Someone? Please?

So I was playing this game a few days ago, but I forgot to favorite it, I thought it was really fun though, It was sort of like Adrenaline Challenge, you would use a bike to get over obstacles to get to the end, only futuristic. There were about 15 levels I think, and at level 9 you would get a new bike. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? Thanks.

At 6/5/09 03:15 PM, ninjakoopa-33 wrote:

At 6/5/09 03:13 PM, igott wrote: What are the pros of immortality?

You live forever and you can never be killed. The way I see it though, there are cons of immortality than pros.

Immortality, not invincibility. In other words, you can still die by shots, poisons, or whatever, anything except dying from age.

Don't waste your time, just get to 55, make a deathknight, and faceroll through the game. Literally.

And the level cap was never 40. It was 60, 70, and then 80.

Why are you guys giving happy birthdays to Krink? He's an imposting.

You get killed, you don't pass it.

Try this. Maybe it's in there somewhere.

At 6/4/09 01:00 AM, BreIm wrote: That really sounds like Diablo 2, but I don't think it came out for PS

Nevermind, I missed a few parts of your post.

That really sounds like Diablo 2, but I don't think it came out for PS

At 6/3/09 08:09 PM, SloppyMoe606 wrote:

At 6/3/09 04:43 PM, BreIm wrote: Above poster is an idiot. There's no point in arguing with you when all you do is spew stupidity in every post.

First we pay $50 for an unfinished game, now they want us to pay another $50 for the same game, only with minor updates.

First off, achievements are the least important part of the game. Valve will most likely add new ones during the 6 months the game has to release. They were probably using the old ones as placeholders.

Secondly, I'm sorry, but have you played the full game? Valve has said that there will be a lot more special infected. So apparently you can judge a game based off of a 1 minute game-play video. Go be an idiot somewhere else.

Thirdly, HOW DO YOU KNOW VALVE WILL MAKE YOU PAY 50$? Do you work at Valve? No you don't. Valve is known for making great deals, and I wouldn't be surprised if this game was at a discount.

Achievements are the least important part of the game? They're the only replay value you tool.

No, I haven't played the game, but from the video there's only 1 new infected, the charger. You don't think they'd show off more? They don't HAVE any.
And third, because all games cost $50.

If valve was known for making great deals, they would have put this in DLC LIKE THEY SHOULD HAVE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Above poster is an idiot. There's no point in arguing with you when all you do is spew stupidity in every post.

First we pay $50 for an unfinished game, now they want us to pay another $50 for the same game, only with minor updates.

At 6/3/09 01:28 PM, Chumbawamba wrote:

At 6/3/09 12:43 PM, tally1989 wrote: But i took a look at some of the videos that where posted, and i saw "(name i cant remember) killed a charger". So i believe you

In this video at about 7 seconds in, you can see a Charger fall.

Wow.

That just proves it then, they're using the same achievements as in left 4 dead1. check out in the middle, one of the people gets the achievement for Drag and Drop.

And there's only 1 new infected, the Charger. The hunter and smoker are still there.

This is..Wow.

How do you pick out someone you're going to mug, figure out their name, and then demand something they might not even have on them?

This topic is fucking stupid.

At 6/3/09 03:35 PM, TightRope wrote: I am laughing so hard right now at all the butthurt angry replies I am getting.

"Dude like NO ONE FUCKING CARES, YOU'RE NOT FUNNY, YOU FAIL!"

You all suck at not being trolled!

Hi, I like to fail at being funny and then backpeddling saying I was just trolling.

Hint: A troll will not admit he's trolling.

At 6/3/09 03:19 PM, TightRope wrote:

At 6/3/09 03:17 PM, Proottalfain wrote: Lol at people who can't notice OP's sarcasm.

The irony of this entire thread was to have a bunch of angry NG'ers reply with shit like "EPIC FAIL", "Oh yeah, so funny i forgot ta laugh!" and "OP is so gay right now, you failed at trolling and this is why you have so many replies!"

Right, just let me fix your errors for you:

"HAHA, NAH GUYS, YOU SEE I WAS JUST TROLLING, I WASN'T TRYING TO BE FUNNY, JUST TROLLING GUYS HAHA, GOT YOU ALL, BUT WE'RE FRIENDS HERE RIGHT? GOOD TIMES GUYS GOOD TIMES...*runs*"

At 6/3/09 03:17 PM, Proottalfain wrote: Lol at people who can't notice OP's sarcasm.

Sarcasm:
Sarcasm is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing.

He's not trying to be sarcastic, he's trying to be funny, and he fails at both.

At 6/3/09 03:12 PM, DeIirium wrote: Omg its funny because you make a topic about good grammar but your grammar sucks.

Omg so funny I'm shitting myself right now

Fuck guys, I remember seeing this 4 years ago, stop posting this. IT'S OLD.

At 6/3/09 09:35 AM, VenomKing666 wrote:

At 6/2/09 10:03 PM, BreIm wrote:

Right, they're nice to their customers.

Well, al the updates from TF2 and the fucking awesome weekend deals they do surely proves it.

Which is why new people have to pay $100+ for the same game twice.

You don't know alot about L4D2 stop fucking crying. And if it pisses you off too much then just don,t buy the fucking sequel, problem solved.

Anyone who says this isn't for greed is an idiot, they basically copy & pasted everything, coded in a few new skins, and made 5 new campaigns which only last 1-2 hours each.

Because you played the game and know it entirely.

Just because valve has given updates for free before doesn't mean they shouldn't do it again,

Dosen't mean they HAVE to give you free stuff either.

because this waaay too soon to be taking more money from their customers for another game that's pretty much the same as L4D1.

