3,386 Forum Posts by "BrianEtrius"
Yeah, sorry for double posting, but here's what's probably going to happen.
Unless you guys want a very shitty looking poster it's going to cost at least $30.
I talked to a few copying places, and they said it would cost a lot per copy if it was of high quality.
Example email:
Dear ************,
Thank you for asking us about our copying services. We hope you can find what you need.
Blah blah advertisement blah,
If you want a poster of high quality and of that size, it will cost at least $29.95. If you want more than 1 copy, you will get a discount of $15 for every 5 you buy.
Blah blah blah more advertisement.
End email.
So unless you guys want to fork over that amount of money, someone needs to give me a suggestion.
At 5/27/08 06:21 PM, americanidiot2f wrote:At 5/27/08 06:09 PM, StickyWicky wrote: When I realise this is the third time I've posted in this thread.When I realized that I made this thread, and it was two months ago.
I don't now why someone would bump this thread.
At 5/27/08 06:11 PM, americanidiot2f wrote:At 5/27/08 05:59 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: well if one poster no longer is good then just get a second blank one or ask users to stop posting internet picsI have thought about that so hard, and well, I can't pull off all that devotion again for a month to just a poster. I can't do things a second time really, I just get too bored of doing it again. The poster isn't crap. Its really great, but I just hate it now when people post pictures since its obvious, there is no room for it.
sheesh
not that hard to ask is it??
Yeah, it's kind of hard to do another poster. I would do it, except my drawing skills are crap. Between americanidiot2f and me, we probably won't have the time or patience to do another one.
Also remember if the rest of you want to another one it better be in this thread. Start another thread and the mods will surely lock it.
Meanwhile we need suggestions on how to copy the bastard.
Hillary does have some terrible taste. To say RFK died in June the day Ted found out about his brain tumor was bad taste. To say basically that Obama "might" get shot at is bad taste. She thinks at this piont she is running for 2012, but I doubt that. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if she was voted out of the Senate.
Besides, if Obama was killed at this point more people would go straight to Al Gore over Clinton.
At 5/26/08 10:23 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: i swear this thread needs to die
The OP clearly has no time for shenangins in this thread
Wheres a mod when you need it?
Riiight. Good luck with that. Too bad a lot of people like this thread, including some mods.
Yeah, from what I've seen, we need some way of copying it in a better way, since the copied version looks a lot like crap. americanidiot2f agrees with me on this. The best way so far is about $50, and I'm assuming most of us don't want to fork over that kind of dough.
Suggestions?
At 5/20/08 09:25 PM, troubles1 wrote:
Obama is nothing like Martin Luther King , Obama is a Racist, and a anti-American Extremist, Pro-BABBY KILLER , HE Could never be a Marter, he has done nothing, all these Idiots who think Obama is So great, DO NOT EVEN KNOW OF ANY Bill's HE SIGHNED AS A SENATOR, His campaign is a joke, he thinks there should be special rules just for him, and the sad part is the media is giving him the special rules, OBAMA Is taking a big Crap on our constitution, and the Ignorant Followers of him are going along just like Charles Manson had his people doing. its sick.
I'd like to see when Obama said any of this, in any speech he gave. Sources?
Yes, his minister's a bit off the deep end. Hell, I'm not surprised he came out during Obama's campaign. The minister probably thought it would be a good time to "spend the word about America and God". Look at the other side too. Obama handled the situation relativly well and got through it without much damage. At least it wasn't like Hillary's campaign.
Also, do you know how else was in that church? Oprah Winfrey. Oprah has quite a lot of power in the media, so to call Obama a racist pig is to call Oprah that, and last time I checked she was one of the most powerful people in the country on the media.
At this point she not campaining for this year, but for 2012.
Suffice to say there is nothing in the consitution about marriage in general, as with many other controversal topics such as abortion and drugs and so on.......
So any state can ban gay marriage. Why, though, is my question. The LGBT community is just like everyone else when it comes to mainstream life. It's no different than being tall or white.
At 5/15/08 08:57 PM, hippl5 wrote: Here's a conspiracy theory:
I'm the only "real" person. Every person I saw, and every person I will ever see is just an illusion. You're all just playing tricks on me, I'm the only one who can see from a first person point of view. Everyone on this site is just a sophisticated bot. Every movie that will come out is already done, it just comes out on a certain date to give me the illusion that it's not really completed.
9/11 was an illusion just to trick me into thinking that stuff can happen, when it's not real. In fact, I'm talking to bots and none of you are real.
