9,972 Forum Posts by "bumcheekcity"
At 7/21/04 11:06 AM, specimen56 wrote: te people themselves should be allowed to do what they want, living off their own free wills and common sense.
And when people en masse get common sense, give me a shout.
At 7/21/04 10:21 AM, specimen56 wrote: In a word, yes, under certain conditions. I would be mre supportive of a truely libitarian system as described in Mills 'on liberty'...
What do you mean, under certain condidiotns? I thought you wanted no restrictions on freedom at all?
<?php
$submitted = $_POST["submitted"];
$username = $_POST["loginusername"];
$pass = $_POST["loginpassword"];
if ($submitted=="submitted")
{
$query = "SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE `username` = `$username` LIMIT 1";
$result=mysql_query($query);
$password=mysql_result($query,1,"password");
}
if ($pass==$password)
{
$_SESSION["username"] = $username;
$_SESSION["password"] = $password;
}
echo "$username<br>$password<br><br>$pass";
?>
<form method="POST" action="?x=bumcheekcity.php?x=0">
<p>Username: <input type="text" name="loginusername" size="20"> Password:
<input type="password" name="loginpassword" size="20">
<input type="hidden" name="submitted" value="submitted">
<input type="submit" value="Log In!" name="B1"></p>
</form>
Warning: mysql_result(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /usr/home/bumcheek/public_html/login.php on line 10
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? I HOPE it's just a bit of mild syntax error...
Could you sum up the film for those who haven't seen it?
At 7/21/04 07:42 AM, antiklaus wrote: A right is a contract between you and your country that cannot be violated. As soon as some other party interferes with that, it is time to take them out.
1) I dont live in YankLand :P
2) Where does your constitution protect incitement of hatred? Dont talk to me about free speech, because you can use writing to incite hatred.
At 7/21/04 07:05 AM, specimen56 wrote: If you limit freedom, it isn't freedom- its opression. I believe that no body of authority has the right to infringe on peoples freedoms. We have the rights to life, liberty and property, and all which that entails.
So, you would support a system of Anarchy?
At 7/20/04 06:22 AM, specimen56 wrote: Because you can't limit freedom. People are either free or oppressed. And whilst there are degrees of it, the fact is if you wwish to call something a freedom, the it must be completely free. We are born with the right to have these feelings, and express them in any way we so desire.
Yes we CAN limit freedom. You DONT have the freedom to murder people. You DONT have the freedom to steal. These are all laws that we enact to protect us from people weho would murder and steal, and, in this case, incite hate.
At 7/21/04 04:12 AM, uncle_skunk wrote: Oh come on.. He wasn't banned, was he? What about.. Oh, uh... 36noir? Why not bum & I? lolwtf?
Well., Shrike said in the 'Gay Sigs' thread, to Dobio to un-ban spanishfli. I thought Dobio would have banned me, because my sig had more snogging, and it's purpose was purely to annoy right-wingers *grins* and Dobio thinks I'm a Spam Whore. And, if spanishfli was banned, I'd definately crossed the line.
At 7/21/04 12:59 AM, -theFUNK- wrote: Or maybe not. Some users are just natural born whiners. I just feel guilty for either A) not deleting these sigs before it became a major issue or B) heading off that topic before another mod did something about it and set a precedent.
As well you should. Bad FUNK.... you have failed as a mod! Ah, I really wasn't expecting 48 hoursw with no-one with the modly powers confronting me about them... And how was mine obscene? It showed a bit of harmless tonsil tennis... Between guys... Actually, no I'm asking a serious question: Was mine really very much more offensive to people? And how come?
At 7/21/04 03:35 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: Ah, I seem to be banned. Damn Homophobes...
One minuite... if spanishfli was banned... why was I not banned?
Ah well, the sigs have done their duty. I will retire to causing mild amounts of havoc another day. For mild, read severe. :D
Ah, I seem to be banned. Damn Homophobes...
At 7/20/04 06:02 PM, Phroek wrote: $next_file_name = "Picture" . ( $num_files + 1 ) . ".jpg";
Surely this line would be:
$next_file_name = "Picture" . ( $num_files++ ) . ".jpg";
or maybe just:
$next_file_name = ( $num_files + 1 ) . ".jpg";
for 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg, etc. It might make it a bit easier. Maybe then test by putting:
echo $next_file_name
At 7/20/04 04:51 PM, 36noir wrote: And how exactly do you make this sweet live you speak of? Otherwise, I'd like to video tape your gay man secks!!1111!!!
