Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/19/06 05:17 PM, darkpengin wrote: ...make him fight a bear with a fish taped to his head.

Haha!! I'm trying to envision that right now, and it's pretty damned hillarious! Very creative.

Hmm... I like all of the above, and I would definitely do the third one in public, because well... that's how I roll. Heh.

...*2000 calories. Excuse the typo.

At 6/19/06 03:29 AM, sdhonda wrote:
Again, there are also practical reasons for it, it's nessasarly sympathy. Again, how can you feel pain and "learn your lesson", when your dead? And lets not forget wrongful convictions...

There IS no lesson to be learned, don't you get it? IF you kill somebody, you are a danger to society and thus forfeited your life when you decided to end someone else's. THose who convict and execute these sadistic creatures are not 'playing God' or 'decided someone's fate', they are merely keeping our society free of threats. End of story. There is no lesson, there is only justice.

Also, keep in mind that back then, popes and kings had the right to execute people back then, as they were "infallible" and "doing gods will." Execution took place under their blessing.

So, if we had a pope conducting executions 'in the name of God', then you'd be all right with it? What the fuck does it matter if some old guy with a big hat says "My God be with you" before he slices off some killer's head, or if a uniformed officer (who took an oath to protect his state and country, mind you) shoots the asshole in the head?

I agree with you, and it is unfortinate how well some of these scum bags get it in prison. If it were up to me, they spend their sentence in a blank white cell with a cold, thin sheeted bed and toilet and sink. Exactly 2000 calories a day of food, and only a few visits a year.

Suppose it was a mercy killing. Lets also not forget that not everyone is a serial murderer. They may not kill again. Even if so, they are spending a good chunk of the remainder of their life rotting in prison.

How old are you? You must not be old enough to have a job yet... You're sypathizing with the enemy again! I do NOT want my hard-earned tax money to be squandered on a low-life infidel to rot in a cell. I don't give a rat's ass how comfortable or uncomfortable his 'living quarters' are, I don't want to pay for a murderer to live. And what's this bull about 200 calories and a few visits a year? Do you really want to keep killing scumbags alive that badly?? So tell me... if I came up to you and shot your best friend in the head, point blank, and walked away without so much as blinking, would I get my own cell and a substantial meal to keep me alive the rest of my life; so I can sit alone and laugh about how I got away with murder and all the law did was slap my wrist and take away my TV? I'd still be alive, and that would piss off a lot of people, and I would love that. YOu not thinking in the right frame of mind. You're not taking to thought the families and friends who are devestated by the actions of these criminals. By keeping alive the very person to took away their baby, their friend, their father or mother, you're making THEM suffer more than the convict.

At 6/17/06 12:40 AM, theconspirator wrote: Lethal injection, electric chair, both are totally inhumane devices which may cause the convict unnecesary pain and suffering. The only viable solution is the guillotine

It saves valuable organs for organ donation, It does not cause any pain to the criminal, and it is so simple, a child could operate it.

Plus, its clears headaches and sinuses right up while giving the closest shave possible.

Seriously, if you have raped someone or murdered someone, you've lost your right to a dignified death or any pity whatsoever. Thats how we roll in Texas.

"If you shoot someone in Texas, we will shoot you back." -Ron White

Excellent and accurate quote... Who said rednecks didn't know what they wer talking about? I for one am apalled by all the Liberal, bleeding-heart sypathy some of you saps are showing for scum like murders and rapists! For those of you who are religious, the penalty for death in biblican times was... guess what? DEATH!! OMGZ, dude! Seriously... I'm baffled...