An even better one: this post was written by a bot to make us think it wasn't....and so on.
Not to tell bad ones, but I think this one is still the best theory.
9/11=Serious business.
Jews=Serious business.
Therefore, Jews=9/11.
Oi, it's me again, with another thread for thought.
We live in a society where there is no good. There is only of absence of evil. Kind of like there is no such thing as cold, only the absence of heat. I'll support this with a fact that which I feel is the main concept of this argument.
Human Nature.
Human nature is the cause of evil. In a sence, evil is a human concept, we created it, for it would not exist otherwise.
We as humans are naturally greedly. We always want the last piece of pie or the closest parking space. At the end of the day it is always about us, or more specificly, me.
But sometimes we feel bad about these things. We get a guilt trip, and feel really bad about it. So we do something to make up for it. For example, if you broke your girlfriend's vase you buy her a new one. You want your conscience to be free of worry. However, most of the time it is not the recieveing end that is happy, it is youself that is happy.
We make ourselves happy by "fixing problems". We only do so because in the end we just what to get happy. Boy, are we greedy.
Which leads us to the various jobs that "help other people". These people aren't doing their job to help, rather they are doing it to feel better. it's the guilt trip.
In the end, it is and always will be about us. We never do good things, rather it is the absence of evil.
After a certain point copyrights do get pretty rediculous, I mean, look at Monsanto.
Several farmers were sued because Monstanto's copyrighted grain blow into their farms and grew....
Also, the process of getting a copyright is way to long. It took one of my friends 7 years to get one, and then 3 years later it was revoked and was "under investigation for possible conflicts with other patents".
It's about time. Several of my friends are going to be happy about this.
Even though it's a small victory, it is a a major milestone toward same sex marriage.
At 5/14/08 05:23 PM, Kleinhans wrote:
I clearly stated that Russian and Chinese Communism are not where I lay in the socialist layout. Im a True Communist and i agree with your views on humanity but as we as humans change and evolve so do mindsets and like anything else it is gradule. If i start a commune in a state and then it catches on then soon a larger number of people will be living a very good free life. and with that slowly other things, such as racism and religious hatred would stop as well. but it takes time
The idea's there, but it's not going to happen. People are naturally greedy. Communism should in theory work, but it won't and never will. It's just the nature of humans.
At 5/11/08 11:27 PM, troubles1 wrote: Clinton WON, THE PEOPLE WANT HER. but because of a screwed up system were theses superheros somehow get to decide for the people who gets to run.. what is the point in voting for a Democrat party member your vote does not count anyway.
mind you I do not like Hillary I just HATE obama, he will ruin this country, with his Marxist views and his extremist friends.
Dude, like take a chill pill. seriously. Calm the fuck down. Really.
At 5/11/08 01:42 PM, n64kid wrote: Would you be opposed to a JohnMcCain/Colin Powell ticket?
I would like to mention something to your point of the democrats losing if they can't choose a nominee by June. McCain generally seems to be the least hated of the 3, and the polls would tip largely in McCain's favor once eith Obama or Clinton gets the nominee, even before June. Simply on the stats of significant percentaqes of Obama supporters hating Hillary and vice versa.
You do have a point, the longer this runs on the better chance McCain has, but it wouldn't largely tip the polls. More young adults voted in the primaries for Obama, and that group hadn't been poiltically active before. That is a pretty big section of the U.S. population too.
Howver, there's a problem. Powell won't run. Had he ran in 2004 it would have been a hands down victory for him. And another thing is Powell, being part of the U.N., opposes torture, unlike McCain.
At 5/11/08 12:54 PM, Kleinhans wrote: I get how America is one of the most fatty countries in the world (and i can't say much since i o fall under the umbrella of fat =p) but with all of the pro-health oragnic food and all the pro-enviroment ppl i find a big spacer in between. Since us Americans dnt grow much of the organic food we end up getting it shipped from overseas which ends up dearly costing our enviroment with all the fuel wasted and all the pollutents let out by the planes/ships but is a nations health worth it? (kepp in mind i honestly dnt care one way or the other i am just doing a census for my school's eviro club thank you all for your input i greatly appreciate it)
~Kleinhans
Actually about 60-70% of crops are organic......but they are processed into various foods.
Of the 60-70% only 20% is actually shipped. The pollution isn't much either from shipping. Get the facts straight first.