If the customers feel betrayed enough they will just not buy it.

L4D1: $40.
L4D2: $50-60.

50 DOLLARS ? JUST LIKE EVERY GAME RELEASED NOOOOOOOOOO

That's at very least $90 to get the the same game twice by the time L4D2 comes out, anyone who doesn't think this is fucked is retarded.

"Anyone that dosen't think just like me is fucking retarded" Yeah, okay kid, you are special, you are the only one that is right, I wouldn't want you to believe you might be wrong or anything.

Your stupidity prevents you from rational discussion. 1 year after L4D 1 came out, you think they're going to shit out 50 hours worth of gameplay? No, they aren't. The campaigns are going to last just as long as l4d1 because of it. And just because they give Updates for Team Fortress 2, that doesn't mean they should charge $60 for things that could easily be added in DLC. This is just to take extra money from their players. Here's the difference between L4D1 And L4D2:

Melee Weapons
New Survivors
A few new campaigns.

Now, tell me, how would this be hard to put it in DLC? Maybe not all at once, But in little pieces. Considering how soon it is after L4D came out, even a blind man could see this is just to take more money from people when they shouldn't. Ohh look, you can kill zombies! Oops, you could do that in the last one. Oh check it out, the Charger! Isn't he badass? You mean the Tank with a mutated arm?
Oh check it out! You can beat up zombies with melee weapons..which noone will use because charging a charger with a melee weapon would be retarded!

IN A WORLD WHERE THE FIRST MOVIE ISN'T A SHITTY ENOUGH, RETARDED PEOPLE SIGN ON TO ACT IN A SEQUEL.

But hey, the storyline looks much improved!

"HURR DURR YOU GOT A PAPERCUT SO NOW I'M LEAVING YOU FOREVER."

But, atleast she'll be fucking werewolves now instead of vampires. Here's the trailer link:

http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi8782361 /

At 6/2/09 10:49 PM, 1001115968 wrote:

At 6/2/09 10:41 PM, BreIm wrote:

At 6/2/09 10:40 PM, 1001115968 wrote: isnt this thread considered..... deletable..... *summons poozy's bandick*

Isn't your post considered fucking stupid?

Oh, hey, it is!

oh hey! stfu noob

This isn't neopets you fucktard, keep your kindergarten-age insults out of here.

Sounds like Lupus.

At 6/2/09 10:52 PM, Dr34m3r wrote:

At 6/2/09 10:32 PM, BreIm wrote: No, it was a hidden dart or something, not a gun. I think it was a ninja-like star, only with the assassin emblem on it.

It's a gun.

Look closer at the end. There's a ninja-like star in the guy at the end.

At 6/2/09 10:40 PM, 1001115968 wrote: isnt this thread considered..... deletable..... *summons poozy's bandick*

Isn't your post considered fucking stupid?

Oh, hey, it is!

At 6/2/09 10:29 PM, megamanbn6 wrote: Wait...

Was that a hidden gun at the end?

No, it was a hidden dart or something, not a gun. I think it was a ninja-like star, only with the assassin emblem on it.

At 6/2/09 06:41 PM, TheSporkLord wrote: 1) edit to my earlier post, its not the same EXACTLY but same scenario.

2) dont get what the hype is all about. i played the first one and it got boring fast, it was to repetitive. hopefully this one will give you something to do.

Would you prefer the trailer feature Ezio sipping a cup of tea with his assassination buddies, instead of showing an actual assassination?

At 6/2/09 07:26 PM, MetalSlimeHunt wrote: This game is going to be LARGER than the WHOLE of L4D with DLC include might everything from L4D1. If you honestly think that has any chance of being DLC then you are stupid. Valve is nice to their consumers, and always have been. So you need to look over your train of thought if this is a realistic reason of Valve-hatred for you.

Right, they're nice to their customers.

Which is why new people have to pay $100+ for the same game twice.

Anyone who says this isn't for greed is an idiot, they basically copy & pasted everything, coded in a few new skins, and made 5 new campaigns which only last 1-2 hours each. Just because valve has given updates for free before doesn't mean they shouldn't do it again, because this waaay too soon to be taking more money from their customers for another game that's pretty much the same as L4D1.

L4D1: $40.
L4D2: $50-60.

That's at very least $90 to get the the same game twice by the time L4D2 comes out, anyone who doesn't think this is fucked is retarded.

At 6/2/09 12:45 PM, ngman7 wrote:

At 6/2/09 12:12 PM, Krbyfan1 wrote:

um guys... this was in 2008...

Well kid i don't read comics.

And yet you linked to a story involving the death of a comic book hero.

You obviously have some interest. Stick to one story, damn it.

I'm too OLD to even care, kid.

Yeah huh. You keep telling yourself that kid.

I mean insolent barbarian.

I mean troll.

Troll, right? *Nods head*

Yeah, Troll!

I'm in my 30s-I'm one of the OLDEST posters here.

You're trying to insult my maturity?

You're arguing with a guy on the internet and your profile pic is a lolcat. You're not mature.

At 6/2/09 12:31 PM, megamanbn6 wrote:

At 6/2/09 12:29 PM, BreIm wrote:
I know you're trying to be clever, but it's not working. This is 1 year after the original game came out and they're going to charge another $60 for it. And yes, most other companies with games like this DO give updates for free.

valve is doing this only for money when it could've easily been added in a patch.

After all the patches, DLC, and such for each of their games being FREE, you can go fuck yourself.

I don't think you understand paying $60 for the same game is retarded. Tons of games give free content, and 5 new campaigns with 4 new survivors isn't enough to be worth the money, at all.

Smooth Criminal. Listen to it, then look up the lyrics.