The problem with society, and with humans for that matter, is that we tend to reach out and and feel pity and sympathy for those who are struggling and in pain or angst. When some low-life scumbag rapes and murders a 12-year-old innocent girl, he's thrown in prison. All the media does is show how bad life is in prison for this dog and voi la! That basketcase is shown to the world as a suffering and pathetic man, thus all your sympathy is not given to the girl who was murdered but instead to the ass wipe who killed her. And you know what, folks? It's WRONG! You may say you're against the death penalty now, but suppose that 12-year-old little girl was your daughter, your kid sister, neice, cousin, etc... And I'm so sure you'd still say "Oh no, just put him away for life. Yes, I want my tax dollars to pay for that man to live comfortable for the rest of his life with a regular meal and excercise and maybe even aTV in his cell. And on weekends, if he's really good, he can go outside and play basketball and even participate in community service like cleaning up our roads."

......................?

Does anyone else thinks that's, well... stupid? If you kill my friend, daughter, brother or sister, aquaintence, or even someone I don't even know, you have given up your right to live. Live is equal to anouther life, that's how it rolls. These demented primal slime should not be allowed any pity or comfort or second chance, and for god's sake that should NOT be allowed a painless death! Bring back the medieval procedures! Stretch the bastard till his arms and legs rip off, crush his head with a mallet, tie a boulder to his feet and drop him in the river (I've heard that drowning is painless, for all you soft-hearted prudes).

It has nothing to do with revenge... If you kill someone, you are a threat to the rest of humanity and therefore are a liability and should be exterminated, by any means possible. And by doing that, we ARE protecting the innocent. And if you can see that, then your pity is being placed int he wrong direction.

Think about it, we're really on the verge of the thrid world war. All the nations are involved, terrorists are trying to bribe our allied countries to get off their back, Al Qaita keeps inventing new weapons of terroism that eventually will be unstoppable, etc etc etc. I hope I'm not the only one who sees this, and if not, what do you think should be done about it?

At 12/17/03 09:34 AM, NEMESiSZ wrote: No one takes them seriously, just smile and nod, and try to oppress them (ie: ignore their obvious shortcomings when considering them for certain careers)

I'm a woman, and I don't take Feminists seriously... they're so full o' shite, like all this PETA and other animal rights activists that wear leather boots. Heh...But you're right, just ignore them; they're all a bunch of scary dikes trying to hold a grudge for absolutely nothing anyway... We have the right to vote now, but I guess that's not good enought for them. (and I mean no offense to any by that comment... really!)

~*~Kittie~*~

Here's a quote I saw in the news a couple days ago:

"It's a sad day when the people express concern when the President is on his knees in prayer. I guess they prefer Presidents who have secritaries on their knees..."

>>>Respond to this...

*rolls on the floor laughing* Oh , how I love what an awesome debate mindless sarcasm can spark! ^_^

OMG! You people are fucking dense!!! I'm not even suggecting making abortion illegal, learn to read! All I'm saying is that many young girls think they HAVE to keep a baby they don't want, an dknow they don't have the money and aren't readt, so they kill it. I'm trying to say that instead of never ginving that child a chance to live, go ahead and give birth to the kid, then give it up for a adoption so a couple who are unabe to have children of their own can get it. Where the hell do you see anything about illegalizing abortion in that suggestion?!?!?!

I wasn't talking about the risks of actually giving birth to stillborn and defected babies... This is supposed to be a topic concerning the "alternate" choice to abortion for healthy, living babies!

That's right... why don't we, the Americans, have suicide bombers on our team? I mean, have you noticed just how loyal the Al Qaida [spelling?] troops are to their cause? If our troops had maybe 1/5 of their loyalty and devotion, we could easily anihilate [spelling again?] the Taliban and all those Muslin extemist. (Keep in mind, though, that not all Muslins are "evil." The Muslim extremists are like the KKK in our own country... :-\ )

Just a thought, ya know? Maybe we could put all the suicidal teenagers in our nation to good use? :-p J/K!

Why is this topic still around? And no one STILL ever gave me a straight answer to my questions... :-( But, I believe that 95% of us here have cleary stated that we enjoy masterbating, so quit telling us not to. We won't listen.