At 5/11/08 12:05 AM, TheMason wrote: For McCain I've heard talk of Mark Sanford (Gov of SC). Huckabee...I'd probably have to stay home or vote for Obama. The VP is going to be more crucial for the Republicans than Democrats methinks. McCain is old so there is the concern that he will not live out his term. So you need a moderate to appeal to the undecideds...on the other hand you need a person like Huckabee to keep the social conservatives motivated. But that loses moderate/libertarians like me...
Yes, I would actually like to see Huckabee run with Obama.....it would at least get some white voters. I would also think McCain would do something like that too, get a conservative Democrat. Still, it's a toss up.
At 5/10/08 09:20 PM, Al6200 wrote:
Obama:
Wesly Clark maybe? Bill Richardson would make it a dream ticket for me.
McCain:
Senator Crist perhaps? Huckabee? Romney?
See, that's the interesting thing. I would hope Huckabee would run because he's not a bad guy. (And this is coming from a far left wing Democrat)
The real question is who will be Obama's running mate. He needs someone to attract the middle class white voters.
Despite, what you think, Obama will get the nomination. Clinton can not get it, for it is mathmaticly impossible for her to win.
The vice president nominations can make or break a candidate. So who do you think will run under Obama and McCain?
The joke is, Hillary lost alreadly. She lost about 2 months ago. It has been mathmaticlly impossible for her to win. The only reason she is still campaigning is to make herself look better for a possible nomination at the Democratic convension.(Which she won't get)
She and Bill deserve each other. Both have lied, and done many things that have pissed people off.
i don't get why Hillary is still campaigning. If she really wanted office, she would have given up already and hope for the vice president nomination. But since she is still going, she is making McCain look better.
Acutally, you're a bit late. The government already beat the country at they game they were trying to win against the terrorists. Here.
At 5/3/08 04:17 PM, whatty wrote: As the century nears its formidable end, our global experience of universal proportions, predicted by many greats, will arrive at our solar system, to our system, authoritarian oppression, family abuse, seppression caused by conformity, and economic devestation will be neutralized by technological terrorism in the times of complete choas, control will never again be gained for toleration will becom extinct.
A wife quarreling with her husband will not think twice or regret her spent bullet, Hungry children will not spare the scared groccer, remorse in all forms will be removed from human thoughts and actions. freedom will only be available through death, this system becomes unavoidable as life on this planet becomes unnessesary,
The hand has five fingers, capable and powerful, with the ability to destroy and create. We have the power to stop and reverse the times of time by making our awareness of abuse known to the powers of industry and their uncouth political arms. Only by raising this awareness and promoting personla peace within today's self devestating society, can we allow the planet a chance to avoid self destruction!
OPEN YOUR EYES, OPEN YOUR MOUTHS, CLOSE YOUR HAND, AND MAKE A FIST.
Any real fans out there?
Sadly, no. There are major problems with this, and therefore, I must disagree.
First and foremost, your title. The world isn't ending, you should say society is ending. Maybe then you won't get as many people on your back.
Second, the format. Never start with space, because you will be talking about the world. When you talk about the world, the other users on Newgrounds from across the world will more or less get pissed off at you. If you say a specific country that you live in, then maybe we can talk. But as of right now, you just a fucking lonely emo kid, probably cutting yourself, on a computer.
3rd. Where are your sources? If you just declare something that is "predicted by many (my favorite part because there is no such thing) greats" then I can't belivev you. Give us a source, then I'll consider this seriously.
That's it for my critism of your thread, now for the real anaysis.
Society is not ending. Despite what you may think, it is not ending. It is becoming dumber and more controllable, but not ending.
The media is what is controling us. It is the media that is controling us with fear. You can read more on this here.
People will not kill for no reason. 9 times out of 10 they have a good reason (at least in their own minds) and the 1 is a crazy nut.
Humans will not rebel against anything. The fact of the matter is that even if they tried they wouldn't make any difference. This is again part of the government not caring and the media. So don't tell people to rebel They wouldn't.
At 4/30/08 11:38 PM, AdamRice wrote: Isn't this kinda counterintuitive to your stance on gun control?
I can tell that you're interested in guns, maybe it's a hobby of yours, maybe you like to hunt, maybe you like to shoot at the range, etc... Whatever the reason, guns are one of your passions in life and that's perfectly fine.
So naturally, you wouldn't want the government to step in and tell you that you no longer have permission to own an assault riffle, hand gun, shot gun, rifle, etc...