Ah *Taps Nose* Sweet live is a new way of sexx0ring poepll. Damn... Well, when I said I like men, what I ReALLY meant was that I like men with vaginas and breasts and XX Chromosones... It's a fetish.
At 7/20/04 04:31 PM, 36noir wrote: That's quite stereotypical, but if you do want to talk as in majority, then the answer is yes. I know a good number of girls that are turned on by gay men.
Really? *Notes 36noir's age*
Hey gourgeous... I like men...
</attempttomakesweetliveto36noir>
Sorry, it isn't complete. HERE is your sig.
ohp-kyle, here is your sig
At 7/20/04 03:27 PM, ohp-kyle wrote: You're right. Do you mind if I steal your signature picture?
I'll make one for you, and stick it in the Lounge.
At 7/20/04 03:44 PM, Quanze13 wrote: no, what i was saying was that me and somebody else had asserted that straight men are uncomfortable with gay sex acts. BC had said that he is very comfortable about gay sex acts, and he is straight. I had suggested that he was bi.
I'm not VERY comfortable, I'm just not homophobic enough to find them 'repulsive' and I honestly dont care, because I dont stare actively at my sig.
At 7/20/04 02:26 PM, Metal69hed wrote: What a load of shit. If you think that way, you will live that way. Work hard and you will reap the success. Remain pessimistic and you will not make it far at all in life, and you will only stop complaining when you are resting in your grave.
Out of interest, per day, how much more actual work does a CEO of Haliburton do than a binman?
In your answer, relate it to the fact that the CEO earns approximately 50,000 times more than the Binmman, and therefore should be working 50,000 times as hard.
At 7/20/04 02:13 PM, BeFell wrote: Does anybody even care about my whereabouts or even remember me?
I remember you, you hippy tree-hugger you...
At 7/20/04 02:45 PM, 1Shot-Paddy wrote: its genetics. I'm sickened by it. Straight people are just sickened by two men kissing that's all there is to it. We don't choose to be sickened by it we just do. Gay people don't choose to be gay do they?
I'm straight, and I'm not sickened.
At 7/20/04 02:35 PM, DigitalWaRfare wrote: I have been gone for awhile can someone tell me when theses 'Gay Seckse' ads began or have they always been here and i have not noticed?
They started about 48 hours ago when I made myself a gay pr0n sig.
You have to e-mail liljim. try again
liljim@newgrounds.com
At 7/20/04 01:38 PM, TheOneBurgees wrote: I think that actual human rights (rights to safety, etc) should be given and not taken away. Citizenship rights (right to vote, etc) should be earned and can be removed.
Taking away peoples right to vote is something I dont agree with, most other rights though, I agree with taking away as punishment...
Source? And no, osamabinladenisafag.com doesn't count...
You guys DO realise you're playing into our hands?
At 7/20/04 01:08 PM, mabzie wrote: lets just say im not rich, but i sure like to have some extra money
Would you not prefer the tax cuts to go to the middle and lower classes then? Rather than the super-rich?
And if anyone wants a sig (purely for reasons of spreading the <3) let me know.
At 7/20/04 01:11 PM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: Y'all do realize that you are only egging it on, don't you? Everyone's only doing this to tick you off. If you didn't whine so much about it, no one would do it.
*DINGDINGDINGDINGDING* WE HAVE A WINNER!!
*Hands IP a disc of free g@y a|\|al pr0n*
I'm just doing this to make a point. We have heterosexual ads, showing hetereosexual pr0n etc, but no homosexual ads. I'm just doing this for any homosexual people out there at NG who might be feeling a little bit left out.
And to annoy people, but that's just fun.
At 7/20/04 12:59 PM, goofygarber wrote: ok bumcheek, im gonna put the banner at the *top* of the page, but if anyone comes along and pays me (doubtful, though) i will have to remove yours... but its up for the time beging
Thanks. If you like, I've got banners (well, pictures) at 125x60, 250x100, and 200x80 sizes, if you'd prefer them. And I've just registered.