Actually, this isn't entirely based on the issue of abortion... Just for the books, I am very pro-life, which is the reason I came up with this topic.
From what I constantly hear, it seems that almost every girl who gets pregnant before she wants to thinks that she has to keep the child, but doesn't what a child yet, so she has to have an abortion. Not the case... Why doesn't she just give the baby up for adoption? Do you have any idea how many couples there are in the contry, and even the world, who are unable to have children of their own? They'd be more than happy to adopt an "unwanted" child from a teen who's not ready for a family of her own yet.
I know what many of your responces will be: What about over populating the Earth? That's not as big an issue as you all make it out to be. Have you ever been outside of a crowed city? You have no idea how much room there is to build, and to populate, and still have plenty of trees and lakes and all that other good nature stuff we need. ^_^
Just think about it; don't destroy a life, give it chance... and let someone else have the family they always wanted...

I second that!!! *luvs HarshX*

The curious Kittie has returned to the Politics board with yet another question... this ine pertaining to censorship in America and sensitizing television/movies/ect just for us.

What are your views on censorship? Should it even be there in teh first place? Is it right to SHELTER us (Americans) the way we do? I, personally, this censorship and senitiziation is utter bullshit... But, heh, that's just the way my neurotic mind sees things...

I'm not really going to ask many more questions. I'm just curoius to see everyone else's points of view and opinions. ^_^ Have fun!

I think TED NUGENT would be the perfect president! LOL. Gotta luv a guy with a shooting range in HIS BASEMENT! whoa... ^_^

At 6/16/03 04:47 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Well if Dr A wont answer you, then I will.

No, you haven't answered me. You dimwits appearently aren't understanding me. I'm not asking about masterbation anymore, I am asking about sex: the art of making love to one's spouse (sex is, after, a gift to Man from God; if you don't belkieve me, go and read some of those gorgeous sex poems in Psalms).
Now, as I have mentioned before, if sperm spilled by masterbation are "murdered," then what of the sperm ejaculated into the woman's body during love-making?? DO they too not die??? *sighs* But it seems to me that nobody has a logical answer to this, and that is why they all avoid the topic of my inquiries. Am I not right? If not, please prove me wrong... without changing the subject on me!

Hmm... it appears to me that Dr. A isn't going to bother answering either of my questions (the first one about it being ok for the law to enforce this absurd illigalization when masterbation takes place in the privacy of one's own home, and the second about sex and marriage and the fact that sperm die; no matter what we do we "kill" spermies). This tells me that he has no answer, thus meaning I have won. *smirks* Heh...

At 6/10/03 08:59 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: Instead of masturbating you ought to be finding a man to get you pregnant so your fertility does not go to waste (after getting married of course :-))

Dr. Arbitrary

Ok then I have an interesting arguement... if masterbating is murder by killing millions of spern, then whst is making love? You can't tell me that a married couple would never make love unless attemting to reporduce. If the male wears a condom, then the sperm are trapped inside and die. But, if they have unprotected sex, the spermies swim around inside of the females body for about a week and eventually die.

Now, when a couple actually decides to try for a child, only one of the millions of sperm expelled will actually make it to the egg, leaving the rest to swim around (like there brthers before them) and die too!

From all your responses, everything we humans do will send us to hell! Just what the hell are you trying to accomplish with this topic? You're tell us that we can't masterbate b/c it is murderous, but making love (whether or not the end result is for a child) causes the exact same "damage"!!! This argument is pointless...

Another clone topic... sorry, it's just on my mind right now. I've herd many people aruing about whether or not they would buy the meat of clones animals. But I say, what's the damn difference? Does it matter if the animals came from a womb or a scientist's lab? Besides, if no one told us, how the hell would we know the is came from a cloned animal?? I mean, it's still meat, and most likely tastes the same, it was just manufactured rather than born naturally. Hey, we eat SPAM don't we? And I know for sure that ain't real, kosher meat.

Well, I guess the question at hand is this: Would you buy cloned meat from the grocery store?