Now me, I'm interested in cars and trucks. I own a 1968 Cutlass S. Yeah, a gas guzzling, 455 cubic inch V8 muscle car. My favorite hobby, one of my passions in life, is restoring it. I really have a thing for all of those cars from the late 60's and early 70's.
If the government came along and told me I could no longer legally drive my Cutlass on the street because it didn't meet a high efficiency fuel standard, well, I would be furious! My reaction would be that it's my money and my car, so if I want to spend $10/gallon to drive a car that gets 11 mpg, it's my choice and my right as a citizen.
I guess you could say that you're a gun person and I'm a car person.
The stance holds, you don't want the government touching your guns, I don't want the government touching my cars.
Heh heh, another great topic. :D
Anyways, AdamRice's got a point. Like guns, or for that matter anything, it is a consumer's choice what to buy. Obviously if it is unefficent cars then companies will continue making them.
This is no more than an argument about the Second Admenment, just istead with cars. It is the people's choice. If the government interviens, then their free market is now a controlled markey.
You can guess what that leads to. I don't need to go into it here.
At 4/30/08 12:33 AM, BrianEtrius wrote: Unfortunately , my hopes of a serious topic without tangents going off have obviously failed. Let us ignore the one user (*cough* morefngdbs *cough*) and get on with the topic, shall we?
Fixed. Still think we need a spell check.
Unfortunetly, my hopes of a seroius topic without tangents going off have obviusly failed. Let us ignore the one user (*cough* morefngdbs *cough*) and get on with the topic, shall we?
At 4/27/08 12:53 PM, morefngdbs wrote: No ,I don't know of anyone in my circle of friends & family who are in any kind of "Province of Fear"
In fear of what?
What is there to be afraid of?
If your talking about world problems...why should we be afraid?
Be afraid of what exactly?
Who gives a flying fuck what's going on else where? we are in a HUGE country, with very few people in it. We have a massive amount of Natural resources & grow more food in a year than we can eat in 10 years. Sure it may not be fresh produce in the middle of winter, but that isn't a huge deal as we have been living in the Area for over 400 years, there wasn't a lot of 'fresh Produce' in winter until recent times.
Remember our country is the second largest in area & the smallest in population (we've got about 35 million people in all of Canada) We have the largest amount of fresh water of any other country.
So don't worry Brian... move to Canada & be happy, like we all are !
It's people like these who make their countries look bad. Not only that, they try to be smart and fuck up an intelligent conversation.
Besides, if I wanted to be in nowhere land, there's a reason for Alaska. By the way, the reason there aren't more people in Canada is because they get the wrong impression of Canadians like youself. Congradulations. You made yourself and your country look more like an idiot.
At 4/26/08 05:10 PM, morefngdbs wrote:At 4/26/08 01:44 AM, BrianEtrius wrote: Quick note,;
So what do you think of the stae of fear.
Hey Brian , I just wanted to let you know that where I am right now (East Coast of Canada) there is no "State of Fear". As a matter of fact there are no 'States' at all .
Provinces , yes we have those.
But we don't have any 'states' here.
Maybe you should come visit sometime & get yourself calmed down.
This is definately the place for it.
Have a great day.
So someone wants to be a smartass. Right. Did I not ask for a reasonable answer?
Fine, it's a "Province of Fear".
At 4/26/08 04:14 PM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: I dont understand this siht, fear does nothing to us but drive us into stupid wars so the fat motherfuckers in power can sleep on pillows stuffed with tax payer money.
Fear is somthing that keeps us from doing things that may hurt us, but no, the government isn't figurativly holding a gun to our heads n telling us to give them our money.
And this is coming from a man who can't spell shit. Right.
We own the government you guys, let me tell you a little story, if everyone in America wanted Bush out, he would be out in 2 seconds because the government are the ones who fear. How would you feel if you were the president n you were doing stupid corrupt things, when you slept all you would dream about is a swarm of people rioting towards you with pitchforks n tortches.
First you disagree, then you prove my argument. Okay.
To tell us that we are scared sheep being herded to the slaughter house is a very retarded misunderstanding, you may have given up on your freedom but luckily some haven't, and we'll be the ones saving your ass, literally.
So you have no personal fear? You would jump off a buliding in a second? Who says this has to be a government fear? Fear is anything, really.
I'm not a fucking emo.
This is just how society works.
At 4/26/08 12:07 PM, Christopherr wrote: I don't feel afraid.
Have any personal fears then? You know what I mean. How about a random person walking up to you and shoots you. Or your car explodes. Or a varitey of other things that could very well happen.
