrote: It's not the features, but the cultural similarity that attracts me. So a girl who is more culturally similar to me is more attractive.

Yeah, I reckon people are ultimately more divided by class than nationality.

At 2/16/04 05:46 PM, MarijuanaClock wrote:

At 2/16/04 04:57 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: Just posting a link to an article or thread doesn't inspire much debate. Ask a question or two.

I'm sorry you're a lazy bastard who can't read. Really I am.

I read the post, found it interesting, and closed the window. When you post an article, do what redskunk said. Quote a few lines, raise an issue, and we'll all love you...

At 2/16/04 08:54 PM, -redskunk- wrote: Yes, I'm going on leave at 2,000 posts =P

No, stay. YOu're my source of entertainment :P

At 2/16/04 08:58 PM, -redskunk- wrote: Exactly. Like when asked if they were in the top 1% (economically speaking), 19% of people said yes.

Thats actually kinda funny. How can anyone think they're in the top 1% when they're probably blatantly not.

At 2/16/04 06:55 PM, Proteas wrote: But does that make Clinton any better than Bush, since they have both admitted to having done drugs in the past?

Well, considering one of them lied about it...

At 2/16/04 07:41 PM, Obdeboondocks wrote: You see guys? The list goes on and on. And people are saying we do not need a "whole" month to appreciate this. Shoot if we dont do a lot for it, of course the people will get bored. It is sort of hard to fathom how the media and the government has portrayed February as the only month to appreciates these peoples importance to this country.

Out of interest, what actually HAPPENS in Black Hitory Month to rember Blacks?

At 2/16/04 07:00 PM, Earfetish wrote: Unfortunately, you can't see old profiles.

It only works on .html pages, not on anything with a ? or = sign in the adress bar, i thinkl.

Yeah, get rid of popup ads, and pay for Newgrounds. or not...

At 2/16/04 06:45 PM, NumberClock wrote: Yep, Golden's post were pretty much more thought out and more..his posts were..um..more greatly then some peoples posts here and I guess he didn't think that, might as well just have to wait for him to post here and answer himself.

But if he asked for them to be deleted... I would assume that he'd left?

At 2/16/04 11:08 AM, RifleOfGod wrote: Its alright that it started at 8:45.but who goes on newgrounds at 3:00 A.M.

Dont forget, there are people in other parts of the world, and time zones, too.