Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 2/18/04 02:34 AM, BlackLightning wrote: and we have a stalker nice photo shop picture

That's blatantly not photoshopped...

At 2/18/04 06:44 AM, PaulXS wrote: My suggestion is to hack the damn site.

Yeah. You try it.

At 2/18/04 06:49 AM, Mustard_Man wrote: Before posting a topic, please ask yourself the following question:
"Am I making a post which is either funny, informative, or interesting on any level?"

It is informative. he's informing us that his movie is stolen.

At 2/18/04 01:53 AM, NewEvolution wrote: Heheh...well, at least you have a good sense of humor. No hard feelings, but this topic is way overdone by people new to NG. Didn't mean to blow up at ya.

Mind you, a Lv9 user isn't very new...

At 2/18/04 05:07 AM, _eLMo_ wrote: Now I have gotten kind of bored of posting and my grades are getting higher.

Exactly the opposite with me, as dobio will confirm...

At 2/18/04 06:08 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: Ah shit, there's brains over my new shoes...

In other News, bumcheekcity passed the 5000 post marek today. Please worship here.

At 2/17/04 08:54 PM, Dobio wrote:

At 2/17/04 05:47 PM, Rebel40000 wrote: bumcheeky, if every post you made earned you a bar of gold, you'd be the richest man alive...

No, actually Tanner would be the richest.

Maye not so. Tanner would have ~13,500 gold bars. Is that worth more than the fortunes of Gates yet? I dont think so.

At 2/18/04 06:13 AM, superultimaweapon wrote: lemme just say this:
if the world is only 7000 years old, WHAT ABOUT DINOSAURS?

I think the Earth is 5500 years old, according to bible. And the sky is supported by 4 large pillars.

At 2/18/04 06:54 AM, ExCrEaTiOn wrote: what do you all think about the new school system, that they are changeing the GCSE for a four diploma thing, personally i would like it to stay the way it is.

What on earth? First I've heard of this. What's going on? can you provide a link to something?

At 2/17/04 06:31 PM, -redskunk- wrote: we all knew that...

Yes, but some evidently dont. Hence their right-wing stance on pot.

Ah shit, there's brains over my new shoes...

Killing a dog for mauling someone had always seemed a bit... I dunno. The dog is just programmed to attack, he didn't have any malice into it. Death for dogs, but humans who make a conscious decision to do it?

At 2/17/04 10:59 PM, Mike277 wrote: As a christian, I believe that people have a right to choose whether or not they want to believe in God. I have many friends that are athiests or jewish or believe in another religion. I don't bash on them for not being a christian, and I would never hold that against someone. If someone say, an Athiest tries to tell me that my faith is "wrong", I just ignore them...That's right boys and girls, IGNORE!!! If someone pisses you off, don't try to "get even with him/her" Just accept the fact that not everybody believes what you believe in.

These have been some of the msot sensible words I have read on the board today. I must second everything you just said.

At 2/18/04 01:21 AM, -redskunk- wrote: Interesting. All the cases I hear of, the dog is summarily executed. It's so sad that people can't watch their friggin dogs, that it resorts to this. Maybe there should be some kind of test to make sure your qualified to own a pet.

Oh yeah, like anyone would bother taking it. There's a dog license here in England... Not many people know or care.

At 2/18/04 01:19 AM, -redskunk- wrote:

...if they had been caught in the act, they both would have been considered guilty in the eyes of the law.

Naw, they're both well off. They would of gotten away easily. Wait, are we sure Bush never got caught with coke? I heard he showed up to his Yale interview wasted....

Oh come on. You've gotta show up to an interview wasted OCNE in your life...

Let's just be thankfull neither one of them did LSD, that stuff stays in your system. I would have hated for one of them to have had a flashback in the middle of a speech.

But it would be entertaining.

And would also explain how Bush xan pass some of the pbills he passes.

At 2/17/04 08:21 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: ...Maybe you need to provide some stepping stones in the form of evidence so that we can join you in your enlightened state.

It's funny how n00bs sometimes believe flames will make the whole forum rally behind them.

At 2/17/04 08:31 PM, bombkangaroo wrote: in a perfectly logical situation they would be unable to marry, but there are several problems with actually determining who is and is not infertile.

