2,916 Forum Posts by "Breed"
At 3/6/10 03:26 PM, PessimistOwl wrote: Here's one. Okay, so I use mixcraft.....
And this is an FL studio problem how?
You would find more answers if you didn't ask in a help thread for a different program. . .haha
At 3/6/10 02:38 PM, xKore wrote:At 3/6/10 02:35 PM, DjEsyrik wrote: All my songs is made in fl9 but, its one thing that is pissing me off!!!select the notes you want
How to copy and paste notes in piano roll !??!??
ctrl + c to copy
ctrl + v to paste
dont forget alt-f4 for FL studio hax
At 3/6/10 03:35 AM, EchozAurora wrote: Also... I get to open up a new dance night at a new club tonight!!! Wooooot! =D
Congratz!
This reminds me, my friend is opening for John B here in Chicago and I am fricken jealous
EWQL has a spring package right now that is tempting enough to go into debt for
At 3/6/10 12:34 AM, YouriX wrote:At 3/5/10 11:30 PM, LogicalDefiance wrote: I LOVE YOUI dont know if i should be insulted or flatterd. But anyways i have an example of what i made with eastwest, Its not a perfect example.
yes homo
It was just a play with words because people always say "no homo" and I think it's stupid. So flattery was the direction I was going.
I just through in a famous string piece and uploaded a demo myself. THIS THING SELLS ITSELF HOLY SHIT
-
Play Demo (Bach Cello Suite 1) by LogicalDefianceClick to listen.
- Score
- 0 / 5.00
- Type
- Song
- Genre
- Classical
- Popularity
- 2 Views
At 3/5/10 09:13 PM, wtflolnoob wrote: Saw waves are just triangles with a sharp decline, which creates an entirely different frequency (often too high to hear, but still affects the sound).
Nah. They aren't. And even if they were, triangle waves are still made with sine waves. However in this case the harmonic content of a triangle is different then a saw. A triangle only has odd harmonics while a saw has both odd and even harmonics.
They do have a clicking aspect to them though, and thats from because the zero crossing on a saw wave is basically vertical all the way from the trough to the peak.
At 3/5/10 11:15 PM, YouriX wrote: To be honest i think i got the link from Sorohon if im right.
But here is the link!
http://www.soundsonline.com/free-orchest ra
You'll have to fill in a form at first but its totally worth it!!
..........................
I LOVE YOU
yes homo
At 3/5/10 07:08 PM, Back-From-Purgatory wrote:At 3/5/10 07:01 PM, LogicalDefiance wrote: Music Industry might be a little bit of a tough cookie to crack, but the broader AUDIO industry has a lot more sources for income. Film scoring or songs/performance are just the commercial sides of things but you can easily pursue a career in engineering (electrical/software/acoustical(design))I was actually trying to find something along those lines, but the only place I've found that teaches anything along those lines is Axe Music... but the last time I took lessons (Guitar lessons that is) there, I was better than the instructor was. So I'm not going that route... I love the store and everything, it's where I bought my 7 string and a good chunk of my equipment... but they can't teach worth shit.
, business, or management. And a lot of times you can end up with a shitload of degrees and teach. Teaching is the ultimate if you want to pursue your own audio work. And I don't mean teaching primary schools, I mean getting a masters and teaching college.
There's gotta be like at least 2000 colleges that teach this subject area. . . .Electrical and Software Engineering are the 2 of the most popular engineering fields up there with computer and mechanical engineering.
Acoustic programs are rare, but Hartford has a really unique dual acoustic/music major program thats pretty cool.
Composition/sound design/business stuff is also common with any school with a music section(which is a LOT of schools).
BTW - college is expensive, just about anywhere other then community college in california. This is why we use loans( not the loans posting in here haha), and fill out FAFSA's and look for scholarships years in advance.
Music Industry might be a little bit of a tough cookie to crack, but the broader AUDIO industry has a lot more sources for income. Film scoring or songs/performance are just the commercial sides of things but you can easily pursue a career in engineering (electrical/software/acoustical(design))
, business, or management. And a lot of times you can end up with a shitload of degrees and teach. Teaching is the ultimate if you want to pursue your own audio work. And I don't mean teaching primary schools, I mean getting a masters and teaching college.
At 3/5/10 06:25 PM, loansindi wrote:At 3/5/10 05:47 PM, Back-From-Purgatory wrote: What should I expect from this sort of thing should I finish the 2 years of classes?Well ideally you'd be me...