Ok, so we all know about Dolly the sheep and how scientists have been attemping to clone humans now... but, do you think it's right for them to be playing God like this? Personally, I see no problem with it. After all, the clones are humans too, as well as individuals. As along as the "clone" is treated as a person and not a resource (such as using them as "disposable" organ doners). A clone could be someone's mother, you know. But, what I think, is that it would be another gigantic scientific step and an advancement for mankind, and should be ebraced, not resricted or looked down upon.

Erm, not to be rude, peoples, but...

STICK WITH THE DAMN TOPIC!!! I didn't make this board so we coujld discuss sex and homosexuality and needing to be laid... *sighs* Maybe it's just a lost cause.

That's supposed to be "any" not "and." Sorry for the typo (I jut got my nails don't and can't type at all >.<).

At 6/9/03 02:06 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: If someone murders someone in public, they should get in trouble, no questions asked. But if they do it in their home in their room, it's okay?

By the way "but last time I checked when you mastrbate you do in your home in your room where no one can see" First, I don't masturbate. Second, you've got a lot of nerve to spy on me in my home in the hopes of catching me whacking off, you sick weirdo, Eavesdropping is a sin you know.

Dr. Arbitrary

Oh, I see... it's not ok for us to spy on YOU; so how then do you suppose that this law is supposed to be enforced without law officials breaking into the PRIVACY of one's home in order to charge them with such an idiotic offense???

And as for the murder part... what do we women kill when we masterbate? Last time I checked, I wasn't spouting off and sperm when I brought myself to an ograsm...

At 6/6/03 03:01 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote:

At 6/6/03 01:55 AM, Nighthawk24us2002 wrote:

If you said dancing, or going on rollercoasters or exercising...i could understand that.

Dancing and rollercoasters are sinful and I would kill myself before suggesting them to someone. Excercise is ok though, but make sure you don't do it out of pride or something. Professional bodybuilders go to hell. I know this for a fact.

And I suppose you went to hell and saw all these bodybuilders? How else would you know such a "fact"? DO you even know what a "fact" is? It's a bit of information that has been PROVEN! When you can give me tangible evidence that support your idiotic argument, maybe I'll concider your opposition...

//Go to heaven for the weather... go to hell to see you friends. //

Dr. Arbitrary

At 6/3/03 01:51 AM, jimsween wrote:

At 6/3/03 01:24 AM, TheShrike wrote: Kittie is teh SECKSEH, and itz all teh mediaz falt!

KITTE R0X0RS MY B0X0RS!!11!1 I don't understand why she is mad, I think she fits the exact definition that the media made as beautifull.

"In the year 2000 Callista Flockhart will gain 500 pounds, however everyone else will gain 800 pounds and she will again be made fun of for being too thin."- Conan O' Brien

*blushes* omg.. thank you so much! *is speechless* Nice little quote there... I hate Calista Fockhart! I think she's oogly!

I don't know if this topic has been brought up before or not... But do you really think, that as endless as our universe is, that we are the only living (and somewhat intelligent) life-forms in the entire cosmos? I mean, what about crop circles, Roswell, Area 51, etc...? They can't all be scams, can they? Just curious, ya know. Because, at least, I believe in "alien life." It's somewhere out there... is has to be... don't you agree?

At 6/3/03 01:24 AM, TheShrike wrote: Kittie is teh SECKSEH, and itz all teh mediaz falt!

*tilts her little kittie head in confusion* What language are you speaking???

EXCUSE ME, PEOPLES! I believe the topic at hand is about whether or not fake beauty is really beautiful... not how badly each of us need to get laid (although I'm quite sure all of us could use a good lay! ^_^). Please, I'm fishing for oppinions here (not compliments); the first page actually stcuk to the topic, then is kind of wandered off into sexual commentary. *sighs* Can't you peeps keep sex out of at least on topic? Go spam someone else, maybe? *grumbles and goes back to staring at a Cosmopolitan magazine*