Why on earth? Just because someone can't procreate, doens't mean they shoudn't marry?

some people will not know about it until they are married, others will lie. you can't go to their doctor because that is an invasion of privacy and violates doctor patient confidentiality, and the cost of investigating every single couple who intend to marry would most likely outweigh whatever benefit could be derived from preventing their marriage. not to mention an infertile [married] couple could still adopt, after all they are the ideal candidates for such an undertaking(given that they have made a public commitment to the creation of a new family and they have the ability to provide for a child who needs parents).

A Gay married couple could adopt too, but neither situation results in any MORE babies being born. They're just moved about a bit.

Let them marry. They love each other, that's all you need.

Skunk, stop irritating newbies...

At 2/17/04 06:53 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 2/17/04 09:47 AM, mentalis wrote: Since God made us, He can do what ever he wants to us.

How about this one for a real brain fucker? The Bible talks about God having created life on earth. It never said that he didn't create life on any other planet, now does it?

It also never said he didn't dance the macarena on tuesdays whilst wearing womens underwear. What'#s your point?

At 2/18/04 12:50 AM, -redskunk- wrote:

At 2/17/04 06:11 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: If we dont, we have taken our first few steps into becoming a dictatorship.

So melodramatic

If we disallow certain people the vote, then we're a dictatorship. They are still part of the people.

Perhaps we could try to educate them / cut the bullshit surrounding issues.

Both these ideas should be in place now.

At 2/17/04 07:56 PM, Proteas wrote: Has anyone here heard of this site, Perverted-Justice?
Here is the basic premise: it is an online registery of known sexual predators who have as yet to be arrested or prosecuted. It gives you the e-mail/screen name of the predator, their whereabouts, and their home/cell phone number (my guess is so you can call up the guy and harass him). They keep an archive of predators who have been busted thanks to their website's information.

If they have all the information and the proof, there's no need to make it public, they could work with the police to catch these scumbags, instead of wasing time and effort on a stupid vigilante group.

Personally, I see this as a good way to gaurd your family from the weirdo's out there. I'd like to know what everybody else thinks about this.

Keeping registry of sex offenders = good.
Doing it in order to harass them = bad.

At 2/17/04 09:41 PM, bombkangaroo wrote: the millionaire, or one of his ancestors, at some point has earned that money/property/stuff. if he leaves it to his descendents then that is his choice, he worked so that he could provide for his family, it is no different than someone leaving a smaller amount of money or a semi-detached house to their children.

So it's fine for you to be a lazy sod, as long as your dad wasn't? r maybe your Grandad?

At 2/17/04 10:03 PM, Jimsween wrote: Do I seem like the type of person who would use sarcasm while talking about such a delicate subject as this?

Yes. And Trueer is a word.

At 2/17/04 10:40 PM, Locke666 wrote: Bougeoise were originally the non noble class who had obtained enough money and power not to be considered peasents. The bankers, the doctors, and the plain rich guys were all bougeiose.
The bougeiose are and always have been the upper class.

Bankers, doctors etc. are middle class though. Upper Class is reserved for Aristocracy.

At 2/17/04 01:47 PM, -redskunk- wrote: This phenomenon with lighter skin occurs within the black community also however.

I dont think having light ski is a 'phenomenon'

At 2/17/04 06:19 PM, -redskunk- wrote: What I'm wondering is: "Why isn't anyone questioning that passed-out cat?!"

Cats never tell you anything, you know that.

At 2/17/04 09:53 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: Its the whole idea of I can make fun of my sister but you cant type thing. Or only you can make fun of your mom, but not your friends. So only a Canadian can make fun of Quebec.

You find that with black people. Some of them call each other "my n!gger", but if a white perso says that, it's racist.

Just one of those facts of life. As an afterthouhgt, I hate that N-Word blankout.

At 2/17/04 08:28 PM, Adun wrote: Go to hell if you want to stop me from using this web site. If you want this site to be more appropreat, stop with the god damn cartoon porn ads.

A good iddue. We have our own choice weather we want to watch some of the smut and violence in here, but the ads are thrust on us.

At 2/17/04 08:26 PM, Proteas wrote: For those of you who didn't know, J.H.'s mother died of breast cancer. She refused to seek medical help, believing that prayer alone could get her through her sickness. He was highly attached to her, to say the least.

As a general rule, I try not to laugh at ill or stupid people. But I actually find that quite amusing, in a morbid way.

At 2/17/04 05:53 PM, -redskunk- wrote: I agree with what meester arbitrary said.

Here poses an interesting question: Should we alolow people to vote, if they do not understand what they are voting about?

If we do, we run the risk of electing an idiot into power.

If we dont, we have taken our first few steps into becoming a dictatorship.