Oh noes! Get out while you still can!
juuust kidding. or am i?
I had an old coworker who did this for a living. I know it takes a lot of general carpenter like knowledge. I'll see if I can't get in touch with him somehow and shoot you a PM if I can. From the sounds of it, it's a little bit rough as a career.
At 3/5/10 05:48 PM, sorohanro wrote: Actually SoundForge is a editor that support just one track at the time. The fact that can stream from several inputs to a stereo channel doesn't make it a multi-tracker (like Audacity).
Bastards and their sneaky wording. I tried to stress how much I havent used the program for reasons just like that.
Oh man this contest just got gangbanged by 5 dudes
OUCH
Really though, it's a good concept, just taken too far.
At 3/5/10 05:50 PM, Calamaistr wrote: 4: tulips: they come from turkey.
What are you talking about? Tulips clearly come from the arctic pole
tru fax ^^
At 3/5/10 05:14 PM, Rucklo wrote: Theoretically you can recreate any sound using a mathemetical method called fourier-analysis. But this is practically impossible, since there will be too many factors you just can't get "right" if you're trying to recreate f.ex. a recorded three seconds of a violine playing...
I was pretty sure Fourier had claimed that we could only create a simple version of any sound, and that recreating the actual sound was impossible due to the infinite amount of overtones and changes in them over time.
maybe i'm just twisting around your words and thats what you meant anyways. if so, sorry =/
At 3/5/10 05:05 PM, thecoreman wrote: Can it be? Can the free Audacity be better the 300$ SoundForge?
It COULD be, but it's not. You definitely CAN record multi channel in soundforge. I don't have the experience using it, but I quote directly from the soundforge page:
"you can record multichannel audio when using multichannel sound devices. Each audio stream can set to a particular channel, and be edited in the Sound Forge interface just like a stereo file."
And I am sure there are a lot more features then Audacity I just don't have experience with those programs.
If you use FL studio, you can open up a sytrus, use the waveshaper to make a sawtooth wave in one of the operators, then go to the OSC tab, and click the little arrow to bring up the menu shown below, and select "Convert Shape to sine harmonics" and you will see what I was talking about. To be honest I think I had that formula wrong.
At 3/5/10 04:58 PM, eatmeatleet wrote: I have this kind of noobish question. I've been looking at simple waves with fruity parametric eq2. I wonder what is the explanation of saw having highest range of frequencies out of the 4 and sine having none
I hope you understand the question (:
The reason is that the sine wave is the pure form of a single frequency sound, where as all other sounds are combinations of sine waves and their harmonics and partials. The saw wave in particular is an addition of every level of harmonics by an exponential amount less each time. So you have the fundamental frequency, then you have 1 over 2 squared the level of it's fundamental on the 2nd harmonic(or 2 times the frequency of first), then 1 over 3 squared of the fundamental on the 3rd harmonic(3x fundamental freq), and so on to infinity.
Make sense?
At 3/5/10 04:50 PM, senshijc wrote: ive been banned from audio portal but i don't know why.? I was trying tu upload my first song to NG and qhen i was submitting told my that i had been banned how is that possible.!?
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/8565 15
Read that
Too many rules for me. Only allowing use of certain plug-ins or samples i understand, but all those are things are just creativity blockers. Like automation restrictions? Really???
At 3/5/10 04:27 PM, TomBanks wrote: What a bunch of bitter assholes.
mostly just me in this situation.
another term for us is "people who follow rules and expect others too"
At 3/5/10 03:56 PM, nathanallenpinard wrote:At 3/5/10 02:48 PM, LogicalDefiance wrote: I've noticed a lot of the deals are indie and pop.Yup, the music supervisor is usually responsible for placement of that. The composer does the custom work, while the pop/rock industry gets their songs placed in the film/TV show. Such as House. M.D.
I would think a lot more of them would be along the lines of film scoring(orchestral, fx, etc)...but I suppose they each probably have their own guy for that and just need bands.
Thanks for clearing that up. I SHOULD know that already considering Film Scoring is a big possibility for one of my majors.
At 3/5/10 03:57 PM, InvisibleObserver wrote:At 3/5/10 03:11 PM, dm47 wrote: is there any way to make sure that the note is EXACTLY one beat?Several, but the easiest is to simply double click the note to bring up its individual settings, and then set the note time to 0:04:000 (quarter note). Or however long you want.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
ok you win for easiest way. There's always like 10 bagillion ways to do something in FL studio.
At 3/3/10 01:33 PM, landscapers1 wrote:At 3/3/10 11:13 AM, loansindi wrote: I use audacity because it does what I need, it's open source and extensible.lolollol i'm a steinberg too +1
Last I check steinberg doesn't make audacity....but maybe they just market it as a separate company for some random reason
At 3/3/10 03:33 PM, Gravey wrote: PROTOOLZ FOR LIFE GUYZ
I kinda LOLd a bit at this
1- digidesign is a piece of shit scammer for making a grip of specialized cables and making the HD system only work with TDM plugins and stuff which is a product only they make. So fuck them for that.
2 - Pro-Tools is good for recording and works well with consoles. Thats why it's the industry standard....otherwise fuck protools.
3 - Pro-tools works on PC. . . .so yeah
4 - Apple only has Logic & Motu as specialized Apple OS only products basically(excluding garageband because its a beginner program). Not to mention the power of DAW is hardly a matter anymore, it's more so just preference for UI layout now a days. Also PC has FL studio(the universal beginner to pro level system for electronic production excluding recording/external device use.)
anywaysssssssss to the OP
When in doubt, go with Steinberg products as they set the standard in audio without being an asshole. Or if you're broke: Audacity
At 3/5/10 03:11 PM, dm47 wrote: hey guys, a quick question about piano roll.
is there any way to make sure that the note is EXACTLY one beat? Like, I know I can drag it to the right until it looks like it's 1 beat, but that's not a perfect method. And unfortunately.. the "snap to" options don't work for the end (right side) of the note, only the beginning. Or am I wrong?
You're wrong. The snap functions do work just fine on both sides. However sometimes when you turn the snap off to adjust something it will automatically place incorrectly sized notes thereafter(or rather the size of the note you just adjusted) whenever you click. There's 2 easy ways to solve that:
One way is to drag the note to the very front/left, hit C(which switches it to the cut tool), and cut the note at the mark you want with snap settings on(then hit B to get back to brush so you can move it back).
Or if you don't have other notes, you can just delete everything in the piano roll, turn on your snap settings, use the simple sequencer and put a note, then right click the instrument button just to the left of the sequencing and click "send to piano roll", which will do exactly that only with an exact measurement starting from wherever you placed the note, and ending at the end of the measure. From that point on just drag the right side over to the amount you would like.
If i explained that horribly let me know and I will reword them.
GL
At 3/5/10 04:11 AM, StaticKatana wrote:At 2/19/10 12:24 AM, LogicalDefiance wrote: Ok good to know I am blind. I will look those up in my handy FL Power book and get back to it tomorowUm, excuse me,but do you know anywhere that I can download piano samples
Just go to content library and DL all the free stuff. They have a bunch of sampled pianos with a directwave multi sample set up included which is pretty handy considering mapping samples on directwave is kind of a bitch.
but if you have a pirated version and cant use the content library as a consequence then my response would be something along the lines of "GO TO HELL"
I've noticed a lot of the deals are indie and pop.
I would think a lot more of them would be along the lines of film scoring(orchestral, fx, etc)...but I suppose they each probably have their own guy for that and just need bands.
oh shit did i just solve my own question?
At 3/2/10 10:38 PM, Heavens-Fury wrote: Face it, your just too lazy to actually help. Now keep going down that way, srsly...
You obviously have trouble understanding the concept of both rules and what "Favorites" are....
At 3/5/10 02:32 PM, DavidRx wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/3 16140
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/2 69036
And now we have spam...GREAT
At 3/5/10 10:47 AM, Mich wrote:At 3/5/10 08:06 AM, MH16 wrote:Well obviously.At 3/5/10 06:54 AM, ZStriefel wrote: Wooden shoes do sound rather funArgh, stereotypes. Nobody actually wears them here.
Also, cheese, and trance, and ridiculous gabber songs.
Don't forget weed and tulips.
Best place for either with the biggest tulip garden in the world and just the plain legality of the substance.
Botany of Desire is a great 2 hour free PBS movie all about that stuff. Also Apples which turned out to be crazy. Did you know that apple babies are mostly shit we would never eat? Like they have to genetically create one of the the same couple types of apple trees to get a kind we would eat.

